Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Physical Attractiveness More Important Than Race, Finds Study

  • Thread starter Deleted member 20056
  • Start date
Deleted member 20056

Deleted member 20056

Specialist in Incel Psychology
-
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Posts
691

View: https://twitter.com/NickWolfinger/status/1406343117893107713

E4RTS9SUUAAJGkK
 
Wow, what a surprise
 
Thats a lie my friend
 
How is it a cope to point out that physical attractiveness impacts whether or not you'll be successful in life?
it does but saying race is less important is cope
 
Race makes up like 70 percent of physical attractiveness jfl
 
So what retards? Benefits of physical attractiveness are what is being measured. A case isn't being made that whites and blacks are equally attractive or some shit.
 
9/10 foids will pick attractive white chad over attractive chang.

I think thats all I need to say to make my case.


Also jfl at these studies :feelshaha::soy::soy:
Not like it matters, trucel is trucel irrespective of race, why even bother
 
Study after study when it was right in the face.
 
I wish I saved that one screenshot where a larping chadfish asked a foid on tinder:

Would you go out with a 5'9 6/10 white guy or a 6'1 Asian guy.?

The white foid responded, "white guy, I think most girls would"


Ahh yes, I remember now, it was in that video with "what a wonderful world" playing in the background while it showed examples of the racepill.
 
They only studied whites and blacks which are the two best looking races anyway so of course the race factor is not that big. If they included rice and currycels the results would be vastly different.
 
If this wasn't obvious to begin with, you aren't blackpilled.
@tehgymcel420 thoughts?
 
If this wasn't obvious to begin with, you aren't blackpilled.
@tehgymcel420 thoughts?
Non white race = lower physical attractiveness

Average white man:
https://cdn.britannica.com/92/215392-050-96A4BC1D/Australian-actor-Chris-Hemsworth-2019.jpg


Average ethnic:
https://incels.is/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FE0xQm9R.jpg&hash=6afa060f592c13c624fe46e3e499e440
 
Non white race = lower physical attractiveness

Average white man:
https://cdn.britannica.com/92/215392-050-96A4BC1D/Australian-actor-Chris-Hemsworth-2019.jpg


Average ethnic:
https://incels.is/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FE0xQm9R.jpg&hash=6afa060f592c13c624fe46e3e499e440
that's not averag for white male, where the hell do you live JFL.
 
9/10 foids will pick attractive white chad over attractive chang.

I think thats all I need to say to make my case.


Also jfl at these studies :feelshaha::soy::soy:
Not like it matters, trucel is trucel irrespective of race, why even bother
Yeah, because Caucasoid skull > Negroid skull > Mongoloid skull. A white chad and a arab chad are basically on even footing because of this.
9a008598025ed00a291cdb438ae8cafc

Non white race = lower physical attractiveness

Average white man:
https://cdn.britannica.com/92/215392-050-96A4BC1D/Australian-actor-Chris-Hemsworth-2019.jpg


Average ethnic:
https://incels.is/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FE0xQm9R.jpg&hash=6afa060f592c13c624fe46e3e499e440

Italian vs Arab

Southeurope3


D7dc9e5571607256150047ec8dd59bf4

that's not averag for white male, where the hell do you live JFL.
He's a self hating Egyptians who gets off on insulting himself. It's like a fetish for him:feelsmusic:
 
Last edited:
Yet there are no laws against discriminating men because of their attractiveness. In any anti-discrimination clauses they always go on and on that you can't dicriminate against someone because of their gender, ethnicity, skin color, or sexuality. But never due to how good looking they are, how tall they are, whether they have hunter eyes or square jaw.

It's the only type of bigotry that is acceptable and encouraged by society.
 
Ethnics are having trouble understanding this study. What it's saying is that perceived attractiveness is a better indicator of success in life than race. If it were the case that there was one attractive ethnic and the rest of them were subhuman, it would still be the case. There is undoubtedly a prejudice against ethnics, but this study isn't disputing that. If you like, it's measuring the advantages of ethnics that look attractive and white enough, and observing that this advantage is larger than the advantage of being a white subhuman.
 
Ethnics are having trouble understanding this study. What it's saying is that perceived attractiveness is a better indicator of success in life than race. If it were the case that there was one attractive ethnic and the rest of them were subhuman, it would still be the case. There is undoubtedly a prejudice against ethnics, but this study isn't disputing that. If you like, it's measuring the advantages of ethnics that look attractive and white enough, and observing that this advantage is larger than the advantage of being a white subhuman.
There might just be more white chads
 
There are more white chads, but that doesn't make a difference. White subhumans are less likely to be successful in life than black chads.
 
No, it is false. Foids participate in these studies for virtue signalling purposes. Therefore, not properly controlled by design.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top