Experiment Rate the feminism of this NYT comment

[Deleted member 5861]

"The entire framing of this is wrong. Within the last 100 years women have started to not be treated like property (started, not completed yet). A true libertarian economist would realize that the best way to resolve a supply and demand issue in a market, here the sex market, would be to completely liberate women because the marketplace, as we're so crass to describe it, would clear itself without significant distribution issues if women didn't have to worry about sexual assault and had access to reproductive health care from places like Planned Parenthood. Instead of appreciating the economic, social, psychic, spiritual, philosophical, cultural benefits of liberating women, white men wring their hands that liberating women has left some men without sex and therefore angry. So once again we have to direct our attention to the violent, petulant, angry white man and his problems and see if we can come up with robot sex slaves since owning women is thankfully now out of favor. I'm so tired of white men and their nonsense"

how feminist is this?

 

[Insalsa]

Mmm, idk man, this seems pretty blackpilled to me

 

[Moustachcel]

in the feminism scale this is like 6/10

 

[bluecollarCEL]

Yeah all the men in the 1950s just LOVED to beat the shit out of their wives.
Yes men in the 1950s wanted women to be stay at home moms to "keep them down" and not for great child raising.

Put this cunt in the Hoe Bag.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Mmm, idk man, this seems pretty blackpilled to me

"here the sex market, would be to completely liberate women because the marketplace, as we're so crass to describe it, would clear itself without significant distribution issues if women didn't have to worry about sexual assault and had access to reproductive health care from places like Planned Parenthood."

Just increase hypergamy theory

 

[Insalsa]

"here the sex market, would be to completely liberate women because the marketplace, as we're so crass to describe it, would clear itself without significant distribution issues if women didn't have to worry about sexual assault and had access to reproductive health care from places like Planned Parenthood."

Just increase hypergamy theory

Yeah, we should solve poverty by imposing pure capitalism.this way, it would solve itself if companies didn't have to worry about taxes.

Just let the poor starve to death theory

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Yeah all the men in the 1950s just LOVED to beat the shit out of their wives.
Yes men in the 1950s wanted women to be stay at home moms to "keep them down" and not for great child raising.

Put this cunt in the Hoe Bag.

Retarded women literally protested and campaigned to work more JFL Im out here trying to work less.

 

[Mahlo]

Mmm, idk man, this seems pretty blackpilled to me

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Just let the poor starve to death theory

Perfect example of womens mentality when it comes to incels.

 

[oldcel75]

And why "white men"? This bitch will never write "angry black men" because it's raaaacist.

 

[meat]

white women where treated great back 100 years ago
if someone raped the blonde some fucker gets lynched, whats better than that, votes?

 

[Deleted member 5861]

white women where treated great back 100 years ago
if someone raped the blonde some fucker gets lynched, whats better than that, votes?

preventing them from cheating on their husband is miss soggy knees

 

[acnescarcel]

why should white men care what you annoying tramps want, just like you don't care what we want? why would it be in our interest to improve your life and not our own? JFL. far as i can see women have given very little since their liberation, besides more bitching.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

far as i can see women have given very little since their liberation, besides more bitching.

this is signature-tier quality post.

 

[not_here_4_points]

It's so amusing reading feminist theorists' imaginations of good ideas. So fucking redpilling. They can sound so smart yet have no sense.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

It's so amusing reading feminist theorists' imaginations of good ideas. So fucking redpilling. They can sound so smart yet have no sense.

"philosophical benefits of liberating women"
that is pretentiousness to the scale I have never seen before. JFL she doesn't even know what philosophy is
"completely liberating women would fix the distribution issues"
why would a woman go after this when she can just share chad with another foid?

Its not like feminism was ever logical to begin with, anyways.

 

[DonkeyPunch]

"Muh JBW!!!!"