https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel
the editing of this article is being dominated by one user.
> 90% of citations/sources = fake news
the editing of this article is being dominated by one user.
> 90% of citations/sources = fake news
SuicideFuel Reminder that the Wikipedia article on Incels is Fictitious Propaganda
T
This page is protected to prevent vandalism.
Wikipedia
You know someone's butthurt when they don't let you edit the article.
Also JFL at incels "are mostly white",Wikipedia is literally calling all ethnics fakecels.
Also JFL at incels "are mostly white",Wikipedia is literally calling all ethnics fakecels.
Last edited:
I wonder how many muslims committed murders and mass killings because of their views
Wikipedia is the worst source you can use for research purposes. It is only good when you want to idea-fap to your own ideology.
> 45 deathsView attachment 57494
I wonder how many muslims committed murders and mass killings because of their views
How many incesl have roped compared to this number?
"But, but... They're making roasties feel bad and self reflect on their whorish ways."
I just clicked that wiki link and i am shocked beyond belief. These guys need a quick death.
by whom? shoot the protector.
this but just the German part
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevism
and then a little bit of this to finish myself off
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basque_nationalism
also Metapedia is better. avoid RationalWiki. its like Wikipedia but 50% more soy, if that was possible.
Last edited:
Wikipedia
Any “progressive” community or site will paint incels in the absolute worst way. Incels are characterized as anti-female, anti-minority, and potentially violent. What’s laughable is how they claim racism is endemic amongst incels when most progressives see minorities as infantile and disregard them after voting season.
Wikipedia = controlled opposition
check 9/11 page it's the same story
- While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages.
check 9/11 page it's the same story
Nikolas Cruz is mentioned and he had a girlfriend so the reason for his actions definitely weren’t involuntary celibacy. Only because he praised Rodger in some random YouTube comment is he mentioned.
Great job (((Wikipedia))).
Great job (((Wikipedia))).
Ever since I saw @SergeantIncel post on this, (https://incels.is/threads/2010s-wik...more-accurate-and-objective-than-2018s.49712/) I don't feel bad about refusing to give a single cent to Wikipedia every time they're on their knees begging like dogs for money.
Their wikipedia article on inceldom is completely biased and filled with lies and propaganda. It's so interesting to see how certain people write about you once you're considered their enemy, nuance and balanced perspective go right out the window, and the propaganda machine starts churning out garbage like that.
Their wikipedia article on inceldom is completely biased and filled with lies and propaganda. It's so interesting to see how certain people write about you once you're considered their enemy, nuance and balanced perspective go right out the window, and the propaganda machine starts churning out garbage like that.
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly on that. I wrote in another thread about it, (https://incels.is/threads/faggots-o...school-shooting-on-incels.85430/#post-1632290)
It's surreal to see how drastically different those pages are in the span of just a few years. It's more absurd how hardly anyone has even noticed this.
Last edited:
Only soys use wiki, foids use IG.
>Fictitious
We live in a propaganda-filled world now. Its just incredible how deluded are most people about anything politically relevant because of this. Its so sad. Objectivity and truth dont matter anymore
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
