Blackpill "online dating isn't real life"

[Invalidusername]

The "online dating doesn't reflect real life, and those dating apps are usually used for hookups" argument is bullshit and here's why:

What this argument states is that we shouldn't take the statistics from these online dating apps as evidence, and that online dating doesn't reflect real life as people on those dating apps are just looking for to "hookup" and are just simply shallow.

First of all these people who use these online dating apps don't exist in a vaccum or some dimension that exists separate from ours, they pretty much live amongst us in different areas of the world. Keep in mind these online dating app users aren't a niche group, in fact there's roughly 10 upon 10s of millions of online dating users (it is estimated that by 2020 there will be roughly 300 million people using online dating apps). So in short we can conclude that a lot of people use these apps, and that we can actually use the statistics to generalise the results for the populations.

So what I'm trying to say is, how on earth can simply state that all those 10s upon 10s of millions of people are ONLY after hookups???
According to datingsitereviews:

"Contrary to popular belief that online dating is all about hookups, only 34% of users said they surf dating sites and apps for casual flings. More users (41%) are looking for friendship, and most users really are searching for lasting love (60%)"

Source: datingsitesreviews.com/article.php?story=survey-reveals-modern-dating-is-not-so-different-after-all

So what does this mean?

Well, as we already know women are very picky. In both tinder and okcupid it is shown that women have high standards, and rate roughly 20% of men as attractive (chad-lites and chads) whilst the majority of men are perceived as being unattractive. Now we consider the fact that we have 10s upon 10s of millions of people using these online dating apps, with a good amount actively perusing relationships on there. If we combine these 2 we get this:

-a lot of people (roughly 60%) are looking for a relationship on these online dating apps

-women who use these online dating apps are extremely picky and go after top tier men, and not men with top tier personalities

-if women are using these apps to persue a partner then this must mean they don't choose someone based their personality traits, but gather their top tier looks

-you can't counter all this by saying that these apps are only for hookups when that only applies to 34% of users

-therefore, online dating can reflect how dating is like both irl and online.

This all solidifies what these online dating apps are telling us: women don't care about your personality, they care about top tier looks. Even for relationships

Shouldn't personality be considered when it comes to getting into a relationship? According to women, apparently not.

And here's a bonus study that shows that looks were more important than personality :

The Importance of Physical Attractiveness to the Mate Choices of Women and Their Mothers - Evolutionary Psychological Science

Prior research investigating the mate preferences of women and their parents reveals two important findings with regard to physical attractiveness. First, daughters more strongly value mate characteristics connoting genetic quality (such as physical attractiveness) than their parents. Second...

link.springer.com

Let's end the bullshit that our personality made lonely @ bluepillers. Its just our looks

IT won't touch this

 

[Deleted member 15752]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

 

[mylifeistrash]

Judging by all the failed approach videos and journals

real life is much worse

 

[Deleted member 8206]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

 

[Angry_runt]

I think the best argument against the thread title is that by that reasoning Amazon is not real life either but it still had an enormous effect on retail.

As for Tinder, it is what it is because foids want it to be that way. Thirsty men are following foids to wherever they congregate, not the other way around. If Tinder is about hookups, it's because foids on Tinder want hookups. If Tinder won't let you even send a message to a foid without her liking your pics first, it's because foids don't want ugly guys to be able to even talk to them.

 

[Insomniac]

Online dating is more real than real life

 

[UselesseatER]

Online dating is more real than real life

 

[ihaveno1]

real life is even worse because u just get laughed at and rejected harshly like in neet's vid he shared yesterday...

there is just no winning as an incel

 

[TheGoodGuy]

Online dating is more real than real life

There is no real life anymore everyone is preoccupied with their phones and social media, people can´t even eat without posting pictures of their food and men are getting in legal trouble over cold approaching so it´s impossible to meet a girl in "real life" anymore.

 

[MarriedAndLookin4Fun]

IT won't touch this

IT only touches the obvious bait threads and hyperbolic comments tbh
low IQ incels in denial

 

[mylifeistrash]

There is no real life anymore everyone is preoccupied with their phones and social media, people can´t even eat without posting pictures of their food and men are getting in legal trouble over cold approaching so it´s impossible to meet a girl in "real life" anymore.

That blows my mind. Everyone, even kids or senior citizens is on their phone whenever I see them in public.

Yet dating apps aren't real? Instagram isn't real?

 

[UglyBastard]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

I have to disagree. Tinder is used by girls and women to hookup with Chad/Chad-lite or for validation and nothing more.It's actually rare for girls to have met their long term bf through online dating/hookup apps.And the ones that do are usually unattractive physically or have psycho personalities. As for men. The vast majority are still finding gfs through social circles,work,school, mutual friends etc.

I'm not saying that online social networking doesn't play any role in finding a gf/bf but it's not as prevalent as most people here would think.

 

[Invalidusername]

I have to disagree. Tinder is used by girls and women to hookup with Chad/Chad-lite or for validation and nothing more.It's actually rare for girls to have met their long term bf through online dating/hookup apps.And the ones that do are usually unattractive physically or have psycho personalities. As for men. The vast majority are still finding gfs through social circles,work,school, mutual friends etc.

I'm not saying that online social networking doesn't play any role in finding a gf/bf but it's not as prevalent as most people here would think.

There is gonna be a percentage who just wants to hookup, but I wouldn't say that's the majority. I still feel there's quite a lot of women who use these apps to find a man, and through the statistics we can see they have a preference for top tier men whilst guys are less strict about their preference. especially considering how many people use these dating apps, I feel we can make a fair assumption about the dating scene by looking at social media apps. Also :

Survey Reveals Modern Dating Is Not So Different After All - Dating Sites Reviews

Dating apps and websites completely changed the dynamics of finding love, turning footsie and furtive glances into a series of swipes and winking emojis.

www.datingsitesreviews.com

 

[GoonCel]

WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY

 

[Invalidusername]

WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY

 

[TheGoodGuy]

That blows my mind. Everyone, even kids or senior citizens is on their phone whenever I see them in public.

Yet dating apps aren't real? Instagram isn't real?

It´s pretty common that 3-4 year old´s just get handed an Ipad so the parents don´t have to watch over them 24/7. Kids are using too much technology when I was younger we mixed between using technology and playing with toys or outside with sticks and what not. When was the last time you saw kids playing outside with sticks? I haven´t seen that for many years, kids don´t even dress as kids anymore they get dressed up by their parents to look handsome with a perfect haircut, I saw a little boy a few days ago he was maybe 6 years old but still he had style with his fancy denim jeans, a t-shirt and a coll shirt over and a slick haircut with hair wax in it.

I tell you kids aren´t kids anymore but when I was a child me, my friends are classmates didn´t style our hair I had patches on almost all my jeans because I would tear them up while playing outside with my friends and using our imagination I would get scrapes all over my body through playing we truly lived. Today´s kids already dress fancy, style their hair and try and take good pictures for social media at the age of 7 it´s so fucked up.

 

[SecondComing]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

 

[Deleted member 16455]

online dating is real because you get to see what women really prefer behind closed doors. they hate ethnic or short men. Most just hide it irl because they are virtue signaling cunts.

 

[Cuyen]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

 

[Vorbei]

This might have been true 10 years ago but there is no separation between "online" and "real life" in the current year.

 

[Invalidusername]

online dating is real because you get to see what women really prefer behind closed doors. they hate ethnic or short men. Most just hide it irl because they are virtue signaling cunts.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

The "online dating doesn't reflect real life, and those dating apps are usually used for hookups" argument is bullshit and here's why:

What this argument states is that we shouldn't take the statistics from these online dating apps as evidence, and that online dating doesn't reflect real life as people on those dating apps are just looking for to "hookup" and are just simply shallow.

First of all these people who use these online dating apps don't exist in a vaccum or some dimension that exists separate from ours, they pretty much live amongst us in different areas of the world. Keep in mind these online dating app users aren't a niche group, in fact there's roughly 10 upon 10s of millions of online dating users (it is estimated that by 2020 there will be roughly 300 million people using online dating apps). So in short we can conclude that a lot of people use these apps, and that we can actually use the statistics to generalise the results for the populations.

So what I'm trying to say is, how on earth can simply state that all those 10s upon 10s of millions of people are ONLY after hookups???
According to datingsitereviews:

"Contrary to popular belief that online dating is all about hookups, only 34% of users said they surf dating sites and apps for casual flings. More users (41%) are looking for friendship, and most users really are searching for lasting love (60%)"

Source: datingsitesreviews.com/article.php?story=survey-reveals-modern-dating-is-not-so-different-after-all

So what does this mean?

Well, as we already know women are very picky. In both tinder and okcupid it is shown that women have high standards, and rate roughly 20% of men as attractive (chad-lites and chads) whilst the majority of men are perceived as being unattractive. Now we consider the fact that we have 10s upon 10s of millions of people using these online dating apps, with a good amount actively perusing relationships on there. If we combine these 2 we get this:

-a lot of people (roughly 60%) are looking for a relationship on these online dating apps

-women who use these online dating apps are extremely picky and go after top tier men, and not men with top tier personalities

-if women are using these apps to persue a partner then this must mean they don't choose someone based their personality traits, but gather their top tier looks

-you can't counter all this by saying that these apps are only for hookups when that only applies to 34% of users

-therefore, online dating can reflect how dating is like both irl and online.

