Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

[Poll] Who amongst us are Truecels?

Are you truecel?


  • Total voters
    56
asdf1234

asdf1234

goodbye says asdf day 1 account
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
1,994
My truecel definition: KHHV, does NOT mog Blackops2cel, over 20 years old.
 
He (peace be upon him) mogs me by a mile. When I first saw him (pbuh), I wished for someone uglier to represent us as Incels. Because I thought he is kinda more attractive than us. But apparently most Incels aren't as ugly as I thought. Most Incels mog me. It's over boyos.
 
None of us are truecels with these stringent requirements.
 
I am KV and 22.
 
Got laid once and i mog blackops2cel
 
I'm 30 but I'm just a KHV (single H).
 
this forum is just going to be lookism 2.0 if the mods don't do something about the frauds and attention seekers
 
I am khhv 27, but I "mog" stblkops2cel
 
I am not khhv, however blackops2cel probably mogs me and im over 26. So what does that make me
 
Battlefield3cel said:
I am not khhv, however blackops2cel probably mogs me and im over 26. So what does that make me

escortcel? Or full of shit?
 
31 year old KHHV. Looks are irrelevant.
 
-if anyone has ever genuinely smiled at you you are not a truecel

-if you have any friends you aren't truecel

-if you havent been called ugly in the past 2 months you arent truecel

-if you have ever done anything at all with a girl (date, kiss, touch/grope, hug) you are not a truecel
 
rickvanderhammer said:
this forum is just going to be lookism 2.0 if the mods don't do something about the frauds and attention seekers

Report them.
 
Just K. I fucked an escort but didn't kiss her.
 
incel said:
-if anyone has ever genuinely smiled at you you are not a truecel

-if you have any friends you aren't truecel

-if you havent been called ugly in the past 2 months you arent truecel

-if you have ever done anything at all with a girl (date, kiss, touch/grope, hug) you are not a truecel

I'd be shocked if there's one person on here who can be considered a "truecel" by your definition. None of these apply to me.
 
incel said:
-if anyone has ever genuinely smiled at you you are not a truecel

-if you have any friends you aren't truecel

-if you havent been called ugly in the past 2 months you arent truecel

-if you have ever done anything at all with a girl (date, kiss, touch/grope, hug) you are not a truecel

The "No True Scotsman" fallacy continues to cannibalize this community from within.
 
If you don't have piss bottles you are a fakecel.
 
blackcel said:
If you don't have piss bottles you are a fakecel.

If you were born through the vaginal canal and not through Caesarean section you can't be a truecel.
 
Framecel222 said:
I'd be shocked if there's one person on here who can be considered a "truecel" by your definition. None of these apply to me.

thats becuase you are incel not truecel

-volcel: not ugly enough to be a virgin

-incel: ugly (money/fame and surgery might get you laid)

-truecel: deformed/disgusting no hope


blickpall said:
The "No True Scotsman" fallacy continues to cannibalize this community from within.

you are not a philosopher.
 
blickpall said:
incel said:
-if anyone has ever genuinely smiled at you you are not a truecel
-if you have any friends you aren't truecel
-if you havent been called ugly in the past 2 months you arent truecel
-if you have ever done anything at all with a girl (date, kiss, touch/grope, hug) you are not a truecel
The "No True Scotsman" fallacy continues to cannibalize this community from within.
You don't know what the "No True Scotsman" fallacy means. Normie tier philosophy is so ludicrous
 
incel said:
you are not a philosopher.
Never claimed to be one. Doesn't take a philosopher to evaluate stupidity, though.

fagotonabike said:
You don't know what the "No True Scotsman" fallacy means.
You've never seen a fallacy in your life.
 
Framecel222 said:
None of us are truecels with these stringent requirements.


I'm KHHV, and an Incel amongst Asians. It's hard for a Whitecel to not mog Blops but Asians and Rice easily get mogged by Blops.
 
blickpall said:
Never claimed to be one. Doesn't take a philosopher to evaluate stupidity, though.

You've never seen a fallacy in your life.

I know about the straw man fallacy which is what your doing right now
 
blickpall said:
incel said:
you are not a philosopher.
Never claimed to be one. Doesn't take a philosopher to evaluate stupidity, though.
fagotonabike said:
You don't know what the "No True Scotsman" fallacy means.
You've never seen a fallacy in your life.

Jesus Christ you're one dense motherfucker. The "No True Scotsman" fallacy does not apply here, because the "Scotsmen" we're talking about aren't actually "Scotsmen" but fucking English brute that dressed up and LARPS as "Scotsmen".

You see, you completely misunderstood the concept of the fallacy.

Having rules and guidelines of what a "Scotsman" is and at what point something isn't a "Scotsman" isn't a "True scotsman fallacy", it is simply stating the requirements for something to be considered a "Scotsman" in the first place.

Pointing out that someone that LARPs as a "Scotsman" isn't a true "Scotsman" IS NOT A "True Scotsman Fallacy", it is simply stating that someone, by concept, is not a "Scotsman".

Imagine this: A white guy says he's Asian, he LARPs as an Asian and even tries to conceal himself so that he looks like an Asian. When an Asian tells the white guy that he's not a true Asian but instead just a LARPing fagot it is not a "True Scotsman fallacy", but simply pointing out the truth.

Now stop roleplaying as a philosopher, it's embarrassing, especially since you're awful at it.
 
I'm KV, not KHHV, but I'm 26, so it's still fucking incel as fuck.

I mog thy lord and shepherd pretty hard like most people on here do.

So I guess I'm not a truecel, but then pretty much nobody here is with the blackops2cel requirement.
 
incel said:
-if anyone has ever genuinely smiled at you you are not a truecel

-if you have any friends you aren't truecel

-if you havent been called ugly in the past 2 months you arent truecel

-if you have ever done anything at all with a girl (date, kiss, touch/grope, hug) you are not a truecel

That is more like "are you a social failure?"

A lot of us have fantastic social skills, but are still crushed by hypergamy and Femoid shallowness. This sub is about being an Incel and... and that's it. Nothing more than that.

You are a truecel if you looksmaxed and tried your best but were rejected by 65+ Femoids with not a single one accepting you. While being a 24+ years old sexless, kissless, dateless, hugless, handholdless virgin.
 
DankIncel said:
That is more like "are you a social failure?"

A lot of us have fantastic social skills, but are still crushed by hypergamy and Femoid shallowness. This sub is about being an Incel and... and that's it. Nothing more than that.

You are a truecel if you looksmaxed and tried your best but were rejected by 65+ Femoids with not a single one accepting you. While being a 24+ years old sexless, kissless, dateless, hugless, handholdless virgin.

a truecel is ugly to the point no one feels sorry for you as they are disgusted by your presence. 

you are incel not truecel. all truecels have severe deformities that make them inhuman
 
All things considered, the forum is on the right path.
There are three dangers: 

1. Becoming yet another /r9k/ with edgy facebook normies who are essentially just college students whose only minor problem in life is that they don't have a girlfriend atm,

2. Becoming yet another alt-right echo chamber going on about Jews all the time,

3. ending up like a cult with lots of purity spiraling and a "more incel than tho"-attitude; it's like with indepdenent churches were people gather who want purer Christianity, but after a while the first complain about rock music, then about women wearing pants, then about supporting any business at all that supports gay marriage, then about reading any other bible translation, then about people dying their hair, then about people who don't have as many children as possible, then about people dancing and so on and so forth. The same is happening in right-wing-circles where 4chan /pol/ is considered to be not pure enough, and then 8chan /pol/ is considered not pure enough and the Daily Stormer is not yet radical enough and IronMarch is not yet radical enough. The same in leftist forums, of course, were everyone is accused of actually being more of a liberal rather than a left-winger. And on and on it goes.

So far I don't see any of these three things to happen tho.
 
fagotonabike said:
Jesus Christ you're one dense motherfucker. The "No True Scotsman" fallacy does not apply here, because the "Scotsmen" we're talking about aren't actually "Scotsmen" but fucking English brute that dressed up and LARPS as "Scotsmen".

You see, you completely misunderstood the concept of the fallacy.

Having rules and guidelines of what a "Scotsman" is and at what point something isn't a "Scotsman" isn't a "True scotsman fallacy", it is simply stating the requirements for something to be considered a "Scotsman" in the first place.

Pointing out that someone that LARPs as a "Scotsman" isn't a true "Scotsman" IS NOT A "True Scotsman  Fallacy", it is simply stating that someone, by concept, is not a "Scotsman".

Imagine this: A white guy says he's Asian, he LARPs as an Asian and even tries to conceal himself so that he looks like an Asian. When an Asian tells the white guy that he's not a true Asian but instead just a LARPing fagot it is not a "True Scotsman fallacy", but simply pointing out the truth.

Now stop roleplaying as a philosopher, it's embarrassing, especially since you're awful at it.

You've never seen a Scotsman in your life.
 
blickpall said:
fagotonabike said:
Jesus Christ you're one dense motherfucker. The "No True Scotsman" fallacy does not apply here, because the "Scotsmen" we're talking about aren't actually "Scotsmen" but fucking English brute that dressed up and LARPS as "Scotsmen".
You see, you completely misunderstood the concept of the fallacy.
Having rules and guidelines of what a "Scotsman" is and at what point something isn't a "Scotsman" isn't a "True scotsman fallacy", it is simply stating the requirements for something to be considered a "Scotsman" in the first place.
Pointing out that someone that LARPs as a "Scotsman" isn't a true "Scotsman" IS NOT A "True Scotsman Fallacy", it is simply stating that someone, by concept, is not a "Scotsman".
Imagine this: A white guy says he's Asian, he LARPs as an Asian and even tries to conceal himself so that he looks like an Asian. When an Asian tells the white guy that he's not a true Asian but instead just a LARPing fagot it is not a "True Scotsman fallacy", but simply pointing out the truth.
Now stop roleplaying as a philosopher, it's embarrassing, especially since you're awful at it.
You've never seen a Scotsman in your life.
Oh but I have
 
This is stupid, when did It become anything more than just not having sex?
 
kkt6 said:
This is stupid, when did It become anything more than just not having sex?

Since I've been here?

If you look good and are sexless then you're a failed normie, not an Incel.
 
alsalsk said:
Since I've been here?

If you look good and are sexless then you're a failed normie, not an Incel.

If you're unwantingly sexless you're involuntarily celibate. That's it. Not friendless, not kissless, just sexless. That's what an incel is. Involuntarily celibate. 

I'm sick of people trying to put things on top of it, "durr if you held eye contact with a girl for more than two seconds you're fakecel". Fuck off.
 
kkt6 said:
If you're unwantingly sexless you're involuntarily celibate. That's it. Not friendless, not kissless, just sexless. That's what an incel is. Involuntarily celibate. 

I'm sick of people trying to put things on top of it, "durr if you held eye contact with a girl for more than two seconds you're fakecel". Fuck 


Bruh, if you don't try (looksmax, personality) but are a virgin, then you are not an incel

Khhv is for truecels, truecels are people who are seen as genetic scum of the world.

Ugly+virgin is for your basic incels. Becuase if you look good, then you ahould be able to get sex if u tried, so virgins arent neccessarily incels
 
The only physical interaction I had with women was back when me and my cousin kissed which other(We were 12). Am I still a truecel?
 
StayInKitchen said:
The only physical interaction I had with women was back when me and my cousin kissed which other(We were 12). Am I still a truecel?

Yes, exceptions could be made.
 
23 y/o KHHV. Never had a positive experience with a female.
 
Not a truecel, but a norman who scores mostly unnatractive femoids and femoids with major issues. Dating frustrates the crap out of me and I always feel subhuman despite my "successes." I feel like a jester putting on a show for these slags. I have issues maintaining frame and can't spin plates for shit. I fail half of the shit tests. I'm currently dieting so I can have a chance with uggos and whales, FML. Although this time around I'm just going to be thankful for what I have, and ignore some red flags in order to secure a LTR. I'll be happy if she has a fat ass. I got with a pawg (busted face) but didn't wife it because she threw up a couple of red flags, like not having a job. This time I'm not going to give a shit, beggars can't be choosers. I still think about her to this day, fuck.
 
by those requirements, no, I am not a trucel
 
cavsinone_lbjdagoat said:
by those requirements, no, I am not a trucel

Which parts do not hold up for you?
 
alsalsk said:
My truecel definition: KHHV, does NOT mog Blackops2cel, over 20 years old.

KHHV? Check! Does not mog Blackops2cel? Check! Over 20 years old? Check!
I'm a truecel.
 
This is fucking retarded. Just look at the word: INvoluntary CELibate. If you are a truecel that means you're truly KHHV with no means of escape whatever the reason for that may be
 
asdf1234 said:
If you look good and are sexless then you're a failed normie, not an Incel.
 
Am I a truecel if I talked a girl into kissing with me? I mean, she obviously didn't want to but she agreed with enough persuassion.
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
39
Views
820
_meh
_meh
imugly
Replies
7
Views
231
imugly
imugly
supermaxxer
Replies
15
Views
350
Loner94
Loner94

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top