Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Racepill is real

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,862
Yes, it's true that

Being curry isn't the reason you're an incel when there are CHADPREETS
Being rice isn't the reason you're an incel when there are CHANGS
Being Arab isn't the reason you're an incel when there are CHADULLAHS
Being black isn't the reason you're an incel when there are TYRONES

However, the PROPORTION of chads within the population for a particular ethnic group will vary from race to race, due to GENETIC DIFFERENCES UNIQUE TO EACH RACE.

For example: because rices tend to be shorter, have weak frame and weak eye area (squinty eyes), small penises etc. if a male is born as a rice, he is at a significant disadvantage genetically due to an increased likelihood of inheriting these aformentioned features/characteristics ASSOCIATED WITH HIS RACE which will negatively impact his appearance. Therefore, a male who is born as rice is more likely to be incel and less likely to be chad, which is why the PERCENTAGE of CHANGS among the rice population (10%) is much lower than the PERCENTAGE of CHADS among the white population (25%), for example.

Likewise although blacks are likely to be tall and have good frame/athletic physique, they get facially mogged by whites who have greater facial symmetry and aesthetic facial features/skull shape in comparison to blacks, so Tyrone's make up 17% of black population whereas chads make up 25% of white population.

Being born a particular race isn't the definite cause of your inceldom seeing as though there are literal chads WITHIN YOUR RESPECTIVE RACE. However, the PROBABILITY that you will be a chad, normie or incel is heavily influenced by which race you're born in as

GENETICS ARE DIRECTLY LINKED TO RACE

The race you're born into determines whether you have an ADVANTAGE/DISADVANTAGE with regards to having a good appearance, although it is NOT the deciding factor in whether you're an incel or Chad.
 
Last edited:
Same with the white race, you forgot to add that to your list.
 
Yes, I agree with this.
 
High effort post that I agree with.If you are ugly,you are ugly,race won't change much
 
With whites it's like inverted with other races. Being an incel white is as rare as being a Chadpreet.
 
So what you're saying you're less or more likely to be chad depends on your race.

I have noticed the "Chads" of non-European ethnicities, they seem to have European facial features, and not the typical features of their own race.
 
High effort post that I agree with.If you are ugly,you are ugly,race won't change much

Exactly. Females only care about whether you're chad or not. If you're a genetically superior male, it doesnt matter whether you're chadpreet/chang/chadullah/tyrone, foids will still select you over a white normie. Racepill being real doesn't necessarily mean JBW is true.
 
genetics determines everything
 
70-80% of white males are Chad looks. The only reason for their inceldom is because they're mentalcel or lost touch with their masculinity due to their society being cucked for 50+ years. The last generation that's in touch with their masculinity is ww2 generation.

From storming the Normandy beach getting shot at... To being unable to handle verbal criticism... Is a 180 from manly man to effeminate soy cuck...

This is why nonwhites especially rice... Should not lose touch with their masculinity because that's what's gonna sink you in deeper into inceldom. You already have looks disadvantage vs whites. Don't make it worse.
 
What makes you think that? Any data?

I'm only speaking anecdotally. What I can say though is that every single white man, even the fattest neckbeardy white man, that I know or work with, is shacked up with someone above their looksmatch. I only know a couple asian men that aren't incel.
 
I'm only speaking anecdotally. What I can say though is that every single white man, even the fattest neckbeardy white man, that I know or work with, is shacked up with someone above their looksmatch. I only know a couple asian men that aren't incel.
Yes, i agree with the asian pill bec. noodlewhores are giant racist whores. But i still think jbw is bs bec. i see ethnic chads and normies with girlfriends irl.
 
You forgot to add that a 10/10 White Chad will do significantly better than a 10/10 of any other race.
 
genetics determines everything
This x10000. That's why it always blows my mind how people here say racemixing breeds incels automatically. It's more nuanced than that, Jeremy Meeks is an excellent example of that. Your race doesn't mean shit if you're ugly or not. If an ugly curry was born white, he'll just be an ugly white. If a Tyrone was born a mulatto, he'll be a mulatto Tyrone. That's also why being a gymcel won't do anything for you. If you're a fat or scrawny ugly guy who worked out and bulked up, you'll just be an ugly bulky guy.

So yeah I can strongly agree. Genetics is the end all be all.
 
So what you're saying you're less or more likely to be chad depends on your race.

I have noticed the "Chads" of non-European ethnicities, they seem to have European facial features, and not the typical features of their own race.
yes I have noticed this as well most tyrones seem to have inherited white facial features, and are either mixed or light skinned as opposed to being 100% of their own race, which gives them a better chance of inheriting the genes they require from the other race which their race lacks.
You forgot to add that a 10/10 White Chad will do significantly better than a 10/10 of any other race.
yes because whites have the best facial features and are like a jack of all trades when it comes to having everything that would make a man be considered perfect by foids, they only way chads of other races would stand a chance is if they are mixed and receive white facial features in the genetic lottery.
 
So what you're saying you're less or more likely to be chad depends on your race.

I have noticed the "Chads" of non-European ethnicities, they seem to have European facial features, and not the typical features of their own race.

Yes, this is very noticeable. The fact that they are chads whilst having european facial features is no coincidence. There is definitely a correlation there. This just goes to show that foids find european facial features attractive so as long as you have such features, they will find you facially attractive irregardless of which ethnic group you belong to.

I see this very often in the curry ethnic group. Time for a little history lesson

In curry-land there are 2 distinct races. Originally, South Asia was inhabited by a race known as the Dravidians who were a hunter-gatherer people who migrated from Africa 50 000 years ago and closely related to (very likely descended from) the Australoid race to whom Australian aboriginals belong to. 3,800 years ago, the Indo-Aryan people who were a branch of the Indo-European race (ancient persians) migrated from modern day-Iran to the indian subcontinent.

As a result of the race-mixing between the light-skinned Indo-Aryan people and the dark-skinned Dravidians, most curries are a mix of the 2 races. The proportions of each race a curry is genetically is usually observable from their phenotype/outwardly appearance. Most curries lie on a spectrum with indo-aryan on one end and dravidian on the other. There are pure indo-aryans in India/Pakistan/Bangladesh who look like they are fully persian/iranian (you wont even think they're indian) while there are pure dravidians who you legit would mistake for niggers or abos. Of course, the closer a curry is to the indo-aryan side of the spectrum, the greater likelihood of being chad and vice versa as you approach the dravidian side.

Here, let me illustrate with some photos.

This guy is an indian actor who is fully indo-aryan

120649






This guy is an indian actor who is fully dravidian

120650





Both get pussy because both have money and status as a result of being famous bollywood actors.

But if they didn't have money/status and their SMV was simply derived from appearance, i'll let you decide who would be the chad and who would be the incel.
 
Last edited:
EXTREMELY ABOVE THE AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE POST.
 
High effort post that I agree with.If you are ugly,you are ugly,race won't change much

Indeed.

As a Somali I've come to the conclusion that the females of my ethnicity are, pound for pound, more gorgeous than white femoids. White females are overwhelmingly plain. Somali girls on the other hand far more often attain greater heights (and with much greater frequency) of facial beauty.

I'm not being a chauvinist: It's the simple honest truth. Somali women > white women in terms of looks.
 
You forgot to add that a 10/10 White Chad will do significantly better than a 10/10 of any other race.

Dude, a 10/10 of a particular race is equally attractive to a 10/10 from another race. If all factors (NTness, wealth, status etc.) are the same and they are both supposedly 10/10 in looks, then theoretically they should perform equally in the dating field. So if a 10/10 male is outperforming another 10/10 male, then the male who is being outperformed is less than a 10/10.

Your score on the PSL takes into account your race as your attractiveness rating is determined by ALL PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES. I think you dont understand this post, it may be partly my fault as i should have explained it better.

The main message of this post ISN'T that a 10/10 white > 10/10 rice (for example). 10/10s asians are as attractive as 10/10 whites, those asians wouldn't be 10/10 in the first place if they got mogged by whites who are also 10/10. The racepill is to do with the fact that there are far less 10/10 asian males than 10/10 whites.
 
You forgot to add that a 10/10 White Chad will do significantly better than a 10/10 of any other race.
i also think it's that 10/10 whites are more common than 10/10 ethnics. I honestly dont think ethnics can even reach a 10 tbh. Race places a barrier on the highest SMV a member of that race can potentially have. For me, whites max out at 9.5 while ethnics max out at like a 7.5-9 (depending on the kind of ethnic).
 
i also think it's that 10/10 whites are more common than 10/10 ethnics. I honestly dont think ethnics can even reach a 10 tbh. Race places a barrier on the highest SMV a member of that race can potentially have. For me, whites max out at 9.5 while ethnics max out at like a 7.5-9 (depending on the kind of ethnic).

High IQ
 
I’m not white and there are very few whites in my country so JBW theory only applies to sex tourism 3rd world countries and in the west. Telling a curry to get back to his country to find his looksmatch don’t change anything as there’ll be chadpreets.

JBW theory is real, but not alone. You gotta be white and chad, being white only makes you a prey for Thai whores (easy western visa), it’s cuckoldry. If you’re not good looking for your race, you would still stay incel even if you were white. My race doesn’t change the fact that I’ve got fked up frame, stuttering and sub5 face. If i were to born in USA as a white male with the same genetics I’d still long for the rope.
 
JBW is literally the foundation of the racepill.

JBW doesn't mean you can literally "Just Be White" and get laid. Dont believe me? Ask the many white incels in this forum.

If you're a 5'7 manlet with a weak-frame and a sub 5 face but happen to be white, foids won't start drooling over you just because you've got white skin JFL. They'd ignore you, and if you somehow get a foid you'll just get cucked by some 6'1 well-built 8/10-face non-white chad because foids don't give a fucking shit about the colour of your skin, they only care about the size/structure of your bones.

Being white means you have an advantage over other races in the sense that there's more chance of you being born with genetics that allow you to be tall, have good frame and good facial structure. This advantage is the racepill. But if you lose the genetic lottery and end up being a manlet with weak frame and sub 5 face, being white won't save you LMAO
 
Last edited:
JBW doesn't mean you can literally "Just Be White" and get laid. Dont believe me? Ask the many white incels in this forum.

If you're a 5'7 manlet with a weak-frame and a sub 5 face but happen to be white, foids won't start drooling over you just because you've got white skin JFL. They'd ignore you, and if you somehow get a foid you'll just get cucked by some 6'1 well-built 8/10-face non-white chad because foids don't give a fucking shit about the colour of your skin, they only care about the size/structure of your bones.

Being white means you have an advantage over other races in the sense that there's more chance of you being born with genetics that allow you to be tall, have good frame and good facial structure. This advantage is the racepill. But if you lose the genetic lottery and end up being a manlet with weak frame and sub 5 face, being white won't save you LMAO
No shit Sherlock. When did I ever say that being White automatically means you can get laid even if you're a 1/10?
 

Similar threads

Genetics_subhuman
Discussion Luck is a bitch
Replies
6
Views
661
Runt171
Runt171
AsiaCel
Replies
3
Views
337
Fallen-Angel
Fallen-Angel
BloodDrained
Replies
35
Views
2K
blackpillmage
blackpillmage
Senmors
Replies
1
Views
298
femcelbreedingnig
femcelbreedingnig

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top