To be frank, rape might be theoretically 'bad' if it involves a weak-willed individual who cannot control his lust and throws himself at a random whore then cries about 'losing his way' and become unable to face the consequences. However, if the individual is determined to commit the raping out of asserting his will and getting what he thinks he deserves instead of mere bodily lust, and is very well aware of the potential consequences then he is not to be held morally accountable outside of the slave/bluepill morality. The first instance is some low IQ degenerate blinded by his sensual desire, whereas the latter is an expression of self-assertion and opposition to hypergamy/tyranny and all things depraved.
Also, shoutout to the enlightened users @AlexDelarge and @blackpillednigga for excellently pointing out how with men having higher sex drive than whores on average and with the prevalence of female hypergame it's only natural for rape to be an option, if not the basic standard, for willful low SMV males.
I also feel obliged to share a sublime quote of Max Stirner that seems kinda relevant to my premise and inceldom in general:
"Property, therefore, should not and cannot be abolished; it must rather be torn from ghostly hands and become my property; then the erroneous consciousness, that I cannot entitle myself to as much as I require, will vanish."
Also, shoutout to the enlightened users @AlexDelarge and @blackpillednigga for excellently pointing out how with men having higher sex drive than whores on average and with the prevalence of female hypergame it's only natural for rape to be an option, if not the basic standard, for willful low SMV males.
I also feel obliged to share a sublime quote of Max Stirner that seems kinda relevant to my premise and inceldom in general:
"Property, therefore, should not and cannot be abolished; it must rather be torn from ghostly hands and become my property; then the erroneous consciousness, that I cannot entitle myself to as much as I require, will vanish."
