I'll take sports as an example.
Everyone knows that Danica Patrick (racing driver) is exceptionally awful and that she would've gotten the boot had she been a guy. Especially for her grotesque, repeated dangerous accidents.
But if you say this as a mean to criticize egalitarianism, cucks will be quick to retort with Michèle Mouton, ignoring the fact that 2 or 3 decades separate the two characters with almost nothing "empowering" happening for women in between them during that whole time despite there being no gender barriers in the sport anymore, which is proof that women coming into male spaces or claiming their social codes is a purely individualistic endeavor at heart and whose only way to pertain to society at large is female hubris and male dispossession. We can see that it truly does so, because through the lense of egalitarianism, if one woman in a million does something well then this means that she's the rule rather than the exception to that rule ; this is very cruel to men as there's an implicit injunction for their masculinity to be ABSOLUTE if they want to pretend to any type of identity, while women see themselves as an all devoring totemic figure rather than a piece of the puzzle in the sexual alterity. I believe this is really how it works, i remember every time i said something like "it's a manly thing" or something i'd provoke the ire of some roasties.
It's totally understandable that the patriarchy prevented women from proving themselves worthy by applying strict gender roles ; most of them won't be anyways and those that will will only make women unjustifiably arrogant and men lesser. I see cucks and others talking about a "masculinity crisis" everywhere but those idiots wont pick up on something as simple and obvious as this. Masculinity simply lost it's narrative breath, it exhausted itself from being questioned at every turn when it was not viciously attacked be it effectively or symbolically, in the public or the private sphere.
Everyone knows that Danica Patrick (racing driver) is exceptionally awful and that she would've gotten the boot had she been a guy. Especially for her grotesque, repeated dangerous accidents.
But if you say this as a mean to criticize egalitarianism, cucks will be quick to retort with Michèle Mouton, ignoring the fact that 2 or 3 decades separate the two characters with almost nothing "empowering" happening for women in between them during that whole time despite there being no gender barriers in the sport anymore, which is proof that women coming into male spaces or claiming their social codes is a purely individualistic endeavor at heart and whose only way to pertain to society at large is female hubris and male dispossession. We can see that it truly does so, because through the lense of egalitarianism, if one woman in a million does something well then this means that she's the rule rather than the exception to that rule ; this is very cruel to men as there's an implicit injunction for their masculinity to be ABSOLUTE if they want to pretend to any type of identity, while women see themselves as an all devoring totemic figure rather than a piece of the puzzle in the sexual alterity. I believe this is really how it works, i remember every time i said something like "it's a manly thing" or something i'd provoke the ire of some roasties.
It's totally understandable that the patriarchy prevented women from proving themselves worthy by applying strict gender roles ; most of them won't be anyways and those that will will only make women unjustifiably arrogant and men lesser. I see cucks and others talking about a "masculinity crisis" everywhere but those idiots wont pick up on something as simple and obvious as this. Masculinity simply lost it's narrative breath, it exhausted itself from being questioned at every turn when it was not viciously attacked be it effectively or symbolically, in the public or the private sphere.
Last edited:
but they still have nothing of value to say, just like the whole establishment.
