…earn you the same ban as them. 
nah that's harsh
20% at most.
No bro that would be ridiculous ngl.
No man
No it shouldnt.
no bro
like 10% warning tbh
fuark
just post on the behalf of users that aren't banned instead theory
M
Nah. Some people have a soft heart and want to help their bros.
Allow it once and then delete the rest, it's enough.
Allow it once and then delete the rest, it's enough.
I have to disagree wholeheartedly and respectfully with this decision to be enacted upon.
What the fuck does that even mean?
it means that you are a soylet guzzling cuckold
Free sniffles, ritalincel and eskimocel
A warning is enough.
This, op is annoyed cause @RREEEEEEEEE isn't banned
Way to avoid low-effort ban
For the record, I too would like to express my disagreement with the proposal suggested by Original Poster. I feel that such a punishment would be entirely disproportionate - draconian, one might say - to the alleged crime.
@Michael15651 we're u really trying to avoid low effortWay to avoid low-effort ban
T
I fucking dare the mods to ban me free @Ritalincel free @Smallondick free @Tellem--T free @Zyros free @incelkingkong
they should rename this site rulescels.co this site is more about rules than inceldom
An exquisite choice of words, fren, I do not believe to have the required level of sophistication to express these ways of thinking any more precise myself
For the record, I too would like to express my disagreement with the proposal suggested by Original Poster. I feel that such a punishment would be entirely disproportionate - draconian, one might say - to the alleged crime.
Similar threads
- shia.jihadist
- The Lounge
shia.jihadist
Users who are viewing this thread
