Pupillary Response as an Age-Specific Measure of Sexual Interest - Archives of Sexual Behavior
In the visual processing of sexual content, pupil dilation is an indicator of arousal that has been linked to observers’ sexual orientation. This study investigated whether this measure can be extended to determine age-specific sexual interest. In two experiments, the pupillary responses of...
link.springer.com
Honestly, it is quite interesting how technology is essentially going on to prove the blackpill: As some others have noted, AI itself seems to prove what we ourselves claim & prove with various studies n' sheit.
New AI can work out whether you're gay or straight from a photograph
An algorithm deduced the sexuality of people on a dating site with up to 91% accuracy, raising tricky ethical questions
www.theguardian.com
AI calculates 8% of foids aged 18-24 are OnlyFans whores
These are some jaw dropping stats. Source
incels.is
AI Sees Race Even When Humans Can't [Breakdowns]
Deep Learning can detect a person's race from medical images, even if those images are corrupted a lot.
artificialintelligencemadesimple.substack.com
To start off with, this study somewhat proves the lesbianpill; which is that while foids still ofc find "Chad" attractive they would rather value a foid over some lower-value or even average male.
Quite a disparity between the "somewhat attracted to the opposite gender" when comparing men to females.
Here's the first experiment:
Now here is where things do get a bit more interesting, it would seem that men seemed to fixate much more on a foids body compared to foids, whom seemed to of course notice face much more on males by a substantial margin.
Furthermore, the findings indicate that while men and women pupils dilated at around the same fixation %, they seemed to emphasize more upon their own bodies gender as opposed to men. Now, ofc it makes sense that face matters just as much -if not arguably slightly more- than that of your physique. However, if you believe the general thesis myself & many others do on homosexuality you would understand it is more of a sexual perversion, not actual innate attraction via pair bonding. Thus, this could help support a claim that foids see attraction to other foids more in the innately sexual sense for pure pleasure, as opposed to general "romantic" attraction: Possibly, foids strong in-group preference also contributes to this as well.
However, this is where it all gets really interesting:
This graph was done in to measure the "Percentage pupillary change for all stimulus categories for male and female observers in Experiment 1. Lines represent standard errors of the means" in this experiment. I also should point out that the images used for this study were of people at a beach, so semi-sexual Ig we can say.
But based on the mean pupil change in response to stimuli, it seems that while men showed great dilation in response to foid related stimuli, foids seemed to dilute significantly less in response to male elicited stimuli. However, the biggest surprise here is how they not only dilated the most in response to their own gender, but also a somewhat neutral-positive response in regards to boys. Now ofc, let's not jump the gun- sure some of this can be chalked up to foids nurturing instincts. But if that was the full case, then why do they not elicit the same response in regards to foids?
This is quite interesting data- make of it what you will but in my opinion it is quite revealing about the nature of foids.
This is from the findings:
Frankly, this is both a massive lesbianpill as well as that of another certified "empathetic & innocent" gender moment as well as whatever the specific "pill" term for foid pedophilia is.
Genuinely, it seems foids are much more appealed by other foids in a purely aroused sense as opposed to that of most males- not to mention their seemingly "neutral" or "unphased" response to boys in this context.
But let's look at experiment 2:
The left graph is unscrambled images(meaning they were not altered or diluted in anyway), and the right is "scrambled" meaning they were diluted with.
Of course, the unscrambled is of the most significance & aside from the child aspect, what else do you notice?
As in the last one, we see similar results in which mens pupils heavily dilate in response to foids yet hardly so much for men- then foids yield the result of diluting more so for themselves and only slightly much for males.
And ofc, the male stat here:
Makes sense when you factor in how around 1/5th of the guys here are faggots.
In reality, it would be around 95%-100% or so who would display larger pupils in response to men than boys- thus proving foids are more pedophilic than males.
Overall, this is more a brutal lesbianpill than anything. These studies both yielded consistent results that foids elicit response to both male & sexual stimuli, with the various graphs shown here proving they are both chad & lesbian only.
@Koomersarj @wereq @weaselbomber @PersonalityChad @WorthlessSlavicShit @GeckoBus @reveries @Castaway @Grodd @based_meme @LeFrenchCel @Diddy @Lazyandtalentless @Stupid Clown @SuperKanga.Belgrade @Flagellum_Dei @Sergeant Kelly @Regenerator @veryrare @Epedaphic @Fevet @caineturbat2003 @AtrociousCitizen @daydreamER @NIGGER BOJANGLES @Blackpill Monk @Skelly @Antorian @To koniec @stranger @NeverGetUp @Paladin
Attachments
Last edited:
