On this site, we often deconstruct societal narratives. The black-pill is centered on such notions regarding lookism and dating. The current societal narrative regarding race is that it doesn't exist and that there's only a singular human race. Anyone with a pair of eyeballs and a functioning brain, however, can tell that race does indeed exist. I see races as subspecies (there's room for debate on this). We're all Homosaipen but to varying degrees when you take ancient species and their remnants into account. You can find Neanderthal DNA in whites and Asians, and Denisovan DNA in Southeast Asians and Pacific Islanders, and ghost DNA (some theorize Homo-Erectus) in West African populations. The aforementioned ghost DNA is not found in other human populations and can be upwards of 20ish percent of a black person's DNA. Overall, modern human populations are genetically diverse and distinct from one another. We'll get into how exactly later.
How did modern humans come to be? Science says the Theory of Evolution. We share a common ancestor with other primate species, and our closest living relatives today are Chimpanzees and Bonobos. How did modern humans develop and spread across the Earth? The current narrative is what's known as the "out of Africa" hypothesis, which I'm sure you've heard. This is where Soyentists like Richard Dawkins get the "we are all Africans" idea from. There is credible evidence to counter "out of Africa". There are numerous hominid fossils found in Europe that challenge the commonly accepted dates of migrations out of Africa. What's most likely is that it occurred in waves, but not only that, there were also remigrations back into Africa.
Human beings were shaped by evolutionary pressure. This seems obvious, but most don't truly understand to what extent and what it implies. This is where understanding ecology becomes critical. Human beings did not have access to refrigerators, houses with heating, and grocery stores until very recently. Seems obvious, but people again don't understand the implications. Human beings were shaped by a combination of natural and sexual selection for millions of years. It's important to note that natural selection (environmental factors) doesn't always equate to sexual selection. They're highly interconnected but not one-to-one.
Reproduction is fundamental to human societies and cultures, and it's important to understand how reproductive strategies shape behavior and outcomes. "r/K selection theory is a biological concept that describes two different reproductive strategies organisms use to maximize their reproductive success based on environmental conditions. The 'r' strategy focuses on producing a large number of offspring with minimal parental care, suitable for unstable environments, while the 'k' strategy involves fewer offspring with significant investment in their upbringing, ideal for stable environments." The male reproductive strategy across the species is to copulate with as many different females as possible. For females, it's to copulate with the male with the best genes and pass them on, preferably with resources from him, and if that fails, a betabuxx cuckold.
What evolutionary pressures shaped Africans? What was their ecology like? Africa is a large continent with a variety of different ecologies and groups. There's a difference between West African, East African, and South African groups. Let's start with West Africans, whom we're most familiar with in the English-speaking world. West Africans feature the aforementioned ghost DNA and have achieved the least out of all human groups. This is the result of their societal structures, which were shaped by their ecology. A big myth we need to tackle right away is that surviving in Africa is difficult; this is not the case. West Africa is not a Savanna; there are no Lions. There is no winter, and fruits grow year-round in abundance. The biggest conscious channel for these people was competing for mates, not surviving. Disease prompted a live fast, die young mentality to encourage groups to proliferate as much as possible in case a population gets wiped out. This had tremendous effects. West African societies weren't patriarchal, as females could survive on their own, as they could easily gather fruit. Power was held through female alliances, kinship, and sexual manipulation. Due to easy access to resources without males, females were able to be very hypergamous, and this is why Africans have very pronounced secondary sexual characteristics. West African society was inherently gynocentric. Males had to compete within this framework, so they had to evolve peacocking behaviors. If you've ever spent time around blacks, they make their presence known. In return, females had to evolve a rude temperament to fight off competitors and unwanted male advances. Everything about blacks is hypersexualized because they evolved in a sexual arms race. Twerking behavior is unique to them, voluptuous dancing, etc. Females have big breasts, curvy bodies, long and large amounts of hair, etc. Males have high muscularity, taller heights, and big dicks. Blacks also noticeably smell. Why is that? Because it's to signal genetic fitness. In this ecology, it's all about living fast and dying young, spreading your genes as much as possible as quickly as you can. It's quantity over quality when it comes to offspring, and there's much less investment put into them, and fathers are rarely involved. Black babies learn to walk much quicker than white babies, for example. Blacks are more suited for having doggystyle sex as their penises hang downwards more. This indicates that bonding with sexual partners isn't prioritized. Why are blacks so primitive, violent, sexual, and dumb compared to other races? Genetics, not "daaa wyte man" or slavery. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I'm sure you can get the point.
