Remacy
incel & hika
★
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2026
- Posts
- 25
- Online time
- 3h 37m
what do u guys think of illegalism
Letting society be governed by the most antisocial and illegal elements. Think Mexico, Haiti or El Salvador in the past.Elaborate on this one, Ilegalism as in the act of making things illegal or committing crime ?
Absolutely not: we must kill all of them.Letting society be governed by the most antisocial and illegal elements. Think Mexico, Haiti or El Salvador in the past.
If your country has become one of the three, you might as well let a foreign power occupy itLetting society be governed by the most antisocial and illegal elements. Think Mexico, Haiti or El Salvador in the past.
In anarchy, order will arise. The Warlord or the Leviathan may emerge to create order based on protection in exchange for goods or services.I will not have all my limbs hacked off by some 60iq, orc-faced nigger with aids and rabies or something.
Well I hope he stifles the violent criminals brutally, with the exception of ugly, heterosexual males that rape foids.In anarchy, order will arise. The Warlord or the Leviathan may emerge to create order based on protection in exchange for goods or services.
Absolutely not: we must kill all of them.
Isn't this just anarchy?Letting society be governed by the most antisocial and illegal elements. Think Mexico, Haiti or El Salvador in the past.
Well, somewhat. Anarchists in the contemporary era will shun violence and believe the imposition of Anarchy actually stops crime and this position is held by both left and right anarchists. They want a society based on freedom of association, no presence of the state or state law which they view as wicked and the propping up of local or privately owned, decentralized courts, factories, schools, churches, charities etc.Isn't this just anarchy?![]()
If anarchism was actually achieved it would result in a highly ineffective system and brutish existence not a lot of people would be prepared for, just another ideology that sounds good on paper but in execution would be terribleWell, somewhat. Anarchists in the contemporary era will shun violence and believe the imposition of Anarchy actually stops crime and this position is held by both left and right anarchists. They want a society based on freedom of association, no presence of the state or state law which they view as wicked and the propping up of local or privately owned, decentralized courts, factories, schools, churches, charities etc.
From the historical perspective, it could be said the Makhnovshchina was successful to some degree but even then, Makhno just became a warlord quasi dictator.If anarchism was actually achieved it would result in a highly ineffective system and brutish existence not a lot of people would be prepared for, just another ideology that sounds good on paper but in execution would be terrible
the unfortunate irony of a lot of these ideologies that proclaim the destruction of the state. I’ve wanted to look more into the brief history of Makhnovshchina (what a mouthful) considering I think it was the only semi-successful anarchist manifestationMakhno just became a warlord quasi dictator.
Hell no, no way I would want to be governed by a bunch of aggressive 60iq ogres.





