RageFuel R/askfeminists : thoughts on men dying alone?

[MisanthropicMemes]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/thoughts_on_men_dying_alone/



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z7tiu/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z99e5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zbf8k/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8fcq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8xgs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zvwwr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8kyb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

@Stupid Clown @Kamanbert @AtrociousCitizen

Look at this shit man

 

[El Movimiento]

what do you expect from foids, foids gonna foids.

 

[zd60]

Exactly what I come to expect from these pathetic, vile parasites

 

[reveries]

Men die early, women most affected
Foid morals for you. Definitely give these creatures more power.

 

[Super Nigger Boy]

Men aren't the victims! Only we toilets are victims inkwell

 

[Sewer Koala]

Exactly what I come to expect from these pathetic, vile parasites

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

My bad that you have to click on some.of them the reddit linking thing is autistic af

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zauyb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


Average feminist right here btw

@AtrociousCitizen @Kamanbert @Stupid Clown

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

Men die early, women most affected
Foid morals for you. Definitely give these creatures more power.

 

[theanty]

dnc, I know it will be rage-inducing

 

[Very Small Koala]

A lot of reddit foids are actually troons but they omit that because “muh trans women are women “

 

[PersonalityChad]

A lot of reddit foids are actually troons but they omit that because “muh trans women are women “

GIRL = Guy In Real Life

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

Kurk pitten is a male feminist btw

 

[yeetbender_]

dnc, I know it will be rage-inducing

 

[St.Greypiller]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/thoughts_on_men_dying_alone/



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z7tiu/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z99e5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zbf8k/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8fcq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8xgs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zvwwr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1z8kyb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

@Stupid Clown @Kamanbert @AtrociousCitizen

Look at this shit man

victim playing classic

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Men die early, women most affected
Foid morals for you. Definitely give these creatures more power.

That shit made me laugh; the stupidity they display is beyond me.

 

[reveries]

That shit made me laugh; the stupidity they display is beyond me.

This is what happens when you being the center of the universe is the default state since basically your birth, and it's also barely ever questioned cause everybody around is a simp enabler. The idea that we are also humans and we want to be happy too just never occurs to them.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Your point is that rejection by women leads to dying alone. Women, as you correctly stated, do not owe relationships to men. But it has nothing to do with isolation.

You can still make friends. You can still live a rich life without getting into a relationship.

You should question yourself on why you've been led to equate a lack of romantic relationship with isolation and loneliness, and think women are absolutely not affected by it.

This is genuinely some of the most foolishly nonsensical drivel I have read today; even if one does have the possibility of acquiring friends (many of us do not), it does not solve the problem of romantic deprivation; what we desire is love, affection, and intimacy—not merely friendship. It is absurd to suggest that anyone could live a fulfilling life while ignoring their utmost biological imperatives, and also, having friends as an incel typically entails getting mogged as they flaunt their success in your face (unless those friends are also incels). It is also ridiculous that these people say that, for I am sure they would lose their minds if they had to walk a day in our shoes, in destitute loneliness and rejection; they only say these meaningless platitudes because they are in a position of privilege, as keeping dejected men compliant and subservient is beneficial to them.

Like, not only is it absolutely wrong, but you're also completely blind to the levels of isolation women face. You can cherry pick all you want, the truth is the same : women face true isolation too.

The idea that women face “true isolation” in the same way as men is just intellectual dishonesty or sheer delusion. Isolation = can't get chad to settle.

Be it because they never find a partner, because they get abandoned, because they're shamed, shunned. You just chose to look at a convenient lie.

Abandoned after being in multiple relationships. That’s not isolation. That’s called relationship turnover. The men who “abandon” them are often men they chose over more stable partners in their youth. Also, there is no such thing as a woman who cannot find a partner, save for extremely rare cases.

To be blunt : the whole dating market concept is falsehood.

That’s rich coming from someone who has the privilege of being in the market.

Learn, gain knowledge, educate yourself and broaden your horizons instead of relating to the world through narrow concepts that are simply made up of lies.

Just delude yourself

 

[Balding Subhuman]

Even though I'd argue that making that post is already coming from a combative point of view, it still shows that feminists at heart have very misandristic views towards men. Of course these people would like to believe that they are better than those 'evil misogynists' but are they really any different?

But in this world, people have reduced empathy towards men, so their hate and misandry is seen as socially justified.

 

[Kamanbert]

I'm not even triggered by their antics anymore, i think we're the last generations of men that thought women to (still ?) be sweet, nurturing and precious in some way, that's why it hurt so much to discover that they not only are not those things but absolutely exceed some expected neutrality at least ; they're on the warpath !

The idea that women face “true isolation” in the same way as men is just intellectual dishonesty or sheer delusion. Isolation = can't get chad to settle.

Even when it comes to friendships and the relation of an individual to society at large, men are cooked. I cant find it but i remember a great and concise post of @GeckoBus on this, it said :

1) men and women generally like and trust women
2) men and women generally dont like and dont trust men
3) men - the universally disliked - gotta have a woman - the universally liked - to intimately validate them in order to break the spell of social alienation

And no one can deny that this is the way society works - especially not those women attached to their right of painting men as suspicious deplorables. Sure SOME guys will navigate around it through luck or social skill and fortitude but it doesnt mean that all guys can or will get the same results.

By the way, i dont want to make a too lenghty and abstruse/intuitional unsourced schizo aside but to me this is a fallout from the death of the patriarchy, of the pater familias and the increasing gynocentrism that will naturally ensue.

From personal experience, i live in a multicultural city and i notice that muslim/arab men are very present in the public space in their muslim/arab neighborhoods, especially middle-aged men or seniors ; you'll see them doing small groceries, interacting with each other, walking wherever, not to even mention their monopoly on cafes and tea saloons.

The comparison with other neighborhoods warrants some nuances as it's not the perfect opposition but you definitely feel the weight of psycho-social changes induced by """equality""" ; middle-aged men or seniors are almost nowhere to be found and when you do see them it's either because they're with their wives and kids or fucking working ! NEVER do you see them doing anything else, and especially not having fun with each other ; it's as if all the avenues of humanization were completely barren for western men outside of being validated by a woman.

That's why i think that egalitarianism might be even more restrictive and repressive for men than a supposedly tyrannical patriarchy ; the stoic working provider that just shuts up and perform ? I never see him in neighborhoods still somewhat in touch with tradition, i see him (when i do cause he seems ashamed to exit the house ) everywhere else but there ! This seems corroborated by history, watch any early 20th century (or even onwards) footage of a western city and you'll see plenty of middle-aged men or seniors minding their own business which is just unthinkable now. I think they're lying to us.

And when you think about it, there's a lot of audacity in their indifference or hostility to incels complaints given that we live in a society such as this one. Sometimes i think those people want us to get depressed to the point of dying on the streets, not even able to provide for ourselves just like those legions of homeless men i see.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Even when it comes to friendships and the relation of an individual to society at large, men are cooked. I cant find it but i remember a great and concise post of @

@GeckoBus on this, it said :

1) men and women generally like and trust women
2) men and women generally dont like and dont trust men
3) men - the universally disliked - gotta have a woman - the universally liked - to intimately validate them in order to break the spell of social alienation

I am pretty sure I included the quote you are referring to in my last post.

And no one can deny that this is the way society works - especially not those women attached to their right of painting men as suspicious deplorables. Sure SOME guys will navigate around it through luck or social skill and fortitude but it doesnt mean that all guys can or will get the same results.

By the way, i dont want to make a too lenghty and abstruse/intuitional unsourced schizo aside but to me this is a fallout from the death of the patriarchy, of the pater familias and the increasing gynocentrism that will naturally ensue.

From personal experience, i live in a multicultural city and i notice that muslim/arab men are very present in the public space in their muslim/arab neighborhoods, especially middle-aged men or seniors ; you'll see them doing small groceries, interacting with each other, walking wherever, not to even mention their monopoly on cafes and tea saloons.

The comparison with other neighborhoods warrants some nuances as it's not the perfect opposition but you definitely feel the weight of psycho-social changes induced by """equality""" ; middle-aged men or seniors are almost nowhere to be found and when you do see them it's either because they're with their wives and kids or fucking working ! NEVER do you see them doing anything else, and especially not having fun with each other ; it's as if all the avenues of humanization were completely barren for western men outside of being validated by a woman.

