1. Nordics
2. German French British
3. Spanish Italians Japanese, SE/ SW Russians
4. NE Chinese
5. Indigenous American mixed with European
6. North Africans Normal American indigenous Turkey Normal Chinese Koreans Latinos
7. SEA region Pacific Islanders Vietnamese,
8. Middle Eastern Pakistanian Nigerians Indians
9. Ethiopians, Southern Australian indigenous tribes
10. Everyone else
This tier list is mainly about genetic potential in regards to intellectual ability. It is not really about looks although that may be a sign of good decision making: being able to discern and reproduce with good looking people who tend to be healthier, smarter.
Part of what is causing the intellectual growth of the Europeans is the massive farmland they have. This fertile farmland, with a fairly long 6-7 month growing season is why there is a more long-term thinking type of idea in regards to how the Europeans strategize and plan their existence. The Europeans will build communities around farms and defend them from other attackers, but additionaly the farm land is abundant enough such that warfare is discouraged. Unlike in Africa where the farmland is concentrated in Nigeria and Ethiopia, the farmland can sustain everyone if they work together.
Thus, the early Europeans developed collective security agreements and social awareness in regards to geography and other regional powers. Their warfare became much more group orientated, which made ambushes less severe due to the sheer abundance of scouts and warnings. These farming communities if they did go to war, would have much more strategy involved and less brute force, as the wars would take place in encampments reinforced over years, and with populations that are much harder to control and fight with.
As a result, the Europeans learned to better equip massive amounts of units and dedicate various people to certain tasks of higher difficulty in order to defeat the other tribes. But, there were also long periods of peace, as the attacking army always had a disadvantage for the most part being against severe walls, poor logistics and the such. Winning would only be possible with massive technological progress or sheer manpower in alliances or farming superiority.
So, the Europeans had better farmland that encouraged long term geopolitical involvement and scientific defensive wars.
The Nordic peoples do not have much farmland, but they possess high access to fishing which is likely even better than farming because now you have the advent of sailing technology. They also have much better houses for insulation against colder winters, and as a result, criminals are less able to survive once forced out of communities.
Second of all, the inbreeding was very low due to larger freedom of movement within the territory. Unlike India, which is severely shoehorned in at the southern tip and surrounded by mountains, Europe has lots of available space to move around in to the eastern edges or to Spain.
An exception to inbreeding normals is Japan, which devised a system to avoid inbreeding Koseki sometime in 6th century AD.
Another reason for European superiority is their lack of extremely dangerous predators which encourage extreme short term brain thinking ability. Lions, for example, have been to known to kill hundreds of people in encampments through stealth. They cannot really be countered that easily in defensive fortifications. So, the optimal solution is to hunt them down in groups preemptively which requires extremely strong twitch muscle fibres to react against a lion's movements. This involves short term thinking and is why Africans likely may have underdeveloped prefrontal cortex. https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
It is seen that the average cranial capacity (blacks: 1267 cc, 13,185 million neurons; whites: 1347 cc, 13,665 million neurons, and Asians: 1,364, 13,767 million neurons) is in line with some theories here. The above study describes the lower neuron count in blacks and likely, that is mainly caused by the preference for muscular ability to protect from lions, rhinos, hippos, tigers, leopards, and jaguars.
In comparison, the only threats to Europeans are brown bears, gray wolves, sharks and poisonous small creatures. The first two can be defeated with a larger size plus some weapons and are not very aggressive. Other threats are weak to boats and sanitation. That leaves humans, but most human sneak attacks cannot be guarded against with reaction speed due to equipment advantages and position encirclements. Avoiding ambushes is vastly superior to reacting well.
As a result, the Europeans were able to evolve more long term thinking processes, further enhancing their modern scholarly advantages. In addition to the aforementioned mental advantages, their bone structures are built for long distance scouting and archery due to the nature of their wars: often sieges and defensive walls plus scouting. This means, that the average European most likely has extremely good vision to begin with, on the edges of far sightedness which gives them an advantage when doing close range work in the modern era which usually causes near-sightedness. Lastly, the eye socket of a European is extremely structurally resistant to gravitational aging, due to its shape being short and wide. Whereas, gravity usually causes the eye socket to become longer height-wise, causing a more circular eye socket.
Next, the Chinese empire was weakened during the Warring states period. They killed all of the strong men and only the weak undrafted men remained to breed. Beyond that, most of the farmland is concentrated in the north eastern region, causing thievery against those in possession of it. As a result,, most Chinese are physically weaker and prone to theft. The Chinese that had farms likely did not exist in vast enough numbers, nor had to challenge particularly organized enemies thus became mediocrely developed. But, in all likelihood, the physical weakness of most Chinese caused their brains to develop. But, the severe defects in their genetics still cause massive inefficiencies in their population regarding sustainable working ability. After that, they have no real threats beyond tigers, which were mainly in the southern regions. and snakes.
The Japanese largely avoided the warring states genetic slaughter of healthy men, and were able to progress beyond the mainlanders. Their farmland and fishing abilities allowed them to have a relatively peaceful existence with collective wars similar to European wars. However, the sheer lack of numbers caused Japan to be unable to reach the power of the European natural selection machine. Early inbreeding may also have been a problem, but severely weak in-breds likely died out within the last 1000 years. Another problem is the immigration from China and their social isolation which likely exasperated technological starvation in their culture.
Next, the American Indigenous peoples lived in jungles or were land locked in centra America. Jungles are inherently places of extreme reaction speed, not really long term thinking. They are harder to clear than forests. Then, these people lacked the numbers and social communities to achieve much in natural selection and scientific warfare. And, may be in bred as a result. The number of humans coming from Africa over the temporary bridge would have been the only genetic baseline of these people. After the European takeover, the respective motherlands combined genes to produce the superior mixed races who likely possess better neuron counts and physical traits.
Factoring in the middle East's lack of fishing, agriculture, and inbreeding, the only thing that saves them are European genes from slave trades and a decent land base from which some decent people may have passed on genes of value due to sheer numbers.
2. German French British
3. Spanish Italians Japanese, SE/ SW Russians
4. NE Chinese
5. Indigenous American mixed with European
6. North Africans Normal American indigenous Turkey Normal Chinese Koreans Latinos
7. SEA region Pacific Islanders Vietnamese,
8. Middle Eastern Pakistanian Nigerians Indians
9. Ethiopians, Southern Australian indigenous tribes
10. Everyone else
This tier list is mainly about genetic potential in regards to intellectual ability. It is not really about looks although that may be a sign of good decision making: being able to discern and reproduce with good looking people who tend to be healthier, smarter.
Part of what is causing the intellectual growth of the Europeans is the massive farmland they have. This fertile farmland, with a fairly long 6-7 month growing season is why there is a more long-term thinking type of idea in regards to how the Europeans strategize and plan their existence. The Europeans will build communities around farms and defend them from other attackers, but additionaly the farm land is abundant enough such that warfare is discouraged. Unlike in Africa where the farmland is concentrated in Nigeria and Ethiopia, the farmland can sustain everyone if they work together.
Thus, the early Europeans developed collective security agreements and social awareness in regards to geography and other regional powers. Their warfare became much more group orientated, which made ambushes less severe due to the sheer abundance of scouts and warnings. These farming communities if they did go to war, would have much more strategy involved and less brute force, as the wars would take place in encampments reinforced over years, and with populations that are much harder to control and fight with.
As a result, the Europeans learned to better equip massive amounts of units and dedicate various people to certain tasks of higher difficulty in order to defeat the other tribes. But, there were also long periods of peace, as the attacking army always had a disadvantage for the most part being against severe walls, poor logistics and the such. Winning would only be possible with massive technological progress or sheer manpower in alliances or farming superiority.
So, the Europeans had better farmland that encouraged long term geopolitical involvement and scientific defensive wars.
The Nordic peoples do not have much farmland, but they possess high access to fishing which is likely even better than farming because now you have the advent of sailing technology. They also have much better houses for insulation against colder winters, and as a result, criminals are less able to survive once forced out of communities.
