If you're rich, good. But women don't want to talk about business.
If you have status, good. But women don't want to talk about sociology about why status is evident.
If you have looks, good. But if you talk about the biological implications on why looks matter then women get impatient and call you an aspie.
Typical human primality.
Women/ people in general are bottomblind, and are tophoppers. They hop to the top, and blind themselves to anything without glamor, and bluster if there's any pressure, and are product-predicated.
This is why they're not meant to build. They're meant to ignore, and only be with the powerful.
No one cares about the process of anything. If you see a burger, people eat it, and do you think they wanna hear about how the cow was slaughtered? But that's a false equivalence. In a lot of cases the process is sad/ hard, but not nearly as gruesome as the process of slaughtering a cow.
In a lot of cases the emotions of empathy should be there, and SHOULD not offset by the gruesomenesses of the processes.
That's the issue. People are process-vexed, or vexed in general to all things but high value product.
That's why as an incel, your pain is yours. Even if you looksmax and ascend, you're not gonna get any heed unless you have a product to push. (If you show you were once incel, then you have a less secure foundation to be valuable, and people can competitively use that to opress you). You can go through all the pain throughout your day, and 99% of girls will reject you if you're unpresentable. Being dominantly/ primally presentable is the only thing that matters to them.
Sure, some will wanna fix men who are in pain, but only if the primal checklist is met, and they think the detriment of having to be patient/ stressed in dealing with a guy's psychosis/ autism will be more beneficial in the end.
When he has LMS, and sometimes, autism/ psychosis can have a profound effect of making her feel accomplished in being someone who makes a generally impatient/ angry/ flat/ snappy person feel patience to.
Women like assholes, and hate nice men. It's patronizing that a woman seems low value that a guy can just be nice, and get her investment back.
Because women are constantly the protagonists of their own narcissistic life goals... looking to be impressive/ different/ influential/ distinct. When they get with someone harder to get because that person has a HUGE selection pool form being good looking (chad), and she was chosen, then she is distinct among all women who would want him. That makes her feel accomplished. It also makes her feel an ego-boost to get someone who is angry/ irritable/ spoiled/ dominant like a chad to like her back.
A nice guy offering love, when he has a scarcity mindset, isn't a great catch, and makes a woman feel angry. Someone so petty, with something so easy to offer (done out of desperation in her mind. To all women, being nice is something out of desperation ... due to the fact that person can't be a dominant dick chad. And if a dominant dick chad isn't being a bad person, then they're misusing their power).
It's why if we incels got other incels to constantly approach her, she'd fall into anxiety/ rage. Because she WANTS these incels to know their role/ place, and to fuck off and be losers.
Women no matter how sweet are a lot like this too. If strawberry the shortcake had a fat ogre from lord of the rings in it, then they would run away. A happy environment takes a lot of refinement. And that means, unhappiness for those who get excluded. That's inevitable. So don't be fool in thinking women are the "gentle gender". They're not.
The willingness for others to hear about your plights depends on their pain resilience towards negativity, how much pleasure they find in identifying problems, or seeing you as a thing whose welfare they care about, and if it fits in their personal agenda.
People do not address issues where they do not want involvement/ public awareness of their stance on.
They want public awareness on their issues if it gives virtue/ positive societal recognition.
When it gives excess pressure, aid to a hostile cause (to them), and negative societal recognition, then generally people won't even address the issue.
Veracity is a very conditional/ self interest based virtue.
Women are not designed to be empathetic to betas. They're meant to help the world kill them by doing nothing at all.
And the betas are designed to be angry to help in their evolution.
Betas are the ones with the proper mental experience to guide mankind into the future. Alphas have been nothing in our society generally. Spoiled and dull.
All great inventors, conquerors, successes are usually self made men who dominate because of their drive and fury.
And then the lavish lifestyle creates a lineage of spoiled high tiers who destroy what they built, with some exceptions.
Giving someone a high position with a lot of hatred like say, Tywin Lannister (who hated his weak father) from game of Thrones creates something impervious. And even he had high tier kids, save for tyrion (who was really the smartest).Tywin has hateful drive/ fear of failure to dominate his enemies, so he has both beta-awareness, and alpha arrogance.
If you have status, good. But women don't want to talk about sociology about why status is evident.
If you have looks, good. But if you talk about the biological implications on why looks matter then women get impatient and call you an aspie.
Typical human primality.
Women/ people in general are bottomblind, and are tophoppers. They hop to the top, and blind themselves to anything without glamor, and bluster if there's any pressure, and are product-predicated.
This is why they're not meant to build. They're meant to ignore, and only be with the powerful.
No one cares about the process of anything. If you see a burger, people eat it, and do you think they wanna hear about how the cow was slaughtered? But that's a false equivalence. In a lot of cases the process is sad/ hard, but not nearly as gruesome as the process of slaughtering a cow.
In a lot of cases the emotions of empathy should be there, and SHOULD not offset by the gruesomenesses of the processes.
That's the issue. People are process-vexed, or vexed in general to all things but high value product.
That's why as an incel, your pain is yours. Even if you looksmax and ascend, you're not gonna get any heed unless you have a product to push. (If you show you were once incel, then you have a less secure foundation to be valuable, and people can competitively use that to opress you). You can go through all the pain throughout your day, and 99% of girls will reject you if you're unpresentable. Being dominantly/ primally presentable is the only thing that matters to them.
Sure, some will wanna fix men who are in pain, but only if the primal checklist is met, and they think the detriment of having to be patient/ stressed in dealing with a guy's psychosis/ autism will be more beneficial in the end.
When he has LMS, and sometimes, autism/ psychosis can have a profound effect of making her feel accomplished in being someone who makes a generally impatient/ angry/ flat/ snappy person feel patience to.
Women like assholes, and hate nice men. It's patronizing that a woman seems low value that a guy can just be nice, and get her investment back.
Because women are constantly the protagonists of their own narcissistic life goals... looking to be impressive/ different/ influential/ distinct. When they get with someone harder to get because that person has a HUGE selection pool form being good looking (chad), and she was chosen, then she is distinct among all women who would want him. That makes her feel accomplished. It also makes her feel an ego-boost to get someone who is angry/ irritable/ spoiled/ dominant like a chad to like her back.
A nice guy offering love, when he has a scarcity mindset, isn't a great catch, and makes a woman feel angry. Someone so petty, with something so easy to offer (done out of desperation in her mind. To all women, being nice is something out of desperation ... due to the fact that person can't be a dominant dick chad. And if a dominant dick chad isn't being a bad person, then they're misusing their power).
It's why if we incels got other incels to constantly approach her, she'd fall into anxiety/ rage. Because she WANTS these incels to know their role/ place, and to fuck off and be losers.
Women no matter how sweet are a lot like this too. If strawberry the shortcake had a fat ogre from lord of the rings in it, then they would run away. A happy environment takes a lot of refinement. And that means, unhappiness for those who get excluded. That's inevitable. So don't be fool in thinking women are the "gentle gender". They're not.
The willingness for others to hear about your plights depends on their pain resilience towards negativity, how much pleasure they find in identifying problems, or seeing you as a thing whose welfare they care about, and if it fits in their personal agenda.
People do not address issues where they do not want involvement/ public awareness of their stance on.
They want public awareness on their issues if it gives virtue/ positive societal recognition.
When it gives excess pressure, aid to a hostile cause (to them), and negative societal recognition, then generally people won't even address the issue.
Veracity is a very conditional/ self interest based virtue.
Women are not designed to be empathetic to betas. They're meant to help the world kill them by doing nothing at all.
And the betas are designed to be angry to help in their evolution.
Betas are the ones with the proper mental experience to guide mankind into the future. Alphas have been nothing in our society generally. Spoiled and dull.
All great inventors, conquerors, successes are usually self made men who dominate because of their drive and fury.
And then the lavish lifestyle creates a lineage of spoiled high tiers who destroy what they built, with some exceptions.
Giving someone a high position with a lot of hatred like say, Tywin Lannister (who hated his weak father) from game of Thrones creates something impervious. And even he had high tier kids, save for tyrion (who was really the smartest).Tywin has hateful drive/ fear of failure to dominate his enemies, so he has both beta-awareness, and alpha arrogance.
Last edited:
it says a lot about these low iq posters when they can't even understand verbose and prose, gaston
