Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Phrenology (skull=personality) is right and ahead of its time

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

Hope for more mass shootings in 2025
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
23,071
IT users laugh about incels discussing about phrenology, and some IT users have bashed us for allegedly believing in phrenology. Well, phrenology, as funny as it sounds, is (mostly) right in measuring a individual's personality.

121278


Human personality is believed to be influenced by genetic (looks), environment (also looks LOL), growing development (looks play a role in this) and other factors, like chemical in the brain.

The definition from wikipedia

Personality is defined as the characteristic set of behaviors, cognitions, and emotional patterns that evolve from biological and environmental factors.[1] While there is no generally agreed upon definition of personality, most theories focus on motivation and psychological interactions with one's environment.[2] Trait-based personality theories, such as those defined by Raymond Cattell define personality as the traits that predict a person's behavior. On the other hand, more behaviorally based approaches define personality through learning and habits. Nevertheless, most theories view personality as relatively stable.[1]

Now for phrenology...

Phrenology
(from Ancient Greek φρήν (phrēn), meaning 'mind', and λόγος (logos), meaning 'knowledge') is a pseudoscience which involves the measurement of bumps on the skull to predict mental traits.

121277


Phrenology couldnt be more right, it is actually very high IQ and way ahead of its time from 19th century. It is also mostly right in determining a individuals personality, like someone with good jaw and browridge will be given poistitive reinforcement through out his life and he is confident and fearless, in contrast, the nerd is constantly bullied and likely sent him to a state of retreat and he has developed inhibition as a mechanism to deal (or perhaps, run away) with competition against stronger males.

Do notice I said mostly right because this test doesn't account for mentalcel individuals, like that retarded chad

if you dont believe in phrenology, you are bluepilled and dont think looks matters and you are low IQ as ITcels
 
Phrenology and physiognomy are de facto part of psychiatry (mental hospitals are full of ugly people)
 
Thought it was a "haha" gif lol
It was an attempt at a standing ovation. My mistake, I'm not so well versed in this gif communication business. Cheers to a good post.
 
(((pesudo)))science
 
I thought this is a universal knowledge.
Virtually every civilization i know associated one's inner traits and 'personality':soy: with certain facial characteristics.

Denying this is just one among the many insanity of liberalism and their belief in blank slate individuals
 
Phrenology couldnt be more right, it is actually very high IQ and way ahead of its time from 19th century. It is also mostly right in determining a individuals personality, like someone with good jaw and browridge will be given poistitive reinforcement through out his life and he is confident and fearless, in contrast, the nerd is constantly bullied and likely sent him to a state of retreat and he has developed inhibition as a mechanism to deal (or perhaps, run away) with competition against stronger males.
theres definetly something to it. maybe the incel looking guy (recessed chin, prey eyes etc) isnt born with low inhibition and betaness (in terms of his thinking and behaviour) but as soon as the world aknowledges how he looks he will be shaped into a beta without ever experiencing the opposite. Its kind of like a self-fullfilling prophecy. On the other hand its actually pretty low IQ to always seperate the physical from the psychological, they are not perfectly seperated, they go hand in hand with each other. one example is testosterone. while it has a massive impact on how you look (muscle mass, bones, skin) it also has a massive impact on how you behave (posture, metabolism, risktaking,
pain tolerance, sexdrive). Of course the human body consists of a lot of different hormones, genes and whatnot that all interact in one way or another with each other, so you can NOT always 100% predict things (a lot of testosterone doesnt always mean that you are aggressive,
Testo as everything else in the body doesnt operate completely alone and isolated, but the more testo you have the higher the possibility that you are a aggressive guy) but to completely dismiss the links between looks and personality/ behavior, no matter at what angle you look at it, is just wrong
 
Last edited:
https://incels.is/attachments/1560251913592-png.121277/

The chad slayer skull vs the beta cuck skull.
 
My theory is that there will be many rollbacks in science, where they acknowledge that things like Phrenology, Telegony, Lamarckism are true, in order for the scientific establishment to maintain credibility.

However there will also be a special doctrine created so that social policy will NOT take these new acknoledgements into account, and that people will be encouraged to remain "woke" like it's still 2015 in spite of the truth, essentially creating an alternate fanfiction universe for normies to live in happily ever after, even as established science officially changes.
 
It can’t account for everything but looks are generally a good indicator of how well an individual is treated by their environment
 
IT users laugh about incels discussing about phrenology, and some IT users have bashed us for allegedly believing in phrenology. Well, phrenology, as funny as it sounds, is (mostly) right in measuring a individual's personality.

View attachment 121278

Human personality is believed to be influenced by genetic (looks), environment (also looks LOL), growing development (looks play a role in this) and other factors, like chemical in the brain.

The definition from wikipedia

Personality is defined as the characteristic set of behaviors, cognitions, and emotional patterns that evolve from biological and environmental factors.[1] While there is no generally agreed upon definition of personality, most theories focus on motivation and psychological interactions with one's environment.[2] Trait-based personality theories, such as those defined by Raymond Cattell define personality as the traits that predict a person's behavior. On the other hand, more behaviorally based approaches define personality through learning and habits. Nevertheless, most theories view personality as relatively stable.[1]

Now for phrenology...

Phrenology
(from Ancient Greek φρήν (phrēn), meaning 'mind', and λόγος (logos), meaning 'knowledge') is a pseudoscience which involves the measurement of bumps on the skull to predict mental traits.

View attachment 121277

Phrenology couldnt be more right, it is actually very high IQ and way ahead of its time from 19th century. It is also mostly right in determining a individuals personality, like someone with good jaw and browridge will be given poistitive reinforcement through out his life and he is confident and fearless, in contrast, the nerd is constantly bullied and likely sent him to a state of retreat and he has developed inhibition as a mechanism to deal (or perhaps, run away) with competition against stronger males.

Do notice I said mostly right because this test doesn't account for mentalcel individuals, like that retarded chad

if you dont believe in phrenology, you are bluepilled and dont think looks matters and you are low IQ as ITcels
High iq, high awareness, high knowledge.

They all mocked Cesare Lombroso when he conducted a study about this stuff and wrote several books yet no one has given an equally viable alternative to his findings. He has been proven right so many times by modern science (Adrian Raine for example) while his biggest opponents, social constructivists, are basically a laughing stock nowadays.
He made some gross and grotesque claims for sure but the general theory was correct and accurate af.

I'll do a graduation thesis on this dude soon lol
 
Phrenologys only problem is that it got a bit too esoteric and precise - but its correct in a very broad general sense that certain skull / bone shapes are going to be correlated with certain personality features. That is the basis of looks theory - mm's make mm's (millimeters make male models).

A recessed chin is a feature universally seen as disgusting, weak, beta, creepy etc - and anyone suffering one will have to deal with those personality types automatically applied to them EVEN IF THEY AREN'T TRUE. And over time, the inability to socialise normally will gradually cement those perceptions into reality.

A funny example is the colonel from pornhubs be a porn star reality thing. That dude has a terribly recessed chin, and is so ugly one of the porn stars has to cancel a scene with him despite him being polite and courteous, and acting confident and alpha (or trying to).
 
Retarded bearded soy cucks will reject phrenology when it comes in the form of ancient knowledge from old white men.

Retarded bearded soy cucks will accept phrenology when it comes in the form of computer algorithms scanning faces and seeking out pre-crime.
 
Phrenology is based and should be taught in schools.
 
My theory is that there will be many rollbacks in science, where they acknowledge that things like Phrenology, Telegony, Lamarckism are true, in order for the scientific establishment to maintain credibility.

However there will also be a special doctrine created so that social policy will NOT take these new acknoledgements into account, and that people will be encouraged to remain "woke" like it's still 2015 in spite of the truth, essentially creating an alternate fanfiction universe for normies to live in happily ever after, even as established science officially changes.
High iq. Many atheistfags science cucks desperately want to deny that BUT there IS a scientific enstablishment like there is a political-cultural one. Scientific enstablishment has many times lied to keep its credibility in the same way the political-cultural enstablishment did.
For example I can't really digest Catholicism even if I try really hard but i also acknowledged how it is really probable that many Darwinist claims are actually horsecrap (macro evolution for example).
They simply want to keep the status quo and their grip over it like any other fucking system/enstablishment

Just think what they want you to believe about gender and race equality and then think what the truth actually is and you'll understand how even the scientific elites are behaving exactly like any other political elite
Phrenology is based and should be taught in schools.
Totally. It should be used before entering society as an adult to know which kind of people we should distance ourselves from
 
Last edited:
High iq. Many atheistfags science cucks desperately want to deny that BUT there IS a scientific enstablishment like there is a political-cultural one. Scientific enstablishment has many times lied to keep its credibility in the same way the political-cultural enstablishment did.
For example I can't really digest Catholicism even if I try really hard but i also acknowledged how it is really probable that many Darwinist claims are actually horsecrap (macro evolution for example).
They simply want to keep the status quo and their grip over it like any other fucking system/enstablishment

Just think what they want you to believe about gender and race equality and then think what the truth actually is and you'll understand how even the scientific elites are behaving exactly like any other political elite

Totally. It should be used before entering society as an adult to know which kind of people we should distance ourselves from
Thanks and you're right, the establishment basically forced through a few revolutions around the mid-1900s in order to kick out the last remains of traditional/racist/eugenic/eurocentric thought, aiming to consolidate the "moral gains" of ww2 and create a platform to promote equality, sexual liberation and reality denial.
A bunch of old commies thumped on their desks really hard to ram these new ideas through and they succeeded.

Once created this establishment has just been defending itself fiercely and trying to hold the authority and cultural territory it's gained for as long as possible.
But as the rational attacks keep mounting they'll have to roll back those territorial gains a little in order to maintain credibility, after figuring out how to spin their admission of defeat, so that it doesn't functionally have any impact at all on society besides appeasing critics.
 
Thanks and you're right, the establishment basically forced through a few revolutions around the mid-1900s in order to kick out the last remains of traditional/racist/eugenic/eurocentric thought, aiming to consolidate the "moral gains" of ww2 and create a platform to promote equality, sexual liberation and reality denial.
A bunch of old commies thumped on their desks really hard to ram these new ideas through and they succeeded.

Once created this establishment has just been defending itself fiercely and trying to hold the authority and cultural territory it's gained for as long as possible.
But as the rational attacks keep mounting they'll have to roll back those territorial gains a little in order to maintain credibility, after figuring out how to spin their admission of defeat, so that it doesn't functionally have any impact at all on society besides appeasing critics.
The most frustrating thing is when they even try to larp as the super partes objective truth
 
100% true, femoids need 0.00345s to judge you whether you are a Chad or Incel based by your skull
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top