Blackpill Our species is polygamous by default

[sultryloser]

Probably water, but I feel like it tonight. here goes.

Through mDNA, researchers were able to settle on the fact that during prehistory, only one in seventeen men were able to pass along their genes. Something you can observe if you have living grandparents is that tracing your family tree, you will find twice as many female ancestors, that's because even in the modern era they breed more. This shit has been going on forever, it's dialed up to eleven today.

Our species is the paragon of adaptability, and so I posit that were are both polygamous and monogamous. Specially monogamous, as it comes about after agriculture, men who were not alphas were still human and could have even possessed higher IQ (not something females select for), and together man discovered how to predict the annual flooding of the Nile, where and what crops grow in what soils, seasonal patterns, and I think that these men would have thought it unfair that one man have sex with all of the women in the tribe, and so this very sensible patriarchy to restrain women's nature and enforce monogamy was created. And it worked out. We had this good thing going for thousands of years where because women couldn't work, the average man had value as a provider to her. Maybe she wasn't so attracted to him, but she knew that he would work hard at his job and pay the bills and mend the house, and she hadn't slept with TikTok, Tinder, Instagram 6'5 Chad, so she wasn't thinking back to how wet her pussy was and that 5'9 NW2 Michael who works photocopying spreadsheets isn't good enough. There was something for average men and bellow to work towards.

The deathblows of male SMV came thick and fast (like Chad does) in the last century.

1. Connectivity, transport, globalization (online dating, sex tourism, a bigger reach for alphas)
2. Welfare, women no longer have to find a beta to raise a child, the taxpayer is formed mainly by betas
3. Death of societal pressures (slut shaming, fat acceptance)
4. Feminism and empowerment

The parts about welfare and connectivity compound in the worst ways, because when women decide it's time for a baby at 32 and their pregnancy test comes back positive from their latest hookup with weekly Chad, they have the security from the government to have that baby without so much as vetting a single beta male provider. The average and bellow average man is cut-out of the equation entirely, because well, think about it, in a polygamous species all a woman needs is sperm from an alpha that will make it more likely her sons will be that alpha of the next generation. In this case the average man and bellow can provide NOTHING.

I learnt about this idea called Briffault's law a few months ago, and it states that

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

and this law I can't think of being anymore relevant to the discussion of inceldom as we delve further into the OnlyFans era, the era where women out-earn men for easier work. If this law is true then inceldom can only be the result of any society that emancipates their women. Women have to be oppressed for the average man to have a chance.

The epidemic of single mothers in my country is alarming, and it's precisely because of women's choices. If you let them choose, give them the ability to raise children by themselves wholly, this is what happens. Unless our sex drives were balanced, this is how it will always end. Unbelievable how these facts are only being widely spread now, and not uncontested mind you.

TLDR; It's over.

 

[Seahorsecel]

Born as male in 2024 = game over

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

It's not. The fact that we are moving toward polygamy is why humankind is failing as a species.

 

[sultryloser]

It's not. The fact that we are moving toward polygamy is why humankind is failing as a species.

Do you disagree with this:

Our species is the paragon of adaptability, and so I posit that were are both polygamous and monogamous. Specially monogamous, as it comes about after agriculture,

 

[Suicidal Schizoid]

I always thought so cause I don't believe in marriage and thought it's a societal concept to hook a woman to you when in nature the reality is polygamous to maximize offspring, though I could imagine some tribes had marriage and monogamy early on ?

 

[Suicidal Schizoid]

It's not. The fact that we are moving toward polygamy is why humankind is failing as a species.

Cope to think early prehistoric man wasn't polygamous and fucking everywhere, especially men who would just BONK a woman in the head and rape her

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Humans are promiscuous like Chimps and Bonobos. We still naturally drift towards polygamy over monogamy however. Simply because power structures in social groups naturally follow a top down pattern where males at the top of the patriarchal hierarchy can consolidate resources and females.

 

[SuperKanga.Belgrade]

Women have always been this way since the beginning. Social media has just shown their true colors.

We can implement all of these laws and restrictions, but what's the point if there will never be any physical attraction in the first place?

You would be providing for somebody who doesn't care about you.

 

[lifeisfucked215]

There was a reason our ancestors had such strict laws for women and marriage. History will repeat itself eventually. Maybe not in our lifetime but eventually it will

 

[Abacaxi14]

And that's the reason why I have no choice but to be MSTOW.

I will just buy video games, escort max and drink until I pass out. Why do I exist if I cant breed? Might as well live an hedonist lifestyle.

 

[VintageCarCoper]

Cope to think early prehistoric man wasn't polygamous and fucking everywhere, especially men who would just BONK a woman in the head and rape her

You gotta remember that back in the prehistoric days women were almost never just randomly wandering around in the middle of nowhere by themselves to be easily raped. They were protected by the males of the tribe and almost always had a man with them.

 

[illumizoldyck]

doesn't matter
polygamous society/countries/empires never survive, they usually get conquered by superior monogamous nations.
why?? cuz polygamy creates unilateral access of foids to top males aka chads only. would you defend a country that favored/catered chads and where chads fkd all the foids while u were stuck rotting?? you wouldn't, you would just rot and let it all burn.

while monogamous societies are more fair and every male has incentives aka foids/family to save/thrive and work for.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

Do you disagree with this:

Sort of. Adaptability plays a part, but polygamous species have big differences between the 2 genders. There is even a new word that's been created to describe what men are having to do today to find a mate: peacocking.

Cope to think early prehistoric man wasn't polygamous and fucking everywhere, especially men who would just BONK a woman in the head and rape her

Not a cope.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

doesn't matter
polygamous society/countries/empires never survive, they usually get conquered by superior monogamous nations.
why?? cuz polygamy creates unilateral access of foids to top males aka chads only. would you defend a country that favored/catered chads and where chads fkd all the foids while u were stuck rotting?? you wouldn't, you would just rot and let it all burn.

while monogamous societies are more fair and every male has incentives aka foids/family to save/thrive and work for.

Also this. Polygamy creates a "nobody owes anything" cutthroat society.

 

[Suicidal Schizoid]

You gotta remember that back in the prehistoric days women were almost never just randomly wandering around in the middle of nowhere by themselves to be easily raped. They were protected by the males of the tribe and almost always had a man with them.

The males would go hunt also those males would rape them too

 

[BlueCore]

And that's the reason why I have no choice but to be MSTOW.

I will just buy video games, escort max and drink until I pass out. Why do I exist if I cant breed? Might as well live an hedonist lifestyle.

 

[InceldianWarrior]

Our species is also very violent by default. It was never all about looks, because an ogrecel could just kill a pretty boy.

 

[sultryloser]

We can implement all of these laws and restrictions, but what's the point if there will never be any physical attraction in the first place?

You would be providing for somebody who doesn't care about you.

If you feel like that, you need to kill yourself and hope you're reborn handsome or a woman or get surgery. Our gender is one of compromise, It's never our needs first. We are second class citizens.

If you're anything over 23, I'd give up on this idea of love; women's pair bonding ability by that age and the average lay count acceleration means that unless you're Chad, you're not getting love, only compromise and her settling.

 

[sultryloser]

And that's the reason why I have no choice but to be MSTOW.

I will just buy video games, escort max and drink until I pass out. Why do I exist if I cant breed? Might as well live an hedonist lifestyle.

Legit. I'm on that fence whether or not to just give up and dive deep into coping and escapism or to hold out with slivers of hope. Leaning more toward MTOW though.

 

[sultryloser]

would you defend a country that favored/catered chads and where chads fkd all the foids while u were stuck rotting?? you wouldn't, you would just rot and let it all burn.

You underestimate men's ability to get used to it. So many men would be bluepilled and adapt to the new status quo. You see it happening now, open relationships, men providing for single moms, OnlyFans, sex dolls. Men will cope and adapt. The Collapse is not happening. That's cope.

 

[vic624]

If you feel like that, you need to kill yourself and hope you're reborn handsome or a woman or get surgery. Our gender is one of compromise, It's never our needs first. We are second class citizens.

If you're anything over 23, I'd give up on this idea of love; women's pair bonding ability by that age and the average lay count acceleration means that unless you're Chad, you're not getting love, only compromise and her settling.

Kind of cucked for a planet adding 360,000 new people every day. At 50% female that's a million new virgins every 10 days. Yes, love from a grateful Yazidi slave may not be the same satisfaction as pair bonding with a peer from your own environment, but it is better than living with a [claims-to-be] reformed whore.

 

[sultryloser]

, love from a grateful Yazidi slave

But you can't find this. This is increasingly becoming rarer everyday as empowerment steamrolls over the globalized planet. A few years back women were given the ability to drive in Saudi Arabia, and that was because of this raincloud of female empowerment washing everywhere over planet-wide. It is spreading and growing in influence, because it's spreading.

We will reach a point where men will still be circumcised regularly, men will be the primary casualties of war, earn less for more demanding work, many more times likely to be homeless, workplace deaths, incelled, and our societies focus will remain laser-focused on women and empowering them further.

I think the quickest solution to this would be an asteroid.

 

[vic624]

But you can't find this. This is increasingly becoming rarer everyday as empowerment steamrolls over the globalized planet. A few years back women were given the ability to drive in Saudi Arabia, and that was because of this raincloud of female empowerment washing everywhere over planet-wide. It is spreading and growing in influence, because it's spreading.

We will reach a point where men will still be circumcised regularly, men will be the primary casualties of war, earn less for more demanding work, many more times likely to be homeless, workplace deaths, incelled, and our societies focus will remain laser-focused on women and empowering them further.

I think the quickest solution to this would be an asteroid.

Female empowerment is just a side effect of them making most consumer purchases. They drive company revenue and are the primary focus of marketing. This is the entire profit model of social media, that follows the same as when radio wanted "Blue Eyes" Sinatra on the radio. Holes listen to commercials, or now their social media data and AI are used for advertisements that are individually specific. The only way that ends is if we force the social ethic to be something besides rapper type, "gettin paid yo" capitalism.

 

[VintageCarCoper]

The males would go hunt also those males would rape them too

True, the men would hunt and could probably get women by providing for them. It would still be very hard to rape because the women are almost never by themselves and would be with at least one other man. If you wanted to rape, you’d probably have to kill the man and then get the woman

 

[SuperKanga.Belgrade]

And that's the reason why I have no choice but to be MSTOW.

I will just buy video games, and drink until I pass out. Why do I exist if I cant breed?

 

[illumizoldyck]

You underestimate men's ability to get used to it. So many men would be bluepilled and adapt to the new status quo. You see it happening now, open relationships, men providing for single moms, OnlyFans, sex dolls. Men will cope and adapt. The Collapse is not happening. That's cope.

thats a minority, red/black pill are literally exploding at light speed.

so many normies are red/black pilled insane.

 

[lechad]

Our species is also very violent by default. It was never all about looks, because an ogrecel could just kill a pretty boy.

Bring back those days

 

[Punished Watcher]

Based. What we have done as a society, through feminism and dating apps, is returned to the way it was at the dawn of man. We've regressed into that dark, hyper-competitive tribal state where it's every man for himself. Make no mistake, building society and placing value on the things like money, art, philosophy, status and all that was the doing of ancient incels. The other sixteen men who were left out by the existing system where the first guy got all seventeen women in a group of 34.

We're higher beasts, but we're still beasts. That's an important distinction to make.

 

[sultryloser]

Colttaine explains this a whole lot better in this video. The explanation starts around the midway point of the video.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BqiSwahrfZE/

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Polygamy is part of the natural order of things.
As is murder.
As is rape.

We humans as a collective have created and developed a certain number of rules and values in order for everyone to live a decent life, for instance monogamy.

And then feminism came in and ruined it all.

 

[i am a wizard]

All done on purpose.

 

[highschoolcel]

It's not. The fact that we are moving toward polygamy is why humankind is failing as a species.

 

[neverbegantbh]

Tldr IT WAS NEVER BEGAN

 

[highschoolcel]

Probably water, but I feel like it tonight. here goes.

Through mDNA, researchers were able to settle on the fact that during prehistory, only one in seventeen men were able to pass along their genes. Something you can observe if you have living grandparents is that tracing your family tree, you will find twice as many female ancestors, that's because even in the modern era they breed more. This shit has been going on forever, it's dialed up to eleven today.

Our species is the paragon of adaptability, and so I posit that were are both polygamous and monogamous. Specially monogamous, as it comes about after agriculture, men who were not alphas were still human and could have even possessed higher IQ (not something females select for), and together man discovered how to predict the annual flooding of the Nile, where and what crops grow in what soils, seasonal patterns, and I think that these men would have thought it unfair that one man have sex with all of the women in the tribe, and so this very sensible patriarchy to restrain women's nature and enforce monogamy was created. And it worked out. We had this good thing going for thousands of years where because women couldn't work, the average man had value as a provider to her. Maybe she wasn't so attracted to him, but she knew that he would work hard at his job and pay the bills and mend the house, and she hadn't slept with TikTok, Tinder, Instagram 6'5 Chad, so she wasn't thinking back to how wet her pussy was and that 5'9 NW2 Michael who works photocopying spreadsheets isn't good enough. There was something for average men and bellow to work towards.

The deathblows of male SMV came thick and fast (like Chad does) in the last century.

1. Connectivity, transport, globalization (online dating, sex tourism, a bigger reach for alphas)
2. Welfare, women no longer have to find a beta to raise a child, the taxpayer is formed mainly by betas
3. Death of societal pressures (slut shaming, fat acceptance)
4. Feminism and empowerment

The parts about welfare and connectivity compound in the worst ways, because when women decide it's time for a baby at 32 and their pregnancy test comes back positive from their latest hookup with weekly Chad, they have the security from the government to have that baby without so much as vetting a single beta male provider. The average and bellow average man is cut-out of the equation entirely, because well, think about it, in a polygamous species all a woman needs is sperm from an alpha that will make it more likely her sons will be that alpha of the next generation. In this case the average man and bellow can provide NOTHING.

I learnt about this idea called Briffault's law a few months ago, and it states that

and this law I can't think of being anymore relevant to the discussion of inceldom as we delve further into the OnlyFans era, the era where women out-earn men for easier work. If this law is true then inceldom can only be the result of any society that emancipates their women. Women have to be oppressed for the average man to have a chance.

The epidemic of single mothers in my country is alarming, and it's precisely because of women's choices. If you let them choose, give them the ability to raise children by themselves wholly, this is what happens. Unless our sex drives were balanced, this is how it will always end. Unbelievable how these facts are only being widely spread now, and not uncontested mind you.

TLDR; It's over.

This kinda post is the reason why I wrote :

10 Ideas blackpillers and radical feminists agree on

Attention non-NTcels : The purpose of this post is to prove a point. I side neither with feminists, nor with blackpillers who promote concepts that justify feminism. 1. Most men are useless and ugly Feminists are very clear about the fact that most men are trash. Similarly, you'll often...

incels.is

You're basically saying "whores being whores is actually ok, it's how our specie work"

 

[sultryloser]

You're basically saying "whores being whores is actually ok, it's how our specie work"

Masterful strawman. I do description, this is not about ethics, but about what is.

 

[highschoolcel]

Masterful strawman. I do description, this is not about ethics, but about what is.

2+2 makes 4 whether you like it or not

« it’s not what I said «

But that’s what you said implies

 

[Retraux]

Keep in mind the reproductive disparity occured in a period when there were both far less people and a far lower popoulation density. I primarily took the form of villages being raided, the men massacred, and the women the invaders found to their liking being raped and forced into marriage. There wasn't seduction involved, it was literally brutal.

 

[highschoolcel]

I disagree with that.

Polygamy and slavery = tribal, primitive societies

Monogamy and work = civilisation and development

This has been extensively studied btw

 

[faded]

You underestimate men's ability to get used to it. So many men would be bluepilled and adapt to the new status quo. You see it happening now, open relationships, men providing for single moms, OnlyFans, sex dolls. Men will cope and adapt. The Collapse is not happening. That's cope.

 

[faded]

This kinda post is the reason why I wrote :

10 Ideas blackpillers and radical feminists agree on

Attention non-NTcels : The purpose of this post is to prove a point. I side neither with feminists, nor with blackpillers who promote concepts that justify feminism. 1. Most men are useless and ugly Feminists are very clear about the fact that most men are trash. Similarly, you'll often...

incels.is

You're basically saying "whores being whores is actually ok, it's how our specie work"

 

[highschoolcel]

@faded spot on