Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Premature Ejaculation Is A Socially Accepted Misnomer (An Obvious Sign Sex Is Now "Female Centered")

BlkPillPres

BlkPillPres

Self-banned
-
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Posts
19,747
Premature ejaculation is a misnomer when you think about it, the intended goal for a sex act, is to ejaculate, that is what nature intended, in fact the quicker the act is over and a female is impregnated, the more efficient that male is at reproducing, probably why fast ejaculaters are probably born, its likely a trait in some way that actually is a positive, but under the modern context of sex, its a negative, because sex today revolves around women, its about what women want

When you look at simple things like this, its easy to see that women now control the narrative of what sex is, how it should start, and how it should finish

This is why I've never really wanted to have a girl friend after I became black pilled and started analyzing things (some may say over analyzing)

When you think about it, the only time a man can be truly free to enjoy sex in this era, is if its with a whore he paid (or rape)

Its the only context within this modern world where you as a man dictate the pace and purpose of a sexual interaction, you don't have to focus on trying to last longer (which ironically is you trying to experience as little pleasure as possible in an act where your drive is to get as much pleasure as possible)

Sex as the average man is probably very limiting, it isn't "free" anymore, it isn't something you can do and "kick loose", unless you are "good in bed" (and that's assuming you have a penis large enough to even satisfy the woman regardless of how long you can last)

THE GREATEST IRONY ABOUT SEX AS A MODERN MAN, IS IT INVOLVES YOU SPENDING MONEY AND EXERTING EFFORT, TO BE "REWARDED" AND "GRACED" WITH THE CHANCE TO PLEASURE A WOMAN (YOU DO ALL THE WORK, SHE IS STILL THE FOCUS AND MAJORITY BENEFACTOR OF THE INTERACTION)


I've heard this before and I believe it it to be true, female ejaculation is what nipples are for men, its something "vestigial", something that isn't even supposed to be there, a left over of the effect of the combination of hormones we all receive in the womb, the female hormones that men got left them with nipples, and the male hormones that women got left them with the ability to ejaculate and orgasm, but it isn't even necessary for them to do so just as a man can lactate if he is hormonally imbalanced, and it isn't necessary for men to produce milk

The female orgasm was discovered by a fluke, and it never would have been discovered had men remained mere primates and mated as they always did, as quick as possible to ensure pregnancy and reduce the chance of being killed by a predator during mating

I am going to become an SEA escortcel at some point, and I can't see myself ever feeling like I'm "missing out", dating and relationships has always felt like a hassle to me, the only thing I ever felt I was missing, was sex, and if I can get that at a relatively consistent rate at a decent price, I'll be set
 
Last edited:
It's one the dumbest parts of this society. Ever since foids got their vibrators, it's been all about their pleasure or lack thereof.

Coping evolutionary biologists, try to pass extended time it takes for a male to ejaculate, as a show of fitness by the male. But the hole has to do very little to prove her fitness. Holes are so valuable, they don't have to anything for anyone, but high status Chads.

Copulation doesn't need to last long because to implant semen isn't difficult. Most primates mount and ejaculate within seconds.

The only issue with the female orgasm, is the resentment she will hold it against you for not providing one.
 
Last edited:
premature ejaculation's clinical definition originally meant before you even get in, which is obviously not good for anything.

like everything in the culture, it's been mutated into an issue about whether or not women are happy. women are never happy.
 
It's one the dumbest parts of this society. Ever since foids got their vibrators, it's been all about their pleasure or lack thereof.

Coping evolutionary biologists, try to pass extended time it takes for a male to ejaculate, as a show of fitness by the male. But the hole has to do very little to prove her fitness. Holes are so valuable, they don't have to anything for anyone, but high status Chads.

Copulation doesn't need to last long because to implant semen isn't difficult. Most primates mount and ejaculate within seconds.

The only issue with the female orgasm, is the resentment she will hold towards for not providing one.

I've heard this before and I believe it, female ejaculation is what nipples are for men, its something "vestigial", something that isn't even supposed to be there, a left over of the effect of the combination of hormones, the female hormones that men got left them with nipples, and the male hormones that women got left them with the ability to ejaculate and orgasm, but it isn't even necessary for them to do so just as a man can lactate if he is hormonally imbalanced and it isn't necessary for men to produce milk

The female orgasm was discovered by a fluke, and it never would have been discovered had men remained mere primates and mated as they always did, as quick as possible to ensure pregnancy and reduce the chance of being killed by a predator during mating

Will add this to the post, seems like an essential thing to point out
 
I've heard this before and I believe it, female ejaculation is what nipples are for men, its something "vestigial", something that isn't even supposed to be there, a left over of the effect of the combination of hormones, the female hormones that men got left them with nipples, and the male hormones that women got left them with the ability to ejaculate and orgasm, but it isn't even necessary for them to do so just as a man can lactate if he is hormonally imbalanced and it isn't necessary for men to produce milk

The female orgasm was discovered by a fluke, and it never would have been discovered had men remained mere primates and mated as they always did, as quick as possible to ensure pregnancy and reduce the chance of being killed by a predator during mating

Will add this to the post, seems like an essential thing to point out
 
Human beings naturally had sex for the purpose of reproduction and pleasure was the by-product of sex. Nowadays, the reverse is true: humans have sex for pleasure and reproduction is the by-product of sex. Abortion and contraception are such a big phenomena in the modern era because human beings want to have sex for the pleasure aspect without bearing the consequences of reproduction.

ejaculation is a biological function for the purpose of inducing conception of a zygote in order for reproduction to take place. But nowadays, society places importance on ejaculation for the purpose of pleasure, but specifically pleasure for the woman.
 
if most cant cum from penetration and its so easy to use a small vibrator during sex then why do they talk so much shit about dick size shouldnt a small dick not be any problem then? cunts drive you insane
 

JFL from the article:
SoNowSexIsARight



if most cant cum from penetration and its so easy to use a small vibrator during sex then why do they talk so much shit about dick size shouldnt a small dick not be any problem then? cunts drive you insane

Its just women doing a power grab, they are trying to control the narrative of sex and what its about, so of course they have to make it about penis size, if its not about penis size then they can't have men at odds with eachother trying to compete and keep up, its almost like a diversion tactic, men are so caught up in their egos and anxiety about sex, that they forget that they are basically just handing over the control of what its about to women
 
Last edited:
let me get this straight. Women have the right to good sex but men dont have the right to sex, period?

lol normscum so low IQ they cant see through the blatant double standards
 
Fuck this double-standard society, men are supposed to ejaculate within seconds because thats the way nature intended for it to be, being able to last longer is simply holding back your orgasm which is unnatural, the female orgasm isn't necesarry in reproduction which is the main point of sex.
 
let me get this straight. Women have the right to good sex but men dont have the right to sex, period?
they literally don't believe that low-value men have the right to exist. so yeah, anything like that is not surprising.
 
let me get this straight. Women have the right to good sex but men dont have the right to sex, period?

lol normscum so low IQ they cant see through the blatant double standards
:blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
Fuck, you make whores sound so much better every day tbh. Modern women are whores anyway.
 
Whats the point of sex if you feel under pressure to perform?
 
if most cant cum from penetration and its so easy to use a small vibrator during sex then why do they talk so much shit about dick size shouldnt a small dick not be any problem then? cunts drive you insane
Just have q vibrating dick, bro
 
Professor J. Moriarty IQ
 
Read somewhere once the female orgasm cause the sperm of men they find desirable to be better retained (since we know foid only get turned on by cbads this means men with at least above average genes)

Imho, your post is petty stupid. The answer is obvious

Female orgasm only matters in relationship / ons, when the female is giving it up for little to nothing of course she expects the act to be pleasurable..

After all pussy is expensive, and foid knows they could ask men to pay for sex
So when they put out the commodity for little to nothing of course she expects the men to pleasure her duh its the least she could get...when she could be asking for money,

Instead she only ask the men pleasure her, this doesnt even have to be through penetrative sex, its probably not hard to bring women to orgasm through clitoral stimulation.

Your post implies most men chase / pay for tail for reproduction
When in reality most men chase / pay for sex simply for pleasure
A lot go out of their way to make sure no child comes out of it.
So in this case wether the men achieve orgasm or not doesnt result to a child either way. Cope post.
 
yes, very true, the premature ejaculation thing is just more retarded gaslighting and shit-testing from society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intravaginal_ejaculation_latency_time lol that this even exists, imagine the existence of a women's 'vaginal tightness and resilience quotient' being calculated and measured by scientists, it's impossible to imagine

this concept can easily be stretched until everyone who doesn't offer women sexual marathons of 30 minutes is a premature ejaculator, because it was never supposed to be a fixed truth.

the problem is women define what sex is supposed to be, it doesn't matter that holding back long past the first urge creates stress hormones for you, you're just expected to deal with the stress during your single moment of glory, and also to catch your cum in your own hand "like a gentleman" if women want less of a mess

i couldn't find the old article teaching men to cum in their own hands but here have this soycuck trained by his wife to jerk off and cum in his hand https://www.quora.com/What-do-couples-do-to-avoid-semen-getting-everywhere-after-having-sex
 
Fuck this double-standard society, men are supposed to ejaculate within seconds because thats the way nature intended for it to be, being able to last longer is simply holding back your orgasm which is unnatural, the female orgasm isn't necesarry in reproduction which is the main point of sex.
in humans a man with high status won’t ejaculate fast because he doesn’t feel in danger and can focus on making the woman more likely to stay, sex lasting more is human just the expectations now are not natural or healthy
but yes female organs aren’t a hard necessity
 
Premature ejaculation is a misnomer when you think about it, the intended goal for a sex act, is to ejaculate, that is what nature intended, in fact the quicker the act is over and a female is impregnated, the more efficient that male is at reproducing, probably why fast ejaculaters are probably born, its likely a trait in some way that actually is a positive, but under the modern context of sex, its a negative, because sex today revolves around women, its about what women want

When you look at simple things like this, its easy to see that women now control the narrative of what sex is, how it should start, and how it should finish

This is why I've never really wanted to have a girl friend after I became black pilled and started analyzing things (some may say over analyzing)

When you think about it, the only time a man can be truly free to enjoy sex in this era, is if its with a whore he paid (or rape)

Its the only context within this modern world where you as a man dictate the pace and purpose of a sexual interaction, you don't have to focus on trying to last longer (which ironically is you trying to experience as little pleasure as possible in an act where your drive is to get as much pleasure as possible)

Sex as the average man is probably very limiting, it isn't "free" anymore, it isn't something you can do and "kick loose", unless you are "good in bed" (and that's assuming you have a penis large enough to even satisfy the woman regardless of how long you can last)

THE GREATEST IRONY ABOUT SEX AS A MODERN MAN, IS IT INVOLVES YOU SPENDING MONEY AND EXERTING EFFORT, TO BE "REWARDED" AND "GRACED" WITH THE CHANCE TO PLEASURE A WOMAN (YOU DO ALL THE WORK, SHE IS STILL THE FOCUS AND MAJORITY BENEFACTOR OF THE INTERACTION)

I've heard this before and I believe it it to be true, female ejaculation is what nipples are for men, its something "vestigial", something that isn't even supposed to be there, a left over of the effect of the combination of hormones we all receive in the womb, the female hormones that men got left them with nipples, and the male hormones that women got left them with the ability to ejaculate and orgasm, but it isn't even necessary for them to do so just as a man can lactate if he is hormonally imbalanced, and it isn't necessary for men to produce milk

The female orgasm was discovered by a fluke, and it never would have been discovered had men remained mere primates and mated as they always did, as quick as possible to ensure pregnancy and reduce the chance of being killed by a predator during mating

I am going to become an SEA escortcel at some point, and I can't see myself ever feeling like I'm "missing out", dating and relationships has always felt like a hassle to me, the only thing I ever felt I was missing, was sex, and if I can get that at a relatively consistent rate at a decent price, I'll be set
just to note females orgasm more with more attractive men.

when a girl orgasms shes got higher chance of the sperm making her pregnant than if she didnt orgasm
 
just to note females orgasm more with more attractive men.
You are really just stating the obvious.

when a girl orgasms shes got higher chance of the sperm making her pregnant than if she didnt orgasm
Where did you get this stat and how did the people who got this data even test for it?

This sounds more like a theory than a proven fact.

It's not like they gathered up a bunch of people, asked them to fuck raw and for the male to inseminate the female, set a control group that purposefully doesn't make the woman orgasm, and then have another group that makes the woman orgasm.

Unless they did something like that I don't see how they could prove it to be true.
 
You are really just stating the obvious.


Where did you get this stat and how did the people who got this data even test for it?

This sounds more like a theory than a proven fact.

It's not like they gathered up a bunch of people, asked them to fuck raw and for the male to inseminate the female, set a control group that purposefully doesn't make the woman orgasm, and then have another group that makes the woman orgasm.

Unless they did something like that I don't see how they could prove it to be true.
just trust me its true google it. not a theory
 
just trust me its true google it. not a theory
Nope, it's a theory.

Theories About Female Orgasms​

There are three main hypotheses on how female orgasm may help with getting pregnant.


Poleaxe Theory​

Proposed by zoologist Desmond Morris in 1967, the poleaxe hypothesis states that the purpose of female orgasms is to tire women out, causing them to lie down after sex. The idea is that this makes it easier for sperm to reach their destination.[UWSL]1[/UWSL]

However, it isn't clear whether or not lying down after sex can help you get pregnant. Studies have been inconclusive, although one study of IUI treatment found that women who remained horizontal after insemination were more likely to conceive.[UWSL]2[/UWSL]

Upsuck Theory​

Another theory of how female orgasm may help with pregnancy achievement is called the upsuck theory. This hypothesis is that the contractions of the uterus that happen with orgasm help "suck up" the semen that gets deposited in the vagina, near the cervix. The orgasm then helps to move the sperm through the uterus and fallopian tubes.

One study actually measured the amount of semen "flowback" (how much semen leaked out after sex). They discovered that when female orgasm occurred a minute or less before male ejaculation, sperm retention was greater. If female orgasm didn't happen within a minute of male ejaculation—before male ejaculation, specifically—lower sperm retention occurred.[UWSL]3[/UWSL]

What if orgasm happened after male ejaculation? Researchers found that as long as the woman has an orgasm up to 45 minutes after, sperm retention was higher. This study did not, however, look at pregnancy rates. If pregnancy rates are higher with female orgasm, it's unclear by how much.[UWSL]4[/UWSL]


Evolutionary Theory​

There is another theory on why female orgasm exists. This theory posits that female orgasms were once important to conception, but no longer play such a vital role.

Today, ovulation occurs on a monthly schedule, whether or not a person has sex. But in earlier humans, could female orgasm have triggered ovulation? This is how it works in some mammals. For example, with cats, if they don't copulate, they don't ovulate.

Clitoral stimulation induces feelings of pleasure, along with a release of hormones and muscular contractions. Those hormones and contractions might have signaled the ovaries to release an egg in ancestral humans.

As humans evolved, and ovulation began to occur regularly, and without sexual stimulation, the clitoris moved further away from the vaginal canal. This doesn't mean female orgasm has no purpose in conception, but it does imply its significance decreased.
There are multiple theories on why female orgasms may increase the chances of pregnancy but none of them have been proven yet.

The only way to prove it would be to conduct a crazy experiment like I described above lol:
It's not like they gathered up a bunch of people, asked them to fuck raw and for the male to inseminate the female, set a control group that purposefully doesn't make the woman orgasm, and then have another group that makes the woman orgasm.

Unless they did something like that I don't see how they could prove it to be true.
 
Last edited:
Lacan says that foids are asexual
 
sex today revolves around women, its about what women want
When you look at simple things like this, its easy to see that women now control the narrative of what sex is, how it should start, and how it should finish

This is why I've never really wanted to have a girl friend after I became black pilled and started analyzing things (some may say over analyzing)

When you think about it, the only time a man can be truly free to enjoy sex in this era, is if its with a whore he paid (or rape)
Another effect of gynocentrism. Its shocking how many "gynocentric" devices have impacted the normie mindset. Its like normies have been hypnotized to deify females and religiously serve their hedonistic interests.

Sometimes I wish I could return to :bluepill:. But things like this remind me why I was attracted to :blackpill:.
 
Last edited:
Nope, it's a theory.

There are multiple theories on why female orgasms may increase the chances of pregnancy but none of them have been proven yet.

The only way to prove it would be to conduct a crazy experiment like I described above lol:
fair
 
Sometimes I wish I could return to :bluepill:. But things like this remind me why I was attracted to :blackpill:.
I would never wish for that because I know I would probably end up as some broke guy working a dead end job and married to a single mother. That's probably where my life was heading as a low tier male with a high sex drive.

