Gyros_Pretcel
19th c. Church of Hamlossus high priest contender
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2018
- Posts
- 9,654
The longer I suffer from inceldom and the more often I see the disparities in initiation of contact by females and males, the more I think the key issue is the different strength in sex drive, which leads to chad being able to monopolize women. Based on the 80 20 rule male sex drive must be four times as high.
So every time chad needs to fuck he fucks one of four available women, who needs to fuck on that day, while every of these 5 parties get perfectly satisfied in this arrangement.
Think about it. It actually makes sense and can explain female chadlust.
When you coomed a lot and your sexdrive lowers, you temporarily can't really get off in a satisfying way, UNLESS some really attractive woman comes around. But if you didn't coom in a while you'd take any uggo. (What basically also explains todays simp problem: High sexdrive × extreme lack of sex. The less sex men get, the more cucked servants by instinct they become. Together a gigantic downward spiral)
How do I explain monogamous chad relationships of the past? Well you know this in between state, when you can coom, but you don't really have to, but on the other hand it doesn't really feel bad either? So they probably found a middle ground for a while, but ultimately this means a slow but steady declining libido of the women without longer recoverey phases. The more a woman is ravaged by chad, the stronger is her libido burned through. Ineviteably she wil even be unsatisfied with chad at some point, not even talking about the chances for some normie after that point.
What about normie relationships of the past? Well they were purely based on economic incentives aka whoredom. Don't dilude yourself about things like female love lol, it never ecistef in the first place (Take the bromance pill) I mean you can still love your government gf and even befriend her; a whore is a whore in the end).
This implies we somehow could commodify access to females in an honest, open, fair and non coercive way. Because lets be honest, that's how females fared in the past and how society found some vague stability, maybe not always in the most fair way though. Is this rape under extortion by threat of financial destruction? I think not, if you see how countless women push this behavior beyond the raw necessities and cherish this lifestyle. There is definitely room for morally just economic intervention and professional GFs.
"Yadayada the value of labor by their body", YES lolbert, but what about the exchange value of my body and time? Cuck if you are not a socialist, especially at least if not a rodgerist one. These natural mismatches of value, birthing normal men into a slave class like state is not acceptable. Neither is forcing women into this role by reactive physical violence. A middle ground has to be found...
This gets even more supported when you look at the ok cupid stats iirc. Most of the men get squeezed into the first quarter of the atteaction graph. (There is the libido gap again male attraction /4 = female attraction.)
Probably water is wet. But maybe this can lead to some new perspectives.
Maybe the solution is some endocrinologocal or physical intervention. I read that trannies get a lot more horny on T overal (No matter if lesbian or homo ones). Same for foids by enlarging the clitorises by vacuumpumping or by topic steroid use, especially DHT. There might simply be a design mismatch with an outdated evolutionary purpose of natural selection.
This could at least help a few more incels, who don't make the cut even after looksmax being adressed by health insurance and also stop the slow attraction burn out.
Afterthought: This also explains how normie males are happy to be beta providers and how there are almost no older incels; We all know how the male sexdrive lowers after 30...
Overall this all really can only lead us down a very dark road if lest unadressed...
So every time chad needs to fuck he fucks one of four available women, who needs to fuck on that day, while every of these 5 parties get perfectly satisfied in this arrangement.
Think about it. It actually makes sense and can explain female chadlust.
When you coomed a lot and your sexdrive lowers, you temporarily can't really get off in a satisfying way, UNLESS some really attractive woman comes around. But if you didn't coom in a while you'd take any uggo. (What basically also explains todays simp problem: High sexdrive × extreme lack of sex. The less sex men get, the more cucked servants by instinct they become. Together a gigantic downward spiral)
How do I explain monogamous chad relationships of the past? Well you know this in between state, when you can coom, but you don't really have to, but on the other hand it doesn't really feel bad either? So they probably found a middle ground for a while, but ultimately this means a slow but steady declining libido of the women without longer recoverey phases. The more a woman is ravaged by chad, the stronger is her libido burned through. Ineviteably she wil even be unsatisfied with chad at some point, not even talking about the chances for some normie after that point.
What about normie relationships of the past? Well they were purely based on economic incentives aka whoredom. Don't dilude yourself about things like female love lol, it never ecistef in the first place (Take the bromance pill) I mean you can still love your government gf and even befriend her; a whore is a whore in the end).
This implies we somehow could commodify access to females in an honest, open, fair and non coercive way. Because lets be honest, that's how females fared in the past and how society found some vague stability, maybe not always in the most fair way though. Is this rape under extortion by threat of financial destruction? I think not, if you see how countless women push this behavior beyond the raw necessities and cherish this lifestyle. There is definitely room for morally just economic intervention and professional GFs.
"Yadayada the value of labor by their body", YES lolbert, but what about the exchange value of my body and time? Cuck if you are not a socialist, especially at least if not a rodgerist one. These natural mismatches of value, birthing normal men into a slave class like state is not acceptable. Neither is forcing women into this role by reactive physical violence. A middle ground has to be found...
This gets even more supported when you look at the ok cupid stats iirc. Most of the men get squeezed into the first quarter of the atteaction graph. (There is the libido gap again male attraction /4 = female attraction.)
Probably water is wet. But maybe this can lead to some new perspectives.
Maybe the solution is some endocrinologocal or physical intervention. I read that trannies get a lot more horny on T overal (No matter if lesbian or homo ones). Same for foids by enlarging the clitorises by vacuumpumping or by topic steroid use, especially DHT. There might simply be a design mismatch with an outdated evolutionary purpose of natural selection.
This could at least help a few more incels, who don't make the cut even after looksmax being adressed by health insurance and also stop the slow attraction burn out.
Afterthought: This also explains how normie males are happy to be beta providers and how there are almost no older incels; We all know how the male sexdrive lowers after 30...
Overall this all really can only lead us down a very dark road if lest unadressed...
Last edited: