Racism

[Akarin]

 

[nausea]

elaborate?

 

[Deleted member 1546]

elaborate?

The picture pretty much says it all. If we incels recognize a hierarchy based on looks amongst men due to genetics, we can do the same based on race. Sub Saharans and Australian Aboriginals are clearly at the bottom.

 

[nausea]

elaborate?

The picture pretty much says it all.

so you claim...

 

[uglylifematters]

elaborate?

probably because of my post I. don't know if you've seen it buts its worth a look

 

[shukin]

I used to dislike blacks until there was a black girl in science class who were very nice to me.

 

[nausea]

elaborate?

probably because of my post I. don't know if you've seen it buts its worth a look

where to look for it?

 

[uglylifematters]

elaborate?

probably because of my post I. don't know if you've seen it buts its worth a look

where to look for it?

https://incels.is/Thread-Serious-to-my-fellow-blackcels-on-this-sub-not-really-just-for-black-lol 
here you go. brace yourself

 

[Deleted member 1546]

so you claim...

The idea the races can live in harmony is a myth. The only way its possible is in a police state like Yugoslavia or the USSR. Both were every multiethnic nations made of constituent republics with ethnic minorities and and large Christian and Muslim communities. There were close to 200 languid in the USSR. What happened when the communist police state apparatus collapsed? Ethnic violence and political decay along national boundaries. 

What about post colonial Africa? constant inter ethnic violence. Rwanda, The Congo, Somalia, Sudan, Zimbabwe, South Africa . . . When India gained independence it had to be divided into there nations do to religious violence. Why is Japan so stable? Nations need to have a relatively uniform ethic and religious composition. It won't be long before Mexicans try forcibly annexing the south west United States.

 

[nausea]

elaborate?

probably because of my post I. don't know if you've seen it buts its worth a look

where to look for it?

https://incels.is/Thread-Serious-to-my-fellow-blackcels-on-this-sub-not-really-just-for-black-lol
here you go. brace yourself

I still fail to see the correlation with the picture in the OP

---

The idea the races can live in harmony is a myth. The only way its possible is in a police state like Yugoslavia or the USSR. Both were every multiethnic nations made of constituent republics with ethnic minorities and and large Christian and Muslim communities. There were close to 200 languid in the USSR. What happened when the communist police state apparatus collapsed? Ethnic violence and political decay along national boundaries. 

What about post colonial Africa? constant inter ethnic violence. Rwanda, The Congo, Somalia, Sudan, Zimbabwe, South Africa . . . When India gained independence it had to be divided into there nations do to religious violence. Why is Japan so stable? Nations need to have a relatively uniform ethic and religious composition. It won't be long before Mexicans try forcibly annexing the south west United States.

nono, I was referring to the picture OP has posted here

 

[Akarin]

elaborate?

I'm saying that equality is an artificial social construct. Women are not equal to men, blacks are not equal to whites.

 

[nausea]

elaborate?

I'm saying that equality is an artificial social construct. Women are not equal to men, blacks are not equal to whites.

you got the evolution thing all wrong

 

[NeverSubmit]

Is that Kate Upton in the pic? Also you are saying Negros are like Wolves and Whites are like dogs?

 

[Deleted member 1546]

nono, I was referring to the picture OP has posted here

The picture is making fun of the false belief that "we are all humans and therefore equal". We can have subspecies of lions or birds, but not people? 

[img=914x458]https://i.warosu.org/data/sci/img/0065/57/1401175209852.png[/img]

[img=916x1478]http://i.imgur.com/sxUAD.jpg[/img]

[img=500x454]https://pics.me.me/identifiably-different-subspecies-closely-related-and-capable-of-interbreeding-effectively-4480817.png[/img]

 

[nausea]

The picture is making fun of the false belief that "we are all humans and therefore equal". We can have subspecies of lions or birds, but not people? 

[img=914x458]https://i.warosu.org/data/sci/img/0065/57/1401175209852.png[/img]

[img=916x1478]http://i.imgur.com/sxUAD.jpg[/img]

[img=500x454]https://pics.me.me/identifiably-different-subspecies-closely-related-and-capable-of-interbreeding-effectively-4480817.png[/img]

thx for the explanation

but why do you mix races with species?

also why OP confuses dogs with wolves?

 

[Akarin]

thx for the explanation

but why do you mix races with species?

also why OP confuses dogs with wolves?

Because blacks are more like diffierent species. They stopped evolving at some point.

 

[nausea]

Because blacks are more like diffierent species. They stopped evolving at some point.

 

[rickvanderhammer]

racism is a cope the only the thing that matters is your face

 

[Its_OVER]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/

 

[subsaharan]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/

Hm

[font=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]Abstract[/font]

Races may exist in humans in a cultural sense, but biological concepts of race are needed to access their reality in a non-species-specific manner and to see if cultural categories correspond to biological categories within humans. Modern biological concepts of race can be implemented objectively with molecular genetic data through hypothesis-testing. Genetic data sets are used to see if biological races exist in humans and in our closest evolutionary relative, the chimpanzee. Using the two most commonly used biological concepts of race, chimpanzees are indeed subdivided into races but humans are not. Adaptive traits, such as skin color, have frequently been used to define races in humans, but such adaptive traits reflect the underlying environmental factor to which they are adaptive and not overall genetic differentiation, and different adaptive traits define discordant groups. There are no objective criteria for choosing one adaptive trait over another to define race. As a consequence, adaptive traits do not define races in humans. Much of the recent scientific literature on human evolution portrays human populations as separate branches on an evolutionary tree. A tree-like structure among humans has been falsified whenever tested, so this practice is scientifically indefensible. It is also socially irresponsible as these pictorial representations of human evolution have more impact on the general public than nuanced phrases in the text of a scientific paper. Humans have much genetic diversity, but the vast majority of this diversity reflects individual uniqueness and not race.

intredasting

bookmarked for later reading. 

I wonder if the White Nationalist shitBible website,  The (still rejected) Alt Hypothesis, has attempted to failcritique this paper yet

 

[Melinda]

 

[avsky1]

true

 

[Akarin]

This, they think that they actually were fucking faraons kek. Egyptians might had dark skin but they facial features were much closer to white people. The niggerblacks were nothing but slaves in Egypt.

 

[Melinda]

This, they think that they actually were fucking faraons kek. Egyptians might had dark skin but they facial features were much closer to white people. The niggerblacks were nothing but slaves in Egypt.

WE WUZ KANGZ N SHIET

 

[Its_OVER]

Hm

[/size][/color]

intredasting

bookmarked for later reading. 

I wonder if the White Nationalist shitBible website,  The (still rejected) Alt Hypothesis, has attempted to failcritique this paper yet

The master race will just label it fake science funded by Soros.

 

[lostcel]

racism is a cope for incels and cucks. just lmao if u think chad has ever thought about his skin colour while he fucks whites, latinas and black bootys while bumpin BBC rap music in his car. stop this coping bullshit. if uve ever gave a shit about ur race as a white guy its already over for you.

 

[disposableman]

alt right is cope. face>everything.