four1298
pro-immigration activist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Posts
- 1,983
- Online time
- 2d 12h
At the outset, I will say rape is BAD. Never commit rape.
When a seed from a plant falls on the soil, the tree nor seed asked for permission from the soil to grow inside of it.
Seeds actually already contain embryos, so a better analogy is that bees, the pollinators, don't ask for permission to pollinate and create a seed. Plants are based.
All the plants are therefore a product of rape. Yet nobody pities the plants that were pollinated.
There's even a Wikipedia page on rape in the animal kingdom:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_coercion_among_animals
Wikipedia is surprisingly based. It makes a list of benefits of rape.
When a seed from a plant falls on the soil, the tree nor seed asked for permission from the soil to grow inside of it.
Seeds actually already contain embryos, so a better analogy is that bees, the pollinators, don't ask for permission to pollinate and create a seed. Plants are based.
All the plants are therefore a product of rape. Yet nobody pities the plants that were pollinated.
There's even a Wikipedia page on rape in the animal kingdom:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_coercion_among_animals
Wikipedia is surprisingly based. It makes a list of benefits of rape.
Proximate
A possible proximate benefit for females is that sometimes after a male mates with a female, he becomes her mate. Then, he would defend and protect her. This is seen in many primate species.
Ultimate
A possible benefit of sexual coercion that would come out in the long run is the “good genes” hypothesis. If males can overcome a female's resistance, then they must possess good genes that would increase the survival or mating success of male offspring. The hypothesis is that females can use the sexual coercion process to assess the quality of a male.
Last edited:





