Blackpill "Peer reviewed" is the ultimate bluepilled buzzword used to deny facts.

[Crustaciouse]

Whenever these morons are shown statistical evidence of the blackpill they spout the same phrase, "muh peer reviewed", "it's not peer reviewed so its false".
Peer review is absolutely impossible for a subject such as the blackpill because of who these "peers" are.
No way in hell would a bluepilled science group lead by shlomo shekelstein ever peer review anything proving the blackpill.
Everybody knows they are heavily biased, especially since most of them are located in colleges and universities.
They will deny anything that would put females in a bad light, so they will never peer review something like the blackpill.

 

[Michael15651]

I agree with this statement, it's all for one.

 

[Deleted member 60]

I'm very skeptical of modern (((science))) in general. Everything is politically influenced. According to the kikes, "traditional masculinity" is a disease.

 

[Crustaciouse]

I'm very skeptical of modern (((science))) in general. Everything is politically influenced. According to the kikes, "traditional masculinity" is a disease.

according to those (((peer reviewed))) studies there are more than 2 genders.

 

[Angry_runt]

Yeah, someone on Twitter took exception to that OkCupid study (where women rate 80% of men as below average) because it was not peer reviewed. They'll belive some theoretical academician over someone who built a business on using that kind data. What do they know, their company is only worth a few hundred million but none of their experiments are valid because they didn't get a stamp of approval from academia.

 

[Rabbi✡Stenowitz]

Shlomo shekelstein

low iq posting

Aside from the obvious liberal nature of the Academia that prevent them from doing unbiased research about hypergamy and inceldom,such researches are unprofitable and unlikely to secure any funding and publication.Even making research about homosexuality among dogs is more profitable than reviewing a study about inceldom.
There is literally no incentive for them to make studies about us.

Yeah, someone on Twitter took exception to that OkCupid study (where women rate 80% of men as below average) because it was not peer reviewed. They'll belive some theoretical academician over someone who built a business on using that kind data. What do they know, their company is only worth a few hundred million but none of their experiments are valid because they didn't get a stamp of approval from academia.

I think it is safer and more efficient to use agreed upon premises and logical conclusions to spread blackpill(i.e Betabuxx,material wealth and good genes can improve your mating chance drastically,the atomization of our society and degradation over the roles of men) rather than showing something as bombastic as researches,tinder experiments and okcupid studies

 

[Total Imbecile]

Tinder experiments are peer reviewed by us when they get shared.

 

[KingOfRome]

It's extremely difficult to convince someone of the blackpill until they've already been kicked so hard in the teeth that they cannot be bluepilled anymore. When their hundredth attempt at getting a first date ends in laughter and mockery. When their conservative Christian fiance who promised to save herself for them breaks her word with a pair of Tyrones in the gym locker room. When they overhear a group of girls talking about how ugly and short some guy is, then look upon that group, see the shifty eyes, and--one time too many--realize they're the subject of the conversation.

There are three ways a person can be blackpilled: learning it young from his parents, figuring it out himself by observing the patterns in the behavior of peers, and by seeking out a viable explanation for years of frustration and agony and finding it through others like him.

Confirmation bias is part of human nature. Before a bluepilled person can be intellectually divorced from the blue pill, he must first be divorced from it emotionally.