The Western society fears groups of only men socializing with each other, where women are totally absent.
In any society, whenever there is a group of men who are not married or not under some other sort of "oversight" of women, this is considered very dangerous because those men can potentially start plotting something politically, or spread negative attitudes about the ruling regime. It has always been this way, this isn't something new. Women are conformist and support whatever ruling regime is in power, so they will spread this attitude to men. Men, on the other hand, are more idealistic and critical. The more men socialize with women, the more tamed they will become.
What is new is that the society we live under now is becoming more and more totalitarian and tries to tame the men as much as possible and is going against things that were normal part of freedom even in the past authoritarian societies.
No one will say this directly and instead they're going to shame men for being "homosexuals" because they're not around women, or "losers" because they supposedly can't attract women. This social attitude looks really forced but it has become effective since Western men now seek approval of women all the time. They basically go to wherever women are. They allow women to dictate the dynamics of their social circle and be in the center of the attention. This is why these men don't have any revolutionary sentiment whatsoever. They're not developing into men who are critical. They are conformist like women. The West (AKA The Euro-Atlantic Empire of Garbage) wants this.
The society wants men and women to mix socially as much as possible. This is why there is so much push for women to enter male spaces. If you can't get women to be girlfriends/wives with you, you're supposed to become some sort of orbiter and male feminist "friend" of women and socialize with them in this way. And if you can't socialize in this way, the regime wants you to be alone instead of socializing with similar lonely men.
I remember I once looked at the Instagram account of an MMA fighter from Dagestan, Khabib Nurmagomedov, and you can see how different the culture is there in this regard. He basically never had any woman on his pics. He only socialized with men, mostly his local people from Dagestan. He's a married man but he never shows pictures of his wife and she is probably at home while he trains and socializes with men only.
This is the real manly culture because it encourages men to stay away from women and don't socialize with them more than is necessary. This way men can focus on fighting and improving themselves. This way you can breed warriors.
In the West, you can't have this because men have succumbed to the social pressure and constantly bring women into their groups.
Incels are seen as dangerous precisely because it's a male-only group where women aren't allowed. They bring back the old fear of conspiratory groups of men plotting something in dark rooms like some freemasons or decembrists. It also reminds them of the old "barbaric" days where men enjoyed freedom that was guaranteed by their ability to group together and fight for their community. The modern Western society wants men totally under the control of the state, so they want them either isolated or in social circles full of women (who are conformist and support the social regime and its ideological norms).
Incels go against this trend and that's why society can't handle it. When you don't allow women in your group, you're automatically problematic for the West.
I really hate the West for destroying everything that resembled male culture because it makes it almost impossible to even find male friends these days if you're not accepted by women. All the social circles are filled with women and if they don't like you, you're out. That's the state of "men" in the West.
Incels are a problem for this regime because it's a brotherhood of men. Even in this early stage and even though it only exists online we can see that there is already very strong sentiment tied to it, people are daring to be much more critical of the society than they would be if there were women around.
In any society, whenever there is a group of men who are not married or not under some other sort of "oversight" of women, this is considered very dangerous because those men can potentially start plotting something politically, or spread negative attitudes about the ruling regime. It has always been this way, this isn't something new. Women are conformist and support whatever ruling regime is in power, so they will spread this attitude to men. Men, on the other hand, are more idealistic and critical. The more men socialize with women, the more tamed they will become.
What is new is that the society we live under now is becoming more and more totalitarian and tries to tame the men as much as possible and is going against things that were normal part of freedom even in the past authoritarian societies.
No one will say this directly and instead they're going to shame men for being "homosexuals" because they're not around women, or "losers" because they supposedly can't attract women. This social attitude looks really forced but it has become effective since Western men now seek approval of women all the time. They basically go to wherever women are. They allow women to dictate the dynamics of their social circle and be in the center of the attention. This is why these men don't have any revolutionary sentiment whatsoever. They're not developing into men who are critical. They are conformist like women. The West (AKA The Euro-Atlantic Empire of Garbage) wants this.
The society wants men and women to mix socially as much as possible. This is why there is so much push for women to enter male spaces. If you can't get women to be girlfriends/wives with you, you're supposed to become some sort of orbiter and male feminist "friend" of women and socialize with them in this way. And if you can't socialize in this way, the regime wants you to be alone instead of socializing with similar lonely men.
I remember I once looked at the Instagram account of an MMA fighter from Dagestan, Khabib Nurmagomedov, and you can see how different the culture is there in this regard. He basically never had any woman on his pics. He only socialized with men, mostly his local people from Dagestan. He's a married man but he never shows pictures of his wife and she is probably at home while he trains and socializes with men only.
This is the real manly culture because it encourages men to stay away from women and don't socialize with them more than is necessary. This way men can focus on fighting and improving themselves. This way you can breed warriors.
In the West, you can't have this because men have succumbed to the social pressure and constantly bring women into their groups.
Incels are seen as dangerous precisely because it's a male-only group where women aren't allowed. They bring back the old fear of conspiratory groups of men plotting something in dark rooms like some freemasons or decembrists. It also reminds them of the old "barbaric" days where men enjoyed freedom that was guaranteed by their ability to group together and fight for their community. The modern Western society wants men totally under the control of the state, so they want them either isolated or in social circles full of women (who are conformist and support the social regime and its ideological norms).
Incels go against this trend and that's why society can't handle it. When you don't allow women in your group, you're automatically problematic for the West.
I really hate the West for destroying everything that resembled male culture because it makes it almost impossible to even find male friends these days if you're not accepted by women. All the social circles are filled with women and if they don't like you, you're out. That's the state of "men" in the West.
Incels are a problem for this regime because it's a brotherhood of men. Even in this early stage and even though it only exists online we can see that there is already very strong sentiment tied to it, people are daring to be much more critical of the society than they would be if there were women around.
Last edited:
