four1298
pro-immigration activist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Posts
- 1,989
- Online time
- 2d 17h
I think immigrants are known to live in "overcrowded" houses. I put "overcrowded" in quotes because it's a hoax like overpopulation. What's overcrowded is just what's supposed to be normal. For example the Center for Immigration Studies says, "We find thpat 14.3 percent of immigrant workers live in overcrowded housing, four times the 3.5 percent for native-born workers." An article says, "A recent Chinese immigrant named Kris had been staying in a similar 'hotel' last year, a standalone house in Monterey Park, for $15 a night. He shared the bedroom with seven to eight people, with mattresses placed on the floor and no divider between beds." It also says, "On August 8, 2022, a city inspection of the building found that at least 24 rooms had problems with overcrowding, with one rental unit having 12 beds. The 24 units housed a total of 232 beds, nearly 10 beds on average per unit." This should be more common. It would end homelessness because it's so cheap. This also deals with the problem of where we're going to keep hundreds of billions of people after pro-natalist policy is passed. If the world can have 5 trillion rooms, seven people can share a room. That's enough rooms for 35 trillion people if seven share a room or 60 trillion if twelve share a room. Perhaps we can have more rooms, but we also need a lot of farmland for food. I also wonder if nature is necessary. Do we need nature at all? Surely the Earth can have at least one trillion people with farms and nature.
Last edited:





