Why do MENA always seem to want to assert proximity to South-Europe/Meds?
I've never seen Asiatics do the same with Russians/Slavs/Finns.
I've never seen Asiatics do the same with Russians/Slavs/Finns.
yes al-andalus is very fetishized by muzzies
Didn't know andalusians had independentist ambitions
Free Al Andalus from spanshitanis
You will nevER have it back though: Not only is the population there genetically & phenotypically distinct, but they also are extremely nationalistic as well & probably very anti-immigrant.
Based Spainards brutally kicked the bloody degenerate subhumans Sandniggers in Crusade in Sandniggers occupied part of Spain
A
Everyone on this godforsaken penensula has independentist ambitions
Based Spaniard Meds kicked out Sandmonkeys: I'm not a fan of Christianity, but ofc Islam would have meant subjugation to external influences.
They also had a based Third Position movement, the Falange
I've heard about the Basques as well, kind of reminds me of the IRA
A
Catalans too and to a lesser extent the Galicians but those don't have the same nasty reputation as the Basque sepratists
Correct: I also read many Spaniards fled into the mountains & South France, but returned after the Reconquista.
Somewhat, but you could say the same for Russia & Mongol/Tatar influence.
Christianity is cringe, but it's better for them to utilize it to uphold a European identity.
spaniards are some less nationalistic people in the world
@thespanishcel my bro can say more about this and al andalus
In the geographic sense, yes, but not the racial sense.
btw what do you think of baskid phenotype ?
I think it looks nice on foids tbh.
What I was getting at, is that since these guys are Nationalistic about their region enough to not want to associate with other Iberians, than why would they be fine with people who are genetically, culturally, linguistically, religiously, phenotypically etc. different?
Yeah I heard the Basques were quite extreme, hence why I also mentioned the IRA(who were based tbh)
I heard Catalonia tried to secede a few years back, but that didn't work out: Galicians also are Celts I think, or have Celtic ancestry.
Nah, that didn't occur heavily contrary to what many think: In fact, from what I've heard, the Arabs/North Africans were a minority there, with most being converts, and with mixed-blood being removed after they got expelled.
Nah it still was a Barrier.
The Mediterranean Sea as a barrier to gene flow: evidence from variation in and around the F7 and F12 genomic regions - BMC Ecology and Evolution
Background The Mediterranean has a long history of interactions among different peoples. In this study, we investigate the genetic relationships among thirteen population samples from the broader Mediterranean region together with three other groups from the Ivory Coast and Bolivia with a...
bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com
They're an intermediary, they have some South European genetic components, but they also have a lot of standard MENA aspects(Natufian) as well as some Sub-Saharan: However, it does make sense they would want to identify with South Europeans more as opposed to Sub-Saharans.
Last edited:
Yeah they are somewhat mixed with them I think: Sub-Saharan gene-flow into Europe has been virtually non-existent, but North Africans do share a decent amount of affinity towards it.
I read another article once showing Sub-Saharan gene-flow into N. Africa only occurred within the last 1,500 years or so.
Most genetic composites show South Europeans have some affinity to the Levant & Caucus mountains, but they are mostly ANF/EEF genetically(found in all of Europe, but dominant in the South).
Last edited:
True.
I just enjoy the meme.
You need to study a little. Spain did not exist at that time and neither did anything called "Spanish" except for that colonial concept used by the Romans to call "Hispania". The natives were conquered by Romans, then conquered by Germans, and then conquered by Arabs.
Spain, for practical purposes, has always been a bitch of empires until they had the opportunity to form their own for greater competition with the Anglo-Saxon world.
Yeah both acted as barries, especially the Med Sea.
As for the Sub-Saharan blood, as I stated, it is fairly recent: I think some of it is to do with the slave-trade Arabs ran, and they were far more likely to engage in miscegenation with their Slaves as opposed to what Whites did. In fact, I think some passage from the Koran is literally about a black slave being freed & mixing with Arabs.
Correct, but this goes back thousands of years; same for Asiatic blood in Slavs & Finns/Baltics.
As I've stated many times, I have no problem with Ethnics provided they are not in White/European countries.
Fair enough, and plus from a geographical perspective you technically are Med.
I also like Nasheeds, though I'm not Islamic.
Correct, you know your European history.
Kek true, they also like to brag about how they had de-facto control over many parts of Italy:
Council of Italy - Wikipedia
When Rome ruled over them for centuries.
Spain did have a somewhat successful run at Empire-building though.
most don't unless you talk about some phenotypes who are transistional
unless you talk about KANGZ bragging about moors and ancient egypt being KANG
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
