Blackpill People react to injustice through a fake/ put-on system of principles they don't even live by for evasion. It is a glorified cop out.

[Pinpoint]

Imagine donald trump getting confronted over his border policies which leave many mexican children starving and wrking when their parents were shipped off.
He responds with "life's life", when in reality he doesn't live by those principles. He just wants to project that he does so because it gives him an excuse not to recognize the same strife and pain mexicans are going through. But no one knows in his personal life experience that he didn't live like that, he was born in wealth and whined like a swine when he didn't get his way most likely.
People often outwardly show fake principles that imply their manliness/ determination/ diligence in the time of crisis similar to the people who are getting hurt so they can be absolved from caring about their struggles.
Women do the same where they look at the incel issues and say "I don't rely on others for validation, that's weak shit". Lmao.
People only admit to something embarrassing or something that bodes undignifyingly on them when there's something in it for them.

 

[StaroRavager]

People only admit to something embarrassing or something that bodes undignifyingly on them when there's something in it for them.

CYA is a strategy all humans adhere to

 

[Pinpoint]

CYA is a strategy all humans adhere to

Yeah and veneering their outward views. "You're creepy" is just another way of saying you're ugly but with the veneered insistence on someone's scary factor to not hurt their ego about something more unchangeable like genetics and appearnce. It's tricking someone into a false thoughtloop about someone thinking about how to come off less scary in your behavior when it really was your looks.

Trump is trying to act like he'd think life is life in that situation but he'd be squealing liek a pig. But no one wil lever know because it's illegal and anti humanitarian to put him in the same thing that he put others in so he's safe.
People don't have their true views expressed. Eveyrthing is in relatio nto the position they are in. People are amoral anarchists.
A lto of the time peopel disguise their fear of consequences as a moral burden keeping them from doing something immoral.

 

[Void]

The just-world theory is the origin of all the failure in acknowledging of injustices. They don't give a shit about any principles except ones that validate their own existence and god forbid anyone tries to tell them "I didn't deserve this shit".

They always reveal that they don't give a shit by saying what you said, "life's life" when confronted with this, acknowledging others don't deserve suffering also makes them have to realize that they also might not deserve anything.

 

[StaroRavager]

Yeah and veneering their outward views. "You're creepy" is just another way of saying you're ugly but with the veneered insistence on someone's scary factor to not hurt their ego about something more unchangeable like genetics and appearnce. It's tricking someone into a false thoughtloop about someone thinking about how to come off less scary in your behavior when it really was your looks.

Trump is trying to act like he'd think life is life in that situation but he'd be squealing liek a pig. But no one wil lever know because it's illegal and anti humanitarian to put him in the same thing that he put others in so he's safe.
People don't have their true views expressed. Eveyrthing is in relatio nto the position they are in. People are amoral anarchists.
A lto of the time peopel disguise their fear of consequences as a moral burden keeping them from doing something immoral.

Loss aversion is the driving force behind many decisions both large and miniscule

 

[Pinpoint]

The just-world theory is the origin of all the failure in acknowledging of injustices. They don't give a shit about any principles except ones that validate their own existence and god forbid anyone tries to tell them "I didn't deserve this shit".

They always reveal that they don't give a shit by saying what you said, "life's life" when confronted with this, acknowledging others don't deserve suffering also makes them have to realize that they also might not deserve anything.

People are forwardly aware of what happens if they acknowledge and injustice, and what becomes of their reputation if they allow the addressment of the situation to come to a head, and then the solidarity of their indifference/ selfishness is made plain.
So they foil the forming of a bad situation happening to others from coming to a head so they can make their evasion of giving their true stance all the more slick and unnoticeable.
Yes to be virtuistic is a trade off of your position. But donald trump needs to be virtuistic to his voters through being outwardly unvirtuistic to those his voters wanted him to downgrade. And it worked.

People are forwardly knowing that the justice on them will require them to give things in exchange to keep up a moralistic image. But people will be as subtly evasive as possible (fake constraints, or veneering ignorance and numbness rather than CONSCIOUS disinterest and disdain) so they can make it look like they're not immoral when they're going to decline the call for justice because of the taxation it'll take upon them.
It's why liberals never mention white slavery. because the drain of stopping their narrative of (white men evil) will lessen their gains. Because then you can't just say oppression is one sided like the current mindset of the masses believes.

Loss aversion is the driving force behind many decisions both large and miniscule

yeah with a virtuistic gloss in most cases.

 

[Smallondick]

The just-world theory is the origin of all the failure in acknowledging of injustices.

 

[Michael15651]

The just-world theory is the origin of all the failure in acknowledging of injustices. They don't give a shit about any principles except ones that validate their own existence and god forbid anyone tries to tell them "I didn't deserve this shit".