Race mixing literally destroyed curries genetically.

[ryhan]

Indian's or curries are a 3-way population AASI or veddiod subhuman Iranian Neolithic (Closest to Balochis braais) and sinthashta steppe (Closest population northern Europeans Genetically I'm not saying we wuz kings that's literally what the genetic data says)

Original populations in south Asia until 50 thousand years ago were hunter-gatherer subhumans they were short and pajeet like as fuck essentially Giga over tier and this population from the mother's side is what gave us Veddiod blood.

From the other angle, around 10 thousand years populations from north-western Iran migrated to the Indus valley and started to genocide the males and basically JBW max the foids essentially leading to a population that is minorly mixed at 87 percent Iranian Neolithic.

Around 3 thousand years ago a group of nomads known typically as the sinthastha people migrated to northern Pakistan and started to do what iran neolethic did to the abo niggers a few went to south India and started mixing with the native pajeet niggers.

And as the sinthastha started mixing with Iranian neolithic and the Iran Neolithic to the abo niggers this produced an hybrid populations and over thousands of years very long periods of inter mixing they gradually formed to create the modern day with every south asian and just about central asian having the exact same genetics the variation though is in proportion.



It's giga brutal to think curries actually had an chance.

 

[PPEcel]

over

 

[Zer0/∞]

[UWSL]All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system to stop the race mixing process but after 5000 years of mixing, every southasian is a mud mongrel.[/UWSL]

Hence every south asian sentience loathes itself and tries to white wash it's genes to become white.

This(modern iranian, ancestral to southasians):

Raped this(andaman islander, ancestral to southasians):

To create these

Indians, pakis etc are a result of ASI(ancient south asian) and ANI(ancient north asian) mixing a few thousand years ago.

Every Indian has ASI and ANI admixture. The more higher in the caste and the more from the north of india, the less ASI and the more ANI.I am skipping a few parts here since this gets a bit twisted in the south where you can find Dalit curries with caucasoid skulls and brahmins with high ASIs. Skin colour and caste is a poor indicator of admixtures down south but in general this is true. Curries look like a mix between Andaman islanders and Middle easterners.

Also as a bonus here's a death pill for North Indian copers. Every indian is a rape result of mixing between these two groups. Even the most lightskinned southasian with light eyes scores up to 20% of this ancient southasian genetic component. This is the reason why North Indians still look like shit on average and distinctly different to Kurds and Iranians and definitely not like the south euro moggers that the North Indian supremacists here make them out to be.

This why curries are the biggest selfhating white worshiping ppl on earth, it lies in their ethnogenesis.

[font=Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif]India has been underrepresented in genome-wide surveys of human variation. We analyse 25 diverse groups in India to provide strong evidence for two ancient populations, genetically divergent, that are ancestral to most Indians today. One, the "Ancestral North Indians" (ANI), is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans, whereas the other, the "Ancestral South Indians" (ASI), is as distinct from ANI and East Asians as they are from each other. By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations, we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 39-71% in most Indian groups, and is higher in traditionally upper caste and Indo-European speakers. Groups with only ASI ancestry may no longer exist in mainland India. However, the Andamanese are an ASI-related group without ANI ancestry, showing that the peopling of the islands must have occurred before ANI-ASI gene flow on the mainland.[/font]
Click to expand...

https://vogonpoem.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ani-asi-2.png

Bitter racepill on South asians

All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system...

looksmax.org

 

[ryhan]

over

 

[Rhaast]

over

 

[unuser]

[UWSL]By your argument it's possible to conclude this particular combination of races is bad (because of the subhuman party involved), and not that every race mixing is bad[/UWSL]

 

[Words2_live_bye]

need Jarawa girlfriend

 

[ryhan]

[UWSL]By your argument it's possible to conclude this particular combination of races is bad (because of the subhuman party involved), and not that every race mixing is bad[/UWSL]

I didn't say every form of race-mixing was bad I said our form of race-mixing lead to the destruction of our race not every form of race mixing

need Jarawa girlfriend

Just destroy your entire blood line theory

[UWSL]All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system to stop the race mixing process but after 5000 years of mixing, every southasian is a mud mongrel.[/UWSL]

Hence every south asian sentience loathes itself and tries to white wash it's genes to become white.

This(modern iranian, ancestral to southasians):

Raped this(andaman islander, ancestral to southasians):

To create these

Indians, pakis etc are a result of ASI(ancient south asian) and ANI(ancient north asian) mixing a few thousand years ago.

Every Indian has ASI and ANI admixture. The more higher in the caste and the more from the north of india, the less ASI and the more ANI.I am skipping a few parts here since this gets a bit twisted in the south where you can find Dalit curries with caucasoid skulls and brahmins with high ASIs. Skin colour and caste is a poor indicator of admixtures down south but in general this is true. Curries look like a mix between Andaman islanders and Middle easterners.

Also as a bonus here's a death pill for North Indian copers. Every indian is a rape result of mixing between these two groups. Even the most lightskinned southasian with light eyes scores up to 20% of this ancient southasian genetic component. This is the reason why North Indians still look like shit on average and distinctly different to Kurds and Iranians and definitely not like the south euro moggers that the North Indian supremacists here make them out to be.

This why curries are the biggest selfhating white worshiping ppl on earth, it lies in their ethnogenesis.

https://vogonpoem.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ani-asi-2.png

Bitter racepill on South asians

All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system...

looksmax.org

Somewhat accurate but not really I mean the 2 components aren't middle eastern there both central asian.

Brahmins don't even have the most steppe or Iranian Neolithic tbqh it's the jatts and the rors 2 completely different entities separate to the caste system that do.

there are other stuff but he frames it like an single invasion it's not that simple.

 

[Quarantined]

we don't know what populations indians are mixed with,
these groups mentioned are just proxys.
I guess you could say they're a mix of a group indigenous to the subcontinent,
and some other groups who came form the outside

 

[Ika-Sama]

[UWSL]All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system to stop the race mixing process but after 5000 years of mixing, every southasian is a mud mongrel.[/UWSL]

Hence every south asian sentience loathes itself and tries to white wash it's genes to become white.

This(modern iranian, ancestral to southasians):

Raped this(andaman islander, ancestral to southasians):

To create these

Indians, pakis etc are a result of ASI(ancient south asian) and ANI(ancient north asian) mixing a few thousand years ago.

Every Indian has ASI and ANI admixture. The more higher in the caste and the more from the north of india, the less ASI and the more ANI.I am skipping a few parts here since this gets a bit twisted in the south where you can find Dalit curries with caucasoid skulls and brahmins with high ASIs. Skin colour and caste is a poor indicator of admixtures down south but in general this is true. Curries look like a mix between Andaman islanders and Middle easterners.

Also as a bonus here's a death pill for North Indian copers. Every indian is a rape result of mixing between these two groups. Even the most lightskinned southasian with light eyes scores up to 20% of this ancient southasian genetic component. This is the reason why North Indians still look like shit on average and distinctly different to Kurds and Iranians and definitely not like the south euro moggers that the North Indian supremacists here make them out to be.

This why curries are the biggest selfhating white worshiping ppl on earth, it lies in their ethnogenesis.

https://vogonpoem.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ani-asi-2.png

Bitter racepill on South asians

All curries from pakistan, india, bangladesh or sri lanka are the interracial rape result between lightskinned invading indo europeans who raped dark skinned primitive dravidian weddoid jungle dweller pygmy tribes of the Indian subcontinent. These light skinned invaders invented the caste system...

looksmax.org

True, even this graph shows that even North Indians are distinct from even West Asians (Iranians, Middle Easterners).

 

[ryhan]

we don't know what populations indians are mixed with,
these groups mentioned are just proxys.
I guess you could say they're a mix of a group indigenous to the subcontinent,
and some other groups who came form the outside

Accurate proxies though AASI is 86 percent in the Irular so it's very accurate and Iranian neolithic is is about 50 percent in the Baluch so they would have had an Iranian phenotype.

And the sinthastha we have genetic connections to northern Europe

True, even this graph shows that even North Indians are distinct from even West Asians (Iranians, Middle Easterners).

Tajik yagnobi is the source population all curries can be modeled as they lack all AASI components and they cluster with Western Eurasians what throws it off even for brahmins and jatts is the 25 percent AASI.

Also there not West Asian there central Asian tbqh.

 

[Quarantined]

Accurate proxies though AASI is 86 percent in the Irular so it's very accurate and Iranian neolithic is is about 50 percent in the Baluch so they would have had an Iranian phenotype.

And the sinthastha we have genetic connections to northern Europe

tools like structure, gedmatch, and pca(principle component analysis) are not as accurate as you'd think and rely on certain assumptions,

ibd(identity by descent) is more accurate at determining similiarity between groups,
I don't understand it completely(actually I don't really undertand it at all),
but a lot of these genetic studies by reich and others are not as precise as you;d think

Why most Principal Component Analyses (PCA) in population genetic studies are wrong

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a multivariate analysis that allows reduction of the complexity of datasets while preserving data covariance and visualizing the information on colorful scatterplots, ideally with only a minimal loss of information. PCA applications are extensively used as...

www.biorxiv.org

A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots - Nature Communications

Clustering methods such as STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE are widely used in population genetic studies to investigate ancestry. Here, the authors provide a tutorial on how to interpret results of these analyses and a tool to test the goodness of fit of the model.

www.nature.com

 

[Transcended Trucel]

 

[ryhan]

tools like structure, gedmatch, and pca(principle component analysis) are not as accurate as you'd think and rely on certain assumptions,

ibd(identity by descent) is more accurate at determining similiarity between groups,
I don't understand it completely,
but a lot of these genetic studies by reich and others are not as precise as you;d think

Why most Principal Component Analyses (PCA) in population genetic studies are wrong

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a multivariate analysis that allows reduction of the complexity of datasets while preserving data covariance and visualizing the information on colorful scatterplots, ideally with only a minimal loss of information. PCA applications are extensively used as...

www.biorxiv.org

A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots - Nature Communications

Clustering methods such as STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE are widely used in population genetic studies to investigate ancestry. Here, the authors provide a tutorial on how to interpret results of these analyses and a tool to test the goodness of fit of the model.

www.nature.com

I used G25 Coordinates tbqh also PCA's shift based on what 1 is comparing a population too but what you generally find is that you model Europeans and East Asian Indians appear in the middle of that cluster.

That's what caused reich Indians were a mix of a European passing population mixed with a more east Eurasian related pop thankfully more studies have been done since and it's largely wrong and also right.

The Irulars are the best proxy they are different from Onge niggers because of 70 thousand years of genetic separation but they look like the Onge and they are very close to what the original migrants to India would have looked.

Then it's the other 2 populations 1 is closest genetically to northern Europeans and the other is to modern-day Iranians and this is true for South Asia and Central Asia so 1 could say south Asians and central Asians are fundamentally same race but with varying proportion.

The closest to ANI we have is Tajik yagnobi

And closest to ASI is irular.

 

[Saint Kaczynski]

over

 

[ryhan]

 

[Quarantined]

I used G25 Coordinates tbqh also PCA's shift based on what 1 is comparing a population too but what you generally find is that you model Europeans and East Asian Indians appear in the middle of that cluster.

That's what caused reich Indians were a mix of a European passing population mixed with a more east Eurasian related pop thankfully more studies have been done since and it's largely wrong and also right.

The Irulars are the best proxy they are different from Onge niggers because of 70 thousand years of genetic separation but they look like the Onge and they are very close to what the original migrants to India would have looked.

Then it's the other 2 populations 1 is closest genetically to northern Europeans and the other is to modern-day Iranians and this is true for South Asia and Central Asia so 1 could say south Asians and central Asians are fundamentally same race but with varying proportion.

The closest to ANI we have is Tajik yagnobi

And closest to ASI is irular.

this is apparently a facial reconstruction of an indian dating around

10300 BP​

There are other facial reconstructions(don't know how accurate) on

Uncover your heritage

Number 1 platform to learn about humanity's ancient past

ancestralwhispers.org

 

[ryhan]

this is apparently a facial reconstruction of an indian dating around

10300 BP​

View attachment 561559

There are other facial reconstructions(don't know how accurate) on

Uncover your heritage

Number 1 platform to learn about humanity's ancient past

ancestralwhispers.org

WTF happened? also bro if you find more pls show me he looks really good for an curry

 

[Made in Heaven]

Indians are notorious for hating themselves. Google ' dark skin india' and you will see article after article after article of Black Indians crying about how light-skinned Indians made fun of them in school and how their light-skinned friends mocked them lol. The funniest cope is how they blame the Mughals and British being "white rulers who perpetuated desire for white skin"