Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Private the forum

DostoevskyCel

DostoevskyCel

Officer
Joined
Mar 18, 2021
Posts
551
the only outcome of it not being private is ITcels screenshotting, but this isn't even the worst part, they feign ignorance at every opportunity, gaslight, and outright lie. Not to mention that the admins bot their posts like crazy, if you sort by new on their sub one in 20 posts have 1k+, one in around 10 have 100+ and 99% of the rest get sub 30 upvotes, it isn't normal for a legit sub. We are drip feeding content to incels in denial and keeping them in the sphere of normie advice, meaning they remain bluepilled.

1618250788191


No one needs me to tell you how horseshit all of this post is, but a proof by counter example should suffice for the claim that there are no chads or stacies. Jeremy Meeks, in spite of being an unironic violent criminal, became a stacked model purely because of his face. Do you think Margot Robbie and Marilyn Monroe became actresses because of their great personalities, contacts, and hard work!! :soy: no, people want good looking actresses, hence they became actresses.

There are no incels by nature? Well there are more men than women on earth, so statistically speaking a very many men will live alone forever or for extended periods of time. Also, some children are born unable to become theoretical physicists. No matter how hard you force them, they will never get a phd in physics, they are not smart enough. Incels are the 50 iq somalians of the dating world.

It's also worth mentioning that this (mostly) isn't a self identifying incel forum, if your lived experience tells you that women do not find you attractive, and despite all the self improvement you cannot get a gf, and you are involuntarily celibate, you're an incel. Not to mention, there have been incels, and violent incels, before the internet's conception, so the notion that incels are a internet subculture is embarrassingly false.

One final thing to note, dear IT cucks and virgins but not incels, some men are not attractive enough for Margot Robbie to be sexually attracted to them, we can all agree. However, there is nothing in her biology that tells her to go for the 9/10 chad as opposed to the 7/10 chadlite, its just her preference, and her own inflated ego which makes her seek out only the best males. As all women have their egos inflated owing to soyciety, they naturally gravitate to higher status men than themselves. That means the lowest value males in terms of attractiveness have zero women actively seeking to be romantically involved with them. Incels are the peacocks with no feathers, there is biologically no reason for women to gravitate to us and be attracted to us. What makes normies think that a bird with no feathers dying without having kids is different from an incel not having children of his own? - cope.
 
the only outcome of it not being private is ITcels screenshotting, but this isn't even the worst part, they feign ignorance at every opportunity, gaslight, and outright lie. Not to mention that the admins bot their posts like crazy, if you sort by new on their sub one in 20 posts have 1k+, one in around 10 have 100+ and 99% of the rest get sub 30 upvotes, it isn't normal for a legit sub. We are drip feeding content to incels in denial and keeping them in the sphere of normie advice, meaning they remain bluepilled.

View attachment 433183

No one needs me to tell you how horseshit all of this post is, but a proof by counter example should suffice for the claim that there are no chads or stacies. Jeremy Meeks, in spite of being an unironic violent criminal, became a stacked model purely because of his face. Do you think Margot Robbie and Marilyn Monroe became actresses because of their great personalities, contacts, and hard work!! :soy: no, people want good looking actresses, hence they became actresses.

There are no incels by nature? Well there are more men than women on earth, so statistically speaking a very many men will live alone forever or for extended periods of time. Also, some children are born unable to become theoretical physicists. No matter how hard you force them, they will never get a phd in physics, they are not smart enough. Incels are the 50 iq somalians of the dating world.

It's also worth mentioning that this (mostly) isn't a self identifying incel forum, if your lived experience tells you that women do not find you attractive, and despite all the self improvement you cannot get a gf, and you are involuntarily celibate, you're an incel. Not to mention, there have been incels, and violent incels, before the internet's conception, so the notion that incels are a internet subculture is embarrassingly false.

One final thing to note, dear IT cucks and virgins but not incels, some men are not attractive enough for Margot Robbie to be sexually attracted to them, we can all agree. However, there is nothing in her biology that tells her to go for the 9/10 chad as opposed to the 7/10 chadlite, its just her preference, and her own inflated ego which makes her seek out only the best males. As all women have their egos inflated owing to soyciety, they naturally gravitate to higher status men than themselves. That means the lowest value males in terms of attractiveness have zero women actively seeking to be romantically involved with them. Incels are the peacocks with no feathers, there is biologically no reason for women to gravitate to us and be attracted to us. What makes normies think that a bird with no feathers dying without having kids is different from an incel not having children of his own? - cope.
The majority of the people on this forum may disagree with you on this, but I agree with you.
 
If we go private, I worry about the brocels out there who only lurk, and how much membership might slow down if we wait for intensive mod approval for everyone who wants to join. This may also mean a rogue mod gatekeeps the forum so heavily that incels are being kept out and, even worse, a compromised mod may let only infiltrators in.
Who would volunteer the time to sort through everything? Would there be a committee of mods that vote on membership? If so, will this be an effective method, or will it choke out our community?
We must weigh the pros and cons of privating this forum carefully. I used to be a lurker for months before I joined, and without that opportunity I may not have figured this would be a place worth joining. I would rather put up with a million normie IT members being morons that risk one real brocel who needs to talk slip through the cracks, personally.
 
How about we stop giving them attention and talk about them everyday? that would kill them pretty quickly, privating the forum would make them feel important.
it wouldn't, they get pms constantly, which are usually their own accounts anyway
If we go private, I worry about the brocels out there who only lurk, and how much membership might slow down if we wait for intensive mod approval for everyone who wants to join. This may also mean a rogue mod gatekeeps the forum so heavily that incels are being kept out and, even worse, a compromised mod may let only infiltrates in.
Who would volunteer the time to sort through everything? Would their be a committee of mods that vote on membership? If so, will this be an effective method, or will it choke out our community?
We must weigh the pros and cons of privating this forum carefully. I used to be a lurker for months before I joined, and without that opportunity I may not have figured this would be a place worth joining. I would rather put up with a million normie IT members being morons that risk one real brocel who needs to talk slip through the cracks, personally.
true, im sure the truth lies somewhere in the middle, would be a nice compromise to show posts but hide replies or something like that imo
 
it wouldn't, they get pms constantly, which are usually their own accounts anyway
Truth be told, so long as we exist, IT exists. And there are one or to retards here giving them 90% of their content by sending them insane threats and edgy comments
 
the only outcome of it not being private is ITcels screenshotting, but this isn't even the worst part, they feign ignorance at every opportunity, gaslight, and outright lie. Not to mention that the admins bot their posts like crazy, if you sort by new on their sub one in 20 posts have 1k+, one in around 10 have 100+ and 99% of the rest get sub 30 upvotes, it isn't normal for a legit sub. We are drip feeding content to incels in denial and keeping them in the sphere of normie advice, meaning they remain bluepilled.

View attachment 433183

No one needs me to tell you how horseshit all of this post is, but a proof by counter example should suffice for the claim that there are no chads or stacies. Jeremy Meeks, in spite of being an unironic violent criminal, became a stacked model purely because of his face. Do you think Margot Robbie and Marilyn Monroe became actresses because of their great personalities, contacts, and hard work!! :soy: no, people want good looking actresses, hence they became actresses.

There are no incels by nature? Well there are more men than women on earth, so statistically speaking a very many men will live alone forever or for extended periods of time. Also, some children are born unable to become theoretical physicists. No matter how hard you force them, they will never get a phd in physics, they are not smart enough. Incels are the 50 iq somalians of the dating world.

It's also worth mentioning that this (mostly) isn't a self identifying incel forum, if your lived experience tells you that women do not find you attractive, and despite all the self improvement you cannot get a gf, and you are involuntarily celibate, you're an incel. Not to mention, there have been incels, and violent incels, before the internet's conception, so the notion that incels are a internet subculture is embarrassingly false.

One final thing to note, dear IT cucks and virgins but not incels, some men are not attractive enough for Margot Robbie to be sexually attracted to them, we can all agree. However, there is nothing in her biology that tells her to go for the 9/10 chad as opposed to the 7/10 chadlite, its just her preference, and her own inflated ego which makes her seek out only the best males. As all women have their egos inflated owing to soyciety, they naturally gravitate to higher status men than themselves. That means the lowest value males in terms of attractiveness have zero women actively seeking to be romantically involved with them. Incels are the peacocks with no feathers, there is biologically no reason for women to gravitate to us and be attracted to us. What makes normies think that a bird with no feathers dying without having kids is different from an incel not having children of his own? - cope.
The majority of the people on this forum may disagree with you on this
How about we stop giving them attention and talk about them everyday? that would kill them pretty quickly, privating the forum would make them feel important.
Tbh if even we actively manage to deprive them of the attention crave and yearn for, they will still spend their days screenshotting our posts and spreading lies about us. It’s never going to stop, bro.
 
How about we stop giving them attention and talk about them everyday? that would kill them pretty quickly, privating the forum would make them feel important.
That will never happen. Unfortunately.
 
You're helping them get their high by going over there, talking about them, and posting their stuff on here.

And to those that say that they would still continue to do it. And? Nothing we're saying about them here curbs their actions anyway other than they get a high knowing that a few too many of us not only go there, but talk about, screen shot, and acknowledge them every day.

Stop talking, caring, acknowledging IT, tiktok, and I would say Reddit as a whole for that matter.
 
most of reddit is incels in denial
I would say most of reddits are normies, cucks , and foids.
And most of this forum believe the same.
 
This is the only place where we can publicize black pills. Privatization would end that.

IT thugs could easily just make infiltrator accounts to bypass the privatization and get their screenshots anyway, resulting in privating the forum achieving nothing but closing off the truth.

Truth be told, so long as we exist, IT exists. And there are one or to retards here giving them 90% of their content by sending them insane threats and edgy comments
If nobody was posting edgy shit, they would just post it themselves as false flags. Their entire forum model relies on the production of that content, they're not gonna see it disappear and just go "welp guess we got rid of the filthy inkwells, job well done fellow cucks" no they're gonna go into business for themselves. This has been done countless times with other online movements being targeted for smears.
 
Not one argument in that wall of text, just the same empty platitudes. Hard to have any arguments when you are objectively wrong.
 
This is the only place where we can publicize black pills. Privatization would end that.

IT thugs could easily just make infiltrator accounts to bypass the privatization and get their screenshots anyway, resulting in privating the forum achieving nothing but closing off the truth.


If nobody was posting edgy shit, they would just post it themselves as false flags. Their entire forum model relies on the production of that content, they're not gonna see it disappear and just go "welp guess we got rid of the filthy inkwells, job well done fellow cucks" no they're gonna go into business for themselves. This has been done countless times with other online movements being targeted for smears.
This is how I think about it. They do what they do regardless of the attention we give them. Notice that most of what they post is not our threads about them, but weird PMs they fake and the occasional weird ass thread on here. Only the users here think they spend much time watching the threads we make about them, I think.
 
Maybe it's better if the FBI can easily keep an eye on us, because otherwise they'll send troops to our houses, believing we're planning attacks while we're just comparating our dick sizes and insult each other in a respectful way.
 
the normies hang around the more popular subs

the foids have their own safe space

cucks browse the landwhale porn subs commenting "beautiful"

incels in denial are everywhere, making fun of incels and also defending w*men
You seem to know alot about reddit , how many posts do you have there and what cat did you prefer.
I made an account there a few years ago to post on incels and mgtow stuff but never got around to post anything before everything got nuked .
 
How about we stop giving them attention and talk about them everyday? that would kill them pretty quickly, privating the forum would make them feel important.
Yeah how about OP privates my parts LMFAOOOO
 
Shouldn't be privated, but I think should be moved to a russian server or something.
 
They're retarded. Who cares what they say about us

LMAO
 
I don't care about some mentally ill trannies and soycucks talking shit behind our backs in their little hugbox echochambers, but I think giving them the satisfaction to easily be able to lurk for content they clearly enjoy is a waste of potential and it's quite lenient from our part.

Making the process harder for them would be pretty satisfactory, although ultimately they will still able to keep lurking/screenshooting by making fake accounts, unless there's a new set of standard where we only allow active members to have the privilege to see the forum and we force new users to be active, in that case although it's not a 100% effective solution, it will sure make it harder for them.
 
We should atleast have a private section if nothing else. Honestly the admin here should write a long and detailed post about why he won’t do it and have it pinned. He has refused this request several times and I still don’t understand the reason that well. There is no reason to have every last thing here public.
@SergeantIncel
 
This isn't a bad idea. Members only

Fuck them with their cherrypicked posts
 
YES PRIVATE THE FORUM NOW
I don't care about some mentally ill trannies and soycucks talking shit behind our backs in their little hugbox echochambers, but I think giving them the satisfaction to easily be able to lurk for content they clearly enjoy is a waste of potential and it's quite lenient from our part.

Making the process harder for them would be pretty satisfactory, although ultimately they will still able to keep lurking/screenshooting by making fake accounts, unless there's a new set of standard where we only allow active members to have the privilege to see the forum and we force new users to be active, in that case although it's not a 100% effective solution, it will sure make it harder for them.
If they didn't have this site, they would look for inceldom behind a rock on normal sites causing them to look even crazier and more extreme than they intend.
 
If they didn't have this site, they would look for inceldom behind a rock on normal sites causing them to look even crazier and more extreme than they intend.
:yes:
And for those concerned about infiltrators still making it in look at a thread from a recent infiltrator and how well they managed to blend in
 
Last edited:
How about we stop giving them attention and talk about them everyday? that would kill them pretty quickly, privating the forum would make them feel important.
 
YES PRIVATE THE FORUM NOW

If they didn't have this site, they would look for inceldom behind a rock on normal sites causing them to look even crazier and more extreme than they intend.
Based.
 
:yes:
And for those concerned about infiltrators still making it in look at a thread from a recent infiltrator and how well they managed to blend in
they should pin that thread
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
15
Views
486
CruxGammata
CruxGammata
ForeverGrey
Replies
47
Views
2K
stalin22
stalin22
Clavicus Vile
Replies
17
Views
370
Autistic Uggo
Autistic Uggo
Zer0/∞
Replies
11
Views
520
Zer0/∞
Zer0/∞

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top