something that will ruin this site for guys that have had enough negative experiences with women and don't want exposure to them in any capcity.
How is there any capacity of exposure if you don't actually visit the 'debate foids' subforum though?
At moments we feel like we can't take it, you just don't participate.
As if women will argue in good faith. As if they can make good arguments. As if they'll be willing to spend their time arguing with subhumans
Plus they'd become the center of attention
I don't actually require someone to debate with me in good faith to enjoy a debate.
I ultimately never know 100% where someone's faith lies, it's always speculation.
If they can't make good arguments then TBH it will just be boring for me and I'll pop my head in and point out there stupidity in 5 seconds and move on to a more interesting thread.
Easy arguments could be good training material for newcels though, who weirdly seem to be joining this place in HS which makes me wonder if they've even built up any debate skills or time-tested confidence in their own viewpoints which you gain by actually defending them.
Most oldcels have years under their belt of arguing in other forums to build up their skills and I'm worried we might be coddling Gen Z so that if they ever do need to debate a foid they'd just collapse.
He claims it's inevitable since there are women larping as guys here already. My point is: who gives a fuck if they can't cash in on that privilege since if they reveal they are women they'll get banned?
If it's actually possible for them to cash in on the privilege here then we need to examine our internal problems because we should be blackpilled enough that this doesn't happen.
That's actually a good "stress test" for how blackpilled the community is: if women are actually able to enjoy female privilege here because we immediately simp to them, then we have not internalized our blackpill revelations to a significant enough degree.
I fully expect that any who do so (and I probably will be among them) should be mocked by the rest of the community for their weakness, and we should accept that criticism in good nature.
he admitted in a previous post that the no foids allowed rule here cuts down on foid participation
I think you misread the context of that comment: when I said "you can make it less convenient" I was talking about requiring cam verification that a member is male, as specified in the following sentence that you did not quote.