What about other African groups? East and South African groups have a different ecology; these people live in different biomes where they tend to be hunter-gatherers or farmers. Ethiopia had quite early contact with the outside world, a lot sooner, so it developed to a much larger extent. Hunter-Gatherer tribes have to be fast to engage in persistence hunting, so they evolved height. They're largely patriarchal, as most hunter-gatherer groups are. Your tall, skinny African comes from these hunter-gatherer groups. There were also many migrations within Africa; Bantu peoples migrated south and essentially genocided native southern Africans (Khoisan people). Here are some interesting facts about the region https://www.africanbudgetsafaris.com/blog/south-africa-people-culture-the-khoisan-people/. Why didn't Africans develop or invent anything? It's simple; they didn't need to. Europeans and Asians were shaped by surviving winters (a large selective pressure was put on the brain). This impacted culture, they needed to large how to preserve food and plan for the winter. Africans never had to. That's the fundamental reason why the closer to the equator you are, the dumber the people are, and therefore the less developed. West Africans also weren't monogamous. Monogamy is the cornerstone of any civilization. Civilization is a bunch of people coming together to survive the winter; where there's no winter, there's no civilization.
I could get into Asians and whites, but there's not much to say. Asians are generally smarter on average, but are more socially minded, meaning there's a shame culture, so people are less willing to break societal conventions. It has to do with rice farming when it comes to Asians. "Research suggests that the cooperative nature of rice farming, which requires significant communal effort and coordination, has contributed to the development of more collectivist and interdependent cultural values in regions where rice is traditionally grown, such as southern China, Japan, and Korea". It's for this reason that Asia was less Faustian than Europe and that Asia didn't invent or adopt Liberal values as widely. Think of race like a pole. East Asians are the most civilized and intelligent, whites are in the middle, and blacks are the closest to our other primate relatives.
How did modern humans come to be? Science says the Theory of Evolution. We share a common ancestor with other primate species, and our closest living relatives today are Chimpanzees and Bonobos. How did modern humans develop and spread across the Earth? The current narrative is what's known as the "out of Africa" hypothesis, which I'm sure you've heard. This is where Soyentists like Richard Dawkins get the "we are all Africans" idea from. There is credible evidence to counter "out of Africa". There are numerous hominid fossils found in Europe that challenge the commonly accepted dates of migrations out of Africa. What's most likely is that it occurred in waves, but not only that, there were also remigrations back into Africa.
Human beings were shaped by evolutionary pressure. This seems obvious, but most don't truly understand to what extent and what it implies. This is where understanding ecology becomes critical. Human beings did not have access to refrigerators, houses with heating, and grocery stores until very recently. Seems obvious, but people again don't understand the implications. Human beings were shaped by a combination of natural and sexual selection for millions of years. It's important to note that natural selection (environmental factors) doesn't always equate to sexual selection. They're highly interconnected but not one-to-one.
Reproduction is fundamental to human societies and cultures, and it's important to understand how reproductive strategies shape behavior and outcomes. "r/K selection theory is a biological concept that describes two different reproductive strategies organisms use to maximize their reproductive success based on environmental conditions. The 'r' strategy focuses on producing a large number of offspring with minimal parental care, suitable for unstable environments, while the 'k' strategy involves fewer offspring with significant investment in their upbringing, ideal for stable environments." The male reproductive strategy across the species is to copulate with as many different females as possible. For females, it's to copulate with the male with the best genes and pass them on, preferably with resources from him, and if that fails, a betabuxx cuckold.
What evolutionary pressures shaped Africans? What was their ecology like? Africa is a large continent with a variety of different ecologies and groups. There's a difference between West African, East African, and South African groups. Let's start with West Africans, whom we're most familiar with in the English-speaking world. West Africans feature the aforementioned ghost DNA and have achieved the least out of all human groups. This is the result of their societal structures, which were shaped by their ecology. A big myth we need to tackle right away is that surviving in Africa is difficult; this is not the case. West Africa is not a Savanna; there are no Lions. There is no winter, and fruits grow year-round in abundance. The biggest conscious channel for these people was competing for mates, not surviving. Disease prompted a live fast, die young mentality to encourage groups to proliferate as much as possible in case a population gets wiped out. This had tremendous effects. West African societies weren't patriarchal, as females could survive on their own, as they could easily gather fruit. Power was held through female alliances, kinship, and sexual manipulation. Due to easy access to resources without males, females were able to be very hypergamous, and this is why Africans have very pronounced secondary sexual characteristics. West African society was inherently gynocentric. Males had to compete within this framework, so they had to evolve peacocking behaviors. If you've ever spent time around blacks, they make their presence known. In return, females had to evolve a rude temperament to fight off competitors and unwanted male advances. Everything about blacks is hypersexualized because they evolved in a sexual arms race. Twerking behavior is unique to them, voluptuous dancing, etc. Females have big breasts, curvy bodies, long and large amounts of hair, etc. Males have high muscularity, taller heights, and big dicks. Blacks also noticeably smell. Why is that? Because it's to signal genetic fitness. In this ecology, it's all about living fast and dying young, spreading your genes as much as possible as quickly as you can. It's quantity over quality when it comes to offspring, and there's much less investment put into them, and fathers are rarely involved. Black babies learn to walk much quicker than white babies, for example. Blacks are more suited for having doggystyle sex as their penises hang downwards more. This indicates that bonding with sexual partners isn't prioritized. Why are blacks so primitive, violent, sexual, and dumb compared to other races? Genetics, not "daaa wyte man" or slavery. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I'm sure you can get the point.
What about other African groups? East and South African groups have a different ecology; these people live in different biomes where they tend to be hunter-gatherers or farmers. Ethiopia had quite early contact with the outside world, a lot sooner, so it developed to a much larger extent. Hunter-Gatherer tribes have to be fast to engage in persistence hunting, so they evolved height. They're largely patriarchal, as most hunter-gatherer groups are. Your tall, skinny African comes from these hunter-gatherer groups. There were also many migrations within Africa; Bantu peoples migrated south and essentially genocided native southern Africans (Khoisan people). Here are some interesting facts about the region https://www.africanbudgetsafaris.com/blog/south-africa-people-culture-the-khoisan-people/. Why didn't Africans develop or invent anything? It's simple; they didn't need to. Europeans and Asians were shaped by surviving winters (a large selective pressure was put on the brain). This impacted culture, they needed to large how to preserve food and plan for the winter. Africans never had to. That's the fundamental reason why the closer to the equator you are, the dumber the people are, and therefore the less developed. West Africans also weren't monogamous. Monogamy is the cornerstone of any civilization. Civilization is a bunch of people coming together to survive the winter; where there's no winter, there's no civilization.
I could get into Asians and whites, but there's not much to say. Asians are generally smarter on average, but are more socially minded, meaning there's a shame culture, so people are less willing to break societal conventions. It has to do with rice farming when it comes to Asians. "Research suggests that the cooperative nature of rice farming, which requires significant communal effort and coordination, has contributed to the development of more collectivist and interdependent cultural values in regions where rice is traditionally grown, such as southern China, Japan, and Korea". It's for this reason that Asia was less Faustian than Europe and that Asia didn't invent or adopt Liberal values as widely. Think of race like a pole. East Asians are the most civilized and intelligent, whites are in the middle, and blacks are the closest to our other primate relatives.