Second of all, the inbreeding was very low due to larger freedom of movement within the territory. Unlike India, which is severely shoehorned in at the southern tip and surrounded by mountains, Europe has lots of available space to move around in to the eastern edges or to Spain.
An exception to inbreeding normals is Japan, which devised a system to avoid inbreeding Koseki sometime in 6th century AD.
Another reason for European superiority is their lack of extremely dangerous predators which encourage extreme short term brain thinking ability. Lions, for example, have been to known to kill hundreds of people in encampments through stealth. They cannot really be countered that easily in defensive fortifications. So, the optimal solution is to hunt them down in groups preemptively which requires extremely strong twitch muscle fibres to react against a lion's movements. This involves short term thinking and is why Africans likely may have underdeveloped prefrontal cortex. https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
It is seen that the average cranial capacity (blacks: 1267 cc, 13,185 million neurons; whites: 1347 cc, 13,665 million neurons, and Asians: 1,364, 13,767 million neurons) is in line with some theories here. The above study describes the lower neuron count in blacks and likely, that is mainly caused by the preference for muscular ability to protect from lions, rhinos, hippos, tigers, leopards, and jaguars.
In comparison, the only threats to Europeans are brown bears, gray wolves, sharks and poisonous small creatures. The first two can be defeated with a larger size plus some weapons and are not very aggressive. Other threats are weak to boats and sanitation. That leaves humans, but most human sneak attacks cannot be guarded against with reaction speed due to equipment advantages and position encirclements. Avoiding ambushes is vastly superior to reacting well.
As a result, the Europeans were able to evolve more long term thinking processes, further enhancing their modern scholarly advantages. In addition to the aforementioned mental advantages, their bone structures are built for long distance scouting and archery due to the nature of their wars: often sieges and defensive walls plus scouting. This means, that the average European most likely has extremely good vision to begin with, on the edges of far sightedness which gives them an advantage when doing close range work in the modern era which usually causes near-sightedness. Lastly, the eye socket of a European is extremely structurally resistant to gravitational aging, due to its shape being short and wide. Whereas, gravity usually causes the eye socket to become longer height-wise, causing a more circular eye socket.
Next, the Chinese empire was weakened during the Warring states period. They killed all of the strong men and only the weak undrafted men remained to breed. Beyond that, most of the farmland is concentrated in the north eastern region, causing thievery against those in possession of it. As a result,, most Chinese are physically weaker and prone to theft. The Chinese that had farms likely did not exist in vast enough numbers, nor had to challenge particularly organized enemies thus became mediocrely developed. But, in all likelihood, the physical weakness of most Chinese caused their brains to develop. But, the severe defects in their genetics still cause massive inefficiencies in their population regarding sustainable working ability. After that, they have no real threats beyond tigers, which were mainly in the southern regions. and snakes.
The Japanese largely avoided the warring states genetic slaughter of healthy men, and were able to progress beyond the mainlanders. Their farmland and fishing abilities allowed them to have a relatively peaceful existence with collective wars similar to European wars. However, the sheer lack of numbers caused Japan to be unable to reach the power of the European natural selection machine. Early inbreeding may also have been a problem, but severely weak in-breds likely died out within the last 1000 years. Another problem is the immigration from China and their social isolation which likely exasperated technological starvation in their culture.
Next, the American Indigenous peoples lived in jungles or were land locked in centra America. Jungles are inherently places of extreme reaction speed, not really long term thinking. They are harder to clear than forests. Then, these people lacked the numbers and social communities to achieve much in natural selection and scientific warfare. And, may be in bred as a result. The number of humans coming from Africa over the temporary bridge would have been the only genetic baseline of these people. After the European takeover, the respective motherlands combined genes to produce the superior mixed races who likely possess better neuron counts and physical traits.
Factoring in the middle East's lack of fishing, agriculture, and inbreeding, the only thing that saves them are European genes from slave trades and a decent land base from which some decent people may have passed on genes of value due to sheer numbers.
Last edited:
