Dr. Autismo
British Incel
-
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
- Posts
- 27,505
- Online time
- 1d 12h
Ever notice the contradiction of wokesters where they virtue signal about being anti hate, while at the same time, still being very hateful themselves?
I call this good-hate.
The idea of this term is that whatever hate they spout for a certain group is justified and deserved due to historical baggage and grievances like war, slavery, etc.
For example, they say they hate white people, while claiming to be anti racist.
The reasons they give a pretty flimsy too.
The reasons they give to justify their good-hate is that according to them, whites are Imperialistic, warmongering, bigoted, racist, sexist, etc.
Despite these traits being shared and common among other races, even today.
Fun fact, Africans and South Americans had Imperial empires that practiced slavery long before making contact with European explorers.
They even traded slaves with them in exchange for resources like gunpowder.
Japan had an empire during ww2 and invaded Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Korea, Burma and China.
Speaking of, the Chinese Communist Party is pretty much a modern empire, plenty of China's land mass is made up of colonized land like tibet, south Mongolia, Manchuria and Hong Kong.
China even wanted to invade and colonize Taiwan, but Taiwan is protected by the US, and china invading Taiwan could spark conflict between the US and China and start WW3.
And of course, the term "good-hate" is meant to be ironic.
They claim that all hate is bad, but won't mind being hateful towards a certain group that they feel are dominant and deserve it.
Yeah, pretty Orwellian right here.
I call this good-hate.
The idea of this term is that whatever hate they spout for a certain group is justified and deserved due to historical baggage and grievances like war, slavery, etc.
For example, they say they hate white people, while claiming to be anti racist.
The reasons they give a pretty flimsy too.
The reasons they give to justify their good-hate is that according to them, whites are Imperialistic, warmongering, bigoted, racist, sexist, etc.
Despite these traits being shared and common among other races, even today.
Fun fact, Africans and South Americans had Imperial empires that practiced slavery long before making contact with European explorers.
They even traded slaves with them in exchange for resources like gunpowder.
Japan had an empire during ww2 and invaded Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Korea, Burma and China.
Speaking of, the Chinese Communist Party is pretty much a modern empire, plenty of China's land mass is made up of colonized land like tibet, south Mongolia, Manchuria and Hong Kong.
China even wanted to invade and colonize Taiwan, but Taiwan is protected by the US, and china invading Taiwan could spark conflict between the US and China and start WW3.
And of course, the term "good-hate" is meant to be ironic.
They claim that all hate is bad, but won't mind being hateful towards a certain group that they feel are dominant and deserve it.
Yeah, pretty Orwellian right here.
Last edited:





