Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Power dynamics of women

The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
This is content posted from elsewhere, not mine but thought it a good read, I'll stick the link at the bottom & post it here as for some reason ppl don't like linking off site to read things. P.S - If you read the whole thing there is somewhere inside a free coupon good for one sexdoll. *

===

Like a Gerbil Scratching at the Glass Bottom of an Aquarium​

Andrew Anglin March 21, 2021



When I was a child, I had a pet gerbil. I don’t believe it remains a popular hobby for children, but in the 1990s, it was something that parents did for children: they bought them small animals in cages. Kids would sit and watch them, like a miniature zoo.
Looking back, it seems cruel, but I suppose sitting and watching a small animal in a cage is superior to playing with a tablet, which is what I see kids doing now. Kids should be given dogs, primarily. I think every child deserves a dog, and it should be a full-sized dog. Having a dog teaches children a lot about life and the concept of loyalty. The dog actually likes you and is not a captive in a cage, like a small rodent. (I will note that I still love aquarium’s with fish, and it’s a hobby I’ve always wanted to get into. Fish don’t know they’re in a cage, so there is nothing cruel about it. When I finally achieve victory over my enemies and am established in a large office in Manhattan, which will be in the New York Times Building, which I will own, there will be aquariums everywhere including a shark in the main entrance lobby.)
Pet gerbils live in a small cage, with a kind of sawdust in it that they can burrow into. Ours was in a glass aquarium, as for fish.

There were two gerbils, who were given to our family by someone who didn’t want them anymore, because it is a weird burden to create for yourself, looking after this miniature zoo. One of the gerbils died soon after we received them, and so there was only one in the aquarium. The gerbil developed a neurotic disorder wherein it would dig through the matting, down to the glass bottom of the aquarium, and then just continually scratch the glass with its claws. It would do this day in and day out.
I have found a gerbil blog that features a post about this behavior:
Scratching and biting at the cage are negative behavioral signs in gerbils. According to Current Protocols in Neuroscience, these repetitive behaviors are known as stereotypy and are common in caged animals.
These signs indicate that something is wrong, although what that ‘something’ is can vary. You should identify the problem so you can fix it or your gerbil will remain unhappy.
A gerbil will display repetitive scratching behavior when it can’t satisfy its natural need to burrow into the ground. This may be because it doesn’t have enough substrate, or it doesn’t have any bedding at all.
This behavior will focus on the corners of the enclosure. The reasons why are unclear, but perhaps the gerbil’s instincts encourage it to dig there.
This was my experience.
I remember watching this behavior, and thinking: “This creature does not understand that this glass is not dirt. He is naturally designed to live in a place where the ground under him is dirt, and he cannot understand the nature of his captivity, so he is doing the only thing that comes natural to him. He cannot recognize that it isn’t working, because it’s the only thing he knows how to do. To stop doing it would mean to simply give up.”
After a good while of this behavior, the gerbil stopped eating and died. It was not particularly sad to me, as I had no emotional connection to the gerbil.
I think about this strange experience often now, with relation to the way human beings are reacting to our unnatural social environment. We have effectively been put inside of a cage by people with no emotional connection to us. We are engaging in pathological behavior patterns, doing things that should work in our natural environment, but which do not work in the neo-post-modern proto-utopian urban domestic environment.

Girlfriends as the Glass Bottom of a Human Cage​


The most obvious example of this social stereotypy in humans is found in the way that men deal with women.
I have peers, people in my age range, some slightly older and some slightly younger, who keep having “girlfriends.” They move in with these women, as if they are married, but they do not produce children. After a while, it always ends, usually in a psycho performative spectacle by the woman. The woman creates the spectacle for the purpose of making others think the man was doing something evil to her, when in fact she simply got bored and wanted to go do something else.
When men are in the trenches of these relational boondoggles, I say to them: “What are you doing with that woman? What is the goal of this endeavor?”
Here is an example of the conversation:
Me: What are you doing with that woman you’re living with?
Them: What do you mean? She’s my girlfriend.
Me: Yes, I understand that. What is the purpose of the relationship?
Them: Well, we get along and I like spending time with her.
Me: Do you like spending time with her?
Them: Yeah, I mean, sure, she’s funny and we have fun.
Me: Do you enjoy the way she controls your life? Is that fun for you?
Them: Well, I don’t know if she controls my life…
Me: But all your decisions are based around her. Every decision that you make.
Them: Well…
Me: That’s the definition of “controlling your life.”
Them: So what are you getting at? You saying I should be gay?
Me: No, I’m asking you what is going on. What is the purpose of this relationship you have formed?
Them: Well, we might get married, I guess, but [insert arbitrary reasons they haven’t gotten married].
Me: Do you really want to spend the rest of your life with this woman?
Them: I don’t know.
Me: Why do you not have children with this woman you are cohabitating with?
Them: Well, we’ve talked about it, but we’re not ready.
Me: When will you be ready?
Them: Well, I don’t even know if she wants kids. I don’t know if I want kids.
Me: So what is the purpose of the relationship, where you live with this woman, and she controls your life?
Them: I don’t know man, she’s my girlfriend.
If gerbils could talk, the conversation I would have had with the gerbil digging at the bottom of the aquarium would have been very similar to that, I’m certain.

Humans are Mammals and We Reproduce Sexually​


This the normal life arc of a man, as determined by biology and natural social norms derived from biology:
  • You are born.
  • For a brief period, you are a child.
  • You enter puberty, wherein your glands begin dumping testosterone.
  • You get horny – that is to say, your penis gets erect, and you have an overwhelming desire to stick it into a girl.
  • You start making gestures towards a girl. It is some kind of performance, or demonstration.
  • At some point, a girl responds positively, and you begin a process of trying to get her alone and naked.
  • Eventually, you get her alone somewhere and have sex with her. She protests, but you’re stronger than she is, and you know she wants it just as much as you do, or else why would she have let you catch her alone like this.
  • You repeat this behavior, with the girl being more into it after the first time. She professes her love.
  • Eventually, she tells her mother that her mensuration doesn’t seem to be happening as it usually does.
  • Her mother questions her with regards to who’s been sticking his whatever in her wherever.
  • The girl confesses.
  • Her mother tells your mother what has taken place.
  • Your mother tells your father to go tell you what this means.
  • Your father tells you that you are soon to be married, and to be a father yourself. He tells you some stories of what it was like when this happened with him, and tells you it’s all going to be fine. You’re a good man and you’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You get married. Your child is born months later. You love it.
  • Now, you need to make sure to work hard, to take care of the child.
  • You have more children.
  • You continue working.
  • You grow to develop a bond with the woman that goes beyond sex, because you’ve been with her for years, through the standard trials and tribulations of existence.
  • At some point, you end up in the same position as your father was, explaining to your son that he’ll be getting married soon, and to not be afraid; you remember what it was like when your father told you this. You tell him he’s a good man and he’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You are excited to be a grandfather, but not as excited as your wife is to be a grandmother.
  • As you age, you start to work less, and your children begin to take care of you, as you took care of them.
  • You die.
That was the cycle of life for most people, throughout all of history.
There is a myth about a “shotgun wedding,” which is when a man takes a woman’s virginity and the girl’s father goes and points a shotgun at him and demands he marry the girl. I doubt there were shotguns (or swords, or weapons of any sort) involved most of the time. Most of the time, it was two teenagers, who had probably grown up together, and whose parents already knew each other, who snuck off in the woods together and did the deed.
I’m sure that most of the deflowerings would qualify as “rape” by modern standards, but the girl knew what she was doing when she ended up alone with the boy that was pursuing her, whether she giggled and said “no, no” or moaned and said “yes, yes.” Most likely, the boy would have been pressing the issue for a bit, and the girl would eventually decide to go meet him alone when she was ovulating.
Note: For those of you who don’t know, because they sure as hell don’t tell you in sex-ed: women tend to usually get pregnant only two days a month, which also happen to be the only two days a month they have anything approaching the male sex drive (even then it doesn’t really approach the male sex drive, in terms of intensity, at all, because women don’t have very much testosterone). And yes, it is possible that a girl can get pregnant other days of the month.
Furthermore, if I may veer slightly into nigh lewdness, the teenage boy is going to be so excited that he’s going to ejaculate very quickly, and teenage boys have almost hyper-powered sperm.
So: it actually is likely that the “virginity incident” would result in impregnation. Especially since people were much healthier back then.
Sometimes, this inevitable incident was preempted by more sophisticated parents through an arranged marriage, but that was largely for more upper class people. In the arranged marriage, it was still just two horny teenagers, the parents or others in the community simply took control of the situation, and directed the teenage sex drive into a controlled environment. Also, if the norm was arranged marriages, this gave the teenagers something to look forward to as they attempted to control the sex urge.
The church did its best to encourage arranged marriage, because the sex before marriage act that takes place in nature was considered barbaric and immoral. Who knows what the rate of virgin marriage actually was, but if you go back and look, you will find that the time between a marriage and the first born child was typically nine months – or just a little bit less. Even in very strict Christian society, no one was doing the math and shaming people.
I’ve seen statistics that claim in America, the (female) sex before marriage rate in 1900 was as low as 10% and as high as 60%, but obviously, people are going to lie about it. It’s a lie that doesn’t hurt anyone. They would marry their first sexual partner, as a result of the pregnancy issue.
The point is this: sex was associated with marriage, whether the deed happened before or after, because sex was associated with pregnancy and children. Whether it was an arranged marriage or a so-called “shotgun wedding,” the marriage was the result of a sex drive, not a result of “oh we think it’s time to have kids.”

“Family Planning” as Anti-Natalism​

What birth control and the sexual revolution did was transfer all sexual power to women. The previous consequence of a woman having sex meant that she would have to deal with children, and she needed someone to feed those children, so she needed to use the power of sex to secure a man who would provide her with resources.
Birth control allowed women to weaponize sex.
It allowed them to gather resources from a man without having these man’s children. She could say “I’m not ready for children.” That was not an option before birth control, because the sex act resulted in children as a matter of science.
This was part of a larger social engineering project by the people who have locked us in this cage.
Women’s sexual liberation was only possible due to the scientific creation of the various forms of birth control. They used arguments that seemed to make logical sense to men, apparently – they argued that they wanted “equal rights.” This has of course resulted in absolute domination of society by women.

The concept of “family planning,” which translates into “women navigating around pregnancy for the reason of using sex as a weapon,” only became possible in the age of birth control, in all its dazzling and diabolical wonder. Up until then, people would have sex because they were horny, the result was children, and the social norms, reinforced by everything from religion to economics, meant marriage. This is how human beings managed the human reproductive drive (excluding Africans, Australian Aboriginals, and maybe some other brown people, who raised children communally like many apes).
Traditional marriage was a legal contract, typically between the man and the girl’s father. That is the ritual you see in modern marriages, when the father walks the bride down the aisle and turns her over to the man. The reason it was a legal contract was because couples might have fights, they might have problems, they might want to have sex with other people, or whatever. Who knows what’s going to happen in 10 or 20 years between two people who had sex because of hormones, so it was written in blood or stone.
Marriage is no longer a contract; it is a pointless, archaic ritual. The fact that divorce is not only legal, but there is such a thing as “no-fault” divorce – which basically indicates a woman has gotten bored – means that marriage has no actual meaning. That’s why it was so easy to force through homosexual marriage: because heterosexual marriage had already come to be seen as a meaningless, performative ritual, perhaps vaguely related to tax forms.
Women having “careers” played directly into this, providing a cover story for the power scheme that women were and are running. The result was no children and the death of the family unit as the core building block of society.
Everything we’ve witnessed in society since then has followed directly from this original sin of birth control.

Romantic Gibberish​

In the midst of the desecration of the marriage contract, the cage-builders (cultural engineers) were shoveling this romantic gibberish about “true love” and “finding the one” onto the flaming doom-heap. The entire plot was lost. Human coupling was not about children, so it began to be about a metaphysical journey to find a person with the magical power to fill you with eternal happiness.

What they did was redefine sexual infatuation as “falling in love,” and claimed that this feeling could “last forever.” Clearly, sexual infatuation cannot last forever. Once you see a woman in a certain light, over a period of time, you can no longer view her as the perfect object you imagined when your erection was raging. A similar process happens in the mind of the woman, though I would not claim to understand its mechanics. *(while stock lasts, look for **)
There is no such thing as “true love.” It is a fantasy, like Santa Claus, designed for adolescents instead of children. What happens is this:
  • Your body is telling you to reproduce, and thus making you horny.
  • When you have sexual attraction to someone, your brain starts dumping chemicals that are not just sex chemicals, but emotional chemicals which fuel nonsensical thoughts.
  • You start to view the object of your sexual attraction as perfect, even though she’s just some stupid bitch.
When the sexual infatuation wears off, you no longer feel euphoric around the other person. That, according to the gospel of modern media, means that it was not actually “true love,” and you might as well move along to the next “partner.”
In nature, the emotions associated with the sexual infatuation are your brain tricking you, because beyond food and warmth, your number one biological prerogative is reproduction. After you live with this woman, raise kids with her, deal with all that living entails, of course you’re going to develop a different kind of love for her. That is not sexual infatuation, but is something deeper and more meaningful. You see it among elderly couples.
But here’s the issue: No man ever said “oh man, look at those tiddies, they would be great for my infant child to suck milk from.” If a man did think that, you would think him perverse. But that is the end goal of the brain, that is creating the erection and the love emotions. The sexual impulse is the drive to create children, but it is masked in the psyche. The chemicals in the brain are lying to you about the end goal of your erection.
When you separate the two things – sex and children – by calling the sexual impulse “true love” and then claiming that producing children is a logical decision that you make, you have effectively broken the established biological reproduction process.

“Boyfriends” are Battered Abuse Victims​

As much as “free love” was touted, women never intended to give away sex for free. So what we end up with is a situation where women practicing birth control use men as emotional, and often financial, slaves. Maybe you can do “pick-up artistry,” and go out and put on a show for women and she will reward you with sex, but if you want long term access to a vagina, you have to play by the rules of the woman, and her rules are always that she has total control over your life. (This situation has gotten much more extreme in recent years, where so many women have become obese, and thus out of the mating game for any self-respecting man.)
Men very often end up going through a series of “long term relationships,” which always end, because they’re not contracted, and the woman gets bored. For most people I know, there aren’t any children. If there are children, it doesn’t seem to stop women from just imploding the relationship and moving on. This has been called “serial monogamy.” What it is is a cycle of abusing men, which men willingly subject themselves to, because the chemicals in their brains don’t understand what is going on. The brain is telling you: “you are having sex with this woman, so you need to take care of her because she is caring for your spawn.” But there are no spawn. **(sorry stock has run out)
Women are exploiting a loophole in your neurobiology for the purpose of enslaving you to them.
During these relationships, the woman is virtually always in a mother type power situation over the man. Men are typically in some kind of personal denial about that. None of them want to admit it, and it apparently just feels normal to them that their “girlfriend” controls their life.
As of 2019, only 30% of millennials were married with at least one child, but thanks to the magic of abortion, only 24% of millennial women are single mothers (presumably, as many as a third of the “spouse and child” are step-dad situations).

Theoretically, women eventually get to be in their thirties, and feel they want to have at least one child, and decide to “settle down.” They usually marry some man who is dopey and well-off financially.
However, a lot of millennial women are not doing that. They are instead just continuing the process of “dating” and moving in with a different man every few years, then destroying the relationship, then going out and looking for another one. A portion of Gen X women are now doing this into their 40s and even 50s, and that looks like it is going to be the path of a much larger portion of millennial women.
The men who get dragged through this process are victims of incredible abuse. It is an Anti-Male Industrial Complex.

Men are simply doing what their biology tells them to do, and women drag them through broken glass.

Broken Machines​

We had a system that worked fine, and we changed it in an attempt to build a utopia, and now we are lonely, hollow, broken things.
We are attempting to do something natural, to fall into the patterns of nature, and it doesn’t work, because we are living in a completely artificial environment, not different to my poor gerbil.
Men have a desire for the company of a woman, because we are hardwired to reproduce. But if you are not reproducing, the woman is totally useless. But the psyche cannot grasp it.
Clearly, it is more complicated than simply trying to fill a natural role. Human beings are mammals, but our psychology is more complex. It’s not as big of a difference as humanists make it out to be, but we are more complicated than apes.
Many of these men who are playing the role of “boyfriend” were raised by single mothers or from otherwise broken families. (I would classify having a weak father who deferred to your mother as a “broken family.” It’s not functioning as it should.) They are accustomed to female authority, so they are looking for female authority. Women exploit men who come from broken families. They target them.
One thing I’ve noticed is that these men in their late twenties through their mid-thirties tend to have “girlfriends” their own age. That is a question I will ask them: “well, if you’re going to get married, why not get one fresher?” It seems to me an obvious question. These men are often in good shape, and making some money, so why not get the youngest girl possible, if you’re planning on having children?
Because they don’t know what they’re doing. They’re not even thinking about it. They never had to think about it before, because it was just something that fell together, as a result of biological drives.

The Root of Our Decay​

The family is the root of society, and the collapse of the family is what destroyed our society.
If we woke up tomorrow and all forms of birth control ceased to exist, from condoms to abortion, and we also banned all forms of government financial aid to women (including affirmative action hiring, free daycare, and all of the rest of the various feminist programs), it would take about 18 months before society reorganized itself into a far-right fantasy.
This is what would happen:
  • Women would have to get married.
  • Men would be the ones setting the terms of the marriage, because they would be the ones with all of the resources.
  • Women would reorient their needs and desires to that of a married woman raising children, and support their husbands who were providing their income.
  • Women’s desire to do all of these weird things they’re doing, pushing homosexuality and an anti-white agenda, would disappear, as their maternal instincts would be focused on their children.
We talk a lot about Jews on this website. As a Christian, I do believe that Jews, who define themselves by a rejection of Christ, are the embodiment of satan’s agenda on earth.
However, the empowerment of women was a prerequisite for everything else that is happening right now. It wouldn’t matter that “no-fault divorce” existed if women would honor the vows they made before God, but a woman is utterly incapable of making basic decisions, let alone grasping the concept of honor.
The first decision that the first woman made was to take the advice of a talking snake that she’d just met minutes earlier.

If the snake had approached man, he would have told him to get away from him with his weird schemes. But Satan used the woman to manipulate the man. That is our exact predicament presently.
White women remain the most active and aggressive persecutors of white men, even now. Probably, none of you were raised by a Jew, but you were raised by an agent of the Jewish agenda. You’ve probably never had a Jew wreck your personal life, but you’ve all had your lives wrecked by women – if only your mother.
There isn’t really a solution to the problem of “what do we do about women?”
Anyone who tells you they have a solution is lying to you. Any man who says that it’s easy to “find a good girl” is the most vile kind of fiend. There are no “good girls” in a feminist society. That is what “women’s empowerment” means. It means they’re allowed to make decisions. All of their decisions are going to be bad. Every aspect of our society incentivizes the worst conceivable behavior in women.

The option that you have is to not let them control your life. Don’t be some bitch’s “boyfriend.” You’re better than that. You don’t deserve this society that you’ve been thrown into. You did nothing to deserve this. Do what you can, see if you can figure something out, but don’t let them take your self-respect.

In any situation where you are involved with a woman, you need to be ready to get up and walk away as soon as she stops doing what you want her to do. Do not ever engage them in arguments. That is below any man, to get down into this sickening psychodrama that they feed on. Do not ever allow them to dictate your behavior.

 
Last edited:
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
I have peers, people in my age range, some slightly older and some slightly younger, who keep having “girlfriends.” They move in with these women, as if they are married, but they do not produce children. After a while, it always ends, usually in a psycho performative spectacle by the woman. The woman creates the spectacle for the purpose of making others think the man was doing something evil to her, when in fact she simply got bored and wanted to go do something else.
That and the guy was a subchad
 
Deleted member 33688

Deleted member 33688

Self-banned
-
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Posts
234
Online
7d 7h 44m
 
The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
Gymcelled said:
That and the guy was a subchad
Yeah it ain't aimed at incels for sure.
Starship said:
No not at all, go about your day & read some simple threads that have been regurgitated many times over.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
The Abyss said:
Any man who says that it’s easy to “find a good girl” is the most vile kind of fiend. There are no “good girls” in a feminist society. That is what “women’s empowerment” means. It means they’re allowed to make decisions. All of their decisions are going to be bad. Every aspect of our society incentivizes the worst conceivable behavior in women.
Brutal
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
10,492
Online
125d 16h 38m
GeneticTrashLoser said:
I don't agree with everything he said, but he's making pretty much the same point ( but with a conservative tinge).
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSwmXXc885Q
Even someone like Tucker Carlson is finally seeing how bad for society an increasing population of incel men can be.

The next ten years will be glorious.
 
The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
Deleted member 33216

Deleted member 33216

Every cope has an end
-
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Posts
2,141
Online
19d 23h 13m
based_meme said:
Even someone like Tucker Carlson is finally seeing how bad for society an increasing population of incel men can be.

The next ten years will be glorious.
Well, inceldom flies in the face of everything he believes in. Tucker is all about patriotism, hard work, and Western values. Whereas inceldom can induce nihilism (which is the main opponent to Western values, along with individualism and consumerism), cynicism, and refusal to contribute to the system. But yeah, I'm glad that even hardline conservative types are starting to see the problem.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Supreme Incel Commander in Chief
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
19,020
Online
73d 59m
The Abyss said:
This is content posted from elsewhere, not mine but thought it a good read, I'll stick the link at the bottom & post it here as for some reason ppl don't like linking off site to read things. P.S - If you read the whole thing there is somewhere inside a free coupon good for one sexdoll. *

===

Like a Gerbil Scratching at the Glass Bottom of an Aquarium​

Andrew Anglin March 21, 2021



When I was a child, I had a pet gerbil. I don’t believe it remains a popular hobby for children, but in the 1990s, it was something that parents did for children: they bought them small animals in cages. Kids would sit and watch them, like a miniature zoo.
Looking back, it seems cruel, but I suppose sitting and watching a small animal in a cage is superior to playing with a tablet, which is what I see kids doing now. Kids should be given dogs, primarily. I think every child deserves a dog, and it should be a full-sized dog. Having a dog teaches children a lot about life and the concept of loyalty. The dog actually likes you and is not a captive in a cage, like a small rodent. (I will note that I still love aquarium’s with fish, and it’s a hobby I’ve always wanted to get into. Fish don’t know they’re in a cage, so there is nothing cruel about it. When I finally achieve victory over my enemies and am established in a large office in Manhattan, which will be in the New York Times Building, which I will own, there will be aquariums everywhere including a shark in the main entrance lobby.)
Pet gerbils live in a small cage, with a kind of sawdust in it that they can burrow into. Ours was in a glass aquarium, as for fish.

There were two gerbils, who were given to our family by someone who didn’t want them anymore, because it is a weird burden to create for yourself, looking after this miniature zoo. One of the gerbils died soon after we received them, and so there was only one in the aquarium. The gerbil developed a neurotic disorder wherein it would dig through the matting, down to the glass bottom of the aquarium, and then just continually scratch the glass with its claws. It would do this day in and day out.
I have found a gerbil blog that features a post about this behavior:

This was my experience.
I remember watching this behavior, and thinking: “This creature does not understand that this glass is not dirt. He is naturally designed to live in a place where the ground under him is dirt, and he cannot understand the nature of his captivity, so he is doing the only thing that comes natural to him. He cannot recognize that it isn’t working, because it’s the only thing he knows how to do. To stop doing it would mean to simply give up.”
After a good while of this behavior, the gerbil stopped eating and died. It was not particularly sad to me, as I had no emotional connection to the gerbil.
I think about this strange experience often now, with relation to the way human beings are reacting to our unnatural social environment. We have effectively been put inside of a cage by people with no emotional connection to us. We are engaging in pathological behavior patterns, doing things that should work in our natural environment, but which do not work in the neo-post-modern proto-utopian urban domestic environment.

Girlfriends as the Glass Bottom of a Human Cage​


The most obvious example of this social stereotypy in humans is found in the way that men deal with women.
I have peers, people in my age range, some slightly older and some slightly younger, who keep having “girlfriends.” They move in with these women, as if they are married, but they do not produce children. After a while, it always ends, usually in a psycho performative spectacle by the woman. The woman creates the spectacle for the purpose of making others think the man was doing something evil to her, when in fact she simply got bored and wanted to go do something else.
When men are in the trenches of these relational boondoggles, I say to them: “What are you doing with that woman? What is the goal of this endeavor?”
Here is an example of the conversation:

If gerbils could talk, the conversation I would have had with the gerbil digging at the bottom of the aquarium would have been very similar to that, I’m certain.

Humans are Mammals and We Reproduce Sexually​


This the normal life arc of a man, as determined by biology and natural social norms derived from biology:
  • You are born.
  • For a brief period, you are a child.
  • You enter puberty, wherein your glands begin dumping testosterone.
  • You get horny – that is to say, your penis gets erect, and you have an overwhelming desire to stick it into a girl.
  • You start making gestures towards a girl. It is some kind of performance, or demonstration.
  • At some point, a girl responds positively, and you begin a process of trying to get her alone and naked.
  • Eventually, you get her alone somewhere and have sex with her. She protests, but you’re stronger than she is, and you know she wants it just as much as you do, or else why would she have let you catch her alone like this.
  • You repeat this behavior, with the girl being more into it after the first time. She professes her love.
  • Eventually, she tells her mother that her mensuration doesn’t seem to be happening as it usually does.
  • Her mother questions her with regards to who’s been sticking his whatever in her wherever.
  • The girl confesses.
  • Her mother tells your mother what has taken place.
  • Your mother tells your father to go tell you what this means.
  • Your father tells you that you are soon to be married, and to be a father yourself. He tells you some stories of what it was like when this happened with him, and tells you it’s all going to be fine. You’re a good man and you’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You get married. Your child is born months later. You love it.
  • Now, you need to make sure to work hard, to take care of the child.
  • You have more children.
  • You continue working.
  • You grow to develop a bond with the woman that goes beyond sex, because you’ve been with her for years, through the standard trials and tribulations of existence.
  • At some point, you end up in the same position as your father was, explaining to your son that he’ll be getting married soon, and to not be afraid; you remember what it was like when your father told you this. You tell him he’s a good man and he’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You are excited to be a grandfather, but not as excited as your wife is to be a grandmother.
  • As you age, you start to work less, and your children begin to take care of you, as you took care of them.
  • You die.
That was the cycle of life for most people, throughout all of history.
There is a myth about a “shotgun wedding,” which is when a man takes a woman’s virginity and the girl’s father goes and points a shotgun at him and demands he marry the girl. I doubt there were shotguns (or swords, or weapons of any sort) involved most of the time. Most of the time, it was two teenagers, who had probably grown up together, and whose parents already knew each other, who snuck off in the woods together and did the deed.
I’m sure that most of the deflowerings would qualify as “rape” by modern standards, but the girl knew what she was doing when she ended up alone with the boy that was pursuing her, whether she giggled and said “no, no” or moaned and said “yes, yes.” Most likely, the boy would have been pressing the issue for a bit, and the girl would eventually decide to go meet him alone when she was ovulating.
Note: For those of you who don’t know, because they sure as hell don’t tell you in sex-ed: women tend to usually get pregnant only two days a month, which also happen to be the only two days a month they have anything approaching the male sex drive (even then it doesn’t really approach the male sex drive, in terms of intensity, at all, because women don’t have very much testosterone). And yes, it is possible that a girl can get pregnant other days of the month.
Furthermore, if I may veer slightly into nigh lewdness, the teenage boy is going to be so excited that he’s going to ejaculate very quickly, and teenage boys have almost hyper-powered sperm.
So: it actually is likely that the “virginity incident” would result in impregnation. Especially since people were much healthier back then.
Sometimes, this inevitable incident was preempted by more sophisticated parents through an arranged marriage, but that was largely for more upper class people. In the arranged marriage, it was still just two horny teenagers, the parents or others in the community simply took control of the situation, and directed the teenage sex drive into a controlled environment. Also, if the norm was arranged marriages, this gave the teenagers something to look forward to as they attempted to control the sex urge.
The church did its best to encourage arranged marriage, because the sex before marriage act that takes place in nature was considered barbaric and immoral. Who knows what the rate of virgin marriage actually was, but if you go back and look, you will find that the time between a marriage and the first born child was typically nine months – or just a little bit less. Even in very strict Christian society, no one was doing the math and shaming people.
I’ve seen statistics that claim in America, the (female) sex before marriage rate in 1900 was as low as 10% and as high as 60%, but obviously, people are going to lie about it. It’s a lie that doesn’t hurt anyone. They would marry their first sexual partner, as a result of the pregnancy issue.
The point is this: sex was associated with marriage, whether the deed happened before or after, because sex was associated with pregnancy and children. Whether it was an arranged marriage or a so-called “shotgun wedding,” the marriage was the result of a sex drive, not a result of “oh we think it’s time to have kids.”

“Family Planning” as Anti-Natalism​

What birth control and the sexual revolution did was transfer all sexual power to women. The previous consequence of a woman having sex meant that she would have to deal with children, and she needed someone to feed those children, so she needed to use the power of sex to secure a man who would provide her with resources.
Birth control allowed women to weaponize sex.
It allowed them to gather resources from a man without having these man’s children. She could say “I’m not ready for children.” That was not an option before birth control, because the sex act resulted in children as a matter of science.
This was part of a larger social engineering project by the people who have locked us in this cage.
Women’s sexual liberation was only possible due to the scientific creation of the various forms of birth control. They used arguments that seemed to make logical sense to men, apparently – they argued that they wanted “equal rights.” This has of course resulted in absolute domination of society by women.

The concept of “family planning,” which translates into “women navigating around pregnancy for the reason of using sex as a weapon,” only became possible in the age of birth control, in all its dazzling and diabolical wonder. Up until then, people would have sex because they were horny, the result was children, and the social norms, reinforced by everything from religion to economics, meant marriage. This is how human beings managed the human reproductive drive (excluding Africans, Australian Aboriginals, and maybe some other brown people, who raised children communally like many apes).
Traditional marriage was a legal contract, typically between the man and the girl’s father. That is the ritual you see in modern marriages, when the father walks the bride down the aisle and turns her over to the man. The reason it was a legal contract was because couples might have fights, they might have problems, they might want to have sex with other people, or whatever. Who knows what’s going to happen in 10 or 20 years between two people who had sex because of hormones, so it was written in blood or stone.
Marriage is no longer a contract; it is a pointless, archaic ritual. The fact that divorce is not only legal, but there is such a thing as “no-fault” divorce – which basically indicates a woman has gotten bored – means that marriage has no actual meaning. That’s why it was so easy to force through homosexual marriage: because heterosexual marriage had already come to be seen as a meaningless, performative ritual, perhaps vaguely related to tax forms.
Women having “careers” played directly into this, providing a cover story for the power scheme that women were and are running. The result was no children and the death of the family unit as the core building block of society.
Everything we’ve witnessed in society since then has followed directly from this original sin of birth control.

Romantic Gibberish​

In the midst of the desecration of the marriage contract, the cage-builders (cultural engineers) were shoveling this romantic gibberish about “true love” and “finding the one” onto the flaming doom-heap. The entire plot was lost. Human coupling was not about children, so it began to be about a metaphysical journey to find a person with the magical power to fill you with eternal happiness.

What they did was redefine sexual infatuation as “falling in love,” and claimed that this feeling could “last forever.” Clearly, sexual infatuation cannot last forever. Once you see a woman in a certain light, over a period of time, you can no longer view her as the perfect object you imagined when your erection was raging. A similar process happens in the mind of the woman, though I would not claim to understand its mechanics. *(while stock lasts, look for **)
There is no such thing as “true love.” It is a fantasy, like Santa Claus, designed for adolescents instead of children. What happens is this:
  • Your body is telling you to reproduce, and thus making you horny.
  • When you have sexual attraction to someone, your brain starts dumping chemicals that are not just sex chemicals, but emotional chemicals which fuel nonsensical thoughts.
  • You start to view the object of your sexual attraction as perfect, even though she’s just some stupid bitch.
When the sexual infatuation wears off, you no longer feel euphoric around the other person. That, according to the gospel of modern media, means that it was not actually “true love,” and you might as well move along to the next “partner.”
In nature, the emotions associated with the sexual infatuation are your brain tricking you, because beyond food and warmth, your number one biological prerogative is reproduction. After you live with this woman, raise kids with her, deal with all that living entails, of course you’re going to develop a different kind of love for her. That is not sexual infatuation, but is something deeper and more meaningful. You see it among elderly couples.
But here’s the issue: No man ever said “oh man, look at those tiddies, they would be great for my infant child to suck milk from.” If a man did think that, you would think him perverse. But that is the end goal of the brain, that is creating the erection and the love emotions. The sexual impulse is the drive to create children, but it is masked in the psyche. The chemicals in the brain are lying to you about the end goal of your erection.
When you separate the two things – sex and children – by calling the sexual impulse “true love” and then claiming that producing children is a logical decision that you make, you have effectively broken the established biological reproduction process.

“Boyfriends” are Battered Abuse Victims​

As much as “free love” was touted, women never intended to give away sex for free. So what we end up with is a situation where women practicing birth control use men as emotional, and often financial, slaves. Maybe you can do “pick-up artistry,” and go out and put on a show for women and she will reward you with sex, but if you want long term access to a vagina, you have to play by the rules of the woman, and her rules are always that she has total control over your life. (This situation has gotten much more extreme in recent years, where so many women have become obese, and thus out of the mating game for any self-respecting man.)
Men very often end up going through a series of “long term relationships,” which always end, because they’re not contracted, and the woman gets bored. For most people I know, there aren’t any children. If there are children, it doesn’t seem to stop women from just imploding the relationship and moving on. This has been called “serial monogamy.” What it is is a cycle of abusing men, which men willingly subject themselves to, because the chemicals in their brains don’t understand what is going on. The brain is telling you: “you are having sex with this woman, so you need to take care of her because she is caring for your spawn.” But there are no spawn. **(sorry stock has run out)
Women are exploiting a loophole in your neurobiology for the purpose of enslaving you to them.
During these relationships, the woman is virtually always in a mother type power situation over the man. Men are typically in some kind of personal denial about that. None of them want to admit it, and it apparently just feels normal to them that their “girlfriend” controls their life.
As of 2019, only 30% of millennials were married with at least one child, but thanks to the magic of abortion, only 24% of millennial women are single mothers (presumably, as many as a third of the “spouse and child” are step-dad situations).

Theoretically, women eventually get to be in their thirties, and feel they want to have at least one child, and decide to “settle down.” They usually marry some man who is dopey and well-off financially.
However, a lot of millennial women are not doing that. They are instead just continuing the process of “dating” and moving in with a different man every few years, then destroying the relationship, then going out and looking for another one. A portion of Gen X women are now doing this into their 40s and even 50s, and that looks like it is going to be the path of a much larger portion of millennial women.
The men who get dragged through this process are victims of incredible abuse. It is an Anti-Male Industrial Complex.

Men are simply doing what their biology tells them to do, and women drag them through broken glass.

Broken Machines​

We had a system that worked fine, and we changed it in an attempt to build a utopia, and now we are lonely, hollow, broken things.
We are attempting to do something natural, to fall into the patterns of nature, and it doesn’t work, because we are living in a completely artificial environment, not different to my poor gerbil.
Men have a desire for the company of a woman, because we are hardwired to reproduce. But if you are not reproducing, the woman is totally useless. But the psyche cannot grasp it.
Clearly, it is more complicated than simply trying to fill a natural role. Human beings are mammals, but our psychology is more complex. It’s not as big of a difference as humanists make it out to be, but we are more complicated than apes.
Many of these men who are playing the role of “boyfriend” were raised by single mothers or from otherwise broken families. (I would classify having a weak father who deferred to your mother as a “broken family.” It’s not functioning as it should.) They are accustomed to female authority, so they are looking for female authority. Women exploit men who come from broken families. They target them.
One thing I’ve noticed is that these men in their late twenties through their mid-thirties tend to have “girlfriends” their own age. That is a question I will ask them: “well, if you’re going to get married, why not get one fresher?” It seems to me an obvious question. These men are often in good shape, and making some money, so why not get the youngest girl possible, if you’re planning on having children?
Because they don’t know what they’re doing. They’re not even thinking about it. They never had to think about it before, because it was just something that fell together, as a result of biological drives.

The Root of Our Decay​

The family is the root of society, and the collapse of the family is what destroyed our society.
If we woke up tomorrow and all forms of birth control ceased to exist, from condoms to abortion, and we also banned all forms of government financial aid to women (including affirmative action hiring, free daycare, and all of the rest of the various feminist programs), it would take about 18 months before society reorganized itself into a far-right fantasy.
This is what would happen:
  • Women would have to get married.
  • Men would be the ones setting the terms of the marriage, because they would be the ones with all of the resources.
  • Women would reorient their needs and desires to that of a married woman raising children, and support their husbands who were providing their income.
  • Women’s desire to do all of these weird things they’re doing, pushing homosexuality and an anti-white agenda, would disappear, as their maternal instincts would be focused on their children.
We talk a lot about Jews on this website. As a Christian, I do believe that Jews, who define themselves by a rejection of Christ, are the embodiment of satan’s agenda on earth.
However, the empowerment of women was a prerequisite for everything else that is happening right now. It wouldn’t matter that “no-fault divorce” existed if women would honor the vows they made before God, but a woman is utterly incapable of making basic decisions, let alone grasping the concept of honor.
The first decision that the first woman made was to take the advice of a talking snake that she’d just met minutes earlier.

If the snake had approached man, he would have told him to get away from him with his weird schemes. But Satan used the woman to manipulate the man. That is our exact predicament presently.
White women remain the most active and aggressive persecutors of white men, even now. Probably, none of you were raised by a Jew, but you were raised by an agent of the Jewish agenda. You’ve probably never had a Jew wreck your personal life, but you’ve all had your lives wrecked by women – if only your mother.
There isn’t really a solution to the problem of “what do we do about women?”
Anyone who tells you they have a solution is lying to you. Any man who says that it’s easy to “find a good girl” is the most vile kind of fiend. There are no “good girls” in a feminist society. That is what “women’s empowerment” means. It means they’re allowed to make decisions. All of their decisions are going to be bad. Every aspect of our society incentivizes the worst conceivable behavior in women.

The option that you have is to not let them control your life. Don’t be some bitch’s “boyfriend.” You’re better than that. You don’t deserve this society that you’ve been thrown into. You did nothing to deserve this. Do what you can, see if you can figure something out, but don’t let them take your self-respect.

In any situation where you are involved with a woman, you need to be ready to get up and walk away as soon as she stops doing what you want her to do. Do not ever engage them in arguments. That is below any man, to get down into this sickening psychodrama that they feed on. Do not ever allow them to dictate your behavior.

tera high iq. However, I think some parts that I disagree with:

1) I don't know what kind of society you are talking about, but I highly doubt sex before marriage was common at all when people lived in villages. This is because in those societies, and something that psychologists agree with, is that moral behaviour is maintained by the risk it will have to a person's reputation.

2) If sex was common before marriage and it happened like you said it did, then many males ended up getting cucked and marrying to raise another man's kid. Most women probably had sex with some Chad or village thug like person back then, got impregnated, and started sleeping with the beta boy billy who liked her so she can pass the kid off as his, and make him marry her and raise Chad's kid.

GeneticTrashLoser said:
I don't agree with everything he said, but he's making pretty much the same point ( but with a conservative tinge).
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSwmXXc885Q


absolutely brootal
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
10,492
Online
125d 16h 38m
The Abyss said:
It's difficult to say. On one hand, governments want the increasing proportions of incel men to be contributing taxpayers and keep the wheels of the economy greased. On the other hand, they know that there isn't any carrot at the end of the stick (no wife with 2.5 kids, a dog, and a suburban house to come home to from a hard day's work) for most men who are slaving away 40+ hours a week, paying their taxes like a good citizen.

Porn and video games can only keep that growing proportion of your male population docile for so long, before their angst turns to anger and they start rebelling against the system you've setup to keep them down as second rate citizens. Giving them money in the form of tax breaks or certain incentives is not going to do anything. Changing laws might have some minimal positive effect, but the damage from 50+ years of feminism and a gynocentric culture in society is too great of a wound for Western society to heal from.

I don't know what the governments are going to do. I don't think even they know what to do. The globalists and their social engineers do, however. Our current status quo was practically modeled after the mouse Utopia experiment. The globalists have something in mind, and I think it may involve another major war and the reinstatement of the draft to reduce and weaken the male population. There is a small chance of having concentration camps, but governments would need practically the threat of imminent insurrection or civil war to get that passed through the channels and made into reality. In the US the FEMA camps are basically just that: concentration camps, though they're mostly empty. The UK and Australia would need a different approach, and whatever it will be I doubt their men are gonna take it lying down (Canadian and New Zealand's men would, though, so their governments have little to worry about in that regard).

tl;dr;kys There's just not enough information to accurately extrapolate a fairly likelihood outcome here.
 
Autismus Maximus

Autismus Maximus

Officer
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Posts
942
Online
18d 5h 30m
It's not often that I read something that really enlightens me these days. Well done, OP.
 
The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
based_meme said:
It's difficult to say. On one hand, governments want the increasing proportions of incel men to be contributing taxpayers and keep the wheels of the economy greased. On the other hand, they know that there isn't any carrot at the end of the stick (no wife with 2.5 kids, a dog, and a suburban house to come home to from a hard day's work) for most men who are slaving away 40+ hours a week, paying their taxes like a good citizen.

Porn and video games can only keep that growing proportion of your male population docile for so long, before their angst turns to anger and they start rebelling against the system you've setup to keep them down as second rate citizens. Giving them money in the form of tax breaks or certain incentives is not going to do anything. Changing laws might have some minimal positive effect, but the damage from 50+ years of feminism and a gynocentric culture in society is too great of a wound for Western society to heal from.

I don't know what the governments are going to do. I don't think even they know what to do. The globalists and their social engineers do, however. Our current status quo was practically modeled after the mouse Utopia experiment. The globalists have something in mind, and I think it may involve another major war and the reinstatement of the draft to reduce and weaken the male population. There is a small chance of having concentration camps, but governments would need practically the threat of imminent insurrection or civil war to get that passed through the channels and made into reality. In the US the FEMA camps are basically just that: concentration camps, though they're mostly empty. The UK and Australia would need a different approach, and whatever it will be I doubt their men are gonna take it lying down (Canadian and New Zealand's men would, though, so their governments have little to worry about in that regard).

tl;dr;kys There's just not enough information to accurately extrapolate a fairly likelihood outcome here.
Uk is a land of cucks, they'll go along with it, any nation where you can get ppl wearing masks 24/7 scared of the flu under a new name is already defeated.

I reckon these jabs will accelerate sterilisation.
 
Izayacel

Izayacel

ADEL EID"
★★★★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
8,202
Online
24d 16h 11m
curryboy420

curryboy420

Major
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Posts
2,465
Online
29d 20h 47m
High iq, will finish reading later but your description of how the avg normie loses his virginity in step by step format was too much for me
 
Emba

Emba

Jarjar Sphinx
★★★★★
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
28,874
Online
112d 22h 24m
That commie fucker doesn't speak for the White race! And he sure doesn't speak for Incels. He spits a mean blackpill, but he's controlled opposition. He's a sex-having russian Chad, playing jbw game!
 
The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
Emba said:
That commie fucker doesn't speak for the White race! And he sure doesn't speak for Incels. He spits a mean blackpill, but he's controlled opposition. He's a sex-having russian Chad, playing jbw game!
Anybody legit not in their pocket gets arrested or 100% deplatformed.
 
Emba

Emba

Jarjar Sphinx
★★★★★
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
28,874
Online
112d 22h 24m
The Abyss said:
Anybody legit not in their pocket gets arrested or 100% deplatformed.
Confirmed :€
 
SocialzERo

SocialzERo

Blackcel
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Posts
7,363
Online
154d 1h 13m
Dn rd but i certainly will cause Anglin apparently started to identify with incels
 
B

BermaPermannaculo

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Posts
478
Online
15d 11h 37m
waste matter

waste matter

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Posts
5,491
Online
41d 23h 41m
great post also bookmarked
 
Deleted member 31869

Deleted member 31869

Just pass me the rope
-
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Posts
5,068
Online
73d 3h 14m
based and blackpilled
 
M

maxxxer

Off to respect women
★★★
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Posts
207
Online
2d 19h 6m
GeneticTrashLoser said:
I don't agree with everything he said, but he's making pretty much the same point ( but with a conservative tinge).
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSwmXXc885Q
Based, however he only talks about economic stratification, not the hypergamic freedom of women. If he brought that up, he would be canceled.

The left will keep touting equality for all when it only means privilege for a few and destroys society.
 
ThePopeofCope

ThePopeofCope

Nowhere I Belong
★★
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Posts
3,691
Online
10d 17h 3m
Unbelievably valuable post, anon.
 
Deleted member 33216

Deleted member 33216

Every cope has an end
-
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Posts
2,141
Online
19d 23h 13m
maxxxer said:
Based, however he only talks about economic stratification, not the hypergamic freedom of women. If he brought that up, he would be canceled.

The left will keep touting equality for all when it only means privilege for a few and destroys society.
Yeah, even someone like Tucker has to be careful with his words these days. JFL at the cucked society we live in.
 
C

Currycel25

Banned
-
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Posts
689
Online
5d 6h 33m
Wow u read the dailystromer
 
The Abyss

The Abyss

Aspergerscel. Cope 'til you rope.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
12,443
Online
82d 21h 10m
Currycel25 said:
Wow u read the dailystromer
Absolutely shocking, got any other sites that don't appear on Google due to being not alligned with today's thinking?
 
BITG

BITG

No road left but the one that leads to the end
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Posts
8,439
Online
97d 14h 51m
based_meme said:
Even someone like Tucker Carlson is finally seeing how bad for society an increasing population of incel men can be.

The next ten years will be glorious.
 
Benj-amin

Benj-amin

I am not Insane, Just one step ahead of the curve.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Posts
1,905
Online
26d 11h 18m
The Abyss said:
Yeah it ain't aimed at incels for sure.

No not at all, go about your day & read some simple threads that have been regurgitated many times over.
He is a Greycel so it is to be expected that he is not able to pay attention for more than a few seconds.
 
cvh1991

cvh1991

Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
1,027
Online
4d 18h 40m
The Abyss said:
This is content posted from elsewhere, not mine but thought it a good read, I'll stick the link at the bottom & post it here as for some reason ppl don't like linking off site to read things. P.S - If you read the whole thing there is somewhere inside a free coupon good for one sexdoll. *

===

Like a Gerbil Scratching at the Glass Bottom of an Aquarium​

Andrew Anglin March 21, 2021



When I was a child, I had a pet gerbil. I don’t believe it remains a popular hobby for children, but in the 1990s, it was something that parents did for children: they bought them small animals in cages. Kids would sit and watch them, like a miniature zoo.
Looking back, it seems cruel, but I suppose sitting and watching a small animal in a cage is superior to playing with a tablet, which is what I see kids doing now. Kids should be given dogs, primarily. I think every child deserves a dog, and it should be a full-sized dog. Having a dog teaches children a lot about life and the concept of loyalty. The dog actually likes you and is not a captive in a cage, like a small rodent. (I will note that I still love aquarium’s with fish, and it’s a hobby I’ve always wanted to get into. Fish don’t know they’re in a cage, so there is nothing cruel about it. When I finally achieve victory over my enemies and am established in a large office in Manhattan, which will be in the New York Times Building, which I will own, there will be aquariums everywhere including a shark in the main entrance lobby.)
Pet gerbils live in a small cage, with a kind of sawdust in it that they can burrow into. Ours was in a glass aquarium, as for fish.

There were two gerbils, who were given to our family by someone who didn’t want them anymore, because it is a weird burden to create for yourself, looking after this miniature zoo. One of the gerbils died soon after we received them, and so there was only one in the aquarium. The gerbil developed a neurotic disorder wherein it would dig through the matting, down to the glass bottom of the aquarium, and then just continually scratch the glass with its claws. It would do this day in and day out.
I have found a gerbil blog that features a post about this behavior:

This was my experience.
I remember watching this behavior, and thinking: “This creature does not understand that this glass is not dirt. He is naturally designed to live in a place where the ground under him is dirt, and he cannot understand the nature of his captivity, so he is doing the only thing that comes natural to him. He cannot recognize that it isn’t working, because it’s the only thing he knows how to do. To stop doing it would mean to simply give up.”
After a good while of this behavior, the gerbil stopped eating and died. It was not particularly sad to me, as I had no emotional connection to the gerbil.
I think about this strange experience often now, with relation to the way human beings are reacting to our unnatural social environment. We have effectively been put inside of a cage by people with no emotional connection to us. We are engaging in pathological behavior patterns, doing things that should work in our natural environment, but which do not work in the neo-post-modern proto-utopian urban domestic environment.

Girlfriends as the Glass Bottom of a Human Cage​


The most obvious example of this social stereotypy in humans is found in the way that men deal with women.
I have peers, people in my age range, some slightly older and some slightly younger, who keep having “girlfriends.” They move in with these women, as if they are married, but they do not produce children. After a while, it always ends, usually in a psycho performative spectacle by the woman. The woman creates the spectacle for the purpose of making others think the man was doing something evil to her, when in fact she simply got bored and wanted to go do something else.
When men are in the trenches of these relational boondoggles, I say to them: “What are you doing with that woman? What is the goal of this endeavor?”
Here is an example of the conversation:

If gerbils could talk, the conversation I would have had with the gerbil digging at the bottom of the aquarium would have been very similar to that, I’m certain.

Humans are Mammals and We Reproduce Sexually​


This the normal life arc of a man, as determined by biology and natural social norms derived from biology:
  • You are born.
  • For a brief period, you are a child.
  • You enter puberty, wherein your glands begin dumping testosterone.
  • You get horny – that is to say, your penis gets erect, and you have an overwhelming desire to stick it into a girl.
  • You start making gestures towards a girl. It is some kind of performance, or demonstration.
  • At some point, a girl responds positively, and you begin a process of trying to get her alone and naked.
  • Eventually, you get her alone somewhere and have sex with her. She protests, but you’re stronger than she is, and you know she wants it just as much as you do, or else why would she have let you catch her alone like this.
  • You repeat this behavior, with the girl being more into it after the first time. She professes her love.
  • Eventually, she tells her mother that her mensuration doesn’t seem to be happening as it usually does.
  • Her mother questions her with regards to who’s been sticking his whatever in her wherever.
  • The girl confesses.
  • Her mother tells your mother what has taken place.
  • Your mother tells your father to go tell you what this means.
  • Your father tells you that you are soon to be married, and to be a father yourself. He tells you some stories of what it was like when this happened with him, and tells you it’s all going to be fine. You’re a good man and you’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You get married. Your child is born months later. You love it.
  • Now, you need to make sure to work hard, to take care of the child.
  • You have more children.
  • You continue working.
  • You grow to develop a bond with the woman that goes beyond sex, because you’ve been with her for years, through the standard trials and tribulations of existence.
  • At some point, you end up in the same position as your father was, explaining to your son that he’ll be getting married soon, and to not be afraid; you remember what it was like when your father told you this. You tell him he’s a good man and he’ll make a good husband and father.
  • You are excited to be a grandfather, but not as excited as your wife is to be a grandmother.
  • As you age, you start to work less, and your children begin to take care of you, as you took care of them.
  • You die.
That was the cycle of life for most people, throughout all of history.
There is a myth about a “shotgun wedding,” which is when a man takes a woman’s virginity and the girl’s father goes and points a shotgun at him and demands he marry the girl. I doubt there were shotguns (or swords, or weapons of any sort) involved most of the time. Most of the time, it was two teenagers, who had probably grown up together, and whose parents already knew each other, who snuck off in the woods together and did the deed.
I’m sure that most of the deflowerings would qualify as “rape” by modern standards, but the girl knew what she was doing when she ended up alone with the boy that was pursuing her, whether she giggled and said “no, no” or moaned and said “yes, yes.” Most likely, the boy would have been pressing the issue for a bit, and the girl would eventually decide to go meet him alone when she was ovulating.
Note: For those of you who don’t know, because they sure as hell don’t tell you in sex-ed: women tend to usually get pregnant only two days a month, which also happen to be the only two days a month they have anything approaching the male sex drive (even then it doesn’t really approach the male sex drive, in terms of intensity, at all, because women don’t have very much testosterone). And yes, it is possible that a girl can get pregnant other days of the month.
Furthermore, if I may veer slightly into nigh lewdness, the teenage boy is going to be so excited that he’s going to ejaculate very quickly, and teenage boys have almost hyper-powered sperm.
So: it actually is likely that the “virginity incident” would result in impregnation. Especially since people were much healthier back then.
Sometimes, this inevitable incident was preempted by more sophisticated parents through an arranged marriage, but that was largely for more upper class people. In the arranged marriage, it was still just two horny teenagers, the parents or others in the community simply took control of the situation, and directed the teenage sex drive into a controlled environment. Also, if the norm was arranged marriages, this gave the teenagers something to look forward to as they attempted to control the sex urge.
The church did its best to encourage arranged marriage, because the sex before marriage act that takes place in nature was considered barbaric and immoral. Who knows what the rate of virgin marriage actually was, but if you go back and look, you will find that the time between a marriage and the first born child was typically nine months – or just a little bit less. Even in very strict Christian society, no one was doing the math and shaming people.
I’ve seen statistics that claim in America, the (female) sex before marriage rate in 1900 was as low as 10% and as high as 60%, but obviously, people are going to lie about it. It’s a lie that doesn’t hurt anyone. They would marry their first sexual partner, as a result of the pregnancy issue.
The point is this: sex was associated with marriage, whether the deed happened before or after, because sex was associated with pregnancy and children. Whether it was an arranged marriage or a so-called “shotgun wedding,” the marriage was the result of a sex drive, not a result of “oh we think it’s time to have kids.”

“Family Planning” as Anti-Natalism​

What birth control and the sexual revolution did was transfer all sexual power to women. The previous consequence of a woman having sex meant that she would have to deal with children, and she needed someone to feed those children, so she needed to use the power of sex to secure a man who would provide her with resources.
Birth control allowed women to weaponize sex.
It allowed them to gather resources from a man without having these man’s children. She could say “I’m not ready for children.” That was not an option before birth control, because the sex act resulted in children as a matter of science.
This was part of a larger social engineering project by the people who have locked us in this cage.
Women’s sexual liberation was only possible due to the scientific creation of the various forms of birth control. They used arguments that seemed to make logical sense to men, apparently – they argued that they wanted “equal rights.” This has of course resulted in absolute domination of society by women.

The concept of “family planning,” which translates into “women navigating around pregnancy for the reason of using sex as a weapon,” only became possible in the age of birth control, in all its dazzling and diabolical wonder. Up until then, people would have sex because they were horny, the result was children, and the social norms, reinforced by everything from religion to economics, meant marriage. This is how human beings managed the human reproductive drive (excluding Africans, Australian Aboriginals, and maybe some other brown people, who raised children communally like many apes).
Traditional marriage was a legal contract, typically between the man and the girl’s father. That is the ritual you see in modern marriages, when the father walks the bride down the aisle and turns her over to the man. The reason it was a legal contract was because couples might have fights, they might have problems, they might want to have sex with other people, or whatever. Who knows what’s going to happen in 10 or 20 years between two people who had sex because of hormones, so it was written in blood or stone.
Marriage is no longer a contract; it is a pointless, archaic ritual. The fact that divorce is not only legal, but there is such a thing as “no-fault” divorce – which basically indicates a woman has gotten bored – means that marriage has no actual meaning. That’s why it was so easy to force through homosexual marriage: because heterosexual marriage had already come to be seen as a meaningless, performative ritual, perhaps vaguely related to tax forms.
Women having “careers” played directly into this, providing a cover story for the power scheme that women were and are running. The result was no children and the death of the family unit as the core building block of society.
Everything we’ve witnessed in society since then has followed directly from this original sin of birth control.

Romantic Gibberish​

In the midst of the desecration of the marriage contract, the cage-builders (cultural engineers) were shoveling this romantic gibberish about “true love” and “finding the one” onto the flaming doom-heap. The entire plot was lost. Human coupling was not about children, so it began to be about a metaphysical journey to find a person with the magical power to fill you with eternal happiness.

What they did was redefine sexual infatuation as “falling in love,” and claimed that this feeling could “last forever.” Clearly, sexual infatuation cannot last forever. Once you see a woman in a certain light, over a period of time, you can no longer view her as the perfect object you imagined when your erection was raging. A similar process happens in the mind of the woman, though I would not claim to understand its mechanics. *(while stock lasts, look for **)
There is no such thing as “true love.” It is a fantasy, like Santa Claus, designed for adolescents instead of children. What happens is this:
  • Your body is telling you to reproduce, and thus making you horny.
  • When you have sexual attraction to someone, your brain starts dumping chemicals that are not just sex chemicals, but emotional chemicals which fuel nonsensical thoughts.
  • You start to view the object of your sexual attraction as perfect, even though she’s just some stupid bitch.
When the sexual infatuation wears off, you no longer feel euphoric around the other person. That, according to the gospel of modern media, means that it was not actually “true love,” and you might as well move along to the next “partner.”
In nature, the emotions associated with the sexual infatuation are your brain tricking you, because beyond food and warmth, your number one biological prerogative is reproduction. After you live with this woman, raise kids with her, deal with all that living entails, of course you’re going to develop a different kind of love for her. That is not sexual infatuation, but is something deeper and more meaningful. You see it among elderly couples.
But here’s the issue: No man ever said “oh man, look at those tiddies, they would be great for my infant child to suck milk from.” If a man did think that, you would think him perverse. But that is the end goal of the brain, that is creating the erection and the love emotions. The sexual impulse is the drive to create children, but it is masked in the psyche. The chemicals in the brain are lying to you about the end goal of your erection.
When you separate the two things – sex and children – by calling the sexual impulse “true love” and then claiming that producing children is a logical decision that you make, you have effectively broken the established biological reproduction process.

“Boyfriends” are Battered Abuse Victims​

As much as “free love” was touted, women never intended to give away sex for free. So what we end up with is a situation where women practicing birth control use men as emotional, and often financial, slaves. Maybe you can do “pick-up artistry,” and go out and put on a show for women and she will reward you with sex, but if you want long term access to a vagina, you have to play by the rules of the woman, and her rules are always that she has total control over your life. (This situation has gotten much more extreme in recent years, where so many women have become obese, and thus out of the mating game for any self-respecting man.)
Men very often end up going through a series of “long term relationships,” which always end, because they’re not contracted, and the woman gets bored. For most people I know, there aren’t any children. If there are children, it doesn’t seem to stop women from just imploding the relationship and moving on. This has been called “serial monogamy.” What it is is a cycle of abusing men, which men willingly subject themselves to, because the chemicals in their brains don’t understand what is going on. The brain is telling you: “you are having sex with this woman, so you need to take care of her because she is caring for your spawn.” But there are no spawn. **(sorry stock has run out)
Women are exploiting a loophole in your neurobiology for the purpose of enslaving you to them.
During these relationships, the woman is virtually always in a mother type power situation over the man. Men are typically in some kind of personal denial about that. None of them want to admit it, and it apparently just feels normal to them that their “girlfriend” controls their life.
As of 2019, only 30% of millennials were married with at least one child, but thanks to the magic of abortion, only 24% of millennial women are single mothers (presumably, as many as a third of the “spouse and child” are step-dad situations).

Theoretically, women eventually get to be in their thirties, and feel they want to have at least one child, and decide to “settle down.” They usually marry some man who is dopey and well-off financially.
However, a lot of millennial women are not doing that. They are instead just continuing the process of “dating” and moving in with a different man every few years, then destroying the relationship, then going out and looking for another one. A portion of Gen X women are now doing this into their 40s and even 50s, and that looks like it is going to be the path of a much larger portion of millennial women.
The men who get dragged through this process are victims of incredible abuse. It is an Anti-Male Industrial Complex.

Men are simply doing what their biology tells them to do, and women drag them through broken glass.

Broken Machines​

We had a system that worked fine, and we changed it in an attempt to build a utopia, and now we are lonely, hollow, broken things.
We are attempting to do something natural, to fall into the patterns of nature, and it doesn’t work, because we are living in a completely artificial environment, not different to my poor gerbil.
Men have a desire for the company of a woman, because we are hardwired to reproduce. But if you are not reproducing, the woman is totally useless. But the psyche cannot grasp it.
Clearly, it is more complicated than simply trying to fill a natural role. Human beings are mammals, but our psychology is more complex. It’s not as big of a difference as humanists make it out to be, but we are more complicated than apes.
Many of these men who are playing the role of “boyfriend” were raised by single mothers or from otherwise broken families. (I would classify having a weak father who deferred to your mother as a “broken family.” It’s not functioning as it should.) They are accustomed to female authority, so they are looking for female authority. Women exploit men who come from broken families. They target them.
One thing I’ve noticed is that these men in their late twenties through their mid-thirties tend to have “girlfriends” their own age. That is a question I will ask them: “well, if you’re going to get married, why not get one fresher?” It seems to me an obvious question. These men are often in good shape, and making some money, so why not get the youngest girl possible, if you’re planning on having children?
Because they don’t know what they’re doing. They’re not even thinking about it. They never had to think about it before, because it was just something that fell together, as a result of biological drives.

The Root of Our Decay​

The family is the root of society, and the collapse of the family is what destroyed our society.
If we woke up tomorrow and all forms of birth control ceased to exist, from condoms to abortion, and we also banned all forms of government financial aid to women (including affirmative action hiring, free daycare, and all of the rest of the various feminist programs), it would take about 18 months before society reorganized itself into a far-right fantasy.
This is what would happen:
  • Women would have to get married.
  • Men would be the ones setting the terms of the marriage, because they would be the ones with all of the resources.
  • Women would reorient their needs and desires to that of a married woman raising children, and support their husbands who were providing their income.
  • Women’s desire to do all of these weird things they’re doing, pushing homosexuality and an anti-white agenda, would disappear, as their maternal instincts would be focused on their children.
We talk a lot about Jews on this website. As a Christian, I do believe that Jews, who define themselves by a rejection of Christ, are the embodiment of satan’s agenda on earth.
However, the empowerment of women was a prerequisite for everything else that is happening right now. It wouldn’t matter that “no-fault divorce” existed if women would honor the vows they made before God, but a woman is utterly incapable of making basic decisions, let alone grasping the concept of honor.
The first decision that the first woman made was to take the advice of a talking snake that she’d just met minutes earlier.

If the snake had approached man, he would have told him to get away from him with his weird schemes. But Satan used the woman to manipulate the man. That is our exact predicament presently.
White women remain the most active and aggressive persecutors of white men, even now. Probably, none of you were raised by a Jew, but you were raised by an agent of the Jewish agenda. You’ve probably never had a Jew wreck your personal life, but you’ve all had your lives wrecked by women – if only your mother.
There isn’t really a solution to the problem of “what do we do about women?”
Anyone who tells you they have a solution is lying to you. Any man who says that it’s easy to “find a good girl” is the most vile kind of fiend. There are no “good girls” in a feminist society. That is what “women’s empowerment” means. It means they’re allowed to make decisions. All of their decisions are going to be bad. Every aspect of our society incentivizes the worst conceivable behavior in women.

The option that you have is to not let them control your life. Don’t be some bitch’s “boyfriend.” You’re better than that. You don’t deserve this society that you’ve been thrown into. You did nothing to deserve this. Do what you can, see if you can figure something out, but don’t let them take your self-respect.

In any situation where you are involved with a woman, you need to be ready to get up and walk away as soon as she stops doing what you want her to do. Do not ever engage them in arguments. That is below any man, to get down into this sickening psychodrama that they feed on. Do not ever allow them to dictate your behavior.

Awesome post mate, high effort and some accurate/based observations.

What you said about relationships ending because the girl does something psychotic then blames the man (and people eat it up/believe them lol) is so accurate. I have sisters and they pull that shit constantly.
 
Camos95

Camos95

Beancel
★★★★
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Posts
321
Online
3d 18h 12m
The kind of posts we should have here
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,167
Online
34d 7h 37m
Copexodius Maximus said:
tera high iq. However, I think some parts that I disagree with:

1) I don't know what kind of society you are talking about, but I highly doubt sex before marriage was common at all when people lived in villages. This is because in those societies, and something that psychologists agree with, is that moral behaviour is maintained by the risk it will have to a person's reputation.

2) If sex was common before marriage and it happened like you said it did, then many males ended up getting cucked and marrying to raise another man's kid. Most women probably had sex with some Chad or village thug like person back then, got impregnated, and started sleeping with the beta boy billy who liked her so she can pass the kid off as his, and make him marry her and raise Chad's kid.


View attachment 425632

absolutely brootal
Reality pill comment
 
Nebuchadnezzar

Nebuchadnezzar

King of Babylon
★★★★
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Posts
1,314
Online
29d 8h 55m
Saudade

Saudade

jason blahas me
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Posts
5,819
Online
80d 1h 18m
The more users should read this brilliant piece.
 
Arabcel9

Arabcel9

Captain
★★★
Joined
Apr 30, 2020
Posts
1,704
Online
6d 8h 47m
gonna need a lot of time to digest this
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top