L
Liptusg
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2022
- Posts
- 302
- Online time
- 1h 5m
Disclaimer: /r/ForeverAloneWomen is a wannabe spinoff community of /r/ForeverAlone wherein women with double-digit bodycounts and/or several ex-boyfriends who have never been alone for any significant period in their life let alone 'forever' get together to bemoan the consequences of their own hypergamy and chadsexuality while barring their KHHV male counterparts from messaging them because they've gotten too many romantic overtures from ugly men, even though many of those males are gynocentric feminist redditors 'to their own liking' and not 'entitled misogynistic incels'.
None of them have ever willingly interacted with an ugly male or a 'loser' in their entire lives, they routinely make their disdain for the men who pursue them clear, and whenever they assert to have dated an 'ugly' or 'overweight' male, he was either average or we are dealing with LARP, on top of their toxic behavior in the following events. Let's proceed with the first thread:
Why are being ugly and and overweight the very first things that she uses to characterize men and then pats herself on the back for supposedly 'giving people a chance' when, according to feminists and bluepillers, women couldn't care less about looks and it's not even in their top 10 most desirable qualities among 'emotional intelligence, basic human decency, humor' and so forth?
Which brings us to this next display of 'femcel' shallowness and gaslighting:
Here we see a woman fantasizing about the 'romanticism' of being lavished with extravagant expenditures by a male which is more important to her than the actual company of the male in question, and then adding that she even 'keeps ugly men a chance' ( To become her paypig ) in the hopes of one of them doing that for her, with the implication that those men would otherwise never stand a chance thanks to their physical appearance. In a thread about 'Women being priced by men for their looks'.
Here we see another woman in the same thread who is whining about supposedly not getting the same treatment as a 10/10 woman would on account of her ugliness, while at the same time maintaining that because she was born with a vagina, any man she dates should be willing to give up his life savings in order to impress her while she is under no obligation to treat ugly men the same way because they have a dick. But then again, she refuses to date any ugly man who doesn't 'compensate' for his ugliness by being a millionaire anyway. So much for 'feminism stands for equality and gender role emancipation'.
Finally here we have a woman who hates ugly guys on principle pulling a claim out of her ass that ugly men won't treat women in their league properly, and that men in general calculate how much effort and respect you deserve based on your looks, while her solipsistic and duplicitous female brain structure shows total obliviousness that she contradicts herself and admits her own gender's guilt a second later
Who cares if they're hotter and more masculine? What matters is how much they're willing to do for her, isn't it? Oh wait, it's because she's literally evaluating men's humanity based on their looks and then projects it on ugly men.
Why emphasize that they are VERY UGLY? Is it because she thinks that very ugly guys should know well enough to understand that they need to make up for their ugliness somehow because of how vapid and superficial women are? Which those women just finished accusing men of?
None of them have ever willingly interacted with an ugly male or a 'loser' in their entire lives, they routinely make their disdain for the men who pursue them clear, and whenever they assert to have dated an 'ugly' or 'overweight' male, he was either average or we are dealing with LARP, on top of their toxic behavior in the following events. Let's proceed with the first thread:
"Pictures on my profile are pretty representative of what I actually look like, or at least I thought. I don’t get many likes on Hinge at all and usually the men who send likes are below average/overweight."
"The guy himself is overweight and currently unemployed after being laid off from his last job. I’m willing to give people a chance and go on dates to get out there so, despite being into fitness and having a full-time job"
"It sucks being an ugly girl. Even ugly, broke men are so cruel to me."
Why are being ugly and and overweight the very first things that she uses to characterize men and then pats herself on the back for supposedly 'giving people a chance' when, according to feminists and bluepillers, women couldn't care less about looks and it's not even in their top 10 most desirable qualities among 'emotional intelligence, basic human decency, humor' and so forth?
Which brings us to this next display of 'femcel' shallowness and gaslighting:
Here we see a woman fantasizing about the 'romanticism' of being lavished with extravagant expenditures by a male which is more important to her than the actual company of the male in question, and then adding that she even 'keeps ugly men a chance' ( To become her paypig ) in the hopes of one of them doing that for her, with the implication that those men would otherwise never stand a chance thanks to their physical appearance. In a thread about 'Women being priced by men for their looks'.
Here we see another woman in the same thread who is whining about supposedly not getting the same treatment as a 10/10 woman would on account of her ugliness, while at the same time maintaining that because she was born with a vagina, any man she dates should be willing to give up his life savings in order to impress her while she is under no obligation to treat ugly men the same way because they have a dick. But then again, she refuses to date any ugly man who doesn't 'compensate' for his ugliness by being a millionaire anyway. So much for 'feminism stands for equality and gender role emancipation'.
Finally here we have a woman who hates ugly guys on principle pulling a claim out of her ass that ugly men won't treat women in their league properly, and that men in general calculate how much effort and respect you deserve based on your looks, while her solipsistic and duplicitous female brain structure shows total obliviousness that she contradicts herself and admits her own gender's guilt a second later
"If an ugly guy offers her a 9pm walk, she doesn't care because there's always a hotter, more masculine man willing to do better"
Who cares if they're hotter and more masculine? What matters is how much they're willing to do for her, isn't it? Oh wait, it's because she's literally evaluating men's humanity based on their looks and then projects it on ugly men.
"You have very ugly guys with nothing to offer"
Why emphasize that they are VERY UGLY? Is it because she thinks that very ugly guys should know well enough to understand that they need to make up for their ugliness somehow because of how vapid and superficial women are? Which those women just finished accusing men of?
Last edited:





