“People aren’t having children because of the cost of living” is mostly a cope

[Ugly virgin]

Nowhere in the universe will you find a more cancerous and despicable creature than a woman.

 

[Zer0/∞]

What you mean. You just need to give them food, a PC and a phone and some clothes. Nothing expensive at all.

That’s the literal bare minimum: you need give them a good Healthcare, a large enough home, in many places tutoring if the education system is competitive, youth clubs so they don’t grow up a friendless asocial loser, and you need a well paid job that won’t make you wageslave so much you never see your children.

 

[shitwolf]

While there is some truth to this statement, the number one reason women aren’t having as many babies is that they simply don’t find most men attractive enough to raise a family with. If money were the primary reason for not starting families we would see more women in relationships sans children, but what we actually see is more and more women simply choosing to stay single, specially in their younger years. They don’t even get to the relationship part.
Even more comical is saying that women are too busy to start a family. Most women aren’t even working lucrative careers. These mfs in the media make it seem like most women are boss babes working as lawyers, doctors, and managers. Most women are working regular jobs just like most men, and no one is that busy that they can’t date. Even guys like Elon musk and Jeff Bezos find the time to date.

Bring a Chad into a woman’s life that gives her commitment and see how fast she gets baby fever, turns submissive, and wants to get married.

As for countries like Japan and South Korea, with really low birth rates, bring an huge influx of white normie men or good looking white guys there and see how quickly things change. The women will start breeding like rats, there will be lots of single mothers, too.

truth nuke