No one is saying that whites can't have it bad. But whites as a whole still have it vastly better than ethnics.
Last edited:
All the white-shaming from SJWs and you have the myopia to use that term on me? Do you know what an SJW even is? You can't speak for every white person. Nor can you speak for every ethnic. If you're worried about people who have it a certain way, all you can do is speak for people who have it a certain way.
You were the one that said ethnics are underprivileged and whites are not. I'm saying no, you're wrong, the underprivileged are the underprivileged. You can't speak for whites or browns as a group. To try is folly, and serves no purpose.
D
It's self-hate to IT and redditors because they want you to act how the way they stereotype you otherwise they feel uncomfortable.
By not acting like a stereotype you partially deny others the opportunity to make fun of you as effectively with those stereotypes or use you as a token minority which is why they try to gaslight you about "being ashamed of your race or culture".
tbhtbh
I disagree.
Pheno/coloring halo is real, but it's completely subjective and does NOT have a significant effect on whether a foid will drop her panties for you. In my opinion it only has as much effect as a nice haircut, or dressing nicely.
If this indian guy walked up to a foids in the bar and started flirting with them I guarantee you he will pull more foids than the white guy. They will see the indian guy's crocodile jaw and instantly wet themselves.
However when it comes to relationships and dating, the white guy will probably have more success due to his white male status. Foids will just want to fuck the indian guy, but will want to date/marry the white guy so she can show him off to her friends and family like "Look at me, I have a hot high status white man!"
This guy is just a delusional coping retard.
Naw one dude is a famous instagram model and the other is living in ths slums of India (in this case yes almost entirely due to pheno).
I'm sure you can run Tinder experiments between the two and there will be a big difference.
Why pheno/coloring doesn't matter as much is because guys like him will always be slayers among on their own people.
D
Discussion of anything at this point is retarded honestly, it just turns into childish slap fights.
I agree with you, but the race threads are always fun to read regardless.
So what about an ethnic person with a good life? Is he somehow not hated for his skin?
This is why generalizations fail. There are no "ranks" among the underprivileged. It's like trying to rank the dead. There are no ranks among the dead, you're either dead or you're not.
Exactly, this is what most of the forum thinks but there's a small cohort of stormfronters & ethnics who are constantly starting shit & roping in other unrelated users.
I got every right to bring up the racepill over and over again so as long as I continue to witness it day in and day out.
These women here in the bay area, regardless of what race they are, automatically dismiss you and won't even make eye contact with you if you are ethnic. (Asian, Indian, Middle eastern, Black, or Hispanic). Wherever you see those foids out in public, know one thing, they are trying to get the attention of white men and don't want you looking at them.
I fucking hate white Anglo society and foids. YOu'd think with all the talk of liberalism in our education system starting from elementary school, that foids would be objective and non-racist. The brutal reality is foids are far more racist than even the average alt-right whitecel (who will at least occasionally settle for a noodle or latina).
These women here in the bay area, regardless of what race they are, automatically dismiss you and won't even make eye contact with you if you are ethnic. (Asian, Indian, Middle eastern, Black, or Hispanic). Wherever you see those foids out in public, know one thing, they are trying to get the attention of white men and don't want you looking at them.
I fucking hate white Anglo society and foids. YOu'd think with all the talk of liberalism in our education system starting from elementary school, that foids would be objective and non-racist. The brutal reality is foids are far more racist than even the average alt-right whitecel (who will at least occasionally settle for a noodle or latina).
D
I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about how petty and stupid the discussions get on here.
Everyone wants to be white.
Lmao speak for your own pathetic self. Id rather stay a Gorilla
You're not wrong. He probably would slay a few years back now that i think about it lol.
A white gorilla would have tons of halo though.
But now adays we kill albino gorillas. We see them as genetic defects.
your race affects your bone structure and height a lot though. there are outliers sure but there are also trends.
There are correlations between race and height/facial attractiveness, but I believe 99% of it is due to environmental/cultural reasons and not genetics. For example mexicans from Mexico tend to be short because of malnutrition and low quality food in their country. But mexicans born in the USA that grow up eating an American diet usually grow to be significantly taller than their parents.
Nah it's genetics. I know big tall curries who were raised in curryland. I also know samll curries who were born in the West.
There are outliers in everything. Those tall curries probably ate better than 99% of other curries. Nobody knows. But I know for a fact that people on this forum tend to downplay the significant effect that diet and exercise has on your height and facial attractiveness.
B
The entire subject of mathematics would like a word with you.
Generalizations in math aren't exact either. And math accepts that. But you can make inaccurate assumptions in math where exact predictions are impossible. It's ignorant to do that same kind of guesswork about the content of a person's character.
B
I can tell you haven't done much math in your journeys. The whole idea is prove statements which can then be generalized to all cases (numbers). This is how all of those formulas they make you memorize in school are constructed.
The guesswork you're talking about a person's character happens as a matter of course. It's how we make snap judgments of people to make a binary friend/foe distinction. We've evolved that way to increase our survivability.
You build models and archetypes of people, objects, and concepts as you progress in your learning journey (life) and gather more data about the world to process. You then run the data against the existing models you have. This informs your models and you may adjust them from time time. The models then make predictions for you that you use as conclusions and judgments in your daily life. Right now, you have a model in your brain which informs archetypes of things like "policeman", "priest," "drug addict," "politician" etc. Stereotypes are simply a subtype of an archetype with the filter of race/nationality.
Generalizations are how we operate, whether you like it or not. You make a generalization, collect data, then reach a conclusion that either confirms it or denies it. If you encounter 100 people wearing a blue shirt and red hat trying to sell you a broken refrigerator, you're probably going to (rightly and logically) assume that the 101st person wearing the same two clothing items has a broken refrigerator they want to sell you. But no, this one just wants to spread the gospel of Jesus. You make a small note to yourself and move on.
Generalizations aren't how we have to operate. But more to the point, your "Stereotypes are for our survival" bullshit has nothing to do with this situation. Inaccurate stereotypes might be forgivable if you need them to survive. You don't need them to stoke racial divisions on Incels.co.
B
I'm not telling you what we should and shouldn't do. I'm explaining to you the how and why of what humans do when they learn things and navigate their environment.
Don't twist my words, FBI. I never said "stereotypes are for survival" (anyone can just fucking scroll up and read for themselves JFL). What I said is that humans build models (the thing that's supposed to generalize and make predictions) for things when they learn and that includes models for people.
Is that what's happening? You're so sure of yourself.
Between my post and yours, 4 minutes went by. You spent 2 minutes reading, 2 minutes replying, and 0 minutes thinking carefully about what I said.
How's your math? I can tell it's bad enough that you've come to a very wrong conclusion here.
You said...
Those are the stereotypes we're talking about. The generalizations.
Yes, that's what we're doing. "You're white therefore you're not as incel as me" is racial division, it's unnecessary, and it's also wrong. You can't be more incel than someone any more than you can be more dead than someone.
D
No point in race if you die without descendants.
B
Yes. That's how we make judgments of people initially, without extra information, because we only have previous information to work with. Building models of people is what every human does. It's literally how we navigate around socially.
"Stereotyping," as you commonly understand it, is when you stick to your models despite what the data is telling you. I'm speaking more abstractly, focusing on the process behind the stereoptying, while you're fixating on the stereotyping itself.
What the hell is all of this fluff and garbage you're injecting into the conversation? Go back and show me where I made a comment pertaining to anything of the sort.
I don't care about any of that crap. I'm here to tell you why and how generalizations are done, and why they're generally reliable even in this context. You're literally doing the thing where somebody says, "these numbers show that 85% of x are at risk of y," and you interject and say, "yeah, but I know this one x that didn't get y. So what about that, huh?" "Bruh."
You're not seeing the forest for the trees here. You're too fixated on incorrect instances of the process of generalization. It's statistical. Stereotyping is simply generalizations that haven't been updated.
Now there are good stereotypes (Asian are good at math) and there are bad stereotypes (Asians suck at driving). They both need updating. But I'm not going to waste time going into them, you can think about them on your own. When people hear the word "stereotype" they immediately attach the negative connotation to it and slap on concepts like racism onto it without thinking.
Last edited:
its entertaining
We're talking about the generalizations mentioned in this thread. The generalizations of who is incel and who isn't and why that's inaccurate and destructive to say. That's what this thread is about.
cumskin shitskin cumskin shitskin
B
OK. That too is generalizable across certain variables.
You can already see that someone is 5'2", facially a 4, skinny with little muscle, has a near 100% chance of being incel. Being a certain race changes the odds slightly, but those variables mentioned (height, face, muscle mass) are weighted heavily enough that the variable of race doesn't need to apply (weighted relatively much lighter).
Change some of the variables around, and maybe add some more, and it will change the weight of the race variable.
What the hell is so controversial about that? THAT'S what you fuckers are arguing about?
JFL
Yeah, that's controversial. To say that is to say someone is "less incel" just because they're white. Inaccurate. Destructive. Shouldn't say it, and I'm pretty sure we have rules against that kind of race-baiting.
B
You can't be "more" or "less" incel. Inceldom is binary. You either are, or you aren't.
Whoever is arguing that there's an inceldom gradient either isn't incel, is an idiot, or wants to win a victimhood competition.
Objectively I am the most incel of them all because I'm not human.
No foid will fuck a Gorilla (willingly), therefore I win the victim competition
Just like you can't be more or less dead. Therefore to say that someone is "less incel" because they're white is inaccurate and destructive. Brown incels aren't "more incel."
B
"And the award for the Most Incel incel 2020 goes to.... I don't believe this:
@ThoughtfulCel "
Yes. It is, however, accurate to say something like, "white is less likely to be incel in east Asia than black."
Everybody is racist against someone, there is no one race absolved of being a victim of racism.
B
What does this claim have to do with what I said? Seems out of place tbh.
It has to do with the topic of this thread. Whether whites have it better than browns as far as inceldom.
B
OK, but why are you quoting my comment when you say that? It's like if I say "the Aston Martin is a sick ride" and you quote that and go "people should drive more carefully on the road"..... ... ok.
Because this is the topic you came to, and that's the point of mine you addressed.
B
Aren't you a genetically modified 7 feet tall Gorilla with a 7 inch dick? I'd understand if you were a normal Gorilla with a 3 inch dick but foids will literally fuck anything that isn't sub8 men.
Nah man I'm 6'1.
Every encounter I have with a foid ends in them running away screaming.
They don't get far though
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
