Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Returning to the propagation of despair specifically engineered for outcast men: commodification

TruecelVariant

TruecelVariant

Truecel = Celibate until True Love is found
★★
Joined
Jun 16, 2025
Posts
194
Online time
2h 56m
I would like to further discuss the growing commodification of incels. I hope to discuss other aspects in later blogging session but first lets establish some of the phenomenae that is malcontenting to me.

First topic I would like to discuss is not only the tik tokification of our terms but also the de-contextualization of the concept that defines being incel (involuntary celibate) a term that is straight forward in a literal interpretation and doesnt need any further elaboration. The phenomenae of (slangification or decontextualization) is a common phenomena, but with the rise of so called subjectivist ethics (which means no ethics) you see this phenomenae accelerated. Before it used to take multiple generations for this to occur but now it has accelerated.

Usually you see it accelerate amongst retards who form teleological(emotional on conotational) definitions of words rather than onteological and concept based definitions. Incels have been discriminated decontextualized and criminalized in general (when only a few are criminals as in any group).
They associate the term with being a loser, violent, neet. Clear evidence of the term taking on a canotation based definition because of normalfagification. The term gender is a big example of this. Contextually, in a western society with christian ethics, profanity and things that are "sinful" are deemed bad in public. So the term "sex," being a reference to genetelia and such things is deemed inappropriate. So in christian fashion they make a new word that defines the same thing to use in public settings so that it doesnt bring up "sexual activity" or the relation to it. However, it ia not a social construct arbitrarily made, its definition is based on sex, hence it is equivalent to sex not analogous! But subjectivist, nihilist, and marxian perspectives allowed the far reaching extrapolation that it refers to something different than sex. It represents your "social expression of sex" which is retarded.



Now this phenonenae cannot be stopped since the majority of the popularion has always been stupid unthinking fools who use tools but do not think of the tools they use. However, it is worthy to note, this leads me to how the commodification of incels become so attractive in recent years, to corpos/feds/degens/redpillers.
Till next time thank you for reading
 
Last edited:
please separate your big blob of text, my eyes hurt
 
I like what you’re getting at but in your next post please just write plainly because all the half finished sentences and grammatical errors (for instance, “phenomenae” is not a word, the singular is phenomenon and the plural is phenomena) are really distracting and detract from your main point
 
Last edited:
I like what you’re getting at but in your next post please just write plainly because all the half finished sentences and grammatical errors (for instance, “phenomenae” is not a word, the singular is phenomenon and the plural is phenomena) are really distracting and detract from your main point
Dont care for grammar nor modern evolutions.
 

Similar threads

RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
19
Views
708
VλREN
VλREN
Yunoo
Replies
11
Views
2K
Hong Xiuquan
Hong Xiuquan
Flagellum_Dei
Replies
9
Views
949
Flagellum_Dei
Flagellum_Dei
BlackPilledNormi
Replies
8
Views
362
Paperman
P

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →