Experiment Re: Can We Go On r/IncelTears To Defend Ourselves?

[Deleted member 17752]

You can but most of you fags just sperg out and look like retards. There might be the braincels members in there too but I know some of you go on there.

 

[unsettling]

You can but most of you fags just sperg out and look like retards. There might be the braincels members in there too but I know some of you go ok there.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

but why? people here should know already that arguing with cucktears is like arguing with animals, it is literally pointless

That's completely doable if you are already capable of communicating with a chair.

We already had a few incels try debating the other side. Most defected and left us.

Wuot

 

[StoicNihilist]

You'll just get banned from the subreddit.

We're not stopping anyone from doing it, and we're not going to ban you over it. I just feel that it's a big waste of time, however.

Update: I made the proposition to the president mod on r/IncelTears. They are considering it.

I'm just waiting for the yes or no.

Wish me luck.

 

[ordinaryotaku]

I did this exact thing but intentionally, I made an account literally just to justify against their claims and I eventually got banned when I didn't even break any of the rules. Check out my post history, I tried to be as high IQ as possible:

u/MarcLepineTheSecond

 

[Wonder]

Some kind of debate sub like r/debateblackpill would be great but IT would not read it and Reddit would just ban it.

 

[StoicNihilist]

Some kind of debate sub like r/debateblackpill would be great but IT would not read it and Reddit would just ban it.

Most likely. The mods at cucktears seem uninterested in a debate.

 

[Deleted member]

You'll just get banned from the subreddit.

We're not stopping anyone from doing it, and we're not going to ban you over it. I just feel that it's a big waste of time, however.

that's right. the people there are not interested in arguing legitimately; it's just to validate their own beliefs about this disgusting world. that's why the circlejerk of "inceltears" exists in the first place.

 

[jerrycan dan]

You'll just get banned from the subreddit.

We're not stopping anyone from doing it, and we're not going to ban you over it. I just feel that it's a big waste of time, however.

I got banned from inceltears in under a minute for telling braziliansigma to get a job kek
Imagine how long you'd last trying to defend yourself.

 

[StaroRavager]

debate with r/IncelTears

Don’t even try, those clowns won’t let you get the chance

 

[CrookedOzCel]

Yeah what everyone else said their tiny pea brains would go into overdrive if forced to actually use logic and scientific facts for once

 

[Hate_my_life]

.>cucktears
.>logical arguments
View attachment 111917

^This

They won't address any points we/you will make and their counter-arguments will be platitudes. Lies. Not verifiable.
Just look at how they respond to any high IQ post made:

"Well, I know X who doesn't fit your description therefore you must be wrong"

The alternative approach they will take is the "moral high ground" which I think is a bullshit way to win a debate.

What I mean by that is let us say there's a Child Murderer and a Parent to one of the children this murder killed arguing about the second law of thermodynamics.
The murder states: "The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of the Universe must always Increase" and the murderer even provides so much evidence to prove his claim.
Wanna know what the parent would do in the "moral high ground" case to win?
"You piece of shit, You murdered children!" - Not even related to the matter at hand, but society will still support the Parent NO MATTER what they say as the murderers past actions annul his claims (for some reason?).
That's akin to how cucktears are going to win debates.

I was reading an old thread on r/subredditoftheday where IncelTears were literally highlighted to be the pathetic people (by other normies JFL) they are; to pick on people who know they are pathetic.
Want to know how they responded to the claims?

"But, but these guy are misogynists, endorse rape and say Vile evil things". Deflection.
Incase you don't believe me:

"Mean"?

They advocate for the rape, torture, and murder of women just for being women. I think that's beyond just mean...

Edit: No longer responding to the comments/rude PMs asking for evidence or arguing that I'm making it up. If multiple murders and the banning of incels for trying to find a way to rape and get away with it is not enough evidence for you there's clearly no convincing you.

Edit2: I see a lot of people defending braincels. Here's one of the top posts on that sub right now: https://i.redd.it/2ws8l9n7avu01.jpg

Make no mistake these subs are about hating women. If you came here to defend people who post shit like that you are a trash person.

Edit3: I've gotten more PMs with "kill yourself" and whore/slut/etc since posting this than I have in my entire time posting on Reddit. But they are the victims I guess.

Yes, the entire incel community. By and large they consistently dehumanize and degenerate women, fantasize about raping them, praise Eliot Rodger, shame women for not being virgins, defend pedophilia, are in favor of incest, sex slavery and mail order brides, and are 100% in favor of stripping away women's rights to choose the sexual partner of their choice.

And they spend their time on r/braincels or incels.me making fun of women. Or are you trying to imply women aren't people, like they are femoids or something... oh wait.

The same thing/s will be said if you try and debate the blackpill with them and unless they can control their white knight tendancy to "Protect muh lady" then it's redundant.
If someone can point me to ONE example in which they actually refute a point we're making without mentioning our justified hatred for women or SOME extreme edgy posters then I'll - idk tbh.

The point is they won't argue with the point at hand. Remember that faggot on the livestream when he invited some mods? He got all triggered about people throwing the word FAGGOT about when he realised he was losing?
That's how they "win".

Like women, they'll dismiss logic to convince people but rather convey emotions to suit their needs.