Do you agree?
White>Mulatto>Latino>Black>Mixed>Middle Eastern>Asian>Indian>Abo
Mixed are like HAPAS and others.
White>Mulatto>Latino>Black>Mixed>Middle Eastern>Asian>Indian>Abo
Mixed are like HAPAS and others.
Blackpill Race Hierarchy in order? White>Mulatto>Latino>Black>Mixed>Middle Eastern>Asian>Indian>Abo
latinos, mulattos, hapas are all mixed
it ultimately depends on how white they look
some hapas look 100% rice while some look like keanu
some latinos are tall and light while others are dark and short
it ultimately depends on how white they look
some hapas look 100% rice while some look like keanu
some latinos are tall and light while others are dark and short
we need a separate race, genetics and jews folder @SergeantIncel
Imo:
Northern euro
Southern euro
Slav
Mixed
Latino
Black
Arab
Gypsy
Asian
Northern euro
Southern euro
Slav
Mixed
Latino
Black
Arab
Gypsy
Asian
Curries>Blacks>Asians>MENA>Latino because they breed like rabbits
Black has it better than latino, mena who grow up in a western country are probably equal to black smv.
@Capable_Onion Latinos do not mog mulattos, and blasians.. mulattos mog the fuck out of latinos
JFL @ putting sandniggers above rice.
rice are invisible to women
Curries at the bottom, we are even below abos.
Lol Abos are extremely subhuman indians are like chads to them
This is inceldom discussion, so why?
Women run from sandniggers.
If were talking about chad Latinos vs Chad mulattos then they certainly do
White
Asian
Black
Jew
All others
Asian
Black
Jew
All others
chad mulattos mog chad latinos out of the water what are u talking
Mulatto's are inherently held back by african genes, chad latinos are not
what does genes has to do with this.. Mulattos are better looking. That is the whole point.
Genes = Looks
Mulatto's inherit nappy hair, big lips, noses, etc
Latinos have straight hair, thin lips, sharp noses, and light skin
can anyone here let me know what race “abo” is.
Objectively speaking, as in not my opinion. Foids racial ranking of men:
White males (by far), White looking Hispanic males (approx. the top 23% of Hispanic males) second, Black males (at an extremely far distant third), Asian males, Middle eastern males, and lastly Indian males. Short dark looking Hispanic men are presumably between Asian and Indian males.
All in all, men of color are rock bottom. Black men do better than the other colored races of men but not by much.
Also things to note, Asian males per capita are most likely above Black males (slightly). Since micro-regional culture plays a huge role in opinions of certain groups. In liberal places like SF, LA, Seattle, and NYC. Black males are seen as cool and popular amongst the degenerate racist hypocritical foids. White liberal Anglos gain "cool" points by giving Black males a pass. Even though Black males are statistically speaking prone to all sorts of social pathology and dysfunction.
In more conservative rural areas all over the US, opinions of Asian and Indian men are much higher than in liberal shitholes. Giving them a small boost in value but still do poorly overall with foids.
Women of all races genuinely hate Asian and Indian men in liberal shitholes. They also hate middle eastern men but are too afraid of being seen as Islamo-phobes and so often will not be so open in expressing their bias, hate, and disgust as they do with Asian and Indian men.
Black males often get a pass in liberal areas. But even then they still do poorly overall from what I've seen.
What I've just described is the objective plain hard truth and there really is no getting around it. Foids in the Anglosphere are extremely racist against men of color.
If you are a man of color in the US, you have to be exceptional to have success with foids.
As silly as it sounds, from what I've seen, men of color that stylemaxx to dress as white as possible, and act as white as possible, can be successful with low tier white foids. But from what I've ascertained, the vast majority of colored men are not willing to debase themselves by dressing like a white hipster and acting white. While it seems a lot of ethnic foids shamelessly do so in pursuit of white males.
White males (by far), White looking Hispanic males (approx. the top 23% of Hispanic males) second, Black males (at an extremely far distant third), Asian males, Middle eastern males, and lastly Indian males. Short dark looking Hispanic men are presumably between Asian and Indian males.
All in all, men of color are rock bottom. Black men do better than the other colored races of men but not by much.
Also things to note, Asian males per capita are most likely above Black males (slightly). Since micro-regional culture plays a huge role in opinions of certain groups. In liberal places like SF, LA, Seattle, and NYC. Black males are seen as cool and popular amongst the degenerate racist hypocritical foids. White liberal Anglos gain "cool" points by giving Black males a pass. Even though Black males are statistically speaking prone to all sorts of social pathology and dysfunction.
In more conservative rural areas all over the US, opinions of Asian and Indian men are much higher than in liberal shitholes. Giving them a small boost in value but still do poorly overall with foids.
Women of all races genuinely hate Asian and Indian men in liberal shitholes. They also hate middle eastern men but are too afraid of being seen as Islamo-phobes and so often will not be so open in expressing their bias, hate, and disgust as they do with Asian and Indian men.
Black males often get a pass in liberal areas. But even then they still do poorly overall from what I've seen.
What I've just described is the objective plain hard truth and there really is no getting around it. Foids in the Anglosphere are extremely racist against men of color.
If you are a man of color in the US, you have to be exceptional to have success with foids.
As silly as it sounds, from what I've seen, men of color that stylemaxx to dress as white as possible, and act as white as possible, can be successful with low tier white foids. But from what I've ascertained, the vast majority of colored men are not willing to debase themselves by dressing like a white hipster and acting white. While it seems a lot of ethnic foids shamelessly do so in pursuit of white males.
Last edited:
Attractive ppl are a race of their own
Southern Euro > white looking American mulattos > black & Anglo-Saxon (depends on area and preference) > power gap > everyone else
Stop the cope, man. We curries are way more subhuman than abos are.
Whites than Deathnics
We already have the evidence, anyone who puts blacks in the top half of the SMV hierarchy is delusional and brainwashed by the media.
The actual hierarchy is more like
White > Latinos > Asians > Middle Eastern > Blacks > Indians
@Detro high iq asf. But I’m not sure Asian mogs though, they struggle.
White > Latino > Black > Middle Eastern > Asians > Indians
Whites > "White Latinos" > Blacks > Middle Eastern > Mestizo/Amerindian Latinos > Orientals > Indians
Who are white Latinos?
Usually a Criollo/someone culturally brought up in a Latin-American country with a mostly European background.
Is that a distinct racial group though? Wouldn't they just be mixed?
It really doesn't matter what order you put ethnic colored men.
Black, Asian, Indian, and Middle eastern men ALL do very poorly with women in the white Anglosphere. Its just the damn plain truth totally irrespective of expert or layman opinion or research. Its the plain truth as far as the depravity that is happening.
But consistently from my long life of observation (in a liberal shithole known as San Francisco in the Anglosphere), its consistently white looking Hispanic men well above Blacks. Then Blacks at a far distant third, then Asian men trailing closely behind, Middle eastern men slightly behind Asian men (Despite being racially Caucasian). Indian men dead last consistently.
Ethnic males especially Asian males have every right to be angry at whats going on. Black females as well.
I view white nationalist stormfrontcels (on this forum), black males, Asian women, and the average white female you come across everyday in the street as no different. Literally. They really are deep down not any different from an incel and especially an ethnicel's point of view.
I have no idea why the moderators tolerate these white nationalists on this forum.
Both white nationalists and average non racist everyday SJW white females absolutely have no problem with exterminating ethnic males. Meanwhile the white males try to ascend with ethnic foids (just walk around in a major city in the coastal states). And the white females have a very strong feeling of disgust and repulsion in the vast majority of ethnic males.
As far as Black men and Asian women, they will literally send the opposite gender of their race into the gas chambers if it meant they could acquire a White partner over their own (as in the case with Black men and Asian women, any partner as long as it doesn't belong to their race).
For these reasons, I wouldn't say ban all White stormfrontcels like that low IQ faggot @BummerDrummer or some blackcels, or even some noodlewhores larping in this forum. But they should be kept in check very closely for they don't belong here in the first place.
Black, Asian, Indian, and Middle eastern men ALL do very poorly with women in the white Anglosphere. Its just the damn plain truth totally irrespective of expert or layman opinion or research. Its the plain truth as far as the depravity that is happening.
But consistently from my long life of observation (in a liberal shithole known as San Francisco in the Anglosphere), its consistently white looking Hispanic men well above Blacks. Then Blacks at a far distant third, then Asian men trailing closely behind, Middle eastern men slightly behind Asian men (Despite being racially Caucasian). Indian men dead last consistently.
Ethnic males especially Asian males have every right to be angry at whats going on. Black females as well.
I view white nationalist stormfrontcels (on this forum), black males, Asian women, and the average white female you come across everyday in the street as no different. Literally. They really are deep down not any different from an incel and especially an ethnicel's point of view.
I have no idea why the moderators tolerate these white nationalists on this forum.
Both white nationalists and average non racist everyday SJW white females absolutely have no problem with exterminating ethnic males. Meanwhile the white males try to ascend with ethnic foids (just walk around in a major city in the coastal states). And the white females have a very strong feeling of disgust and repulsion in the vast majority of ethnic males.
As far as Black men and Asian women, they will literally send the opposite gender of their race into the gas chambers if it meant they could acquire a White partner over their own (as in the case with Black men and Asian women, any partner as long as it doesn't belong to their race).
For these reasons, I wouldn't say ban all White stormfrontcels like that low IQ faggot @BummerDrummer or some blackcels, or even some noodlewhores larping in this forum. But they should be kept in check very closely for they don't belong here in the first place.
Last edited:
I guess that depends on your definition of "White", which is part of the reason I put it in quotations and why they're separated from Whites in general. When a woman imagines an attractive "Latin male", they're not talking about someone with Otomi, Rarámuri, or Incan descent - not even partially... They're already picturing a Ciollo man or maybe someone partially of Sub-Saharian African ancestry (A Caribbean or Brazilian). I personally have never seen women obsess over some Amerindian.
They legit look like the worst south indian possible, but amplified and inbred. It's a good thing they have such low sentience for their own sake, people exaggerate race stereotypes but I have legit never seen a decent one
Does this include only the Chads of said races? There's no way some average latino is getting more pussy than the average black guy.
D
High IQ
For me:
White>Latino>Mixed>Middle Eastern>Asian>>Mixed>Mulatto>Indian>Abo>Black
White>Latino>Mixed>Middle Eastern>Asian>>Mixed>Mulatto>Indian>Abo>Black
This, though I disagree with Black guys being in that group, but you're spot on about Asians, Indians, and Middle Easterners; guys in those ethnic groups that get white woman nearly always have high T traits and are tall for their group
only true for white women. Blacks tend to do the worst for any other ethnicities other than white women. White men however tops the chart for all women.
Fucking delusioncels here putting middle eastern above asian
I think kpop koreans need their own category, separate from normal asians-- and these types would rank above negroes but below mulattoes
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