The more years you spend yearning for something the more your mind will subconsciously lower your standards in order to reduce mental strain and increase the likelihood of you getting that stress release.

Like I've said before, a lot of the incels on this forum today are going to be married in the future, they have a childish mindset where they refuse to pay for sex so their only outlet will be the women getting off of the cock carousel when these incels are around the age of 35-40

Statistically men reach their financial peak around then, and these women who are getting off of the cock carousel will target lonely incels for the purposes of betabuxx. Women can see the signs and they can spot men like this easily. Remember that women spend pretty much their entire lives being social, reading body language, etc, this comes second nature to them after so many years.

A lot of guys on here talk a good game but from their emotional pathetic posts it's clear as day that they will end up being betabuxxers. If you don't even have the balls to pay for sex because it makes you "feel bad" you're joking if you think you have the balls to cling to the standards you have now.

THEY WILL SETTLE BECAUSE AFTER DECADES OF BEING SEX STARVED AND "AFFECTION" STARVED THEIR STANDARDS WILL BEGIN TO GO DOWN, AND THEY WON'T EVEN REALIZE IT.

IN FACT THEY WILL BE CONVINCED THAT THEY "GOT LUCKY".

Most incels will fall to a rarely talked about phenomenon:
"Standards Attrition"

The stats even show it:
Statically in America around 98% males from the ages of 30 to 44 aren't virgins, and America still has a relatively high marriage rate despite the 50% divorce rate, so clearly a lot of guys are going to just end up settling for cock carousel riders out of desperation. This becomes even more likely when paired up with the fact that pretty much all the users here are emotional fools who go on and on about "finding love" and getting "validation", that kind of desperation will always lead to settling for used up whores later in life
 
Last edited:
I would never wish for that because I know I would probably end up as some broke guy working a dead end job and married to a single mother. That's probably where my life was heading as a low tier male with a high sex drive.

The more years you spend yearning for something the more your mind will subconsciously lower your standards in order to reduce mental strain and increase the likelihood of you getting that stress release.

Like I've said before, a lot of the incels on this forum today are going to be married in the future, they have a childish mindset where they refuse to pay for sex so their only outlet will be the women getting off of the cock carousel when these incels are around the age of 35-40

Statistically men reach their financial peak around then, and these women who are getting off of the cock carousel will target lonely incels for the purposes of betabuxx. Women can see the signs and they can spot men like this easily. Remember that women spend pretty much their entire lives being social, reading body language, etc, this comes second nature to them after so many years.

A lot of guys on here talk a good game but from their emotional pathetic posts it's clear as day that they will end up being betabuxxers. If you don't even have the balls to pay for sex because it makes you "feel bad" you're joking if you think you have the balls to cling to the standards you have now.

THEY WILL SETTLE BECAUSE AFTER DECADES OF BEING SEX STARVED AND "AFFECTION" STARVED THEIR STANDARDS WILL BEGIN TO GO DOWN, AND THEY WON'T EVEN REALIZE IT.

IN FACT THEY WILL BE CONVINCED THAT THEY "GOT LUCKY".
You're right. The :bluepill: still prevails in the majority of them. Their minds are still trapped in gynocentricized matrix.

There's loads of men above my SMV I have seen who are now betabux or babyfathers of ethnic LTBs / subhumans. Its horrible, like nothing I have ever seen before :cryfeels:. Not only are many normies becoming juggernauts, they are becoming betabux (or BDs) of the females they pull through juggernauting.

If normies are doing betabux on top of Juggernaut Law, imagine what the :bluepill:-ed incels will do when they finally get to interact with females after 30. They will probably succumb to the same fate and worse. Because the female will be less willing to commit and not stray from a beta provider when they are ugly and pretend to be oblivious to foid antics.
 
Last edited:
Brutally high iq
 

Similar threads

AshamedVirgin34
Replies
13
Views
380
stalledstorm
S
M
Replies
17
Views
618
arthur17
arthur17
sultryloser
Replies
35
Views
668
highschoolcel
highschoolcel
J
Replies
43
Views
685
mcmoohyun
mcmoohyun

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top