Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Race & Intelligence

Intellau_Celistic

Intellau_Celistic

5'3 KHHV Mentalcel
-
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Posts
163,280
Races vary in intelligence, due to a general cognitive ability labeled 'g'.

Early in the century-old study of
intelligence, researchers discovered that
all tests of mental ability ranked individ-
uals in about the same way.

Although mental tests are often designed to mea-
sure specific domains of cognition—ver-
bal fluency, say, or mathematical skill,
spatial visualization or memory—people
who do well on one kind of test tend to
do well on the others, and people who
do poorly generally do so across the
board. This overlap, or intercorrelation,
suggests that all such tests measure
some global element of intellectual abil-
ity as well as specific cognitive skills. In
recent decades, psychologists have
devoted much effort to isolating that
[UWSL]general factor, which is abbreviated[/UWSL][UWSL] [/UWSL][UWSL]g[/UWSL][UWSL],[/UWSL]
from the other aspects of cognitive abili-
ty gauged in mental tests


G influences health:

Average state IQ, state wealth and racial composition as predictors of state health statistics: Partial support for ‘g’ as a fundamental cause of health disparities​


Abstract
This study examined the degree to which differences in average IQ across the 50 states was associated with differences in health statistics independent of differences in wealth, health care expenditures and racial composition. Results show that even after controlling for differences in state wealth and health care expenditures, average IQ had sizeable positive associations with a wide range of positive health indicators, and sizeable negative associations with a wide range of state health problems.

Consistent with Gottfredson's (2004) [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 174−199.] hypotheses, some of the apparent associations between racial composition and health outcomes were accounted for by IQ differences.

Overall, the results partially confirmed that g does account for a significant portion of the variance many state health outcomes, but socio-economic factors and racial composition appear to also have important relations with some specific health outcomes.


Untimed Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) were administered to 309 17- to 23-year-old students at the University of the Witwatersrand and the Rand Afrikaans University in Johannesburg, South Africa (173 Africans, 136 Whites; 205 women, 104 men). African students solved an average of 44 of the 60 problems whereas White students solved an average of 54 of the problems (p<.001). By the standards of the 1993 US normative sample, the African university students scored at the 14th percentile and the White university students scored at the 61st percentile (IQ equivalents of 84 and 104, respectively). The African–White differences were found to be greater on those items of the SPM with the highest item–total correlations, indicating a difference in g, or the general factor of intelligence. A small sex difference favoring males was found in both the African and the White samples, but unrelated to g.


The fluid and crystallized abilities of white, black, and Hispanic adolescents and adults, both with and without an education covariate​



Data from the standardization sample of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) were used to examine race/ethnic differences on the Horn-Cattell fluid and crystallized constructs. Samples included 768 individuals aged 11 to 24 years (575 White, 117 Black, 76 Hispanic) and 1,160 individuals aged 25 to 94 years (972 White, 124 Black, 64 Hispanic). Multivariate and univariate analyses were conducted, with and without an educational attainment covariate. Race/ethnic group was related significantly to performance on fluid and crystallized variables. Whites generally outscored Blacks and Hispanic on the diverse measures, namely, on tasks dependent on school learning (crystallized), and on those that reflect novel problem solving (fluid). These results maintained even with educational attainment covaried. Hispanics tended to perform better on fluid than on crystallized tests.

 
It's no theory it is FACT
 
I've always wondered what the average IQ between the races on this forum is since we're obviously outliers no matter what race we belong to.
 
and what it has to inceldom ?
 
i thought it said: FACE and intelligence

I think most of the ugly people are stupid because of their bad genetics,
that's why they are not on this forum (these forums are full of fakecels)
truecels are not here, they are probably bluepilled and and they are still trying to date girls instead of rotting here 24/7

an example of how physical appearance is related to intelligence and mental health is autistic people, many of them suffer from strabismus.

 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, you're only going to hear about those studies in a place like this. When those studies are found to be accurate after intensive peer review, they're swept under the rug and explained away as being racist. Even when researchers put forth their best effort to make a "culturally fair" intelligence test. Even controlling for income and education, races have a clear difference in IQ, as if it was be any different than all other genetically inherited traits.
 
This is the IQ black pill, another type of black pill that normies won't swallow.

When it comes to race and sex, I distrust any research that comes to the politically correct conclusion.
 
Unfortunately, you're only going to hear about those studies in a place like this. When those studies are found to be accurate after intensive peer review, they're swept under the rug and explained away as being racist. Even when researchers put forth their best effort to make a "culturally fair" intelligence test. Even controlling for income and education, races have a clear difference in IQ, as if it was be any different than all other genetically inherited traits.
 
Yes however IQ has nothing to do with violence and good heart. Also the people i hate the most tend to be the average IQ people not the lowest IQs
 
White "Liberals":


The private dialogue about race in America is far different from the public one, and we are not referring just to discussions among white rednecks. Our impression is that the private attitudes of white elites toward blacks is strained far beyond any public acknowledgment, that hostility is not uncommon and that a key part of the strain is a growing suspicion that fundamental racial differences are implicated in the social and economic gap that continues to separate blacks and whites, especially alleged genetic differences in intelligence.
Spring special: 50% off fearless reporting.1 year for $10.Subscribe
We say “our impression” because we have been in a unique position to gather impressions. Since the beginning of 1990, we have been writing a book about differences in intellectual capacity among people and groups and what those differences mean for America’s future. As authors do, we have gotten into numberless conversations that begin, “What are you working on now?” Our interlocutors have included scholars at the top-ranked universities and think tanks, journalists, high public officials, lawyers, financiers and corporate executives. In the aggregate, they have split about evenly between left and right of the political center.
With rare exceptions, these people have shared one thing besides their success. As soon as the subject turned to the question of I.Q., they focused on whether there was any genetic race differences in intelligence. And they tended to be scared stiff about the answer. This experience has led us to be scared as well, about the consequences of ignorance. We have been asked whether the question of racial genetic differences in intelligence should even be raised in polite society. We believe there’s no alternative. A taboo issue, filled with potential for hurt and anger, lurks just beneath the surface of American life. It is essential that people begin to talk about this in the open. Because raising this question at all provokes a host of fears, it is worth stating at the outset a clear conclusion of our research: the fascination with race, I.Q. and genes is misbegotten. There are all sorts of things to be worried about regarding intelligence and American life, and even regarding intelligence and ethnicity. But genetics isn’t one of them.

II.

First, the evidence, beginning with this furiously denied fact: intelligence is a useful construct. Among the experts, it is by now beyond much technical dispute that there is such a thing as a general factor of cognitive ability on which human beings differ and that this general factor is measured reasonably well by a variety of standardized tests, best of all by I.Q. tests designed for that purpose. These points are no longer the topic of much new work in the technical journals because most of the questions about them have been answered.
Intelligence as measured by I.Q. tests is predictive of many educational, economic and social outcomes. In America today, you are much better off knowing a child’s I.Q. score than her parents’ income or education if you want to predict whether she will drop out of high school, for example. If you are an employer trying to predict an applicant’s job productivity and are given a choice of just one item of information, you are usually better off asking for an I.Q. score than a resume, college transcript, letter of recommendation or even a job interview. These statements hold true for whites, blacks, Asians and Latinos alike.
This is not to say that I.Q. is destiny—in each of these instances, I.Q. is merely a better predictor than the alternatives, not even close to a perfect one. But it should be stated that the pariah status of intelligence as a construct and I.Q. as its measure for the past three decades has been a function of political fashion, not science.
Ethnic differences in measured cognitive ability have been found since intelligence tests were invented. The battle over the meaning of these differences is largely responsible for today’s controversy over intelligence testing itself. The first thing to remember is that the differences among individuals are far greater than the differences among groups. If all the ethnic differences in intelligence evaporated overnight, most of the intellectual variation in America would endure. The remaining inequality would still strain the political process, because differences in cognitive ability are problematic even in ethnically homogeneous societies.
Even using the word “race” is problematic, which is why we use the word ethnicity as well as race in this article. What does it mean to be “black” in America, in racial terms, when the word black (or African American) can be used for people whose ancestry is more European than African? How are we to classify a person whose parents hail from Panama but whose ancestry is predominantly African? Is he Latino? Black? The rule we follow here is a simple one: to classify people according to the way they classify themselves.
 
Today, we shall focus on East Asians:

Thank you all for joining this show.

1648230122901


Asian IQ


Asiatic


SNP


We observe higher rates of the IQ-linked variant in East Asians, according to the HapMap project.
 
Today, we will invite an entry from "RedFlood" of LooksMax.org. We thank him for his work.


STEM Academia (Chinese-Americans Only)



STEM Private Industries (Mixture of Chinese-Americans and Native-Chinese)

Patents
http://s71.photobucket.com/user/EmilyNeumeyer/media/patentapplications2011.png.html
This is an outdated image that serves only to illustrate the sources of innovation.
http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/help/
With reference to the WIPO link, when a patent office receives a patent application filed by a foreigner, it is marked as a non-resident filing. This means that a majority of American patents are not actually American in origin – let alone White.
http://futureoflife.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/patents-granted.png
China did not even begin until as late as the 2000s.
http://money.cnn.com/interactive/technology/tech-diversity-data/
Similarly, Wall Street is a Chinese phenomena, as the majority of High Frequency Trading Algorithms (HFTA) are written and maintained by the Chinese.
Click to expand...
STEM Pre-University (Foreign-Chinese and Native-Chinese)

Many things require a mix of talent and hard-work, but for mathematics, talent is a prerequisite – so it will help to look at international mathematics, which, not surprisingly, is a field that is entirely dominated by the Chinese.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Mathematical_Olympiad
Winning teams:
“China, 19 times (from the first participation in 1985 until 2014): in every year from 1989 to 2014 except 1994, 1996, 1998, 2003 (Bulgaria won, once), 2007 (Russia won, once), 2012 (Korea won, once)…”
“United States, 6 times: in 1977, 1981, 1986, 1994, 2015, 2016”
So what changed in 2015? Well, let’s look at some pictures:
http://www.maa.org/news/us-team-takes-first-place-at-international-mathematical-olympiad
“The U.S. team’s combined score of 185 edged out the Chinese team’s score of 181 and the Republic of Korea’s third-place score of 161.”
Lineup: 2 Ashkenazi Jews, 2 Chinese, 1 White, 1 Brahman
https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2015/team.cfm?id=942 (the Chinese kid at the front)
He’s also dominating in Computer Science (USACO Gold) and Physics (USAPHO Gold). Everyone else there is just a one-trick pony. He also carried the team in IMO:
https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2015
And what about 2016?
http://wordplay.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/07/18/imo-2016/
“The winning U.S. team score was 214 out of a possible 252, ahead of the Republic of Korea (207) and China (204)”
Lineup: 5 Chinese, 2 Brahman
https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2016&column=rank&order=asc&gender=hide
The Americans have stumbled onto a formula here, in order to beat the Chinese, you need a Chinese.
And that’s just for the winning teams.
Here’s the greatest competitor in IMO history and the rest of the Canadian IMO team:
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadian-math-whiz-wins-international-competition-1.2489083
All Chinese. The Whites in the background are there as a “Leader”, “Deputy Leader”, and “Observer”.
Here’s a typical set-up for the modern Australian IMO team:
http://www.amt.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/IMO-team-e1471396105124.jpg
Lineup: 4 Chinese, 1 White, 1 Brahman
Here’s a typical set-up for the UK IMO team:
https://eventuallyalmosteverywhere.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/p1010513-3.jpg
The UK team has been placing in the 20s for two decades now, how did it suddenly jump to 7th place in 2016?
https://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=UNK&year=2016
Because two Chinese (97% and 93%) and a Brahman (94%) were carrying the three Whites (88% and 84% and 84%)
International Olympiads, as a rule, are dominated by the Chinese:
Physics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Physics_Olympiad
Some more IPO results: http://www.ipho2015.in/results/
Chemistry: http://www.icho2016.chemistry.ge/medals.php (United States = foreign Chinese)
Biology: http://ibo2016.org/IBO2016/Results (United States = foreign Chinese)
Computer Science: http://stats.ioinformatics.org/results/2015 (United States = foreign Chinese)
Some more USACO results: http://usaco.org/current/data/feb16_platinum_results.html
Click to expand...



Western Rebuttal: Chinese ‘Integrity’ (DEBUNKED)

Western peoples consider Chinese papers from China to lack integrity.
Some examples:
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2015/08/25/fake-peer-review-scandal-shines-spotlight-on-china/
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/11/china-pursues-fraudsters-science-publishing
http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763
http://www.economist.com/news/china...earch-leading-academic-fraud-looks-good-paper
But one of these news articles makes the following concession:
“These retracted articles represent less than 0.05% of submissions that Springer received from Chinese authors in the last year…”
So it’s just another case of China’s population skewing perceptions
The problem is not a Chinese one:
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
“From the NY Review of Books 2009: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” -Marcia Angell, MD (“Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)”
Click to expand...



http://www.siemens-foundation.org/p...math-science-technology/2015-regional-finals/

https://student.societyforscience.org/intel-sts-2015-finalists

http://www.aapt.org/aboutaapt/2013-US_Physics-Team_pr20130510.cfm

http://www.imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=USA&year=2014

https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/...ympiad/2014-chemistry-olympiad-finalists.html

https://archive.is/SEXYo

Our results showed greater cortical thickness and gray matter density in the bilateral middle temporal gyri and right anterior temporal lobe in the Chinese population, which may be explained by the greater demand on these regions by the Chinese language (Crinion et al., 2009).

my point about how most modern inventions are created by asians still stands, bringing up information from centuries past is irrelevant to what truly matters, which is the now.
i rarely circle jerk past events anyways :lul:
if i really wanted to circle jerk the past, i can bring up how east asian inventions carried the world for millennia before the west had a tiny streak in comparison, which is ending now.

"As I stated before, Germany had a collective IQ of 114 during it's peak in the 1930'" >no source for this, base iq for pinks is still below 95 btw

vast majority of patents in the modern age are created/owned by asians. even american patents are dominated by asian american scientists. bringing up the past does not refute the fact pinks are now technologically behind asians, as admitted by the pentagon themselves jfl. also doesnt refute the fact that for millenia of years prior, asians dominated technologically. the moment the USA 100% falls behind in all aspects, it will be a irreversible failure [2]
1648093100094


you haven't proven any of my points wrong kek, especially the one about polygenic iqs
asians still intellectually dominate in the USA when they're only 7% of the population. this number is also an understatement, because indians are not part of the asian american intelligentsia i'm talking about.
 
Whites built United States.
Blacks did
screenshot_20230627-221329-130-png.792347

13 million white males were sleeping while 2 million black males were building everything? Come on...
these 2 million were probably just house slaves as we had in Brazil :feelsjuice: the majority population was made by white workers who built America while that "1%" priviliged blacks were in their Senzalas
images
images
images
images


we wuz builders n shiet
images



he was TEMPORARY BANNED from .org for openly admitting that he loves to masturbate for bbc porn, how it is .org so its understandable they didnt perma banned him
 
Racist closeted BBC lover's obsession with IQ
 

Similar threads

SlayerSlayer
Replies
5
Views
291
BPJ
BPJ
SupremeFroggy
Replies
7
Views
392
Evangelioncel
Evangelioncel
Mortis
Replies
53
Views
1K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
Logic55
Replies
23
Views
361
Namtriz912
Namtriz912

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top