From the ripping-off of our slang -- "f[em]oid" there is "m[asc]oid"; "just ... bro" there is "just ... sis" -- to the inference that men have as high standards as women do. It's really annoying that they've taken a genuine situation resulting from feminism, the disparity in male/female sexdrive, connectivity (online-dating), namely "that men are no longer needed by women unless we have looks (or betabucks)", and have turned it once again into victimhood for themselves, completely devoid of logic or the ability to perceive observable reality.
Women love to invade male spaces, and to copy what men do. I doubt many women built houses, invented a sport where you kick a ball, or wrote a software application before men did it first. And this is yet another facsimile.
The joke about that sub is that it is all memes. As yet, I have seen no research. If it is actually women doing it, I wonder if they will have the IQ enough to come up with a complex idea of which bones make up a goodlooking woman. They can't rip off our knowledge 100% because women don't need certain things that men need such as a stong browridge. They'd be limited to discussing cheekbones and makeup. They won't be able to make videos such as my What Attracts Women series or Looks Theory's photoshopping minidocumentaries because they don't have the smarts. The body of footage proving that men can date hot women (without betabucksing) just isn't there. What about Fetish Couple's videos that show how thirsty Asian women are for white men. How will they flip that on its head to make women the victims? Will their videoediting skills be halfdecent or will they get a polyamory-suffering Mangina numale cuck to make the videos for them?
I can foresee them running fake stacey experiments to prove that men like attractive women (duh) but not running fake warpig experiments to prove that women have low standards. And you can't argue with them because logic is lost on women.
Let's start the countdown until they ban men from joining and asking them for dates, sex and relationships. Because that would be a terrible thing for a femcel, right?
Women love to invade male spaces, and to copy what men do. I doubt many women built houses, invented a sport where you kick a ball, or wrote a software application before men did it first. And this is yet another facsimile.
The joke about that sub is that it is all memes. As yet, I have seen no research. If it is actually women doing it, I wonder if they will have the IQ enough to come up with a complex idea of which bones make up a goodlooking woman. They can't rip off our knowledge 100% because women don't need certain things that men need such as a stong browridge. They'd be limited to discussing cheekbones and makeup. They won't be able to make videos such as my What Attracts Women series or Looks Theory's photoshopping minidocumentaries because they don't have the smarts. The body of footage proving that men can date hot women (without betabucksing) just isn't there. What about Fetish Couple's videos that show how thirsty Asian women are for white men. How will they flip that on its head to make women the victims? Will their videoediting skills be halfdecent or will they get a polyamory-suffering Mangina numale cuck to make the videos for them?
I can foresee them running fake stacey experiments to prove that men like attractive women (duh) but not running fake warpig experiments to prove that women have low standards. And you can't argue with them because logic is lost on women.
Let's start the countdown until they ban men from joining and asking them for dates, sex and relationships. Because that would be a terrible thing for a femcel, right?