That's why i think that egalitarianism might be even more restrictive and repressive for men than a supposedly tyrannical patriarchy ; the stoic working provider that just shuts up and perform ? I never see him in neighborhoods still somewhat in touch with tradition, i see him (when i do cause he seems ashamed to exit the house ) everywhere else but there ! This seems corroborated by history, watch any early 20th century (or even onwards) footage of a western city and you'll see plenty of middle-aged men or seniors minding their own business which is just unthinkable now. I think they're lying to us.

You’re 100% right about the contrast with traditional neighborhoods. I’ve noticed it too; the more traditional communities still allow their men space to exist as men. You can see them, laugh with each other, loiter a little, exist without shame. Meanwhile, in atomized liberal societies, the only time you’ll see a middle-aged man is when he’s dragging a toddler around like a pack mule or buried in work just to keep the lights on.

The “egalitarian” West has turned men into invisible functionaries.

 

[Mr.Breb]

It's also really possible to be lonely in a romantic relationship.

Im a millionare, im poor

 

[Kamanbert]

I am pretty sure I included the quote you are referring to in my last post.


You’re 100% right about the contrast with traditional neighborhoods. I’ve noticed it too; the more traditional communities still allow their men space to exist as men. You can see them, laugh with each other, loiter a little, exist without shame. Meanwhile, in atomized liberal societies, the only time you’ll see a middle-aged man is when he’s dragging a toddler around like a pack mule or buried in work just to keep the lights on.

The “egalitarian” West has turned men into invisible functionaries.

To me it increasingly looks like patrarchy as a social system was not only more effective for society, but the real equality ; not perfect but by far the best workaround cause men and women are not "equal" before nature. This is like trying to put qualifying adjectives such as "good" before nature, then next thing you see is a tornado coming for your ass.

 

[femcelbreedingnig]

“Women don’t owe men relationships” why do men still protect foids with this hostile mentality?

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

To me it increasingly looks like patrarchy as a social system was not only more effective for society, but the real equality ; not perfect but by far the best workaround cause men and women are not "equal" before nature. This is like trying to put qualifying adjectives such as "good" before nature, then next thing you see is a tornado coming for your ass.

Well said.

 

[Fortress Resolution]

what do you expect from foids, foids gonna foids.

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

Kurk pitten is a male feminist btw

I'm not even triggered by their antics anymore, i think we're the last generations of men that thought women to (still ?) be sweet, nurturing and precious in some way, that's why it hurt so much to discover that they not only are not those things but absolutely exceed some expected neutrality at least ; they're on the warpath !

Even when it comes to friendships and the relation of an individual to society at large, men are cooked. I cant find it but i remember a great and concise post of @GeckoBus on this, it said :

1) men and women generally like and trust women
2) men and women generally dont like and dont trust men
3) men - the universally disliked - gotta have a woman - the universally liked - to intimately validate them in order to break the spell of social alienation

And no one can deny that this is the way society works - especially not those women attached to their right of painting men as suspicious deplorables. Sure SOME guys will navigate around it through luck or social skill and fortitude but it doesnt mean that all guys can or will get the same results.

By the way, i dont want to make a too lenghty and abstruse/intuitional unsourced schizo aside but to me this is a fallout from the death of the patriarchy, of the pater familias and the increasing gynocentrism that will naturally ensue.

From personal experience, i live in a multicultural city and i notice that muslim/arab men are very present in the public space in their muslim/arab neighborhoods, especially middle-aged men or seniors ; you'll see them doing small groceries, interacting with each other, walking wherever, not to even mention their monopoly on cafes and tea saloons.

The comparison with other neighborhoods warrants some nuances as it's not the perfect opposition but you definitely feel the weight of psycho-social changes induced by """equality""" ; middle-aged men or seniors are almost nowhere to be found and when you do see them it's either because they're with their wives and kids or fucking working ! NEVER do you see them doing anything else, and especially not having fun with each other ; it's as if all the avenues of humanization were completely barren for western men outside of being validated by a woman.

That's why i think that egalitarianism might be even more restrictive and repressive for men than a supposedly tyrannical patriarchy ; the stoic working provider that just shuts up and perform ? I never see him in neighborhoods still somewhat in touch with tradition, i see him (when i do cause he seems ashamed to exit the house ) everywhere else but there ! This seems corroborated by history, watch any early 20th century (or even onwards) footage of a western city and you'll see plenty of middle-aged men or seniors minding their own business which is just unthinkable now. I think they're lying to us.

And when you think about it, there's a lot of audacity in their indifference or hostility to incels complaints given that we live in a society such as this one. Sometimes i think those people want us to get depressed to the point of dying on the streets, not even able to provide for ourselves just like those legions of homeless men i see.

Even though I'd argue that making that post is already coming from a combative point of view, it still shows that feminists at heart have very misandristic views towards men. Of course these people would like to believe that they are better than those 'evil misogynists' but are they really any different?

But in this world, people have reduced empathy towards men, so their hate and misandry is seen as socially justified.

This is genuinely some of the most foolishly nonsensical drivel I have read today; even if one does have the possibility of acquiring friends (many of us do not), it does not solve the problem of romantic deprivation; what we desire is love, affection, and intimacy—not merely friendship. It is absurd to suggest that anyone could live a fulfilling life while ignoring their utmost biological imperatives, and also, having friends as an incel typically entails getting mogged as they flaunt their success in your face (unless those friends are also incels). It is also ridiculous that these people say that, for I am sure they would lose their minds if they had to walk a day in our shoes, in destitute loneliness and rejection; they only say these meaningless platitudes because they are in a position of privilege, as keeping dejected men compliant and subservient is beneficial to them.



The idea that women face “true isolation” in the same way as men is just intellectual dishonesty or sheer delusion. Isolation = can't get chad to settle.


Abandoned after being in multiple relationships. That’s not isolation. That’s called relationship turnover. The men who “abandon” them are often men they chose over more stable partners in their youth. Also, there is no such thing as a woman who cannot find a partner, save for extremely rare cases.


That’s rich coming from someone who has the privilege of being in the market.


Just delude yourself

Strong posts as always friends. This is why I tag u niggas in specific. Sorry if I dont have much to say in return im too low iq but their rhetoric is why low status non nt men end up killing themselves unheard imo. They quite literally can ONLY hold empathy for women, men to them are all these patriarchal oppressors who due to historical grievances ALL deserve to suffer. Theyd like you to think that they just are being "logical" and "rational" and just pointing out how le men are le priviliged manbabies who think men owe them sex and are just hosting an en masse self pity party, but that one commentor who said (with positive updoots btw) that "I dont care if men die and I dont plan to start caring) shows their TRUE core ideological nature. I fucking asked grok "do men die alone more than women yes or no" and it said "yes" lmao (and it rightfully said one of the reasons is due to mens natural gender roles). To these people, ALL men, even non nt low status trucel men, hold this universal upheld privilege over ALL women and thus no man can even also be fucked over by society (which is composed of BOTH men and women) on a systemic level. They hate you and want you dead. Remember that these people enable the horrid, vapid whores who bully non nt low status men even just by proxy with this one sided as fuck fixed feminsitic worldview, even if they claim they just want to dismantle muh patriarchy (whatever the fuck that means, and keep in mind that most men and women enjoy and some even revel in their traditional gender roles, so to fully deprogam the human populace of what they deem to be "hetero patiarchal influence" would require a radical, communist-esque takeover and en masse "reducation" of society). Im not suprised that many of these "people" in this thread also probably in their post history post on tanke shitlord subs like r/communismmemes (that kurk pitten faggot does), making excuses for some of the worst regimes ever who actually oppressed people (even the minorities they claim to be fighting for) while still claiming to have the moral highground over those who commit wrongthink against their psuedo-religious cult. If you REALLY read into what these sociologist koolaid drinking fuckers want its some really scary shit imo, from thinking the natural differences of the sexes are all PURELY socially constructed (which is the same ideology that leads to children being mutilated via sex change operations) to the complete utter destruction of European western society and its very foundations since they believe that the society (which they flourosh from the fruits of btw) is fudementally white supremacist and oppressove muh BIPOC (which also is the same ideology that leads to mass migration in Europele leading to sand nig grooming gangs and a host of all other problems). Never let these "people" tell you that theyre the good ones who just want you to fight systemic oppression and you are just le evil privilged (because mentally ill men who in a society even THEY admit puts a LOT of emphasis on looks ) who also arent very attractive somehow hold more social and systemic prvilige then becky who has lots of support networks and flourishes in social spaces. No, the reality is that these "people" and all they social deconstructionist crap are just gay race communists who love to see the people they deem "oppressors" (whites, men) to suffer. This is why I like to say that leftists notorious emphasis on "emapthy" is all performative (again, just alone how many of these types unironically make excuses for literal fucking authoritarian leftist regimes because those regimes had their same faggot ideology in practice). When I read what feminists say, I realize why saint lepine was right, and imo he also shouldve killed the men too since they were also likely male feminist cucks too (assuming he shot up social theory class)

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

To me it increasingly looks like patrarchy as a social system was not only more effective for society, but the real equality ; not perfect but by far the best workaround cause men and women are not "equal" before nature. This is like trying to put qualifying adjectives such as "good" before nature, then next thing you see is a tornado coming for your ass.

No joke these niggas genuinely believe that the sexes are just blank state blobs and that biology plays such an insiginifcant role, which is why a common talking among these types is "why should what men and women be seen as in society be dictated by their genitals". Its why these so called "educated" assholes who literally spent their whole lives in schooling unironically end up saying shit like "men arent naturally stronger than women, thats just a social construct because female mma fighter is stronger then elon and le patriarchy encourages women to not work out" (this kurk pitten dude unironically said that once and hes a sociologist in uni btw)

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

This is genuinely some of the most foolishly nonsensical drivel I have read today; even if one does have the possibility of acquiring friends (many of us do not), it does not solve the problem of romantic deprivation; what we desire is love, affection, and intimacy—not merely friendship. It is absurd to suggest that anyone could live a fulfilling life while ignoring their utmost biological imperatives, and also, having friends as an incel typically entails getting mogged as they flaunt their success in your face (unless those friends are also incels). It is also ridiculous that these people say that, for I am sure they would lose their minds if they had to walk a day in our shoes, in destitute loneliness and rejection; they only say these meaningless platitudes because they are in a position of privilege, as keeping dejected men compliant and subservient is beneficial to them.



The idea that women face “true isolation” in the same way as men is just intellectual dishonesty or sheer delusion. Isolation = can't get chad to settle.


Abandoned after being in multiple relationships. That’s not isolation. That’s called relationship turnover. The men who “abandon” them are often men they chose over more stable partners in their youth. Also, there is no such thing as a woman who cannot find a partner, save for extremely rare cases.


That’s rich coming from someone who has the privilege of being in the market.


Just delude yourself

That kurk pittem faggots profile is filled to the brim with posts about how hes some male feminist intellectual who critically deconstructs social patriarchal injunctions, but hes also one of those dirtbag lefty types who unironically posts shit like "in the usa private propety is equated on the same level of real human beings" when talking in the context of defending yourself and your family from fucking home invasions (this is a common talking point among these types btw)


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/sociology/comments/1lvc4oj/comment/n24v2wh/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/sociology/comments/1lvc4oj/comment/n24tksl/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


Keep in mind hes also a sandnigger living in france (hes married too), while he simutaneously also bitches about how the west is le evil for oppressing his fellow browns (he seethes when people say islam isnt compatible with european values lmao)

These people literally attened academic courses that teach them to literally fucking view the world and ALL of its dynamics via a absolutely fixed ideological lens but have the gall to call normies who just want to be normal men and women and for their nations not to be literally ethnically replaced as the real "brainwashed" ones lmao. Literally this same faggot denies that mass migration from his fellow dune coons increases rape rates because he knows a few french men who did sa or some shit
"Just import MORE rapists chud!!"

 

[deleted fren]

This is genuinely some of the most foolishly nonsensical drivel I have read today; even if one does have the possibility of acquiring friends (many of us do not), it does not solve the problem of romantic deprivation; what we desire is love, affection, and intimacy—not merely friendship. It is absurd to suggest that anyone could live a fulfilling life while ignoring their utmost biological imperatives, and also, having friends as an incel typically entails getting mogged as they flaunt their success in your face (unless those friends are also incels). It is also ridiculous that these people say that, for I am sure they would lose their minds if they had to walk a day in our shoes, in destitute loneliness and rejection; they only say these meaningless platitudes because they are in a position of privilege, as keeping dejected men compliant and subservient is beneficial to them.



The idea that women face “true isolation” in the same way as men is just intellectual dishonesty or sheer delusion. Isolation = can't get chad to settle.


Abandoned after being in multiple relationships. That’s not isolation. That’s called relationship turnover. The men who “abandon” them are often men they chose over more stable partners in their youth. Also, there is no such thing as a woman who cannot find a partner, save for extremely rare cases.


That’s rich coming from someone who has the privilege of being in the market.


Just delude yourself

 

[deleted fren]

Feminists continue to spread lies that were long debunked. "Muh men leave women because of cancer"
@GeckoBus already ripped that rubbish to death. https://incels.is/threads/men-more-...-they-get-sick-feminist-lies-debunked.544047/

 

[deleted fren]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zbf8k/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


Objectively you will live a much more unhappy life if you're single. That's not something you can choose. It's how your brain is hardwired. Reproduction is our subconscious biological goal and if you don't achieve it your brain will make you feel bad so that you're motivated to.

Results indicated that single individuals reported lower emotional well-being than partnered individuals.

Perceived Social Support and Mental Health Among Single vs. Partnered Polish Young Adults - PMC

The aim of this study was to examine whether young adults in nonmarital romantic relationships experience better mental health and lower levels of mental health problems compared to single young adults. In addition, the current study also tested the ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Depression in early adulthood was associated with never entering a partner relationship over the study period. For those who did enter a relationship, both depression and anxiety were significantly associated with subsequently lower relationship support and higher conflict. Supplementary analyses restricting the analyses to the first relationship entered at follow-up, and considering comorbid anxiety and depression, strongly supported these findings.

Depression and anxiety in early adulthood: consequences for finding a partner, and relationship support and conflict - PMC

Mental health problems in early adulthood may disrupt partner relationship formation and quality. This prospective study used four waves of Australian data to investigate the effects of depression and anxiety in early adulthood on the quality of ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Men are on average more affected by being alone without a partner.

Respondents without a partner in the household, with a small network, and with low emotional support were more often depressed, with men showing higher rates of depression than women. A high need for affiliation was associated with depression in women but not in men. Lack of a partner in the household and having a small network predicted onset of depression in men but not in women. In respondents with high affiliation need and low social support, depression rates were higher, with men being more often depressed than women.

Gender differences in the relation between depression and social support in later life | International Psychogeriatrics | Cambridge Core

Gender differences in the relation between depression and social support in later life - Volume 25 Issue 1

www.cambridge.org

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1lun8es/comment/n1zauyb/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


I'm so surprised that women don't care about men. Couldn't of seen that one coming

Log in - American Psychological Association

psycnet.apa.org

 

[Kamanbert]

Strong posts as always friends. This is why I tag u niggas in specific. Sorry if I dont have much to say in return im too low iq but their rhetoric is why low status non nt men end up killing themselves unheard imo. They quite literally can ONLY hold empathy for women, men to them are all these patriarchal oppressors who due to historical grievances ALL deserve to suffer. Theyd like you to think that they just are being "logical" and "rational" and just pointing out how le men are le priviliged manbabies who think men owe them sex and are just hosting an en masse self pity party, but that one commentor who said (with positive updoots btw) that "I dont care if men die and I dont plan to start caring) shows their TRUE core ideological nature. I fucking asked grok "do men die alone more than women yes or no" and it said "yes" lmao (and it rightfully said one of the reasons is due to mens natural gender roles). To these people, ALL men, even non nt low status trucel men, hold this universal upheld privilege over ALL women and thus no man can even also be fucked over by society (which is composed of BOTH men and women) on a systemic level. They hate you and want you dead. Remember that these people enable the horrid, vapid whores who bully non nt low status men even just by proxy with this one sided as fuck fixed feminsitic worldview, even if they claim they just want to dismantle muh patriarchy (whatever the fuck that means, and keep in mind that most men and women enjoy and some even revel in their traditional gender roles, so to fully deprogam the human populace of what they deem to be "hetero patiarchal influence" would require a radical, communist-esque takeover and en masse "reducation" of society). Im not suprised that many of these "people" in this thread also probably in their post history post on tanke shitlord subs like r/communismmemes (that kurk pitten faggot does), making excuses for some of the worst regimes ever who actually oppressed people (even the minorities they claim to be fighting for) while still claiming to have the moral highground over those who commit wrongthink against their psuedo-religious cult. If you REALLY read into what these sociologist koolaid drinking fuckers want its some really scary shit imo, from thinking the natural differences of the sexes are all PURELY socially constructed (which is the same ideology that leads to children being mutilated via sex change operations) to the complete utter destruction of European western society and its very foundations since they believe that the society (which they flourosh from the fruits of btw) is fudementally white supremacist and oppressove muh BIPOC (which also is the same ideology that leads to mass migration in Europele leading to sand nig grooming gangs and a host of all other problems). Never let these "people" tell you that theyre the good ones who just want you to fight systemic oppression and you are just le evil privilged (because mentally ill men who in a society even THEY admit puts a LOT of emphasis on looks ) who also arent very attractive somehow hold more social and systemic prvilige then becky who has lots of support networks and flourishes in social spaces. No, the reality is that these "people" and all they social deconstructionist crap are just gay race communists who love to see the people they deem "oppressors" (whites, men) to suffer. This is why I like to say that leftists notorious emphasis on "emapthy" is all performative (again, just alone how many of these types unironically make excuses for literal fucking authoritarian leftist regimes because those regimes had their same faggot ideology in practice). When I read what feminists say, I realize why saint lepine was right, and imo he also shouldve killed the men too since they were also likely male feminist cucks too (assuming he shot up social theory class)

There's just too much bullshit going on with those people. It's a herculean task to make some sense out of it. Tbh if i was not unmotivated, hopeless and unconfident in my own abilities or legitimacy i would like to make some sort of incel bible or .is adjacent website advocating for us and men at large with a sound argumentation, with the objective of regrouping every single great point, argument, objection and even freestyle thought-provoking reflections i've seen here or elsewhere so they dont get forgotten in the communicational flux of the manosphere. Even better if we could work on it together - an IRREFUTABLE inkwell codex. @AtrociousCitizen and @GeckoBus are beasts in synthesis. @WorthlessSlavicShit is a master in stats/datas, just to name a few.

This bible would not only be based on science and data like the original blackpill but also on classical humanities (religion, philosophy, history) and their modern extensions (sociology, psychology...).

I see some other male spaces trying to do something similar through videos and websites, like the PMC, but those guys are cringe. Those guys are meninists, not even masculinists if you catch my drift ; they want to act like reverse foids when such a thing is impossible, but it structures their entire activism. I guess our activism would be a reflection of the blackpill ; disillusioned, but deadly.

Of course these are just my thoughts. None of us here would want to do it. Deep down we even lack the rage and hatred feminists have. Even when high-effort, our posts are still knee-jerk reactions.

(this kurk pitten dude unironically said that once and hes a sociologist in uni btw)

This just shows how low academia has fallen. The reified lack of nuance in order to not accord """his""" opinions with actual reality is mindblowing.

 

[Kamanbert]

That kurk pittem faggots profile is filled to the brim with posts about how hes some male feminist intellectual who critically deconstructs social patriarchal injunctions, but hes also one of those dirtbag lefty types who unironically posts shit like "in the usa private propety is equated on the same level of real human beings" when talking in the context of defending yourself and your family from fucking home invasions (this is a common talking point among these types btw)


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/sociology/comments/1lvc4oj/comment/n24v2wh/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/sociology/comments/1lvc4oj/comment/n24tksl/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


Keep in mind hes also a sandnigger living in france (hes married too), while he simutaneously also bitches about how the west is le evil for oppressing his fellow browns (he seethes when people say islam isnt compatible with european values lmao)
View attachment 1484680
These people literally attened academic courses that teach them to literally fucking view the world and ALL of its dynamics via a absolutely fixed ideological lens but have the gall to call normies who just want to be normal men and women and for their nations not to be literally ethnically replaced as the real "brainwashed" ones lmao. Literally this same faggot denies that mass migration from his fellow dune coons increases rape rates because he knows a few french men who did sa or some shit
"Just import MORE rapists chud!!"

Typical warped mind npc he's such a pos

 

[Sonicfancel]

WW3 is inevitable because foids not only have less empathy towards men than a psychopath but also want to see men dying alone. Is even hard to comprehend the everest scale of hate foids have for the average men. This is also why cold approaching never works. Two different worlds.

Great thread.