Total Imbecile
Honorary ethnic
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2017
- Posts
- 10,543
God forbid though there is a safe space sub for ugly males who are legit suffering because of lookism or racism. Compared to what we experience womens problems are laughable, there are thousands of laws protecting them as well while there are no laws pertaining to lookism
Female problems include:
-free money being thrown their way, cant deposit thousands in free cash without catching the attention of the IRS
-easy jobs such as twitchwhoring when you shouldnt have to work
-men going out of their way to please you and help you
-too many options when dating
-government refusing to pay for your dumb life choices such as choosing to have unprotected sex with Chad (even though sex is a privilege and nobody is entitled to it, birth control and abortions are rights JFL)
-getting ghosted by Chad
In all seriousness I cannot think of a single legit issue women face that isnt their own fault ... tutorial mode boyos
Anyways, the sub in question is r/ActualWomen and 2 out of its 3 rules (JFL) are dealing with excluding men:
Of course this is perfectly fine.
Incel subs excluding women? DESPICABLE, SHUT IT DOWN
Female subs excluding men? ITS ONLY RIGHT
Mind you that sub is not innocent, there is a reason why they have those rules in place, their userbase and modbase overlap with that of r/GenderCritical, a known sub for Chadchasers whove been burned and now hate on low status men while still chasing after Chad
Look at any of their threads and youll find it, this one is particularly interesting for example:
"I want male fertility to be opt in rather than force women to play risk every time she engages with men"
"Using a procedure like RISUG (although vasectomies are also reversible, though more complex), boys could be effectively "sterilized" at puberty.
In my fantasy world, they would only be permitted to opt into fertility with the written consent of the female partner, meaning no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted children, no reproductive coercion. If the couple should separate, they are both legally responsible for the care and financing since they both opted in.
And of course, severe punishments for any fertile men who "go rogue" and have sex with anyone besides the woman who granted consent to pregnancy."
Basically this translates to "I dont want Chad to 'go rouge' and slay girls irresponsibly, I want him to commit and have sex with me as well". Being a virgin the above change would do nothing in regards to me raping women because I cant get laid, it would be like locking me up so Jeremy Meeks would stop beating up 15 year old boys. Its pointless trying to grasp this logic tbh so dont try
Of course it doesnt end there, how does keeping men enslaved and injecting them with T blockers sound?
"I have had a similar idea with something different too. Testosterone. Maybe it should be a privilege because it makes men super strong and makes them behave like demons from hell. I almost feel that the full extent of such extraneous musculature development is unnecessarily dangerous in a modern context? And god knows the aggression is a problem too. And maybe, like a motor vehicle license, such access to such physical capacity ought to be limited to only those capable of providing some basic litmus test of responsibility?"
The criteria for getting T that she has in mind must be something like being good looking and tall LOL
What should be done to Chads who trick or guilt trip girls into having sex with them bareback though? Its not like they can just say no because Chad would then just walk away to fuck another girl who would let him do whatever he wants
"“Jen’s” boyfriend is overdue for castration. He’s a rapist."
(Reminder that the original incels sub was banned partially because of suggesting something similar)
Im half tempted to make a reddit account, larp as a female for a week and then just start posting on r/ActualWomen to wreak havoc. Given that there are only three very vague rules either you could get away with it or you would get immediately banned
Honestly, I probably wont do it because I have no time but still its funny to see how incel subs that are necessary since incels get banned from every other sub are appalling but women who are welcomed everywhere making their own female supremacist sub is okay
Female problems include:
-free money being thrown their way, cant deposit thousands in free cash without catching the attention of the IRS
-easy jobs such as twitchwhoring when you shouldnt have to work
-men going out of their way to please you and help you
-too many options when dating
-government refusing to pay for your dumb life choices such as choosing to have unprotected sex with Chad (even though sex is a privilege and nobody is entitled to it, birth control and abortions are rights JFL)
-getting ghosted by Chad
In all seriousness I cannot think of a single legit issue women face that isnt their own fault ... tutorial mode boyos
Anyways, the sub in question is r/ActualWomen and 2 out of its 3 rules (JFL) are dealing with excluding men:
Rule 1: No Men
Clarification A: If you were born male but "identify as" a woman, you are not allowed. If you were born male and "identify as" non-binary or some other gender, you are not allowed. If you have a dick, you are not allowed. If you chose to have your dick removed or otherwise modified, you are not allowed. If you have any questions about your being allowed here, DO NOT MAKE A POST, send a mod mail.
Clarification B: If you were born female (or assigned female, if you are intersex) you are welcome to hang out here. If you were born female and you "identify as" a man, you are free to hang out here, but keep in mind we will refer to uteruses, vaginas, vulvas, clitorises, and breasts as part of female anatomy. Telling us "not all men have dicks" will get you banned. This space centers around female positivity, and you are welcome here to have access to that, but referring to your junk as things like "my dick" will get you banned as well. If you were born female and "identify as" non-binary you are free to hang out here. But aren't we all, like, non-binary?
Rule 2: Taking issue with Rule 1 is not allowed
Clarification of rule 2: If you complain about Rule 1 you will be banned. Don't waste our time.
Of course this is perfectly fine.
Incel subs excluding women? DESPICABLE, SHUT IT DOWN
Female subs excluding men? ITS ONLY RIGHT
Mind you that sub is not innocent, there is a reason why they have those rules in place, their userbase and modbase overlap with that of r/GenderCritical, a known sub for Chadchasers whove been burned and now hate on low status men while still chasing after Chad
Look at any of their threads and youll find it, this one is particularly interesting for example:
"I want male fertility to be opt in rather than force women to play risk every time she engages with men"
"Using a procedure like RISUG (although vasectomies are also reversible, though more complex), boys could be effectively "sterilized" at puberty.
In my fantasy world, they would only be permitted to opt into fertility with the written consent of the female partner, meaning no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted children, no reproductive coercion. If the couple should separate, they are both legally responsible for the care and financing since they both opted in.
And of course, severe punishments for any fertile men who "go rogue" and have sex with anyone besides the woman who granted consent to pregnancy."
Basically this translates to "I dont want Chad to 'go rouge' and slay girls irresponsibly, I want him to commit and have sex with me as well". Being a virgin the above change would do nothing in regards to me raping women because I cant get laid, it would be like locking me up so Jeremy Meeks would stop beating up 15 year old boys. Its pointless trying to grasp this logic tbh so dont try
Of course it doesnt end there, how does keeping men enslaved and injecting them with T blockers sound?
"I have had a similar idea with something different too. Testosterone. Maybe it should be a privilege because it makes men super strong and makes them behave like demons from hell. I almost feel that the full extent of such extraneous musculature development is unnecessarily dangerous in a modern context? And god knows the aggression is a problem too. And maybe, like a motor vehicle license, such access to such physical capacity ought to be limited to only those capable of providing some basic litmus test of responsibility?"
The criteria for getting T that she has in mind must be something like being good looking and tall LOL
What should be done to Chads who trick or guilt trip girls into having sex with them bareback though? Its not like they can just say no because Chad would then just walk away to fuck another girl who would let him do whatever he wants
"“Jen’s” boyfriend is overdue for castration. He’s a rapist."
(Reminder that the original incels sub was banned partially because of suggesting something similar)
Im half tempted to make a reddit account, larp as a female for a week and then just start posting on r/ActualWomen to wreak havoc. Given that there are only three very vague rules either you could get away with it or you would get immediately banned
Honestly, I probably wont do it because I have no time but still its funny to see how incel subs that are necessary since incels get banned from every other sub are appalling but women who are welcomed everywhere making their own female supremacist sub is okay