This all solidifies what these online dating apps are telling us: women don't care about your personality, they care about top tier looks. Even for relationships

Shouldn't personality be considered when it comes to getting into a relationship? According to women, apparently not.

And here's a bonus study that shows that looks were more important than personality :

The Importance of Physical Attractiveness to the Mate Choices of Women and Their Mothers - Evolutionary Psychological Science

Prior research investigating the mate preferences of women and their parents reveals two important findings with regard to physical attractiveness. First, daughters more strongly value mate characteristics connoting genetic quality (such as physical attractiveness) than their parents. Second...

link.springer.com

Let's end the bullshit that our personality made lonely @ bluepillers. Its just our looks

IT won't touch this

IT don't care about touching this. They just want to silence us. That's all & keep us in servitude.

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

 

[NeetSupremacist]

Tinder = real life

All data proofs that Tinder is real life and beyond!

 

[Invalidusername]

IT don't care about touching this. They just want to silence us. That's all & keep us in servitude.

IT is full of landwhales, whiteknights and trannys

 

[blond_elf_bard]

The "online dating doesn't reflect real life, and those dating apps are usually used for hookups" argument is bullshit and here's why:

What this argument states is that we shouldn't take the statistics from these online dating apps as evidence, and that online dating doesn't reflect real life as people on those dating apps are just looking for to "hookup" and are just simply shallow.

First of all these people who use these online dating apps don't exist in a vaccum or some dimension that exists separate from ours, they pretty much live amongst us in different areas of the world. Keep in mind these online dating app users aren't a niche group, in fact there's roughly 10 upon 10s of millions of online dating users (it is estimated that by 2020 there will be roughly 300 million people using online dating apps). So in short we can conclude that a lot of people use these apps, and that we can actually use the statistics to generalise the results for the populations.

So what I'm trying to say is, how on earth can simply state that all those 10s upon 10s of millions of people are ONLY after hookups???
According to datingsitereviews:

"Contrary to popular belief that online dating is all about hookups, only 34% of users said they surf dating sites and apps for casual flings. More users (41%) are looking for friendship, and most users really are searching for lasting love (60%)"

Source: datingsitesreviews.com/article.php?story=survey-reveals-modern-dating-is-not-so-different-after-all

So what does this mean?

Well, as we already know women are very picky. In both tinder and okcupid it is shown that women have high standards, and rate roughly 20% of men as attractive (chad-lites and chads) whilst the majority of men are perceived as being unattractive. Now we consider the fact that we have 10s upon 10s of millions of people using these online dating apps, with a good amount actively perusing relationships on there. If we combine these 2 we get this:

-a lot of people (roughly 60%) are looking for a relationship on these online dating apps

-women who use these online dating apps are extremely picky and go after top tier men, and not men with top tier personalities

-if women are using these apps to persue a partner then this must mean they don't choose someone based their personality traits, but gather their top tier looks

-you can't counter all this by saying that these apps are only for hookups when that only applies to 34% of users

-therefore, online dating can reflect how dating is like both irl and online.

This all solidifies what these online dating apps are telling us: women don't care about your personality, they care about top tier looks. Even for relationships

Shouldn't personality be considered when it comes to getting into a relationship? According to women, apparently not.

And here's a bonus study that shows that looks were more important than personality :

The Importance of Physical Attractiveness to the Mate Choices of Women and Their Mothers - Evolutionary Psychological Science

Prior research investigating the mate preferences of women and their parents reveals two important findings with regard to physical attractiveness. First, daughters more strongly value mate characteristics connoting genetic quality (such as physical attractiveness) than their parents. Second...

link.springer.com

Let's end the bullshit that our personality made lonely @ bluepillers. Its just our looks

IT won't touch this

the thing about dating sites is that you can't utilize alcohol

 

[Captain Funny]

Until you meet up in real life.

 

[Wonder]

Online dating is only more visual, and therefore more real than "real life". Only in the security of the internet do women show their true colors.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

tinder = real life because everyone in real life uses tinder.

Girls get so much validation online that they don't want to be approached anymore (that is, by anyone other than Chad).

Tinder is used by girls and women to hookup with Chad/Chad-lite or for validation and nothing more

Actually they badly want to LTR Chad, it's just that he pumps and dumps them.

This might have been true 10 years ago but there is no separation between "online" and "real life" in the current year.

Cyberpunk is here

 

[Nothinglefttotry41]

the reason online dating actually isn't representative of what would happen irl is because it is like 65% guys, so decent looking girls obviously have their pick