That sounds like a 83 IQ cope. Europe for example had continuous civilization for thousands of years using 100 IQ individuals. Africa could not figure out how to build a 2 story building with 83 iq individuals.
Blackpill Proof that women are much retarded than you think.
B
Men are smarter because we had to be. Women did not have the same selective pressures to solve problems (still don't). All they needed was to have a man who could protect them and solve their problems for them (still do).
Being smarter doesn't make you more noble and less of a selfish asshole. If anything, it's the smart evil people who are prone to bring about the most destruction and harm in any given society. JFL
I don't deny that your statement is true, foids are indeed extremely stupid. However, you can't just post a random image that could be sourced from literally anywhere and claim that the graph presented is absolute truth. First, you'd have to source the data, justify why the sourced data is relevant, and then you can use that to try and make a point.
It's also important to address possible rebuttals. If I was a foid, I could just point to the fact that foids tend to have higher GPAs on average, and then claim that men are in fact the unintelligent ones.
It's also important to address possible rebuttals. If I was a foid, I could just point to the fact that foids tend to have higher GPAs on average, and then claim that men are in fact the unintelligent ones.
did you call me 83 IQ lil shitcurry?
yeah, that civilization was significantly less complex. you can't trust the same normalfags (and even femshits) to perform functions that require vast knowledge and rational, functional thinking because it always ends in disaster
actually, in general it does. of course there are always exceptions but also a high IQ population would be better equipped dealing with them
B
I'd be interested in seeing the evidence that shows how cognitive horsepower is supposedly correlated with increased empathy, moral sensibility, and altruism (less selfish). Everything I've seen and read wrt to IQ and other characteristics shows that there's zero correlation between IQ, personality traits, and morality, as they relate to moral/immoral behavior. Then again, there might be something new I'm not aware of.actually, in general it does. of course there are always exceptions but also a high IQ population would be better equipped dealing with them
Last edited:
uhh there was a study I think, cba searching for it but it's enough evidence for a lifetime seeing how shitskins treat others in general. zero regard for anything. there is a negative correlation between IQ and homicide for one. now do I say nobody ever deserves to be killed? no, but ideally we aren't retarded animals stabbing each other to death over nothing. high IQ allows you to perceive many factors and variables regarding a person, for this alone empathy is bound to be higher. also just not fucking obvious things up, having care for multiple factors is absent in shitskin "societies". in africa they cook with transformer oil.
B
Well, whenever you do feel arsed to look for it, please tag me.
This is true. IQ and criminality is negatively correlated. It has to do with risk analysis and evaluating possible outcomes, but there are also many other factors e.g., impulse control, aggression levels etc. Related note: IQ and psychopathy has zero correlation.
A more intelligent person can infer a person's emotions and understand it intellectually ("this person is experiencing sadness, because their pet died, and people form emotional bonds with their pets"), but it doesn't necessarily mean that they feel it themselves (or emotions close to those same ones). All of that is the "emotional intelligence" bullshit that is peddled by the progressivists.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
