Soy Red piller gets mocked by pretty much everyone for bringing up the horsepill

[grondilu]

So, few days ago a YouTuber in the manosphere got mercilessly mocked by pretty much everyone for talking about how women gets sexually aroused by horses and motorcycles. Even BetterBachelor took part in the public shaming :


View: https://odysee.com/@BetterBachelor:b/just-w.t.f.-this-is-why-men-get-mocked:9


Now, I don't fucking care about women getting their kicks off with animals, vehicles, dildos or whatever. Hell, we men indulge in pornography, prostitution and more generally we probably have many more artificial ways to get sexually aroused than women have anyway, so we're poorly placed to judge.

However, what I don't like about this whole episode is how quick everyone was to dismiss the very idea that women are sexually stimulated when riding horses. The thing is : this is not a new idea. It was stated before, at least once, in a very famous book. And yet nobody mocked the author about this at the time (not that I know of anyway).

It is a short passage in the book but I remember its existence very well because it amused me when I read it long time ago. I couldn't remember the exact words though so I had to look it up, and I did :

There is one striking exception to the second law of animal appeal and that
concerns the horse. The response to this animal is unusual in two ways. When
analysed against increase in age of children, it shows a smooth rise in
popularity followed by an equally smooth fall. The peak coincides with the
onset of puberty. When analysed against the different sexes, it emerges that it
is three times as popular with girls as with boys. No other animal love shows
anything approaching this sex difference. Clearly there is something unusual
about the response to the horse and it requires separate consideration.

The unique feature of the horse in the present context is that it is something
to be mounted and ridden. This applies to none of the other top ten animals. If
we couple this observation with the facts that its popularity peak coincides
with puberty and that there is a strong sexual difference in its appeal, we are
forced to the conclusion that the response to the horse must involve a strong
sexual element. If a symbolic equation is being made between mounting a horse
and sexual mounting, then it is perhaps surprising that the animal has a
greater appeal for girls. But the horse is a powerful, muscular and dominant
animal and is therefore more suited to the male role. Viewed objectively, the
act of horse-riding consists of a long series of rhythmic movements with the
legs wide apart and in close contact with the body of the animal. Its appeal
for girls appears to result from the combination of its masculinity and the
nature of the posture and actions performed on its back. (It must be stressed
here that we are dealing with the child population as a whole. One child in
every eleven preferred the horse to all other animals. Only a small fraction
of this percentage would ever actually own a pony or a horse. Those that do,
quickly learn the many more varied rewards that go with this activity. If, as a
result, they become addicted to horse-riding, this is not, of course,
necessarily significant in the context we have been discussing. )

It remains to explain the fall in popularity of the horse following puberty.
With increasing sexual development, it might be expected to show further
increases in popularity, rather than a decrease. The answer can be found by
comparing the graph for horse love with the curve for sex play in children.
They match one another remarkably well. It would seem that, with the growth of
sexual awareness, and the characteristic sense of privacy that comes to
surround teenage sexual feelings, the response to the horse declines along with
the decline in overt sex-play 'romping'. It is significant here that the appeal
of monkeys also suffers a decline at this point. Many monkeys have particularly
obtrusive sexual organs, including large, pink, sexual swellings. For the
younger child these have no significance and the monkeys' other powerful
anthropomorphic features can operate unhindered. But for older children the
conspicuous genitals become a source of embarrassment and the popularity of
these animals suffers as a consequence.

This, then, is the situation with regard to animal 'loves' in children. For
adults, the responses become more varied and sophisticated, but the basic
anthropomorphism persists. Serious naturalists and zoologists bewail this
fact, but providing it is fully realized that symbolic responses of this kind
tell us nothing about the true nature -of the different animals concerned, they
do little harm and provide a valuable subsidiary outlet for emotional feelings.

- Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape

 

[TheNEET]

riding horses is animal exploitation first and foremost, so foids are evil for doing this even if they don't get aroused

 

[Deleted member 21770]

and then i said; quit horsing around!
xD

 

[übertard]

Horsegirls are just the rich country equivalent of cat/dog ladies

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Redpillers are delusional copers. Better bachelor is actually one of the most rational ones.

 

[Lux]

Bestiality should make you care and bother with it, bestiality that girls do with animals should not be allowed, dogs and horses are their favorite.

 

[grondilu]

Bestiality should make you care and bother with it, bestiality that girls do with animals should not be allowed, dogs and horses are their favorite.

Well, I disagree. As I've stated several times, I love the dogpill, because to me it proves that the ability to fuck women has nothing to do with your value as a human being.

Women can fuck all the animals they want, I literally don't care.

 

[Toxic_Manbabby]

riding horses is animal exploitation first and foremost, so foids are evil for doing this even if they don't get aroused

Well, what the fuck are we supposed to use if we can't use cars anymore? Bicycles? This isn't the Netherlands!

 

[erenyeager]

I wanna live on another planet