You're always making foid employees rich when you spend money, but it's only a problem when it's prostitution? Your logic has no consistency.
For what it's worth, direct payment for sex is a clear act of submission to female authority in the sex / relationship market
Of course you would be contributing to female welfare by making financial expenses on products and services sold by female-owned or female-operated business.
But the difference between purchase of products and services from female-operated business and escorting, has to do with the power dynamics of female behavior in the world of sex and relationships
By purchasing sex from a female, you are implicitly letting them know that you are prepared to submit to their sexual authority by voluntarily completing an instruction or request from them prior to engage in sexual activity with them. Basically it's simping, but at the same time, all civil methods for obtaining sex from females require some degree of simping. Most normies who obtain sex from females don't do it without simping to some degree
However much of the sexual degeneracy in modern society wouldn't have been enabled without the financial support from males to a neoliberal standard for female sexual behavior. For example, let's say you earn $10 an hour from a job that requires some physical effort (e.g. store assistant, construction worker), and the average female sex worker in your city earns $100 an hour.
If you were to pay a sex worker in your city for 1-hour session, it means you would be sacrificing a resource that took you 10 hours of work to earn, for a whore who will acquire that same resource within 1/10th of the time it took for you to acquire it, but thru much less physically demanding labor
The relativeness of physical effort to acquisition of economic resource is massively distorted in favour of females in context of sexual relations.
In modern society, it's extremely easier for females to obtain sex. Due to surge in demand for foid-provided sexual services, females are more likely to be economically rewarded at an insanely higher rate for their participation in sexual acts, than the rate at which men are economically rewarded for filling the job roles which are imperative to the maintenance and survival of the human ecosystem
TLDR: All civil methods for acquiring sex with females require some degree of simping. However simping is not a black and white thing; it's a relative action. Depending on what your own personal economic circumstances are, as well as what the circumstances of potential female sex partners are, how you go about the pursuit for sexual relations with females can have a variably negative impact on your personal situation as well as the situation of the wider sex / relationship market (even if you actually succeed in having sex). To such a degree it may be the better option for you to indefinitely abstain from sex / relationship market, depending on what's your personal economic situation
