Serious People here underrate foids and overrate men

[Deleted member 11159]

Any time a foid gets posted here, no matter how good looking, will get called ugly/ frauding/ fakeupped etc, which is fine and is often the case, but any time a white guy who is 6ft, white, non-deformed and has hair gets posted, he'll get called a Chad.
So often people try to prove hypergamy by showing a TikTok or an Instagram post of a foid dating "Chad" and nearly always they're perfectly looksmatched, the guy is only somewhat better looking or also i've seen a few cases where the foid was better looking than her boyfriend.

Has anyone noticed this too?

 

[shii410]

I think people just want to apply lingo to things even when it's not necessary tbh. the vast majority of people are normies, Chad/Stacy/incels are all relatively small demographics

 

[Transcended Trucel]

yes this is true. but most foids are ugly trash wearing makeup so you can't blame us for underrating them

 

[Deleted member 11159]

yes this is true. but most foids are ugly trash wearing makeup so you can't blame us for underrating them

There is no excuse for calling every white guy Chad because you want to make hypergamy sound worse than it actually is though.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

There is no excuse for calling every white guy Chad because you want to make hypergamy sound worse than it actually is though.

most people here often call Chad's high tier normie or Subhuman in extreme cases

 

[catcel]

I would give anything to live in a world where females can't fraud thier looks by fake-up

Since tiktok is banned in curryland, I use douyin ( Chinese tiktok ) and you wouldn't believe the "make-up transformation" videos on it. Turning sub 3 holes to 8s and 9s.

There is no fucking stigma attached to a female caked in make-up or even wearing wigs .
This is so unfair. Aaaaaaaaaa

 

[Hate_my_life]

Agreed.


>Low-tier normie gets leaked?

"Hes a fakecel. Chadlite. Slayer

>Evident 7/10 foid gets posted

"She's black so she's 3/10 max! Below my looksmatch"

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

There is no excuse for calling every white guy Chad because you want to make hypergamy sound worse than it actually is though.

This lmfao

 

[WarriorSkull]

That's funny, I generally find it is opposite, at least when judging men. At some point you need to take the you-don't-get-a-vote-pill and also realize that not having a pussy means your ultimately incapable of truly knowing where the cutoff line is.

Also understand that everyone here is living extremely fucked lives and as such suffering from extreme alienation. Their life experiences and small bits of their philosophy are what you should take from most of them. Their opinions and feelings (including my own) should be ignored as you would any foid's or normie's.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

The amount of high tier normie white dudes called Chad is pretty insane ngl

as for underrating foids, it's tough to say, since makeup frauding DOES happen.

I think people just want to apply lingo to things even when it's not necessary tbh. the vast majority of people are normies, Chad/Stacy/incels are all relatively small demographics

how small do you think incels are? you said in the other thread 5-10%, when it's actually close to a third (still a minority, yes)

 

[Tenshi]

some guys are retarded but let's be honest most women are subhuman af

I try to judge looking at how many good features they have, also symmetry etc. Would she be ugly if she was a man? Then she's not gl

 

[Neggr]

because the traits u mentioned makes u a fakecel

 

[epillepsy]

When you know the ugliness of female nature, women naturally start to look ugly on the outside as well.

 

[pp183]

its the other way around tbh

 

[Deleted member 11159]

because the traits u mentioned makes u a fakecel

They make you a fakecel, yeah, but not a Chad.

 

[Neggr]

They make you a fakecel, yeah, but not a Chad.

both are sexhavers therefor I hate both of them

 

[shii410]

how small do you think incels are? you said in the other thread 5-10%, when it's actually close to a third (still a minority, yes)

I never said that. I'd estimate like 10% are incels, with the percentage of men who face some struggle with sex/relationships (but aren't incel) being higher. it's just extremely rare for men to have no success with sex or relationships at any point in their life. if you mention that you're never even touched a girl to your normie classmates/coworkers they will roast your ass and make fun of you forever. even on this forum about a third of the userbase has done this

 

[Haywire]

yes. so many here saying landwhale and hambeast and similiar and the foid has no fat that i can see other than big tits. they are just mad because they cant get pussy i understand the hate.

the fake up needs to be banned.

 

[Gymcelled]

because the traits u mentioned makes u a fakecel

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I never said that. I'd estimate like 10% are incels, with the percentage of men who face some struggle with sex/relationships (but aren't incel) being higher. it's just extremely rare for men to have no success with sex or relationships at any point in their life. even on this forum about a third of the userbase has done this
View attachment 331811

15% have unpaid sex and 10% have had romantic relationships, let's assume the romantic relationships all had sex, so that's 15% (about) non incels.

That still leaves 85% of the forum as virgins if you disclude hookers.

you don't seem to be taking this into account, that 10% stat you suggested might have applied years ago, but not now

 

[shii410]

View attachment 331815

part of this has to do with shit like how men are more likely than women to live with their parents which provides an obstacle to sex, less men are employed or attending college (leading to less relationships), maybe stuff like MeToo has some impact

that graph seems about right, 10% are incels (will never be able to have sex or relationships consistently due to unchangeable factors) and 20% are normies (have some temporary obstacle which inconveniences their sex life or are just on a dry spell, they might have some difficulty with sex and relationships but it isn't unattainable for them)

 

[SupremeG]

Let's face it. It is rare to be 6ft and a virgin at the same time.

 

[Deleted member 11159]

Let's face it. It is rare to be 6ft and a virgin at the same time.

6 foot is a very mediocre height. You’re not going to stand out in a group of young white and black males at that height.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Let's face it. It is rare to be 6ft and a virgin at the same time.

depends where you live tbh

part of this has to do with shit like how men are more likely than women to live with their parents which provides an obstacle to sex, less men are employed or attending college (leading to less relationships), maybe stuff like MeToo has some impact

that graph seems about right, 10% are incels (will never be able to have sex or relationships consistently due to unchangeable factors) and 20% are normies (have some temporary obstacle which inconveniences their sex life or are just on a dry spell, they might have some difficulty with sex and relationships but it isn't unattainable for them)

the graph says that 27% are incels

 

[slavcel11]

I noticed underrating of foids but have never seen overrating of guys honestly.

 

[shii410]

the graph says that 27% are incels

not necessarily. being a virgin when you're 18 doesn't inherently mean that you're genetic trash and will never feasibly be able to have a relationship. it does in a lot of cases but not always or even in most cases

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Noticed that as well.

 

[SupremeG]

6 foot is a very mediocre height. You’re not going to stand out in a group of young white and black males at that height.

True but there would be always some bitches who wants to fuck if your face isn't ogre. Women are like retarded animals, see big masculine man, want to smash.

 

[WØLF]

Let's face it. It is rare to be 6ft and a virgin at the same time.

 

[Deleted member 11159]

True but there would be always some bitches who wants to fuck if your face isn't ogre. Women are like retarded animals, see big masculine man, want to smash.

Yes but 6’0 men aren’t big. They’re just somewhat above average.

 

[SupremeG]

Yes but 6’0 men aren’t big. They’re just somewhat above average.

I'm 5'7. They are Skyscrapers to me.

 

[Uglymuggly]

depends where you live tbh

the graph says that 27% are incels

It’s not rare to be a 6 foot virgin

 

[GoffSystemQB]

not necessarily. being a virgin when you're 18 doesn't inherently mean that you're genetic trash and will never feasibly be able to have a relationship. it does in a lot of cases but not always or even in most cases

That is all men under 30. No idea what the mean/median age is in the survey but I very much doubt it's 18.

Although small that would include some people that are gay and got sex prior to 18 perhaps but not able to get it after.

part of this has to do with shit like how men are more likely than women to live with their parents which provides an obstacle to sex, less men are employed or attending college (leading to less relationships), maybe stuff like MeToo has some impact

A lot more of it has to do with social media and online dating.

When we look at the stats that show the rising loserdom in men a lot of that is caused by inceldom not leading to it. People get the cause and effect reversed.

It's just a fact that most of the way people date and hookup in the modern era is online. The efficiency of the markets have left more men behind. It actually takes far less social effort and "having your shit together" to procure dates onlines. Many autistic people are for instance able to use dating apps where otherwise they would have been screwed.

Also in the before with the "10%" the number of people that are virgins until 30 would've been 1% or so making inceldom not really existent as a phenomenon. More so a product of gender ratio solely or autism or deformities.

 

[shii410]

That is all men under 30. No idea what the mean/median age is in the survey but I very much doubt it's 18.

Although small that would include some people that are gay and got sex prior to 18 perhaps but not able to get it after.

yeah, hence why I said not necessarily. there are a lot of reasons why a man aged 18-22 might be a virgin which don't necessarily make him an incel (as in, involuntarily consigned to indefinite celibacy due to genetics or other factors that are outside his control). after 23 it's more ehh. I think the age group on this survey is too broad, especially given how the much the circumstances can vary between people in that demographic

A lot more of it has to do with social media and online dating.

When we look at the stats that show the rising loserdom in men a lot of that is caused by inceldom not leading to it. People get the cause and effect reversed.

It's just a fact that most of the way people date and hookup in the modern era is online. The efficiency of the markets have left more men behind. It actually takes far less social effort and "having your shit together" to procure dates onlines. Many autistic people are for instance able to use dating apps where otherwise they would have been screwed.

Also in the before with the "10%" the number of people that are virgins until 30 would've been 1% or so making inceldom not really existent as a phenomenon. More so a product of gender ratio solely or autism or deformities.

I'd say this is true for hooking up but not necessarily dating, especially for younger guys in high school or college. it's very uncommon for guys to meet their long term girlfriends on Tinder and shit. I think most normie males got girlfriends by being in social proximity to them through class, work, etc. and having a passable appearance + some distinguishing features (playing sports, being popular socially, being tall, things of that nature)

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Nah, women get overrated here too because people here are simps at heart.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

yeah, hence why I said not necessarily. there are a lot of reasons why a man aged 18-22 might be a virgin which don't necessarily make him an incel (as in, involuntarily consigned to indefinite celibacy due to genetics or other factors that are outside his control). after 23 it's more ehh. I think the age group on this survey is too broad


I'd say this is true for hooking up but not necessarily dating, especially for younger guys in high school or college. it's very uncommon for guys to meet their long term girlfriends on Tinder and shit. I think most normie males got girlfriends by being in social proximity to them through class, work, etc. and having a passable appearance + some distinguishing features (playing sports, being popular socially, being tall, things of that nature)

I believe now most (adult) couples have met online. And that was a few years ago.

Different for high school but with that new app for teenagers maybe not so much anymore. I think it is the case in College though. Again would have to look at the median/mean here but I think the age was 24-25 or so not that high.

Obviously it's not all Tinder. There are tons that is classed as online dating. Even just meeting someone on reddit or in WoW or something would be classed as that.

Also it is possible to have success on Tinder as a normie at least above 5. Some story I read the other day had a guy getting 63 matches over 3 years (over 4,500 left swipes) and 2 became GFs.

Not a very high match rate and I wouldn't think of him to be super attractive based on that. He called himself a 6 though.

At the end of the day though there are more virgins earlier in life so even if it was the case that the ratios were more skewed to real-life earlier not that many men are the beneficiary. What is the virginity rate when graduating high school? 50% or more nowadays? What's it in early college? 30% or so?

Then after that all that's left over are largely playing in the online game. Do you see what I'm saying?

Plus it doesn't take much efficiency to leave many men behind. Even if 20% meet or so online. That has a big effect on those who would be completely unable to succeed there.

I honestly haven't noticed it past high school. I've heard lots of people that have met online. Obviously in high school a lot occurs within the school. Past that mark I don't know I've seen plenty that have met online.

Plus that survey is past 18 so doesn't include high school anyways.

 

[frustratedhapa]

Yes. I've seen Stacies being called "average". And no I'm not quick to call someone a Stacy. And yes people here also overrate men. Too many people are labeled as Chads or Chadlites when they are actually normies.

 

[Deleted member 11159]

Yes. I've seen Stacies being called "average". And no I'm not quick to call someone a Stacy. And yes people here also overrate men. Too many people are labeled as Chads or Chadlites when they are actually normies.

It's no wonder people think only Chads have sex

 

[1m62dtr]

That's funny, I generally find it is opposite, at least when judging men. At some point you need to take the you-don't-get-a-vote-pill and also realize that not having a pussy means your ultimately incapable of truly knowing where the cutoff line is.

Also understand that everyone here is living extremely fucked lives and as such suffering from extreme alienation. Their life experiences and small bits of their philosophy are what you should take from most of them. Their opinions and feelings (including my own) should be ignored as you would any foid's or normie's.

This

 

[Irredeemable]

Yes, I assume people are sour grape coping. But some are a bit hypocritical.

 

[NuclearCel]

Any time a foid gets posted here, no matter how good looking, will get called ugly/ frauding/ fakeupped etc, which is fine and is often the case, but any time a white guy who is 6ft, white, non-deformed and has hair gets posted, he'll get called a Chad.
So often people try to prove hypergamy by showing a TikTok or an Instagram post of a foid dating "Chad" and nearly always they're perfectly looksmatched, the guy is only somewhat better looking or also i've seen a few cases where the foid was better looking than her boyfriend.

Has anyone noticed this too?

Yes i have noticed this alot. On the other hand, if you call a female good looking when judging them appropriately, it will be seen as female worship and you can get banned for it. Although, chad worshipping is allowed, which i find very stupid.