JFL dude this one line right here, this tiny little phrase proved how illogical you are, so people should agree with things, not based on logic, but based on racial allegiance, you do see the irony of this post in this specific thread right?. You literally just proved my point of how illogical it is. Am I supposed to just agree with and support what other black posters say because "Muh sticking together, pro black, I lub my peepo's". This is the scary reality about accepting even a single blue pilled concept, you seem to be a well spoken person who has some kind of intelligence, but as long as you are being driven by emotion and not logic, as long as you are grasping on to blue pilled concepts, your arguments will always be inherently flawed.
Them being "both White" should have no baring on what they agree with, me being black should have no baring on what I agree with, we should agree on things based on logic, races aren't some kind of monolith (at least that's not what we should be). Your post is exactly why I think all races need to be bred out of existence until were just one race, then idiots can't say BS like - "Hey you're white, you should be agreeing with me".
Not what they
should do, but what they
will do. The issue with this is placing the burden unduly on one side to let go of their racial awareness when it is perfectly in their interests to be racially conscious when faced with hostility. This is related to a major point that I wanted to get across in relating "White nationalist" posting to "JBW" posting. I appreciate your change in tone here and will admit that this is a little bit of a reach, but I set this opposition up so as to make "ethnic" posters aware of their own biases. Something called "Just Be White" is by its very name tendentious, positing a specific worldview, not necessarily based on fact, that incites beggary and loathing. If people can be riled up as an, effectively, "racially"-constituted (non-White is reified as "ethnic", another point I wanted to stress) mob with this position, it then makes sense for White men to pursue
their own interests and start thinking about incapacitating or getting away from non-Whites when many of them are unabashedly demanding and agitated. On another level, it's usually just annoying for deformed, autistic, whatever Whites to have to assuage ethnics by admitting a "privilege" that doesn't exist. If these particular people were privileged, especially in respect to getting female attention, they wouldn't even be posting here in the first place. Most of the time, though, they still put up with it - then
@DeformAspergerCel makes a joke thread about capeshit "punch Nazis" propaganda films and gets inundated with "stormcel stormfag stormdrain" shouting. The particular relationship between these two "copes" is richly informative and hopefully that was explored clearly here.
Now, I don't know whether you were around for the past few days, but I honestly did assume some continuity between your thread and the earlier ones. The past few displays of ethnic resentment have been so thoroughly distasteful that I was pretty much just set to "belittle" mode and was sick of explaining things to people who weren't going to listen. This may well have prevented me from giving your thread a fair consideration.
But still,
1. That's because the white race doesn't need saving, no race does, all need to be bred out of existence.
2. Also because JBW is a fact that keeps getting denied all the time, so people feel the need to keep re-affirming it
When posts like this exist -
https://incels.is/threads/roundup-of-thailand-trip-girls-advice-conversation-screenshots-etc.28034/
and white users are still denying JBW it gets kinda annoying
When basically every poster on this site who has come out as a "larp" or "ascended" is white and white posters still keep denying JBW that gets kinda annoying, it feel like you're dealing with a group that no matter what, will never admit to the reality of JBW, so threads about it are gonna keep popping up.
If posts ever started to reflect a general consensus that JBW is a fact and people stopped denying it, you'd see threads about it stop.
The "elimination of race" is not some kind of panacea for avoiding tribal conflict. You don't think the forced integration of humanity - i.e. what a lot of Western countries are on their way to - is going to be a protracted and violent process? Or do you think the violence will only be limited to foids and Chads? It's going to come down on everyone's head. Personally, I don't care
too much about this. I have no intention of reproducing and only want there to be a place for me to live out the rest of my life undisturbed by window smashing and demanding subalterns. When some White incel advocates for a racially homogeneous society, I would assume he's thinking of more than women, who, notwithstanding, were much better kept in line in states of monogamy and homogeneity.
Further, hierarchy is built into human psychology and structures. Without "race" (itself utopian) you're going to have other distinctions come to the fore, just like you see in the
n-way crisis of intersectionality. "Equality" is a phantom, no matter how much rationalism you force on natural entropy. You could get your prefect transhumanist world of dispersed intelligence and
de novo genomes and some pressure would still favor some unit over another one. Notwithstanding that there's no use living your life as the simple product of engineering, the stated goals of neutering human behavior won't even work.
If you think
denying JBW is annoying, imagine how annoying it is to have people bombard you with it constantly, most of whom have no clear idea of what they mean by it and just repeat it as a provocative buzzword or a worn cope.
If you're Black, some famous cases of "JBW" falling through are:
Tellem--T - hilariously, people still suck this guy's nuts and call him a "racepiller"
PrinceOfCope
blackletcel
"Genecel", in a sense
I think there was another one here I'm forgetting
Whites who "ascended":
"Weed", who "succeeded" once with a drunk obeast
"whogivesafucc", who called himself ethnic because he was Georgian
"FullofHate", who I'm pretty sure never had sex and just bragged about getting a
single Tinder match with a decent-looking foid
3 whom I won't name
For Rices/Curries (can't remember which he was):
KV3
Related to the site itself, Whites aren't exactly coming out in a distant lead
1. I didn't set myself up to argue with them, I created the thread and they came to it, they set themselves up to argue with me.
I'll take you at your word that this is distinct from all the similar threads made recently, but it shouldn't be hard to see how something like this gets misread.
2. "Effectively the only people who talk about race here are ethnicopers who want to load off their personal ugliness and failure onto either biological causality or "discrimination" " - That's a kind of ironic point to make, because aren't all incels doing this, but just swap out ethnicopers with incels, and replace the white race with Chad, all of us are "loading off our personal ugliness and failure onto either biological causality or discrimination". Also there was no need to seperate the two as "either or" because it is the biological causality that causes the discrimination, its one and the same.
I suppose this is an issue of attribution. Obviously problems are either intrinsic or extrinsic and that they interact dialectically across these categories, but I consider there to be a big difference between having a common goal of scorning female selectivity and that of trying to position oneself as the frontrunner of the victim pageant by demanding special recognition for the "unique" problems of ethnics.
You can see that a problem exists fundamentally with whores in that they all scrounge for men better-looking and of higher status than themselves. They
rarely have requirements that you be a specific race and, moreover, any such requirement
never leads to wanting every single person within that race. You cannot logically reconcile the absurd demands of whores with some kind of
Just Be.
...Here's what I'm talking about when I say that the line between "White person standing up for themselves" and "White supremacy" (what a gay meme term, anyone who uses this is 99% certain to be incapable of independent thought) is purposefully obfuscated and that it's easy to get confused about exactly what someone is trying to say. From a poll just made by one of the forum's most notorious ethnicopers:
as far as I know.
