ResidentHell
Veteran
★
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Posts
- 1,087
As an average, for every two woman that reproduced, a single man reproduced. Basically the average female that eventually became a mother, was impregnated by a man who had a child by two different women on average. This is a major sign that women generally breed via a sort of “many-to-one” relationship, i.e., multiple women share children with one man, happens more often than only one woman shares children with one man. Perhaps hypergamy in modernity is more extreme than it was in the past, but it seems hypergamy has always existed to a degree that has affected the sexual / reproductive prospects of many men who have lived throughout history. The majority of men in history never reproduced, but only a minority of women never reproduced
It’s can easily be argued that hypergamy is the woman’s nature, because there is data that infers it’s how they have operated throughout human history. If women have historically been hypergamous, it’s obvious there would have been a criteria that was used in the mate selection process. I also think this is the same criteria that is used in the hypergamic environment of the modern sex / relationship market, which is Physical Appearance, Economic Wealth and Social Status of course
I have no reason to assume that women used a different criteria for selecting potential mating partners in previous eras. Although they may have been more likely to pursue ogremaxxed males for reasons related to physical utility / protection from hostile forces in less civil / safe conditions. Nonetheless, because the quality of life / socio-economic security in modern society has achieved the highest standard that it has ever been in history, the need for ogremaxxed companions / mating partners has declined or become obsolete for young females in western modernity. Now facial attractiveness matters more, it’s no longer primarily about height and physique or frame
Overall. the data on historical fertility rates for males and females, and the data on paternity fraud rates, all point to the conclusion that the vast majority of females in human history have reproduced with a minority of all males who have ever lived. So I can conclude that the proportion of men who have experienced reproductive success in history is relatively small. It’s comparable to the share of young men in Millennial / Gen Z who have weekly access to sex (between 30% and 40%). The share of males who failed or never tried to achieve reproductive success, are the majority of males who have ever existed in in human history
Another reminder, “paternity fraud” occurs on average for 1 in every 3 births in a heterosexual relationship (though there is data that shows paternity fraud rates could be as high as 40% for certain countries in Africa). This can be extrapolated as for every three males that become a "father", one of those males was a victim of paternity fraud
Moreover it’s fair to assume some victims of paternity fraud never even became a father, and were only surrogate fathers to the children of other men (unknowingly). This is supported by the fact that many cases of paternity fraud took place where the father never suspected it. It seems there were some men in history who never passed down their genes but lived their whole life under the illusion that they did JFL
(Related threads. Includes sources for percentage of men and women in history who reproduced & paternity fraud rates)
It’s can easily be argued that hypergamy is the woman’s nature, because there is data that infers it’s how they have operated throughout human history. If women have historically been hypergamous, it’s obvious there would have been a criteria that was used in the mate selection process. I also think this is the same criteria that is used in the hypergamic environment of the modern sex / relationship market, which is Physical Appearance, Economic Wealth and Social Status of course
I have no reason to assume that women used a different criteria for selecting potential mating partners in previous eras. Although they may have been more likely to pursue ogremaxxed males for reasons related to physical utility / protection from hostile forces in less civil / safe conditions. Nonetheless, because the quality of life / socio-economic security in modern society has achieved the highest standard that it has ever been in history, the need for ogremaxxed companions / mating partners has declined or become obsolete for young females in western modernity. Now facial attractiveness matters more, it’s no longer primarily about height and physique or frame
Overall. the data on historical fertility rates for males and females, and the data on paternity fraud rates, all point to the conclusion that the vast majority of females in human history have reproduced with a minority of all males who have ever lived. So I can conclude that the proportion of men who have experienced reproductive success in history is relatively small. It’s comparable to the share of young men in Millennial / Gen Z who have weekly access to sex (between 30% and 40%). The share of males who failed or never tried to achieve reproductive success, are the majority of males who have ever existed in in human history
Another reminder, “paternity fraud” occurs on average for 1 in every 3 births in a heterosexual relationship (though there is data that shows paternity fraud rates could be as high as 40% for certain countries in Africa). This can be extrapolated as for every three males that become a "father", one of those males was a victim of paternity fraud
Moreover it’s fair to assume some victims of paternity fraud never even became a father, and were only surrogate fathers to the children of other men (unknowingly). This is supported by the fact that many cases of paternity fraud took place where the father never suspected it. It seems there were some men in history who never passed down their genes but lived their whole life under the illusion that they did JFL
(Related threads. Includes sources for percentage of men and women in history who reproduced & paternity fraud rates)
Biological Fatalism in Humans – It’s Easier for Women to Breed Due to The Fact That Fewer Men Than Women are Needed for Reproduction to Happen
Normies like to downplay the “blackpill” as nonsense, by labelling it as “toxic ideologies” or some kind of “conspiracy theory”. But this post is all straight facts. This is the most basic, yet irrefutable explanation of biological fatalism in the human species. Normies will not touch this post...
incels.is
The Implications of Paternity Fraud and Infidelity Rates
There are stats which show that between 30% to 40% of paternity tests turn out negative (although there are other studies that report paternity fraud rates as lower than 30%). The minority of men become victims of paternity fraud, but it is a significant minority. If you extrapolate the...
incels.is
Last edited: