LifeFuel Orthodox Christianbro agrees with us

[GeckoBus]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX6GyJtK6N0

 

[frmentalcel]

not watching but anybody with a triple digit IQ agrees with hs

 

[Piratecel]

based commenter

 

[WeirdoDesperado]

based commenter

I wish every bluepilled incel or incels in denial noticed this. When incels stop accepting being a punching bag, female privileges and cucked laws might decrease even significantly.

 

[GeckoBus]

View attachment 1051893
based commenter

exactly exactly. This is ironically one of the good videos I have seen on incels. Most are just misrepresenting everything on purpose.

 

[Cryotron]

Most are just misrepresenting everything on purpose.

people don't like the truth, it's dangerous to them, and especially women. Wherever you go you hear lies, false hopes, gaslighting.

 

[theautismcel]

View attachment 1051893
based commenter

Normalfags are unable to defend their arguments with studies or any evidence. Their arguments are based solely on their emotions and what they want to believe. Ironic how this is true for the "science" crowd.

 

[Robb97]

View attachment 1051893
based commenter

Nice

 

[GeckoBus]

Normalfags are unable to defend their arguments with studies or any evidence. Their arguments are based solely on their emotions and what they want to believe. Ironic how this is true for the "science" crowd.

scienctism people literally make the same fallacies that people in enlightenment attacked the catholic church for.
Like, is/ought fallacy, appeal to nature fallacy, charge of incredulity, fallacy of authority, circular reasoning etc...
They dont even know their own history (thinking of David Hume for example, most scientismos dont even know him or his devastating critique of scientism).

things get more complicated if I try to learn an infinite number of facts in a finite time. Since Hume, philosophers know that this is logically impossible. One can never learn a general law on the basis of a finite number of observations. Even if I have seen millions of white swans, this does not allow me to draw the conclusion that the statement "All swans are white" is true. I only need to observe one black swan and my general law can be scrapped [Popper, 1952]. The conclusion seems clear.Logically, it is impossible to learn an infinite set on the basis of a finite number of observations. To put it in other words: we can learn facts, but we can not learn general laws. This would mean the end of science.

- Philosophy of Information (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8),
Pieter Adriaans (PhD in theoretical computer science at the University of Amsterdam)Johan van Benthem (Professor of logic at the University of Amsterdam at the Institute for Logic, Language and Computation and professor of philosophy at Stanford University)