RageFuel Receiving a Verbal Warning for "Low Effort" is Bullshit....

[Deleted member 14382]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

 

[Deleted member 22907]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this.

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

No good deed goes unpunished.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

LOL, exactly. This forum is full of inconsistencies.

 

[zangano1]

All my posts are low effort, but the only time I got a low effort warning was for quoting

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

I got a low effort warning for quoting once

 

[Deleted member 14382]

All my posts are low effort, but the only time I got a low effort warning was for quoting

The opposite is true for me.
The fact is "low effort" is entirely subjective and arbitrary. There are no objective criteria by which you can make an accurate determination if a post is "low effort". Just because you don't type a thesis in response to a user doesn't make it "low effort". It can take more wit and mental energy to come up with just a handful of well-placed words, than a whole chapter of writing.

 

[Monk of Failure]

This forum is pretty unpredictable and acts like normie forum sometimes, so you shouldn't be surprised even if they ban you.

 

[BrendioEEE]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

 

[Newbie17]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

not one word

 

[Deleted member 140]

efforts me tbh

 

[Deleted member 19079]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

not one letter

 

[OverBeforeItBegan2]

lots of niggas about to get banned ngl

 

[78980n]

It's over

 

[Deleted member 14382]

lots of niggas about to get banned ngl

Kind of makes me rethink the effort I'm employing on my megathread. I may get banned before I finish it.

 

[FlamingCel]

This is an injustice buddy boyo

 

[Deleted member 21514]

Low effort rule is retarded tbh.

 

[FlamingCel]

efforts me tbh

 

[happiless]

it's over

 

[Admiral_Arkantos]

er

 

[Dionysus]

jfl at these cucks unironically getting warned. im too high iq to get a warning

 

[Emba]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

I was just going to quote you but... After reading it want to add...

Your epic post will be ignored and buried under dogpills.

 

[omnigold]

Choosing what to quote is higher effort than a low effort reply.

 

[Dregster]

It's over

Cope

 

[tooth monster]

It's over

 

[Deleted member 14382]

I was just going to quote you but... After reading it want to add...

Your epic post will be ignored and buried under dogpills.

LOL, that's exactly what I think is going to happen. But, I'll probably continue writing it anyway and save it for myself.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

.... because nothing can be more "low effort" than simply quoting a user without typing a single letter. Yet, this is allowed to slide. But, if you actually go through the trouble of posting a short comment along with the quote (e.g. "not one second", "it's over", etc.), then it's arbitrarily deemed "low effort", and you're emailed a "verbal warning" for this, even though you employed more effort than simply quoting. This epitomizes the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished".

Mind you, I'm known for typing essays on this forum, so it's not like I'm in the habit of making "low effort" posts (in fact, I'm currently in the process of creating a thread that will literally take me months to complete. It will be the longest, most comprehensive and epic post in the history of this forum. I'm not exaggerating).

Cope.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

View attachment 175358
the low effort rule encompasses shitposts as well, so no it isn't arbitrary. empty quoting something you agree with or find funny is allowed (so long as it isn't outright abuse like in the case of that michael1235324 guy), whereas 'hehe i didnt read your post' isn't, especially not outside of offtopic like the post above. people don't type out these threads just for people to say 'didn't read'

I think you misinterpreted what I meant by "not one second". It was a tongue-in-cheek refererence to the fact that I didn't want to hear one second of the audio clip link on the thread I quoted because it was suicide fuel (a foid describing in detail how she rejects unattractive men and then goes on to fuck Chad). Next time, I will quote the specific part of a thread I'm referring to, not the entire thing. Maybe that will prevent misunderstandings.

 

[FinnCel]

I just got warning for spamming
That's what happens when you post here drunk

 

[Deleted member 22907]

I just got warning for spamming
That's what happens when you post here drunk

How else do you get 16 000 posts lol

 

[Deleted member 818]

They should just add a thumbs up feature to prevent spam.

 

[Saudade]

I just got warning for spamming
That's what happens when you post here drunk

Bro at how much % are you on?

 

[Nihilisticel]

Exactly. The mods here are overdoing it. Banning people and giving warnings for anything. That’ll only cause lower activity and lead to this sites downfall

 

[Blacktarpill]

View attachment 175358
the low effort rule encompasses shitposts as well, so no it isn't arbitrary. empty quoting something you agree with or find funny is allowed (so long as it isn't outright abuse like in the case of that michael1235324 guy), whereas 'hehe i didnt read your post' isn't, especially not outside of offtopic like the post above. people don't type out these threads just for people to say 'didn't read'

Not one word. XD
pls no ban

 

[Deleted member 14382]

Exactly. The mods here are overdoing it. Banning people and giving warnings for anything. That’ll only cause lower activity and lead to this sites downfall

I've always dreamed of creating my own forum called "My2Cents.com". It would be a place where you have the freedom to vent your frustration and say absolutely ANYTHING that's on your mind, no matter how violent or offensive (or cuddly and cute). But, I know this isn't possible, as it would quickly be shut down by authorities. "Freedom of speech" doesn't exist.

 

[Damo the incel]

Not one word. XD
pls no ban

What's your problem little man

 

[Nihilisticel]

I've always dreamed of creating my own forum called "My2Cents.com". It would be a place where you have the freedom to vent your frustration and say absolutely ANYTHING that's on your mind, not matter how violent or offensive (or cuddly and cute). But, I know this isn't possible, as it would quickly be shut down by authorities. "Freedom of speech" doesn't exist.

In the 2000s this would’ve been possible

 

[FinnCel]

Bro at how much % are you on?

That's a secret

 

[Mrpvolts]

This forum is pretty unpredictable and acts like normie forum sometimes, so you shouldn't be surprised even if they ban you.

They should just add a thumbs up feature to prevent spam.

 

[speedtypingincel]

LOL, that's exactly what I think is going to happen. But, I'll probably continue writing it anyway and save it for myself.

High IQ threads get ignored because people don't have anything to add.

 

[Deleted member 16624]

View attachment 175358
the low effort rule encompasses shitposts as well, so no it isn't arbitrary. empty quoting something you agree with or find funny is allowed (so long as it isn't outright abuse like in the case of that michael1235324 guy), whereas 'hehe i didnt read your post' isn't, especially not outside of offtopic like the post above. people don't type out these threads just for people to say 'didn't read'

 

[Deleted member 14382]

High IQ threads get ignored because people don't have anything to add.

Now, that's high IQ.

 

[Emba]

LOL, that's exactly what I think is going to happen. But, I'll probably continue writing it anyway and save it for myself.

If the title is interesting i night read it, unless it gets buried too quickly.

 

[ordinaryotaku]

The funny thing is that you aren't even a low effort poster at all. Pretty much everything that I've seen you type up is pretty based and high IQ.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

The effects of being ugly should be your main concern rather than a few warnings which are easy to avoid when you see what rule you broke. Just avoid what you got warned for in the future.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

The funny thing is that you aren't even a low effort poster at all. Pretty much everything that I've seen you type up is pretty based and high IQ.

Thanks, man.