
Mr. Agent Clark
Wizard
★★★
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
- Posts
- 4,219
For those who say "Above 4 SMV me aren't worse than women" "your parents love you regardless of your SMV"
It's not only this picture:
In resume, this study watch 426 caregivers (could be a paid caregiver, grandparents or other siblings too) and see how much the caregivers take care of the children in a supermarket. The researchers rated carefuly all the children from 1 to 10.
The result is that 1% of the least attractive children got taken care of properly (buckled in the shopping cart) while 10% of the most attractive children got taken care of properly.
There is a bunch of studies on this matter, I leave to you if you want to read
Ritter, Langlois et al. (1995): Mothers of cute newborns (rated by strangers) showed more affection, cooing, holding, and engaging—while those with less attractive babies spent more time on routine tasks
Harvard/McLean study: Women (but not men) chose to avoid looking at babies with facial abnormalities and were less motivated to view them, suggesting aesthetic bias in maternal-like behaviors
Field, Tiffany M.; Nitza Vega-Lahr (1984). "Early interactions between infants with cranio-facial anomalies and their mothers". Infant Behavior and Development. 7 (4): 527–530.
Even parents, who have the parental instinct are affected greatly by lookism, imagine normies.
Still think, you people 4/10 SMV or above aren't evil?
Do you need even more evidence, for example
In resume, normies bully more and harder than foids in average.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/zxmvcy/pos_bullying_a_special_ed_kid/
Here you can see an example of how normies bully sub4 SMV kids.
You might argue that women do psychological bullying, and that can be as bad or worse than physical or more direct bullying. I think psychological bullying can get really bad, sometimes as bad as physical but I would say most of the time normies as they are more direct than foids, give more pain foids.
In my own experience, foids did bully me hard, but not as bad as normies did. And what I've seen both in my school and other people I know experiences, normies often do the majority of the harm in bullying.
You can disagree with that, but you CAN'T disagree with that normies are evil, even LTNS or 4/10 SMV normies. Most of the people here are in between 4 and 6 SMV. Yes I'm including you, you are evil. Whether you tortured directly or indirectly, or maybe you was homeschooled and you didn't torture, or maybe there wasn't much sub4 SMVers to target at your school or work... You would had bullied me and all low SMV men if you had the opportunity to.
It's human nature.
Often despise the idea of getting surgeries, shave my beard or try to look better. I don't want to become a torturer myself.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Science proves that the more attractive you are, the more you can get away with being abusive. Which in consequence promotes being more abusive, or harm more.
www.sciencedirect.com
"Teachers rated the most attractive children as being those who used both prosocial and coercive (aggressive) tactics to control peers—called “bistrategic controllers.” These children gained the highest social status despite their aggression"
I experienced myself again, LTN kids that bullied me hard, just like other more attractive kids. Noticed the same thing with other kids that got bullied.
Do you really think that this about black and white? The higher SMV you are the more of a human waste scumbag you are.
It's not only this picture:

Researchers Show Parents Give Unattractive Children Less Attention
A researcher at the University of Alberta has shown that parents are more likely to give better care and pay closer attention to good-looking children compared to unattractive ones. Dr. Andrew Harrell presented his findings recently at the Warren E. Kalbach Population Conference in Edmonton...
www.sciencedaily.com
In resume, this study watch 426 caregivers (could be a paid caregiver, grandparents or other siblings too) and see how much the caregivers take care of the children in a supermarket. The researchers rated carefuly all the children from 1 to 10.
The result is that 1% of the least attractive children got taken care of properly (buckled in the shopping cart) while 10% of the most attractive children got taken care of properly.
There is a bunch of studies on this matter, I leave to you if you want to read
Ritter, Langlois et al. (1995): Mothers of cute newborns (rated by strangers) showed more affection, cooing, holding, and engaging—while those with less attractive babies spent more time on routine tasks
Harvard/McLean study: Women (but not men) chose to avoid looking at babies with facial abnormalities and were less motivated to view them, suggesting aesthetic bias in maternal-like behaviors
Field, Tiffany M.; Nitza Vega-Lahr (1984). "Early interactions between infants with cranio-facial anomalies and their mothers". Infant Behavior and Development. 7 (4): 527–530.
Even parents, who have the parental instinct are affected greatly by lookism, imagine normies.
Still think, you people 4/10 SMV or above aren't evil?
Do you need even more evidence, for example
REVIEW OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF BOYS AND GIRLS INVOLVED IN SCHOOL BULLYING
Bullying at school affects the health and development of children and adolescents. This study aimed to describe evidence about the charac...
www.redalyc.org
In resume, normies bully more and harder than foids in average.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/zxmvcy/pos_bullying_a_special_ed_kid/
Here you can see an example of how normies bully sub4 SMV kids.
You might argue that women do psychological bullying, and that can be as bad or worse than physical or more direct bullying. I think psychological bullying can get really bad, sometimes as bad as physical but I would say most of the time normies as they are more direct than foids, give more pain foids.
In my own experience, foids did bully me hard, but not as bad as normies did. And what I've seen both in my school and other people I know experiences, normies often do the majority of the harm in bullying.
You can disagree with that, but you CAN'T disagree with that normies are evil, even LTNS or 4/10 SMV normies. Most of the people here are in between 4 and 6 SMV. Yes I'm including you, you are evil. Whether you tortured directly or indirectly, or maybe you was homeschooled and you didn't torture, or maybe there wasn't much sub4 SMVers to target at your school or work... You would had bullied me and all low SMV men if you had the opportunity to.
It's human nature.
Often despise the idea of getting surgeries, shave my beard or try to look better. I don't want to become a torturer myself.

Facial attractiveness as a moderator of the association between social and physical aggression and popularity in adolescents - PubMed
This study examined the relations between facial attractiveness, aggression, and popularity in adolescence to determine whether facial attractiveness would buffer against the negative effects of aggression on popularity. We collected ratings of facial attractiveness from standardized...

Science proves that the more attractive you are, the more you can get away with being abusive. Which in consequence promotes being more abusive, or harm more.

Physical attractiveness in preschoolers: Relationships with power, status, aggression and social skills
Several lines of theory and research suggest that power (e.g., social dominance) and status (e.g., social prominence and positive peer regard) are enj…
"Teachers rated the most attractive children as being those who used both prosocial and coercive (aggressive) tactics to control peers—called “bistrategic controllers.” These children gained the highest social status despite their aggression"
I experienced myself again, LTN kids that bullied me hard, just like other more attractive kids. Noticed the same thing with other kids that got bullied.
Do you really think that this about black and white? The higher SMV you are the more of a human waste scumbag you are.