universallyabhorred
Banned
-
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 8,322
Unlike most articles this one doesn't skirt around the issue of lookism, nor does it attack the blackpill as misogynist, and even accepts that looks are important however the solutions it offers are woefully inadequate and it falls back on classic bluepill platitudes, proving there's no real solution they can think of.
Concession of blackpill truth with weak rebuttal
"The truth is that dating is significantly harder for people with mental illnesses or social anxiety. And dating is way, way harder for physically unattractive people. That being said, attractiveness is not stagnant or binary, and plenty of traditionally unattractive people find love and hold successful, lasting relationships with people who subjectively find them attractive."
Ridiculous Bluepill Solution To Helping Incels
The solution is not to demonize incels for their flawed reasoning, but rather to destigmatize therapy for men, along with undoing so many other traditional, rigid standards that dictate what is and isn't "masculine." Ideally, with genuine empathy and support structures in place, incels wouldn't become incels in the first place.
What kind of "support structure" would make a woman genuinely attracted to a sub3 truecel such as myself so "I wouldn't be incel in the first place"? Do women even possess enough "empathy" to even regard unattractive males as human?
Only way this could possibly work is if a therapist forced women to be attracted to an individual through hypnosis, extreme emotional manipulation or perhaps inducing stockholm syndrome. Or maybe society becomes completely patriarchal and prevents women from having any rights or freedom, even going so far as to reclassify them as property that can be brought and sold for money. All such ideas which would genuinely help incels would of course be rejected by that bluepilled idiotic moron as unethical. As usual the author writes crap without understanding the actual issue.
Concession of blackpill truth with weak rebuttal
"The truth is that dating is significantly harder for people with mental illnesses or social anxiety. And dating is way, way harder for physically unattractive people. That being said, attractiveness is not stagnant or binary, and plenty of traditionally unattractive people find love and hold successful, lasting relationships with people who subjectively find them attractive."
Ridiculous Bluepill Solution To Helping Incels
The solution is not to demonize incels for their flawed reasoning, but rather to destigmatize therapy for men, along with undoing so many other traditional, rigid standards that dictate what is and isn't "masculine." Ideally, with genuine empathy and support structures in place, incels wouldn't become incels in the first place.
What kind of "support structure" would make a woman genuinely attracted to a sub3 truecel such as myself so "I wouldn't be incel in the first place"? Do women even possess enough "empathy" to even regard unattractive males as human?
Only way this could possibly work is if a therapist forced women to be attracted to an individual through hypnosis, extreme emotional manipulation or perhaps inducing stockholm syndrome. Or maybe society becomes completely patriarchal and prevents women from having any rights or freedom, even going so far as to reclassify them as property that can be brought and sold for money. All such ideas which would genuinely help incels would of course be rejected by that bluepilled idiotic moron as unethical. As usual the author writes crap without understanding the actual issue.